CVE-2026-53292

MEDIUMNVD 5.55.5
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

Score 5.5 from GitHub Security Advisory published 2026-06-26. NVD baseline CVSS 5.5; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: epss, ghsa, nvd
Trending — 4 sources updated this week
5.5EG
EchelonGraph verdictMonitorLow exploitation likelihood right now — keep watching.
  • Lower severity and no public exploit yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0%CVSS: 5.5Exploit: None knownExposed: 0

A fix is available — apply it.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

net: phonet: do not BUG_ON() in pn_socket_autobind() on failed bind

syzbot reported a kernel BUG triggered from pn_socket_sendmsg() via pn_socket_autobind():

kernel BUG at net/phonet/socket.c:213! RIP: 0010:pn_socket_autobind net/phonet/socket.c:213 [inline] RIP: 0010:pn_socket_sendmsg+0x240/0x250 net/phonet/socket.c:421 Call Trace: sock_sendmsg_nosec+0x112/0x150 net/socket.c:797 __sock_sendmsg net/socket.c:812 [inline] __sys_sendto+0x402/0x590 net/socket.c:2280 ...

pn_socket_autobind() calls pn_socket_bind() with port 0 and, on -EINVAL, assumes the socket was already bound and asserts that the port is non-zero:

err = pn_socket_bind(sock, ..., sizeof(struct sockaddr_pn)); if (err != -EINVAL) return err; BUG_ON(!pn_port(pn_sk(sock->sk)->sobject)); return 0; /* socket was already bound */

However pn_socket_bind() also returns -EINVAL when sk->sk_state is not TCP_CLOSE, even when the socket has never been bound and pn_port() is still 0. In that case the BUG_ON() fires and panics the kernel from a user-triggerable path.

Treat the "bind returned -EINVAL but pn_port() is still 0" case as a regular error and propagate -EINVAL to the caller instead of crashing. Existing callers already translate a non-zero return from pn_socket_autobind() into -ENOBUFS/-EAGAIN, so returning -EINVAL here only changes behaviour from panic to a normal errno.

CVSS v3
5.5
EG Score
5.5(medium)
EG Risk
29(Track)
EG Risk 29/100SSVC: Track

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed
Severity55% × 45%
Exploitation0% × 40%
Automatability30% × 15%
Action: Routine — remediate on your standard cadence.
EPSS PROB
0%
EPSS %ILE
1%
KEV
Not listed

Published

June 26, 2026

Last Modified

July 8, 2026

Advisory Details (2)

Auto-updated Jul 8, 2026
No patch confirmed yet.
generic

net: phonet: do not BUG_ON() in pn_socket_autobind() on failed bind - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/6db58ee730bf434d1afca91b91826e26688856ed
generic

net: phonet: do not BUG_ON() in pn_socket_autobind() on failed bind - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/5b0c911bcdbd982f7748d11c0b39ec5808eae2de

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-53292(2)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Patch Availability(9)

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Affected Packages

(4 across 4 ecosystems)
Debian:11(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFixed inDependents
linux5.10.103-1 ... 7.2~rc5-1~exp1 (496 versions)
Debian:12(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFixed inDependents
linux6.1.106-1 ... 7.2~rc7-1~exp1 (350 versions)
Debian:13(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFixed inDependents
linux6.12.100-1 ... 7.2~rc7-1~exp1 (174 versions)
Debian:14(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFixed inDependents
linux6.12.100-1 ... 7.0.9-1~bpo13+1 (140 versions)7.0.10-1

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

All Vendor Advisories

(9)

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 10× in last 7d / 50× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 180 total refreshes for this CVE.

