CVE-2026-52947

HIGHPre-NVD 7.87.8
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

Score 7.8 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: HIGH) published 2026-06-24. the CNA's CVSS baseline 7.8; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: cna:linux, epss, ghsa
Trending — Patch released this week
7.8EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixSerious severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet.
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0%CVSS: 7.8Exploit: None knownExposed: 0

A fix is available — apply it.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

net: qrtr: fix refcount saturation and potential UAF in qrtr_port_remove

In qrtr_port_remove(), the socket reference count is decremented via __sock_put() before the port is removed from the qrtr_ports XArray and before the RCU grace period elapses.

This breaks the fundamental RCU update paradigm. It exposes a race window where a concurrent RCU reader (such as qrtr_reset_ports() or qrtr_port_lookup()) can obtain a pointer to the socket from the XArray, and attempt to call sock_hold() on a socket whose reference count has already dropped to zero.

This exact race condition was hit during syzkaller fuzzing, leading to the following refcount saturation warning and a potential Use-After-Free:

refcount_t: saturated; leaking memory. WARNING: CPU: 3 PID: 1273 at lib/refcount.c:22 refcount_warn_saturate+0xae/0x1d0 Modules linked in: qrtr(+) bochs drm_shmem_helper ... Call Trace: qrtr_reset_ports net/qrtr/af_qrtr.c:768 [inline] [qrtr] __qrtr_bind.isra.0+0x48b/0x570 net/qrtr/af_qrtr.c:805 [qrtr] qrtr_bind+0x17d/0x210 net/qrtr/af_qrtr.c:901 [qrtr] kernel_bind+0xe4/0x120 net/socket.c:3592 qrtr_ns_init+0x1a6/0x380 net/qrtr/ns.c:715 [qrtr] qrtr_proto_init+0x3b/0xff0 net/qrtr/af_qrtr.c:169 [qrtr] do_one_initcall+0xf5/0x5e0 init/main.c:1283 ...

Fix this by deferring the reference count decrement until after the xa_erase() and the synchronize_rcu() complete.

(Note: The v1 of this patch incorrectly replaced __sock_put() with sock_put(). As Simon Horman pointed out, the callers of qrtr_port_remove() still hold a reference to the socket, so freeing the socket memory here would lead to a subsequent UAF in the caller. Thus, the __sock_put() is kept, but only repositioned to close the RCU race.)

CVSS v3
7.8
EG Score
7.8(medium)
EG Risk
40(Track)
EG Risk 40/100SSVC: Track

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed
Severity78% × 45%
Exploitation0% × 40%
Automatability30% × 15%
Action: Routine — remediate on your standard cadence.
EPSS PROB
0%
EPSS %ILE
3%
KEV
Not listed

Published

June 24, 2026

Last Modified

August 5, 2026

Advisory Details (8)

Auto-updated Jun 28, 2026
No patch confirmed yet.
generic

net: qrtr: fix refcount saturation and potential UAF in qrtr_port_remove - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/ab269990ed58143a92a263be1bee626d82ac03da
generic

net: qrtr: fix refcount saturation and potential UAF in qrtr_port_remove - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/a2171131ecda1ed61a594a1eb715e75fdad0fef5
generic

net: qrtr: fix refcount saturation and potential UAF in qrtr_port_remove - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/7de2d447072be3b1a76793f034432338fc9c494b
generic

net: qrtr: fix refcount saturation and potential UAF in qrtr_port_remove - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/474293d90880622fde9d2430fb0165767090f7b3
generic

net: qrtr: fix refcount saturation and potential UAF in qrtr_port_remove - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/3b20ec8f31e8a6a6782243f473b0abd3463621df
generic

net: qrtr: fix refcount saturation and potential UAF in qrtr_port_remove - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/2aa4c12723fe432e623462a3be42a197a128722b
generic

net: qrtr: fix refcount saturation and potential UAF in qrtr_port_remove - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/2047c2aa0963bb2872fd722300a15bcb441a4c00
generic

net: qrtr: fix refcount saturation and potential UAF in qrtr_port_remove - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/03bfa95e452e2b6ccd76a332060ae4feaf5ad84d

