CVE-2026-53254

HIGHPre-NVD 8.18.1
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

Score 8.1 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: HIGH) published 2026-06-25. the CNA's CVSS baseline 8.1; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: cna:linux, epss, ghsa
Trending — Patch released this week
8.1EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixSerious severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet.
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0%CVSS: 8.1Exploit: None knownExposed: 0

A fix is available — apply it.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

Bluetooth: RFCOMM: validate skb length in MCC handlers

The RFCOMM MCC handlers cast skb->data to protocol-specific structs without validating skb->len first. A malicious remote device can send truncated MCC frames and trigger out-of-bounds reads in these handlers.

Fix this by using skb_pull_data() to validate and access the required data before dereferencing it.

rfcomm_recv_rpn() requires special handling since ETSI TS 07.10 allows 1-byte RPN requests. Handle this by validating only the DLCI byte first, and validating the full struct only when len > 1.

CVSS v3
8.1
EG Score
8.1(medium)
EG Risk
41(Track)
EG Risk 41/100SSVC: Track

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed
Severity81% × 45%
Exploitation0% × 40%
Automatability30% × 15%
Action: Routine — remediate on your standard cadence.
EPSS PROB
0%
EPSS %ILE
19%
KEV
Not listed

Published

June 25, 2026

Last Modified

August 5, 2026

Advisory Details (7)

Auto-updated Jun 28, 2026
No patch confirmed yet.
generic

Bluetooth: RFCOMM: validate skb length in MCC handlers - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/98377e6b1a1a56561ec66a181573ea2b61b2079e
generic

Bluetooth: RFCOMM: validate skb length in MCC handlers - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/7c15c7c2878957cbfed93bcc29c13fdace464254
generic

Bluetooth: RFCOMM: validate skb length in MCC handlers - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/3eabc6d47a0ad22b053329997aaf0ec1e581e392
generic

Bluetooth: RFCOMM: validate skb length in MCC handlers - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/23882b828c3c8c51d0c946446a396b10abb3b16b
generic

Bluetooth: RFCOMM: validate skb length in MCC handlers - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/1b070ac9e99c2c2c3a8112943ca98ab6fca7f10c
generic

Bluetooth: RFCOMM: validate skb length in MCC handlers - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/0d637136ce89f9a2309b2c3502402ce400dab0ef
generic

Bluetooth: RFCOMM: validate skb length in MCC handlers - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/08b9c1fbe78f4ad3f6250c6541cfaabdbeb81997

Patch Availability(6)

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Affected Packages

(5 across 4 ecosystems)
Debian:11(2)
PackageVulnerable rangeFixed inDependents
linux5.10.103-1 ... 7.2~rc5-1~exp1 (496 versions)
linux-6.16.1.106-3~deb11u1 ... 6.1.174-1~deb11u1 (20 versions)6.1.176-1~deb11u1
Debian:12(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFixed inDependents
linux6.1.106-1 ... 6.1.99-1 (53 versions)6.1.176-1
Debian:13(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFixed inDependents
linux6.12.38-1 ... 6.12.94-1~bpo12+1 (27 versions)6.12.94-1
Debian:14(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFixed inDependents
linux6.12.100-1 ... 7.0.9-1~bpo13+1 (145 versions)7.0.13-1

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Additional Vendor Advisories

(4)

Vendors that published advisories for this CVE beyond the curated set above. Broader coverage but minimal per-row detail — click through for the original advisory.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 15× in last 7d / 61× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 331 total refreshes for this CVE.

