CVE-2026-53170

HIGHPre-NVD 8.88.8
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

“—” beside the score: it is equal to the CVSS score beside it.

Score 8.8 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: HIGH) published 2026-06-25. The CNA's CVSS baseline 8.8; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: the CNA's CVSS, EPSS, GitHub Security Advisory

Also known asEUVD-2026-39261 (ENISA EUVD) · GHSA-8pg6-rv6x-wjc2 (GitHub Security Advisories)Source: ENISA EUVD

8.8EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixRemediate within your standard update timelines (the SSVC decision on this page).
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0.2%CVSS: 8.8Exploit: None knownExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is available — apply it.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

accel/ethosu: reject DMA commands with uninitialized length

cmd_state_init() initializes the command state with memset(0xff), leaving dma->len at U64_MAX to signal missing setup. The only setter is NPU_SET_DMA0_LEN; if userspace omits this command and issues NPU_OP_DMA_START, dma->len remains U64_MAX.

In dma_length(), a positive stride added to U64_MAX wraps to a small value. With size0 == 1, check_mul_overflow() does not trigger and dma_length() returns 0 instead of U64_MAX. The caller's U64_MAX check then passes, region_size[] stays 0, and the bounds check in ethosu_job.c is bypassed, allowing hardware to execute DMA with stale physical addresses.

Fix by checking for U64_MAX at the start of dma_length() before any arithmetic, consistent with the sentinel value used throughout the driver to detect uninitialized fields.

CVSS v3
8.8
EG Score
8.8HIGHmedium confidence
EG Risk
40
EG Risk 40/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity88% × 45%
Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 8.8 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.
Exploitation0.2% × 40%
FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.
Automatability0% × 15%
CISA's BOD 26-04 default: no one has published Automatable for this CVE, and CISA treats it as “no” for a CVE not in KEV.
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).
Exploitation none (no CISA value, KEV listing or exploit code on record) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). EchelonGraph holds no SSVC assessment of this CVE from CISA: none of these inputs is from Vulnrichment. EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.
EPSS PROB
0.2%
EPSS %ILE
7th
KEV
Not listed

What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)

The EG score (8.8): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 8.8 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.

EG Severity
8.8 HIGHCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
EG Likelihood
0.2% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-11-12). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
Confirmed exploitation
None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
EG Priority
SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).CISA BOD 26-04: 14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).

A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.

Exploitation none (no CISA value, KEV listing or exploit code on record) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). EchelonGraph holds no SSVC assessment of this CVE from CISA: none of these inputs is from Vulnrichment. EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.

The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). Where an input reads “CISA's BOD 26-04 default”, no one has published it for this CVE, and CISA's implementation guidance says: “If “Automatable” and “Technical Impact” information items about a CVE ID are not available and the CVE ID is not in the KEV Catalog, CISA will treat its values as “no” and “total,” respectively, until CISA or a third party provides metadata about the CVE ID. CISA will always provide the Vulnrichment data for a CVE ID listed in the KEV Catalog.” Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

June 25, 2026

Last Modified

August 5, 2026

Advisory Details (2)

Auto-updated Jun 28, 2026
Patch available.
Web page

accel/ethosu: reject DMA commands with uninitialized length - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/fb25c76a820ca8a547aa478bfb503da0a11494ab
Web page

accel/ethosu: reject DMA commands with uninitialized length - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/d9d021218162b6c4fe0bdf42b2b340f1aae23a12

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-53170(1)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Patch Availability(12)

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Affected Packages

(1 across 1 ecosystem)
Debian:14(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.12.100-1 ... 7.0.9-1~bpo13+1 (146 versions)
  • every version up to 7.0.13-1: fixed in 7.0.13-1
—

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

All Vendor Advisories

(11)

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 8× in last 7d / 34× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed its CVE.org record (CNA or CISA ADP). An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). "EchelonGraph re-scored" is our own recompute of this CVE's score, not an update from a source, and is not counted in the refreshes above. Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 297 rows on record for this CVE.

A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. None are among the latest 100 rows. The 197 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.

