Sylius is an Open Source eCommerce Framework on Symfony. Starting in version 2.0.0 and prior to version 2.0.18, 2.1.15, and 2.2.6, the GET /api/v2/shop/payment-requests/{hash} and PUT /api/v2/shop/payment-requests/{hash} endpoints look up the payment request solely by the hash from the URL. No ownership check is performed against the authenticated customer or the underlying order. An attacker who obtains a payment request hash can read the payment request and, through the payment IRI in the response, recover the underlying order's tokenValue (which itself grants access to the full order, items, addresses, customer email, totals); and/or update the payment request payload (e.g. target_path, after_path). These fields are used by the front-end controller to redirect the user after the payment, so an attacker can flip them to an attacker-controlled URL and intercept the buyer. The hash is a UUID, so it has to be obtained out-of-band (logs, shared links, referrer headers, a co-located client), but once it is known no other credential is required, neither authentication nor knowledge of the order token. The creation endpoint POST /api/v2/shop/orders/{tokenValue}/payment-requests shares the same flaw: it resolves the target order solely from the tokenValue in the URL without verifying that the caller owns the order. The issue is fixed in versions 2.0.18, 2.1.15, and 2.2.6. As a workaround, add a query extension that filters the GET operation; decorate the PUT state provider, guard the POST creation endpoint with a command-bus middleware, and wire the services.
CVE-2026-53639
This medium-severity CVE scores 6.3 under a secondary CVSS source (NVD's own analysis pending). EPSS exploit probability: 0.5%, top 56% of all CVEs by exploit prediction. GitHub Security Advisory data not yet ingested — confidence will rise once GHSA publishes (typical lag: hours to days for open-source ecosystem CVEs; never for infrastructure-only CVEs).
- Lower severity and no public exploit yet
No vendor fix yet — apply a workaround or compensating control (WAF / firewall / segmentation) and watch for a patch.
- CVSS v3
- 6.3
- EG Score
- 6.3(medium)
- EG Risk
- 29(Track)EG Risk 29/100SSVC: Track
EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).
How it’s computedSeverity63% × 45%Exploitation1% × 40%Automatability0% × 15%Action: Routine — remediate on your standard cadence. - EPSS PROB
- 1%
- EPSS %ILE
- 45%
- KEV
- Not listed
Published
July 9, 2026
Last Modified
September 9, 2026
Advisory Details (1)
Auto-updated Sep 8, 2026IDOR on Shop Payment Request endpoints in API · Advisory · Sylius/Sylius · GitHub
Affected: versions: 2.0.18, 2.1.15, 2.2.6.
https://github.com/Sylius/Sylius/security/advisories/GHSA-mr9r-h354-966rVendor Advisories for CVE-2026-53639(1)
These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.
Affected Packages
(1 across 1 ecosystem)
Packagist(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fixed in | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| sylius/sylius | v2.2.0 ... v2.2.5 (6 versions) | 2.2.6 | — |
Weakness Classification(1)
MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 6× in last 7d / 16× in last 30d)
Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.
- 2026-09-20 20:16 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-18 19:28 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-18 05:34 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-16 14:08 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-16 05:15 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-14 06:47 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-13 16:47 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-13 08:17 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-12 03:21 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-11 14:53 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-10 09:35 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-09 17:34 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-09 16:55 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-08 23:21 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-08 22:31 UTCEG score recompute▲ 6.30
- 2026-09-08 22:28 UTCMITRE cvelistV5CVSS v3 → 6.3 · CVSS v4 → 6.3
- 2026-08-02 04:14 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-07-26 12:16 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-07-23 03:19 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-07-09 21:46 UTCEG score recompute
Related CVEs(same CWE)
Same CWE
10 shownCWE-639
Frequently asked(5)
What is CVE-2026-53639?
When was CVE-2026-53639 disclosed?
Is CVE-2026-53639 actively exploited?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-53639?
How do I remediate CVE-2026-53639?
Dependency Blast Radius
See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-53639
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-53639?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.