CVE-2026-53362

HIGHPre-NVD 7.87.8
EchelonGraph scoreHIGH confidence

Score 7.8 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: HIGH) published 2026-07-04. a secondary CVSS source baseline 7.8; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: epss, ghsa, secondary
Trending — Patch released this week
7.8EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixSerious severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet.
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0%CVSS: 7.8Exploit: None knownExposed: 0

A fix is available — apply it.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

ipv6: account for fraggap on the paged allocation path

In __ip6_append_data(), when the paged-allocation branch is taken (MSG_MORE / NETIF_F_SG / large fraglen), alloclen and pagedlen are computed as

alloclen = fragheaderlen + transhdrlen; pagedlen = datalen - transhdrlen;

datalen already includes fraggap (datalen = length + fraggap). When fraggap is non-zero, this is not the first skb and transhdrlen is zero. The fraggap bytes carried over from the previous skb are copied just past the fragment headers in the new skb's linear area. The linear area is therefore undersized by fraggap bytes while pagedlen is overstated by the same amount, and the copy writes past skb->end into the trailing skb_shared_info.

An unprivileged user can trigger this via a UDPv6 socket using MSG_MORE together with MSG_SPLICE_PAGES.

The bad accounting was introduced by commit 773ba4fe9104 ("ipv6: avoid partial copy for zc"). Before commit ce650a166335 ("udp6: Fix __ip6_append_data()'s handling of MSG_SPLICE_PAGES"), the negative copy value caused -EINVAL to be returned. That later commit allowed MSG_SPLICE_PAGES to proceed in this case, making the corruption triggerable.

The non-paged branch sets alloclen to fraglen, which already accounts for fraggap because datalen does. Bring the paged branch in line by adding fraggap to alloclen and subtracting it from pagedlen.

After this adjustment, copy no longer collapses to -fraggap on the paged path, so remove the stale comment describing that old arithmetic. Since a negative copy is no longer expected for a valid MSG_SPLICE_PAGES case, remove the MSG_SPLICE_PAGES exception from the negative copy check.

CVSS v3
7.8
EG Score
7.8(high)
EG Risk
40(Track)
EG Risk 40/100SSVC: Track

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed
Severity78% × 45%
Exploitation0% × 40%
Automatability30% × 15%
Action: Routine — remediate on your standard cadence.
EPSS PROB
0%
EPSS %ILE
18%
KEV
Not listed

Published

July 4, 2026

Last Modified

July 22, 2026

Advisory Details (6)

Auto-updated Jul 18, 2026
No patch confirmed yet.
generic

ipv6: account for fraggap on the paged allocation path - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/736b380e28d0480c7bc3e022f1950f31fe53a7c5
generic

ipv6: account for fraggap on the paged allocation path - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/e9eacf19281ea2498b36291b56c9606118c2d74e
generic

ipv6: account for fraggap on the paged allocation path - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/6374fb9edf72c67a118a2c214a0dddd04c921e0a
generic

ipv6: account for fraggap on the paged allocation path - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/46f201f8b4c39633a1fa3dc12459f506d470993d
generic

ipv6: account for fraggap on the paged allocation path - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/65fb14cbebb0cd0eff903a22d33537ddc8b95769
generic

ipv6: account for fraggap on the paged allocation path - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/14200d435af9a9eeb444f529fc2f689a236b7962

Patch Availability(4)

Vendor / EcosystemFixed in / PatchReleasedSource
redhatkpatch-patch2026-07-22redhat
redhatkernel-0:6.12.0-55.86.1.el10_02026-07-06redhat
redhatkernel-0:6.12.0-211.30.1.el10_22026-07-02redhat
redhatkernel-0:6.12.0-231.14.el10nv2026-07-02redhat

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 14× in last 7d / 207× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 207 total refreshes for this CVE.

