CVE-2026-54876

HIGHPre-NVD 7.57.5
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

Score 7.5 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: HIGH) published 2026-08-05. CISA-ADP (Vulnrichment) CVSS v3.1 baseline 7.5; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: cisa-adp, epss, ghsa
Trending — 4 sources updated this week
7.5EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixSerious severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet.
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0%CVSS: 7.5Exploit: None knownExposed: 0

A fix is available — apply it.

Issue summary: A malicious TLS server can cause a memory leak in a TLS client that has enabled OCSP response checking by sending an OCSP response that contains no single response entries.

Impact summary: An attacker can leak an attacker-tunable amount of memory per TLS handshake in a victim client application. A long-running client that repeatedly connects to a malicious server can have its memory exhausted, resulting in a Denial of Service.

CWE: CWE-401: Missing Release of Memory after Effective Lifetime

Description: The affected function is called during X.509 certificate chain verification when OCSP response checking is enabled with the X509_V_FLAG_OCSP_RESP_CHECK or X509_V_FLAG_OCSP_RESP_CHECK_ALL verification flags, for example when a TLS client verifies an OCSP response stapled into the TLS handshake by the server.

When the received BasicOCSPResponse contains an empty SEQUENCE OF SingleResponse, which is permitted on the wire and accepted by the OpenSSL decoder, the OCSP_BASICRESP structure allocated by OCSP_response_get1_basic() was not freed because an early return bypassed the cleanup code at the end of the function.

The amount of memory leaked per handshake can be amplified by the attacker by padding the certs field of the BasicOCSPResponse with bogus certificates, which are parsed and stored in the leaked structure before the empty response check triggers the early return. A long-running TLS client that repeatedly connects to a malicious server can have its memory exhausted over time.

OCSP response checking is not enabled by default. Only client applications that explicitly enable the OCSP response check verification flags are affected.

FIPS impact: no

The FIPS modules in 4.0 and 3.6 are not affected by this issue as the affected code is outside the OpenSSL FIPS module boundary.

CVSS v3
7.5
EG Score
7.5(medium)
EG Risk
49(Track)
EG Risk 49/100SSVC: Track

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed
Severity75% × 45%
Exploitation0% × 40%
Automatability100% × 15%
Action: Routine — remediate on your standard cadence.
EPSS PROB
0%
EPSS %ILE
18%
KEV
Not listed

Published

August 5, 2026

Last Modified

August 28, 2026

Advisory Details (3)

Auto-updated Aug 5, 2026
Upstream fix merged — awaiting tagged release. Sources: github_commit.
github_commit

commit 155b5fe0f933 (openssl/openssl)

Fix landed in openssl/openssl commit 155b5fe0f933 — awaiting tagged release

https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/155b5fe0f93365e6df1c56ee3606b121080c6c12
github_commit

commit d8c51048ac03 (openssl/openssl)

Fix landed in openssl/openssl commit d8c51048ac03 — awaiting tagged release

https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/d8c51048ac037a21bae0f41cad7a3920dc7f3638

Patch Availability(7)

Vendor / EcosystemFixed in / PatchReleasedSource
redhatruby3-4-main-3.4.10-31.6.hum12026-08-21redhat
redhatruby3-3-main-3.3.10-23.5.hum12026-08-21redhat
redhatruby4-0-main-4.0.6-37.2.hum12026-08-20redhat
redhatopenssl3-main-3.5.7-2.2.hum12026-08-19redhat
redhatopenssl-main-3.5.6-0.5.hum12026-08-18redhat
redhatpython-cryptography-main-50.0.0-1.hum12026-08-17redhat
redhatchunkah-main-0.6.0-3.hum12026-07-21redhat

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Affected Packages

(1 across 1 ecosystem)
Debian:14(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFixed inDependents
openssl3.5.1-1 ... 4.0.2-1 (28 versions)

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 36× in last 7d / 135× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 202 total refreshes for this CVE.