  1. 2026-09-18 19:28 UTCEPSS rescore
  2. 2026-09-18 07:10 UTCEG score recompute
  3. 2026-09-18 07:10 UTCVendor advisory
  4. 2026-09-18 07:10 UTCGHSA enrichment
  5. 2026-09-16 14:08 UTCEPSS rescore
  6. 2026-09-16 05:15 UTCEPSS rescore
  7. 2026-09-14 00:58 UTCEG score recompute
  8. 2026-09-14 00:58 UTCVendor advisory
  9. 2026-09-14 00:58 UTCGHSA enrichment
  10. 2026-09-13 16:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  11. 2026-09-12 15:32 UTCEG score recompute
  12. 2026-09-12 15:32 UTCVendor advisory
  13. 2026-09-12 15:32 UTCGHSA enrichment
  14. 2026-09-11 14:53 UTCEPSS rescore
  15. 2026-09-10 09:35 UTCEPSS rescore
  16. 2026-09-08 22:01 UTCEPSS rescore
  17. 2026-09-07 16:01 UTCEPSS rescore
  18. 2026-09-06 15:00 UTCEG score recompute
  19. 2026-09-06 15:00 UTCVendor advisory
  20. 2026-09-06 14:59 UTCGHSA enrichment
  21. 2026-09-06 13:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  22. 2026-09-04 05:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  23. 2026-09-02 14:12 UTCEPSS rescore
  24. 2026-09-01 13:54 UTCEPSS rescore
  25. 2026-09-01 04:40 UTCEPSS rescore
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-08-30 19:18 UTCEG score recompute
  2. 2026-08-30 19:18 UTCVendor advisory
  3. 2026-08-30 19:18 UTCGHSA enrichment
  4. 2026-08-30 19:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-08-30 01:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  6. 2026-08-28 21:41 UTCEPSS rescore
  7. 2026-08-27 22:58 UTCEG score recompute
  8. 2026-08-27 22:58 UTCVendor advisory
  9. 2026-08-27 22:58 UTCGHSA enrichment
  10. 2026-08-27 14:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  11. 2026-08-26 14:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  12. 2026-08-25 13:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  13. 2026-08-24 12:50 UTCEG score recompute
  14. 2026-08-24 12:50 UTCVendor advisory
  15. 2026-08-24 12:50 UTCGHSA enrichment
  16. 2026-08-23 10:26 UTCEG score recompute
  17. 2026-08-23 10:26 UTCVendor advisory
  18. 2026-08-23 10:26 UTCGHSA enrichment
  19. 2026-08-23 00:19 UTCEPSS rescore
  20. 2026-08-22 09:23 UTCEG score recompute
  21. 2026-08-22 09:23 UTCVendor advisory
  22. 2026-08-22 09:23 UTCGHSA enrichment
  23. 2026-08-21 23:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  24. 2026-08-21 07:43 UTCVendor advisory
  25. 2026-08-21 07:43 UTCGHSA enrichment
  26. 2026-08-20 06:42 UTCEG score recompute
  27. 2026-08-20 06:42 UTCVendor advisory
  28. 2026-08-20 06:42 UTCGHSA enrichment
  29. 2026-08-19 17:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  30. 2026-08-18 23:41 UTCEG score recompute
  31. 2026-08-18 23:41 UTCVendor advisory
  32. 2026-08-18 23:41 UTCGHSA enrichment
  33. 2026-08-18 13:48 UTCEPSS rescore
  34. 2026-08-17 13:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  35. 2026-08-16 21:26 UTCEG score recompute
  36. 2026-08-16 21:26 UTCVendor advisory
  37. 2026-08-16 21:26 UTCGHSA enrichment
  38. 2026-08-16 14:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  39. 2026-08-16 02:14 UTCEPSS rescore
  40. 2026-08-15 20:25 UTCEG score recompute
  41. 2026-08-15 20:25 UTCVendor advisory
  42. 2026-08-15 20:25 UTCGHSA enrichment
  43. 2026-08-15 01:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  44. 2026-08-14 19:23 UTCEG score recompute
  45. 2026-08-14 19:23 UTCVendor advisory
  46. 2026-08-14 19:23 UTCGHSA enrichment
  47. 2026-08-13 22:00 UTCEPSS rescore
  48. 2026-08-13 18:22 UTCVendor advisory
  49. 2026-08-13 18:22 UTCGHSA enrichment
  50. 2026-08-12 15:40 UTCEG score recompute
  51. 2026-08-12 15:40 UTCVendor advisory
  52. 2026-08-12 15:40 UTCGHSA enrichment
  53. 2026-08-12 13:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  54. 2026-08-11 14:36 UTCEG score recompute
  55. 2026-08-11 14:36 UTCVendor advisory
  56. 2026-08-11 14:36 UTCGHSA enrichment
  57. 2026-08-11 00:00 UTCEPSS rescore
  58. 2026-08-10 13:32 UTCEG score recompute
  59. 2026-08-10 13:32 UTCVendor advisory
  60. 2026-08-10 13:32 UTCGHSA enrichment
  61. 2026-08-09 13:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  62. 2026-08-09 12:20 UTCEG score recompute
  63. 2026-08-09 12:20 UTCVendor advisory
  64. 2026-08-09 12:20 UTCGHSA enrichment
  65. 2026-08-08 16:37 UTCEPSS rescore
  66. 2026-08-08 11:19 UTCEG score recompute
  67. 2026-08-08 11:19 UTCVendor advisory
  68. 2026-08-08 11:19 UTCGHSA enrichment
  69. 2026-08-07 10:18 UTCVendor advisory
  70. 2026-08-07 10:18 UTCGHSA enrichment
  71. 2026-08-06 09:17 UTCEG score recompute
  72. 2026-08-06 09:17 UTCVendor advisory
  73. 2026-08-06 09:17 UTCGHSA enrichment
  74. 2026-08-05 19:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  75. 2026-08-05 08:16 UTCEG score recompute

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-53292?
CVE-2026-53292 is a medium vulnerability published on June 26, 2026. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: net: phonet: do not BUGON() in pnsocket_autobind() on failed bind syzbot reported a kernel BUG triggered from pnsocketsendmsg() via pnsocketautobind(): kernel BUG at net/phonet/socket.c:213! RIP: 0010:pnsocketautobind…
When was CVE-2026-53292 disclosed?
CVE-2026-53292 was first published in the National Vulnerability Database on June 26, 2026, with the most recent update on July 8, 2026. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
Is CVE-2026-53292 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-53292 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, which ranks it in the top 98.7% of all scored CVEs.
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-53292?
CVE-2026-53292 has a CVSS v3 base score of 5.5 (NVD).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-53292?
Patch to the fixed version published by the affected vendor. Where vendor advisories exist for CVE-2026-53292, EchelonGraph cross-links them in the Vendor Advisories panel below — those typically contain the canonical remediation steps, fixed version numbers, and any vendor-specific mitigations.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-53292

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-53292?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.