  1. 2026-07-27 01:49 UTCEG score recompute
  2. 2026-07-27 01:49 UTCVendor advisory
  3. 2026-07-27 01:49 UTCGHSA enrichment
  4. 2026-07-26 14:54 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-07-26 12:53 UTCEG score recompute
  6. 2026-07-26 12:53 UTCVendor advisory
  7. 2026-07-26 12:53 UTCGHSA enrichment
  8. 2026-07-25 14:18 UTCEPSS rescore
  9. 2026-07-24 14:18 UTCEPSS rescore
  10. 2026-07-23 14:18 UTCEPSS rescore
  11. 2026-07-23 03:19 UTCEG score recompute
  12. 2026-07-22 14:08 UTCEPSS rescore
  13. 2026-07-21 15:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  14. 2026-07-20 17:08 UTCEPSS rescore
  15. 2026-07-19 14:31 UTCEPSS rescore
  16. 2026-07-19 14:31 UTCEPSS rescore
  17. 2026-07-19 03:43 UTCEG score recompute
  18. 2026-07-19 03:43 UTCVendor advisory
  19. 2026-07-19 03:43 UTCGHSA enrichment
  20. 2026-07-19 02:29 UTCEPSS rescore
  21. 2026-07-18 10:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  22. 2026-07-18 08:00 UTCEG score recompute 7.80
  23. 2026-07-18 08:00 UTCVendor advisory
  24. 2026-07-18 08:00 UTCGHSA enrichment
  25. 2026-07-18 07:59 UTCMITRE cvelistV5CVSS v3 → 7.8 · severity → HIGH
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-07-17 15:59 UTCVendor advisory
  2. 2026-07-17 15:59 UTCGHSA enrichment
  3. 2026-07-17 15:58 UTCVendor advisory
  4. 2026-07-17 15:58 UTCGHSA enrichment
  5. 2026-07-17 15:57 UTCVendor advisory
  6. 2026-07-17 15:57 UTCGHSA enrichment
  7. 2026-07-17 15:56 UTCVendor advisory
  8. 2026-07-17 15:56 UTCGHSA enrichment
  9. 2026-07-17 15:55 UTCVendor advisory
  10. 2026-07-17 15:55 UTCGHSA enrichment
  11. 2026-07-17 15:54 UTCVendor advisory
  12. 2026-07-17 15:54 UTCGHSA enrichment
  13. 2026-07-17 15:53 UTCVendor advisory
  14. 2026-07-17 15:53 UTCGHSA enrichment
  15. 2026-07-17 15:52 UTCVendor advisory
  16. 2026-07-17 15:52 UTCGHSA enrichment
  17. 2026-07-17 15:49 UTCVendor advisory
  18. 2026-07-17 15:49 UTCGHSA enrichment
  19. 2026-07-17 15:48 UTCVendor advisory
  20. 2026-07-17 15:48 UTCGHSA enrichment
  21. 2026-07-17 15:47 UTCVendor advisory
  22. 2026-07-17 15:47 UTCGHSA enrichment
  23. 2026-07-17 15:46 UTCVendor advisory
  24. 2026-07-17 15:46 UTCGHSA enrichment
  25. 2026-07-17 15:45 UTCVendor advisory
  26. 2026-07-17 15:45 UTCGHSA enrichment
  27. 2026-07-17 15:44 UTCVendor advisory
  28. 2026-07-17 15:44 UTCGHSA enrichment
  29. 2026-07-17 15:43 UTCVendor advisory
  30. 2026-07-17 15:43 UTCGHSA enrichment
  31. 2026-07-17 15:43 UTCVendor advisory
  32. 2026-07-17 15:43 UTCGHSA enrichment
  33. 2026-07-17 15:40 UTCVendor advisory
  34. 2026-07-17 15:40 UTCGHSA enrichment
  35. 2026-07-17 15:39 UTCVendor advisory
  36. 2026-07-17 15:39 UTCGHSA enrichment
  37. 2026-07-17 15:38 UTCVendor advisory
  38. 2026-07-17 15:38 UTCGHSA enrichment
  39. 2026-07-17 15:37 UTCVendor advisory
  40. 2026-07-17 15:37 UTCGHSA enrichment
  41. 2026-07-17 15:36 UTCVendor advisory
  42. 2026-07-17 15:36 UTCGHSA enrichment
  43. 2026-07-17 15:35 UTCVendor advisory
  44. 2026-07-17 15:35 UTCGHSA enrichment
  45. 2026-07-17 15:35 UTCVendor advisory
  46. 2026-07-17 15:35 UTCGHSA enrichment
  47. 2026-07-17 15:11 UTCVendor advisory
  48. 2026-07-17 15:11 UTCGHSA enrichment
  49. 2026-07-17 15:08 UTCVendor advisory
  50. 2026-07-17 15:08 UTCGHSA enrichment
  51. 2026-07-17 14:59 UTCVendor advisory
  52. 2026-07-17 14:59 UTCGHSA enrichment
  53. 2026-07-17 14:58 UTCVendor advisory
  54. 2026-07-17 14:58 UTCGHSA enrichment
  55. 2026-07-17 14:55 UTCVendor advisory
  56. 2026-07-17 14:55 UTCGHSA enrichment
  57. 2026-07-17 14:46 UTCVendor advisory
  58. 2026-07-17 14:46 UTCGHSA enrichment
  59. 2026-07-17 14:44 UTCVendor advisory
  60. 2026-07-17 14:44 UTCGHSA enrichment
  61. 2026-07-17 14:36 UTCVendor advisory
  62. 2026-07-17 14:36 UTCGHSA enrichment
  63. 2026-07-17 14:35 UTCVendor advisory
  64. 2026-07-17 14:35 UTCGHSA enrichment
  65. 2026-07-17 14:31 UTCVendor advisory
  66. 2026-07-17 14:31 UTCGHSA enrichment
  67. 2026-07-17 14:28 UTCVendor advisory
  68. 2026-07-17 14:28 UTCGHSA enrichment
  69. 2026-07-17 14:23 UTCVendor advisory
  70. 2026-07-17 14:23 UTCGHSA enrichment
  71. 2026-07-17 14:22 UTCVendor advisory
  72. 2026-07-17 14:22 UTCGHSA enrichment
  73. 2026-07-17 14:20 UTCVendor advisory
  74. 2026-07-17 14:20 UTCGHSA enrichment
  75. 2026-07-17 14:19 UTCVendor advisory

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-53362?
CVE-2026-53362 is a high vulnerability published on July 4, 2026. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: ipv6: account for fraggap on the paged allocation path In ip6appenddata(), when the paged-allocation branch is taken (MSGMORE / NETIFF_SG / large fraglen), alloclen and pagedlen are computed as alloclen = fragheaderlen +…
When was CVE-2026-53362 disclosed?
CVE-2026-53362 was first published in the National Vulnerability Database on July 4, 2026, with the most recent update on July 22, 2026. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
Is CVE-2026-53362 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-53362 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, which ranks it in the top 81.7% of all scored CVEs.
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-53362?
CVE-2026-53362 has a CVSS v3 base score of 7.8 (NVD).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-53362?
Patch to the fixed version published by the affected vendor. Where vendor advisories exist for CVE-2026-53362, EchelonGraph cross-links them in the Vendor Advisories panel below — those typically contain the canonical remediation steps, fixed version numbers, and any vendor-specific mitigations.

Dependency Blast Radius

Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2026-53362

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-53362?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.