djust provides Phoenix LiveView-style reactive server-side rendering for Django with Rust-powered performance. Prior to version 1.0.7, djust.mixins.model_binding.ModelBindingMixin provides a default update_model event handler and is part of the LiveView base MRO, so every LiveView exposes it. It setattrs a view attribute whose name is client-supplied (field), gated only by: reject _-prefixed names; reject a 14-entry denylist of framework internals (FORBIDDEN_MODEL_FIELDS); optional allowed_model_fields which defaults to None = allow all; and hasattr existence. As a result, a client can set any public, existing view attribute — not just the fields actually bound with dj-model= in the rendered template. The denylist covers framework plumbing but nothing about developer business/authz state, and the allowlist is opt-in (off by default). A developer who binds one dj-model="search" input and also keeps self.account_id / self.is_admin / self.total_price as view state does not realize a client can set ALL of them via {type:event, event:"update_model", params:{field, value}} over the WebSocket. Type coercion matches the target attribute's type (so "true" -> bool True), aiding the attacker. This issue is fixed in djust 1.0.7. As a workaround, set allowed_model_fields explicitly on every view using dj-model (or subclassing LiveView) to the minimal list of bindable fields; do not keep authorization/ownership state in public view attributes that share the view with dj-model bindings.
CVE-2026-61598
This high-severity CVE scores 7.1 under a secondary CVSS source (NVD's own analysis pending). EPSS exploit probability: 0.4%, top 65% of all CVEs by exploit prediction. GitHub Security Advisory data not yet ingested — confidence will rise once GHSA publishes (typical lag: hours to days for open-source ecosystem CVEs; never for infrastructure-only CVEs).
- High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
No vendor fix yet — apply a workaround or compensating control (WAF / firewall / segmentation) and watch for a patch.
- CVSS v3
- 7.1
- EG Score
- 7.1(medium)
- EG Risk
- 32(Track)EG Risk 32/100SSVC: Track
EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).
How it’s computedSeverity71% × 45%Exploitation0% × 40%Automatability0% × 15%Action: Routine — remediate on your standard cadence. - EPSS PROB
- 0%
- EPSS %ILE
- 35%
- KEV
- Not listed
Published
September 16, 2026
Last Modified
September 16, 2026
Advisory Details (2)
Auto-updated Sep 16, 2026Client mass-assignment of arbitrary view attributes via the default dj-model update_model handler · Advisory · djust-org/djust · GitHub
https://github.com/djust-org/djust/security/advisories/GHSA-cc7c-9jff-58wjv1.0.7
Patch available: djust-org/djust v1.0.7
https://github.com/djust-org/djust/releases/tag/v1.0.7Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-61598(1)
These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.
Weakness Classification(1)
MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 8× in last 7d / 8× in last 30d)
Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.
- 2026-09-19 02:15 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-18 19:28 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-18 03:11 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-16 16:34 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-16 15:36 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-16 14:23 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-16 14:06 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-16 14:05 UTCMITRE cvelistV5first tracked
Frequently asked(5)
What is CVE-2026-61598?
When was CVE-2026-61598 disclosed?
Is CVE-2026-61598 actively exploited?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-61598?
How do I remediate CVE-2026-61598?
Dependency Blast Radius
Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2026-61598
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-61598?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.