  1. 2026-09-19 07:41 UTCEG score recompute
  2. 2026-09-19 07:41 UTCVendor advisory
  3. 2026-09-19 07:41 UTCGHSA enrichment
  4. 2026-09-18 19:28 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-09-18 17:42 UTCVendor advisory
  6. 2026-09-18 17:42 UTCGHSA enrichment
  7. 2026-09-18 03:54 UTCEG score recompute
  8. 2026-09-18 03:54 UTCVendor advisory
  9. 2026-09-18 03:54 UTCGHSA enrichment
  10. 2026-09-17 19:31 UTCEPSS rescore
  11. 2026-09-17 15:56 UTCVendor advisory
  12. 2026-09-17 15:56 UTCGHSA enrichment
  13. 2026-09-17 01:07 UTCEG score recompute
  14. 2026-09-17 01:07 UTCVendor advisory
  15. 2026-09-17 01:07 UTCGHSA enrichment
  16. 2026-09-16 14:08 UTCEPSS rescore
  17. 2026-09-16 05:15 UTCEPSS rescore
  18. 2026-09-16 05:14 UTCVendor advisory
  19. 2026-09-16 05:13 UTCGHSA enrichment
  20. 2026-09-15 16:22 UTCEG score recompute
  21. 2026-09-15 16:22 UTCVendor advisory
  22. 2026-09-15 16:22 UTCGHSA enrichment
  23. 2026-09-15 03:11 UTCEPSS rescore
  24. 2026-09-15 01:29 UTCVendor advisory
  25. 2026-09-15 01:29 UTCGHSA enrichment
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-09-14 07:26 UTCVendor advisory
  2. 2026-09-14 07:26 UTCGHSA enrichment
  3. 2026-09-13 19:28 UTCEG score recompute
  4. 2026-09-13 19:28 UTCVendor advisory
  5. 2026-09-13 19:28 UTCGHSA enrichment
  6. 2026-09-13 16:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  7. 2026-09-13 07:10 UTCVendor advisory
  8. 2026-09-13 07:10 UTCGHSA enrichment
  9. 2026-09-12 19:13 UTCEG score recompute
  10. 2026-09-12 19:13 UTCVendor advisory
  11. 2026-09-12 19:13 UTCGHSA enrichment
  12. 2026-09-12 07:15 UTCVendor advisory
  13. 2026-09-12 07:15 UTCGHSA enrichment
  14. 2026-09-11 19:17 UTCEG score recompute
  15. 2026-09-11 19:17 UTCVendor advisory
  16. 2026-09-11 19:17 UTCGHSA enrichment
  17. 2026-09-11 14:53 UTCEPSS rescore
  18. 2026-09-11 07:08 UTCVendor advisory
  19. 2026-09-11 07:08 UTCGHSA enrichment
  20. 2026-09-10 19:10 UTCEG score recompute
  21. 2026-09-10 19:10 UTCVendor advisory
  22. 2026-09-10 19:10 UTCGHSA enrichment
  23. 2026-09-10 09:35 UTCEPSS rescore
  24. 2026-09-10 07:12 UTCVendor advisory
  25. 2026-09-10 07:12 UTCGHSA enrichment
  26. 2026-09-09 19:14 UTCVendor advisory
  27. 2026-09-09 19:14 UTCGHSA enrichment
  28. 2026-09-09 06:22 UTCEG score recompute
  29. 2026-09-09 06:22 UTCVendor advisory
  30. 2026-09-09 06:22 UTCGHSA enrichment
  31. 2026-09-08 22:01 UTCEPSS rescore
  32. 2026-09-08 07:59 UTCVendor advisory
  33. 2026-09-08 07:59 UTCGHSA enrichment
  34. 2026-09-07 18:17 UTCEG score recompute
  35. 2026-09-07 18:17 UTCVendor advisory
  36. 2026-09-07 18:17 UTCGHSA enrichment
  37. 2026-09-07 16:01 UTCEPSS rescore
  38. 2026-09-06 18:24 UTCEG score recompute
  39. 2026-09-06 18:24 UTCVendor advisory
  40. 2026-09-06 18:24 UTCGHSA enrichment
  41. 2026-09-06 13:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  42. 2026-09-06 06:25 UTCVendor advisory
  43. 2026-09-06 06:25 UTCGHSA enrichment
  44. 2026-09-05 18:27 UTCEG score recompute
  45. 2026-09-05 18:27 UTCVendor advisory
  46. 2026-09-05 18:26 UTCGHSA enrichment
  47. 2026-09-05 03:48 UTCEG score recompute
  48. 2026-09-05 03:48 UTCVendor advisory
  49. 2026-09-05 03:48 UTCGHSA enrichment
  50. 2026-09-04 09:33 UTCEG score recompute
  51. 2026-09-04 09:33 UTCVendor advisory
  52. 2026-09-04 09:33 UTCGHSA enrichment
  53. 2026-09-04 05:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  54. 2026-09-03 19:17 UTCVendor advisory
  55. 2026-09-03 19:17 UTCGHSA enrichment
  56. 2026-09-03 06:49 UTCEG score recompute
  57. 2026-09-03 06:49 UTCVendor advisory
  58. 2026-09-03 06:48 UTCGHSA enrichment
  59. 2026-09-02 14:12 UTCEPSS rescore
  60. 2026-09-02 08:38 UTCVendor advisory
  61. 2026-09-02 08:38 UTCGHSA enrichment
  62. 2026-09-01 20:32 UTCEG score recompute
  63. 2026-09-01 20:32 UTCVendor advisory
  64. 2026-09-01 20:32 UTCGHSA enrichment
  65. 2026-09-01 13:54 UTCEPSS rescore
  66. 2026-09-01 04:40 UTCEPSS rescore
  67. 2026-08-31 22:49 UTCVendor advisory
  68. 2026-08-31 22:49 UTCGHSA enrichment
  69. 2026-08-30 21:54 UTCEG score recompute
  70. 2026-08-30 21:54 UTCVendor advisory
  71. 2026-08-30 21:54 UTCGHSA enrichment
  72. 2026-08-30 19:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  73. 2026-08-30 09:56 UTCEG score recompute
  74. 2026-08-30 09:56 UTCVendor advisory
  75. 2026-08-30 09:56 UTCGHSA enrichment

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-54876?
CVE-2026-54876 is a high vulnerability published on August 5, 2026. Issue summary: A malicious TLS server can cause a memory leak in a TLS client that has enabled OCSP response checking by sending an OCSP response that contains no single response entries. Impact summary: An attacker can leak an attacker-tunable amount of memory per TLS handshake in a victim client…
When was CVE-2026-54876 disclosed?
CVE-2026-54876 was first published in the National Vulnerability Database on August 5, 2026, with the most recent update on August 28, 2026. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
Is CVE-2026-54876 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-54876 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, which ranks it in the top 81.8% of all scored CVEs.
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-54876?
CVE-2026-54876 has a CVSS v3.1 base score of 7.5 (CISA-ADP / Vulnrichment enrichment; NVD's own analysis pending).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-54876?
Patch to the fixed version published by the affected vendor. Where vendor advisories exist for CVE-2026-54876, EchelonGraph cross-links them in the Vendor Advisories panel below — those typically contain the canonical remediation steps, fixed version numbers, and any vendor-specific mitigations.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-54876

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-54876?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.