Sylius is an Open Source eCommerce Framework on Symfony. An authenticated Insecure Direct Object Reference (IDOR) vulnerability exists in multiple shop LiveComponents due to unvalidated resource IDs accepted via #[LiveArg] parameters. Unlike props, which are protected by LiveComponent's @checksum, args are fully user-controlled - any action that accepts a resource ID via #[LiveArg] and loads it with ->find() without ownership validation is vulnerable. Checkout address FormComponent (addressFieldUpdated action): Accepts an addressId via #[LiveArg] and loads it without verifying ownership, exposing another user's first name, last name, company, phone number, street, city, postcode, and country. Cart WidgetComponent (refreshCart action): Accepts a cartId via #[LiveArg] and loads any order directly from the repository, exposing order total and item count. Cart SummaryComponent (refreshCart action): Accepts a cartId via #[LiveArg] and loads any order directly from the repository, exposing subtotal, discount, shipping cost, taxes (excluded and included), and order total. Since sylius_order contains both active carts (state=cart) and completed orders (state=new/fulfilled) in the same ID space, the cart IDOR exposes data from all orders, not just active carts. The issue is fixed in versions: 2.0.16, 2.1.12, 2.2.3 and above.
CVE-2026-31820
This medium-severity CVE scores 6.5 under NVD CVSS v3. EPSS exploit-prediction score not yet available (the EPSS model rescores nightly; freshly-published CVEs typically appear within 48 hours). GitHub Security Advisory data not yet ingested — confidence will rise once GHSA publishes (typical lag: hours to days for open-source ecosystem CVEs; never for infrastructure-only CVEs).
- Lower severity and no public exploit yet
No vendor fix yet — apply a workaround or compensating control (WAF / firewall / segmentation) and watch for a patch.
- CVSS v3
- 6.5
- EG Score
- 6.5(low)
- EG Risk
- 34(Track)EG Risk 34/100SSVC: Track
EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).
How it’s computedSeverity65% × 45%Exploitation0% × 40%Automatability30% × 15%Action: Routine — remediate on your standard cadence. - EPSS PROB
- 0%
- EPSS %ILE
- 21%
- KEV
- Not listed
Published
March 10, 2026
Last Modified
June 17, 2026
References (1)
- security-advisories@githubhttps://github.com/Sylius/Sylius/security/advisories/GHSA-2xc6-348p-c2x6
Weakness Classification(1)
MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 2× in last 7d / 2× in last 30d)
Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.
- 2026-07-28 15:36 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-27 13:44 UTCEG score recompute
Related CVEs(same CWE)
Same CWE
10 shownCWE-639
- CVE-2018-25270EG 9.8CRITICAL
- CVE-2017-20223EG 9.8CRITICAL
- CVE-2019-25487EG 9.8EPSS p94CRITICAL
- CVE-2019-25235EG 9.8CRITICAL
- CVE-2019-15310EG 9.8EPSS p94CRITICAL
- CVE-2019-15913EG 9.8CRITICAL
- CVE-2019-16340EG 9.8EPSS p97CRITICAL
- CVE-2019-13360EG 9.8EPSS p98CRITICAL
- CVE-2019-12866EG 9.8CRITICAL
- CVE-2019-9756EG 9.8CRITICAL
Frequently asked(5)
What is CVE-2026-31820?
When was CVE-2026-31820 disclosed?
Is CVE-2026-31820 actively exploited?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-31820?
How do I remediate CVE-2026-31820?
Dependency Blast Radius
Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2026-31820
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-31820?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.