  1. 2026-09-18 19:28 UTCEPSS rescore
  2. 2026-09-18 07:29 UTCEG score recompute
  3. 2026-09-18 07:29 UTCVendor advisory
  4. 2026-09-18 07:28 UTCGHSA enrichment
  5. 2026-09-16 14:08 UTCEPSS rescore
  6. 2026-09-16 05:15 UTCEPSS rescore
  7. 2026-09-14 01:23 UTCEG score recompute
  8. 2026-09-14 01:23 UTCVendor advisory
  9. 2026-09-14 01:23 UTCGHSA enrichment
  10. 2026-09-13 16:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  11. 2026-09-13 09:40 UTCVendor advisory
  12. 2026-09-13 09:40 UTCGHSA enrichment
  13. 2026-09-12 15:53 UTCEG score recompute
  14. 2026-09-12 15:53 UTCVendor advisory
  15. 2026-09-12 15:53 UTCGHSA enrichment
  16. 2026-09-11 14:53 UTCEPSS rescore
  17. 2026-09-10 09:35 UTCEPSS rescore
  18. 2026-09-08 22:01 UTCEPSS rescore
  19. 2026-09-07 16:01 UTCEPSS rescore
  20. 2026-09-06 13:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  21. 2026-09-04 05:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  22. 2026-09-02 14:12 UTCEPSS rescore
  23. 2026-09-01 13:54 UTCEPSS rescore
  24. 2026-09-01 04:40 UTCEPSS rescore
  25. 2026-08-30 19:37 UTCEG score recompute
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-08-30 19:37 UTCVendor advisory
  2. 2026-08-30 19:37 UTCGHSA enrichment
  3. 2026-08-30 19:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  4. 2026-08-30 01:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-08-28 21:41 UTCEPSS rescore
  6. 2026-08-27 23:57 UTCEG score recompute
  7. 2026-08-27 23:57 UTCVendor advisory
  8. 2026-08-27 23:57 UTCGHSA enrichment
  9. 2026-08-27 14:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  10. 2026-08-26 14:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  11. 2026-08-25 13:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  12. 2026-08-25 00:14 UTCEG score recompute
  13. 2026-08-25 00:14 UTCVendor advisory
  14. 2026-08-25 00:14 UTCGHSA enrichment
  15. 2026-08-24 13:12 UTCEG score recompute
  16. 2026-08-24 13:12 UTCVendor advisory
  17. 2026-08-24 13:12 UTCGHSA enrichment
  18. 2026-08-23 20:30 UTCVendor advisory
  19. 2026-08-23 20:30 UTCGHSA enrichment
  20. 2026-08-23 09:28 UTCEG score recompute
  21. 2026-08-23 09:28 UTCVendor advisory
  22. 2026-08-23 09:28 UTCGHSA enrichment
  23. 2026-08-23 00:19 UTCEPSS rescore
  24. 2026-08-22 22:27 UTCVendor advisory
  25. 2026-08-22 22:27 UTCGHSA enrichment
  26. 2026-08-22 10:40 UTCEG score recompute
  27. 2026-08-22 10:40 UTCVendor advisory
  28. 2026-08-22 10:40 UTCGHSA enrichment
  29. 2026-08-21 23:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  30. 2026-08-21 17:26 UTCGHSA enrichment
  31. 2026-08-21 05:20 UTCEG score recompute
  32. 2026-08-21 05:20 UTCVendor advisory
  33. 2026-08-21 05:20 UTCGHSA enrichment
  34. 2026-08-20 22:55 UTCEPSS rescore
  35. 2026-08-20 18:14 UTCVendor advisory
  36. 2026-08-20 18:14 UTCGHSA enrichment
  37. 2026-08-20 07:06 UTCEG score recompute
  38. 2026-08-20 07:06 UTCVendor advisory
  39. 2026-08-20 07:05 UTCGHSA enrichment
  40. 2026-08-19 17:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  41. 2026-08-19 12:40 UTCVendor advisory
  42. 2026-08-19 12:40 UTCGHSA enrichment
  43. 2026-08-19 01:31 UTCEG score recompute
  44. 2026-08-19 01:31 UTCVendor advisory
  45. 2026-08-19 01:31 UTCGHSA enrichment
  46. 2026-08-18 13:48 UTCEPSS rescore
  47. 2026-08-17 13:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  48. 2026-08-17 12:53 UTCVendor advisory
  49. 2026-08-17 12:53 UTCGHSA enrichment
  50. 2026-08-17 01:51 UTCEG score recompute
  51. 2026-08-17 01:51 UTCVendor advisory
  52. 2026-08-17 01:51 UTCGHSA enrichment
  53. 2026-08-16 14:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  54. 2026-08-16 14:49 UTCVendor advisory
  55. 2026-08-16 14:49 UTCGHSA enrichment
  56. 2026-08-16 03:47 UTCEG score recompute
  57. 2026-08-16 03:47 UTCVendor advisory
  58. 2026-08-16 03:47 UTCGHSA enrichment
  59. 2026-08-16 02:14 UTCEPSS rescore
  60. 2026-08-15 16:45 UTCVendor advisory
  61. 2026-08-15 16:45 UTCGHSA enrichment
  62. 2026-08-15 05:43 UTCEG score recompute
  63. 2026-08-15 05:43 UTCVendor advisory
  64. 2026-08-15 05:43 UTCGHSA enrichment
  65. 2026-08-15 01:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  66. 2026-08-14 18:41 UTCVendor advisory
  67. 2026-08-14 18:41 UTCGHSA enrichment
  68. 2026-08-14 07:37 UTCEG score recompute
  69. 2026-08-14 07:37 UTCGHSA enrichment
  70. 2026-08-13 22:00 UTCEPSS rescore
  71. 2026-08-13 20:35 UTCVendor advisory
  72. 2026-08-13 20:35 UTCGHSA enrichment
  73. 2026-08-13 09:33 UTCVendor advisory
  74. 2026-08-13 09:33 UTCGHSA enrichment
  75. 2026-08-12 22:31 UTCEG score recompute

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-53254?
CVE-2026-53254 is a high vulnerability published on June 25, 2026. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: Bluetooth: RFCOMM: validate skb length in MCC handlers The RFCOMM MCC handlers cast skb->data to protocol-specific structs without validating skb->len first. A malicious remote device can send truncated MCC frames and trigger…
When was CVE-2026-53254 disclosed?
CVE-2026-53254 was first published in the National Vulnerability Database on June 25, 2026, with the most recent update on August 5, 2026. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
Is CVE-2026-53254 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-53254 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, which ranks it in the top 80.8% of all scored CVEs.
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-53254?
CVE-2026-53254 has a CVSS v4.0 base score of 8.1 (CNA self-assessment; NVD's own analysis pending).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-53254?
Patch to the fixed version published by the affected vendor. Where vendor advisories exist for CVE-2026-53254, EchelonGraph cross-links them in the Vendor Advisories panel below — those typically contain the canonical remediation steps, fixed version numbers, and any vendor-specific mitigations.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-53254

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-53254?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.