Patch Availability(8)

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Affected Packages

(5 across 4 ecosystems)
Debian:11(2)
PackageVulnerable rangeFixed inDependents
linux5.10.103-1 ... 5.10.92-2 (54 versions)5.10.259-1
linux-6.16.1.106-3~deb11u1 ... 6.1.174-1~deb11u1 (20 versions)6.1.176-1~deb11u1
Debian:12(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFixed inDependents
linux6.1.106-1 ... 6.1.99-1 (53 versions)6.1.176-1
Debian:13(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFixed inDependents
linux6.12.38-1 ... 6.12.94-1~bpo12+1 (27 versions)6.12.94-1
Debian:14(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFixed inDependents
linux6.12.100-1 ... 7.0.9-1~bpo13+1 (145 versions)7.0.13-1

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Additional Vendor Advisories

(5)

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 13× in last 7d / 57× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 302 total refreshes for this CVE.

  1. 2026-09-18 19:28 UTCEPSS rescore
  2. 2026-09-18 08:09 UTCEG score recompute
  3. 2026-09-18 08:09 UTCVendor advisory
  4. 2026-09-18 08:09 UTCGHSA enrichment
  5. 2026-09-16 14:08 UTCEPSS rescore
  6. 2026-09-16 05:15 UTCEPSS rescore
  7. 2026-09-14 01:57 UTCEG score recompute
  8. 2026-09-14 01:57 UTCVendor advisory
  9. 2026-09-14 01:57 UTCGHSA enrichment
  10. 2026-09-13 16:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  11. 2026-09-13 12:01 UTCEG score recompute
  12. 2026-09-13 12:01 UTCVendor advisory
  13. 2026-09-13 12:01 UTCGHSA enrichment
  14. 2026-09-11 14:53 UTCEPSS rescore
  15. 2026-09-10 09:35 UTCEPSS rescore
  16. 2026-09-08 22:01 UTCEPSS rescore
  17. 2026-09-07 16:01 UTCEPSS rescore
  18. 2026-09-06 13:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  19. 2026-09-04 05:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  20. 2026-09-02 14:12 UTCEPSS rescore
  21. 2026-09-01 13:54 UTCEPSS rescore
  22. 2026-08-30 20:19 UTCEG score recompute
  23. 2026-08-30 20:19 UTCVendor advisory
  24. 2026-08-30 20:19 UTCGHSA enrichment
  25. 2026-08-30 19:17 UTCEPSS rescore
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-08-30 01:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  2. 2026-08-28 21:41 UTCEPSS rescore
  3. 2026-08-28 04:49 UTCEG score recompute
  4. 2026-08-28 04:49 UTCVendor advisory
  5. 2026-08-28 04:49 UTCGHSA enrichment
  6. 2026-08-27 14:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  7. 2026-08-26 14:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  8. 2026-08-25 13:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  9. 2026-08-25 01:48 UTCEG score recompute
  10. 2026-08-25 01:48 UTCGHSA enrichment
  11. 2026-08-24 13:46 UTCEG score recompute
  12. 2026-08-24 13:46 UTCVendor advisory
  13. 2026-08-24 13:46 UTCGHSA enrichment
  14. 2026-08-24 01:27 UTCVendor advisory
  15. 2026-08-24 01:27 UTCGHSA enrichment
  16. 2026-08-23 13:27 UTCVendor advisory
  17. 2026-08-23 13:27 UTCGHSA enrichment
  18. 2026-08-23 01:10 UTCEG score recompute
  19. 2026-08-23 01:10 UTCVendor advisory
  20. 2026-08-23 01:10 UTCGHSA enrichment
  21. 2026-08-23 00:19 UTCEPSS rescore
  22. 2026-08-22 13:10 UTCEG score recompute
  23. 2026-08-22 13:10 UTCVendor advisory
  24. 2026-08-22 13:10 UTCGHSA enrichment
  25. 2026-08-21 23:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  26. 2026-08-21 19:34 UTCGHSA enrichment
  27. 2026-08-21 07:34 UTCEG score recompute
  28. 2026-08-21 07:34 UTCVendor advisory
  29. 2026-08-21 07:34 UTCGHSA enrichment
  30. 2026-08-20 22:55 UTCEPSS rescore