  1. 2026-11-13 16:53 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  2. 2026-11-12 19:58 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  3. 2026-11-12 19:58 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-8pg6-rv6x-wjc2 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  4. 2026-11-12 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  5. 2026-11-11 16:40 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  6. 2026-11-10 16:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  7. 2026-11-09 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  8. 2026-11-08 16:39 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  9. 2026-11-07 16:39 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  10. 2026-11-06 16:38 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  11. 2026-11-06 05:47 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  12. 2026-11-06 05:47 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-8pg6-rv6x-wjc2 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  13. 2026-11-05 16:38 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  14. 2026-11-04 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  15. 2026-11-03 16:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  16. 2026-11-02 16:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  17. 2026-10-31 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  18. 2026-10-30 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  19. 2026-10-30 15:37 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  20. 2026-10-30 15:37 UTCVendor advisory
  21. 2026-10-30 15:37 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-8pg6-rv6x-wjc2 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  22. 2026-10-29 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  23. 2026-10-28 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  24. 2026-10-27 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  25. 2026-10-25 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-10-25 14:20 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  2. 2026-10-24 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  3. 2026-10-24 01:26 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  4. 2026-10-24 01:26 UTCVendor advisory
  5. 2026-10-24 01:26 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-8pg6-rv6x-wjc2 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  6. 2026-10-23 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  7. 2026-10-22 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  8. 2026-10-21 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  9. 2026-10-20 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  10. 2026-10-18 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  11. 2026-10-18 03:32 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  12. 2026-10-17 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  13. 2026-10-17 11:15 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  14. 2026-10-17 11:15 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-8pg6-rv6x-wjc2 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  15. 2026-10-16 16:42 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  16. 2026-10-15 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  17. 2026-10-14 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  18. 2026-10-14 01:24 UTCOSV refresh
  19. 2026-10-13 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  20. 2026-10-12 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  21. 2026-10-12 15:57 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  22. 2026-10-11 19:41 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  23. 2026-10-11 16:55 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  24. 2026-10-11 14:19 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  25. 2026-10-10 20:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  26. 2026-10-09 20:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  27. 2026-10-08 17:12 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  28. 2026-10-07 23:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  29. 2026-10-06 15:18 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  30. 2026-10-05 17:43 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  31. 2026-10-04 23:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  32. 2026-10-03 14:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  33. 2026-10-02 17:56 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  34. 2026-10-01 19:50 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  35. 2026-09-30 15:03 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  36. 2026-09-29 15:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  37. 2026-09-28 13:51 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  38. 2026-09-27 13:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  39. 2026-09-26 15:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  40. 2026-09-26 00:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  41. 2026-09-23 17:53 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  42. 2026-09-23 09:43 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  43. 2026-09-23 09:43 UTCVendor advisory
  44. 2026-09-23 09:43 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-8pg6-rv6x-wjc2 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  45. 2026-09-20 20:16 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  46. 2026-09-18 19:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  47. 2026-09-18 07:39 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  48. 2026-09-18 07:39 UTCVendor advisory
  49. 2026-09-18 07:39 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-8pg6-rv6x-wjc2 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  50. 2026-09-16 14:08 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  51. 2026-09-16 05:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  52. 2026-09-14 01:27 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  53. 2026-09-14 01:27 UTCVendor advisory
  54. 2026-09-14 01:26 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-8pg6-rv6x-wjc2 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  55. 2026-09-13 16:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  56. 2026-09-13 09:44 UTCVendor advisory
  57. 2026-09-13 09:44 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-8pg6-rv6x-wjc2 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  58. 2026-09-12 15:59 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  59. 2026-09-12 15:59 UTCVendor advisory
  60. 2026-09-12 15:59 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-8pg6-rv6x-wjc2 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  61. 2026-09-11 14:53 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  62. 2026-09-10 09:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  63. 2026-09-08 22:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  64. 2026-09-07 16:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  65. 2026-09-06 13:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  66. 2026-09-04 05:06 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  67. 2026-09-02 14:12 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  68. 2026-09-01 13:54 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  69. 2026-08-30 19:41 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  70. 2026-08-30 19:41 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-8pg6-rv6x-wjc2 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  71. 2026-08-30 19:17 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  72. 2026-08-30 01:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  73. 2026-08-28 21:41 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  74. 2026-08-28 02:55 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  75. 2026-08-28 02:55 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-8pg6-rv6x-wjc2 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-53170?
CVE-2026-53170 is a high-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on June 25, 2026. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: accel/ethosu: reject DMA commands with uninitialized length cmd_state_init() initializes the command state with memset(0xff), leaving dma->len at U64_MAX to signal missing setup. The only setter is NPU_SET_DMA0_LEN; if userspace…
When was the CVE record for CVE-2026-53170 published?
The CVE record for CVE-2026-53170 was published on June 25, 2026. That is the record's publication date; the vulnerability itself may have been made public earlier. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of August 5, 2026; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2026-53170 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-53170 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0.2% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (7th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-53170?
CVE-2026-53170 has a CVSS base score of 8.8 (the CNA's own assessment, by linux; NVD's own analysis pending).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-53170?
A fix for CVE-2026-53170 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2026-53170 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-53170

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-53170?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.