CVE-2026-61598

HIGHPre-NVD 7.17.1
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

This high-severity CVE scores 7.1 under a secondary CVSS source (NVD's own analysis pending). EPSS exploit probability: 0.4%, top 65% of all CVEs by exploit prediction. GitHub Security Advisory data not yet ingested — confidence will rise once GHSA publishes (typical lag: hours to days for open-source ecosystem CVEs; never for infrastructure-only CVEs).

Triggered by: NVD CVSS baseline
Sources: epss, secondary
Trending — 3 sources updated this week
7.1EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixSerious severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet.
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0%CVSS: 7.1Exploit: None knownExposed: 0

No vendor fix yet — apply a workaround or compensating control (WAF / firewall / segmentation) and watch for a patch.

djust provides Phoenix LiveView-style reactive server-side rendering for Django with Rust-powered performance. Prior to version 1.0.7, djust.mixins.model_binding.ModelBindingMixin provides a default update_model event handler and is part of the LiveView base MRO, so every LiveView exposes it. It setattrs a view attribute whose name is client-supplied (field), gated only by: reject _-prefixed names; reject a 14-entry denylist of framework internals (FORBIDDEN_MODEL_FIELDS); optional allowed_model_fields which defaults to None = allow all; and hasattr existence. As a result, a client can set any public, existing view attribute — not just the fields actually bound with dj-model= in the rendered template. The denylist covers framework plumbing but nothing about developer business/authz state, and the allowlist is opt-in (off by default). A developer who binds one dj-model="search" input and also keeps self.account_id / self.is_admin / self.total_price as view state does not realize a client can set ALL of them via {type:event, event:"update_model", params:{field, value}} over the WebSocket. Type coercion matches the target attribute's type (so "true" -> bool True), aiding the attacker. This issue is fixed in djust 1.0.7. As a workaround, set allowed_model_fields explicitly on every view using dj-model (or subclassing LiveView) to the minimal list of bindable fields; do not keep authorization/ownership state in public view attributes that share the view with dj-model bindings.

CVSS v3
7.1
EG Score
7.1(medium)
EG Risk
32(Track)
EG Risk 32/100SSVC: Track

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed
Severity71% × 45%
Exploitation0% × 40%
Automatability0% × 15%
Action: Routine — remediate on your standard cadence.
EPSS PROB
0%
EPSS %ILE
35%
KEV
Not listed

Published

September 16, 2026

Last Modified

September 16, 2026

Advisory Details (2)

Auto-updated Sep 16, 2026
Patch available. Sources: github_release, github.
github Patch Available

Client mass-assignment of arbitrary view attributes via the default dj-model update_model handler · Advisory · djust-org/djust · GitHub

https://github.com/djust-org/djust/security/advisories/GHSA-cc7c-9jff-58wj
github_release Patch Available

v1.0.7

Patch available: djust-org/djust v1.0.7

https://github.com/djust-org/djust/releases/tag/v1.0.7

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-61598(1)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 8× in last 7d / 8× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

  1. 2026-09-19 02:15 UTCEG score recompute
  2. 2026-09-18 19:28 UTCEPSS rescore
  3. 2026-09-18 03:11 UTCEG score recompute
  4. 2026-09-16 16:34 UTCEG score recompute
  5. 2026-09-16 15:36 UTCEG score recompute
  6. 2026-09-16 14:23 UTCEG score recompute
  7. 2026-09-16 14:06 UTCEG score recompute
  8. 2026-09-16 14:05 UTCMITRE cvelistV5first tracked

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-61598?
CVE-2026-61598 is a high vulnerability published on September 16, 2026. djust provides Phoenix LiveView-style reactive server-side rendering for Django with Rust-powered performance. Prior to version 1.0.7, djust.mixins.modelbinding.ModelBindingMixin provides a default updatemodel event handler and is part of the LiveView base MRO, so every LiveView exposes it. It…
When was CVE-2026-61598 disclosed?
CVE-2026-61598 was first published in the National Vulnerability Database on September 16, 2026. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
Is CVE-2026-61598 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-61598 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, which ranks it in the top 65.0% of all scored CVEs.
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-61598?
CVE-2026-61598 has a CVSS v3 base score of 7.1 (NVD).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-61598?
Patch to the fixed version published by the affected vendor. Where vendor advisories exist for CVE-2026-61598, EchelonGraph cross-links them in the Vendor Advisories panel below — those typically contain the canonical remediation steps, fixed version numbers, and any vendor-specific mitigations.

Dependency Blast Radius

Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2026-61598

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-61598?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.