  31. 2026-08-20 19:34 UTCVendor advisory
  32. 2026-08-20 19:34 UTCGHSA enrichment
  33. 2026-08-20 07:34 UTCEG score recompute
  34. 2026-08-20 07:34 UTCVendor advisory
  35. 2026-08-20 07:34 UTCGHSA enrichment
  36. 2026-08-19 17:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  37. 2026-08-19 14:16 UTCVendor advisory
  38. 2026-08-19 14:16 UTCGHSA enrichment
  39. 2026-08-19 02:16 UTCEG score recompute
  40. 2026-08-19 02:16 UTCVendor advisory
  41. 2026-08-19 02:16 UTCGHSA enrichment
  42. 2026-08-18 13:48 UTCEPSS rescore
  43. 2026-08-17 14:10 UTCEG score recompute
  44. 2026-08-17 14:10 UTCGHSA enrichment
  45. 2026-08-17 13:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  46. 2026-08-17 02:10 UTCEG score recompute
  47. 2026-08-17 02:10 UTCVendor advisory
  48. 2026-08-17 02:10 UTCGHSA enrichment
  49. 2026-08-16 14:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  50. 2026-08-16 14:10 UTCEG score recompute
  51. 2026-08-16 14:10 UTCVendor advisory
  52. 2026-08-16 14:10 UTCGHSA enrichment
  53. 2026-08-16 02:14 UTCEPSS rescore
  54. 2026-08-16 02:10 UTCVendor advisory
  55. 2026-08-16 02:10 UTCGHSA enrichment
  56. 2026-08-15 14:10 UTCVendor advisory
  57. 2026-08-15 14:10 UTCGHSA enrichment
  58. 2026-08-15 02:09 UTCEG score recompute
  59. 2026-08-15 02:09 UTCVendor advisory
  60. 2026-08-15 02:09 UTCGHSA enrichment
  61. 2026-08-15 01:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  62. 2026-08-14 14:09 UTCVendor advisory
  63. 2026-08-14 14:09 UTCGHSA enrichment
  64. 2026-08-14 02:08 UTCEG score recompute
  65. 2026-08-14 02:08 UTCVendor advisory
  66. 2026-08-14 02:08 UTCGHSA enrichment
  67. 2026-08-13 22:00 UTCEPSS rescore
  68. 2026-08-13 14:08 UTCVendor advisory
  69. 2026-08-13 14:08 UTCGHSA enrichment
  70. 2026-08-13 02:05 UTCGHSA enrichment
  71. 2026-08-12 14:05 UTCEG score recompute
  72. 2026-08-12 14:05 UTCVendor advisory
  73. 2026-08-12 14:05 UTCGHSA enrichment
  74. 2026-08-12 13:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  75. 2026-08-12 02:00 UTCVendor advisory

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-52947?
CVE-2026-52947 is a high vulnerability published on June 24, 2026. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: net: qrtr: fix refcount saturation and potential UAF in qrtrportremove In qrtrportremove(), the socket reference count is decremented via sockput() before the port is removed from the qrtrports XArray and before the RCU grace…
When was CVE-2026-52947 disclosed?
CVE-2026-52947 was first published in the National Vulnerability Database on June 24, 2026, with the most recent update on August 5, 2026. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
Is CVE-2026-52947 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-52947 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, which ranks it in the top 96.7% of all scored CVEs.
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-52947?
CVE-2026-52947 has a CVSS v4.0 base score of 7.8 (CNA self-assessment; NVD's own analysis pending).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-52947?
Patch to the fixed version published by the affected vendor. Where vendor advisories exist for CVE-2026-52947, EchelonGraph cross-links them in the Vendor Advisories panel below — those typically contain the canonical remediation steps, fixed version numbers, and any vendor-specific mitigations.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-52947

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-52947?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.