CVE-2026-50237

HIGHPre-NVD 7.47.4
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

“—” beside the score: it is equal to the CVSS score beside it.

Score 7.4 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: HIGH) published 2026-08-11. A secondary CVSS source baseline 7.4; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: EPSS, GitHub Security Advisory, a secondary CVSS source

Also known asEUVD-2026-56132 (ENISA EUVD) · GHSA-5mvj-m7fw-m49w (GitHub Security Advisories)Source: ENISA EUVD

7.4EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixRemediate within your standard update timelines (the SSVC decision on this page).
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0.5%CVSS: 7.4Exploit: None knownExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is available — apply it.

A Server-Side Request Forgery and supply chain flaw was found in the OpenShift Console Helm catalog proxy. A namespace tenant can plant a ProjectHelmChartRepository with an arbitrary URL that the console pod fetches server-side, bypassing tenant egress restrictions. Combined with catalog metadata poisoning and admin-mediated chart installation, this enables privilege escalation.

CVSS v3
7.4
EG Score
7.4HIGHmedium confidence
EG Risk
33
EG Risk 33/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity74% × 45%
Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 7.4 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.
Exploitation0.5% × 40%
FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.
Automatability0% × 15%
CISA's SSVC Automatable value: no (Vulnrichment).
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at every mission impact level.
Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.
EPSS PROB
0.5%
EPSS %ILE
41st
KEV
Not listed

What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)

The EG score (7.4): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 7.4 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.

EG Severity
7.4 HIGHCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
EG Likelihood
0.5% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-11-06). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
Confirmed exploitation
None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
EG Priority
SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at every mission impact level.CISA BOD 26-04: 60 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at every mission impact level.

A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.

Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)60 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.

The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

August 11, 2026

Last Modified

October 24, 2026

Advisory Details (2)

Auto-updated Aug 11, 2026
Patch available. Sources: redhat.
Red Hat

2484746 – (CVE-2026-50237) CVE-2026-50237 openshift/console: Namespace tenant SSRF with egress bypass, catalog poisoning, and admin-mediated supply chain escalation via ProjectHelmChartRepository in OpenShift Console

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2484746
Red HatMentions a patch (unverified)

CVE-2026-50237 - Red Hat Customer Portal

Affected: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 or OpenShift Container Platform 4, is affected by this vulnerability and a fix may be released to a

https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-50237

Patch Availability(11)

Vendor / EcosystemFix (by version range) / PatchReleasedSource
redhatopenshift4/ose-console-rhel9:17876313822026-09-03redhat
redhatopenshift4/ose-console:17870564032026-08-26redhat
redhatopenshift4/ose-console:17870285592026-08-26redhat
redhatopenshift4/ose-console-rhel9:17870541592026-08-26redhat
redhatopenshift4/ose-console:17865115872026-08-20redhat
redhatopenshift4/ose-console:17864777602026-08-20redhat
redhatopenshift4/ose-console-rhel9:17865407762026-08-19redhat
redhatopenshift4/ose-console-rhel9:17864868222026-08-19redhat
redhatopenshift4/ose-console-rhel9:17865740432026-08-18redhat
redhatopenshift4/ose-console-rhel9:17866079152026-08-18redhat
redhatopenshift4/ose-console-rhel9:17865349312026-08-18redhat

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 9× in last 7d / 40× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed its CVE.org record (CNA or CISA ADP). An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). "EchelonGraph re-scored" is our own recompute of this CVE's score, not an update from a source, and is not counted in the refreshes above. Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 412 rows on record for this CVE.

A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. None are among the latest 100 rows. The 312 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.

  1. 2026-11-12 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 41st percentile
  2. 2026-11-11 16:40 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 41st percentile
  3. 2026-11-10 16:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 41st percentile
  4. 2026-11-09 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 41st percentile
  5. 2026-11-08 16:39 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 41st percentile
  6. 2026-11-07 16:39 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 41st percentile
  7. 2026-11-07 08:57 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  8. 2026-11-07 08:57 UTCVendor advisory
  9. 2026-11-07 08:57 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-5mvj-m7fw-m49w · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.4
  10. 2026-11-06 16:38 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 41st percentile
  11. 2026-11-05 16:38 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 41st percentile
  12. 2026-11-04 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 41st percentile
  13. 2026-11-03 16:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 40th percentile
  14. 2026-11-02 16:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 40th percentile
  15. 2026-11-01 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 40th percentile
  16. 2026-10-31 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 40th percentile
  17. 2026-10-31 12:43 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  18. 2026-10-31 12:43 UTCVendor advisory
  19. 2026-10-31 12:42 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-5mvj-m7fw-m49w · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.4
  20. 2026-10-30 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 40th percentile
  21. 2026-10-29 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 40th percentile
  22. 2026-10-28 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 40th percentile
  23. 2026-10-27 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 40th percentile
  24. 2026-10-26 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 40th percentile
  25. 2026-10-25 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 40th percentile
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-10-25 14:22 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  2. 2026-10-24 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 40th percentile
  3. 2026-10-24 16:27 UTCVendor advisory
  4. 2026-10-24 16:27 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-5mvj-m7fw-m49w · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.4
  5. 2026-10-23 19:30 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  6. 2026-10-23 19:30 UTCVendor advisory
  7. 2026-10-23 19:29 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-5mvj-m7fw-m49w · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.4
  8. 2026-10-23 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 39th percentile
  9. 2026-10-22 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 39th percentile
  10. 2026-10-21 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 39th percentile
  11. 2026-10-20 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 39th percentile
  12. 2026-10-19 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 39th percentile
  13. 2026-10-18 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 39th percentile
  14. 2026-10-18 03:33 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  15. 2026-10-17 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 39th percentile
  16. 2026-10-17 11:48 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  17. 2026-10-17 11:48 UTCVendor advisory
  18. 2026-10-17 11:48 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-5mvj-m7fw-m49w · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.4
  19. 2026-10-16 16:42 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 39th percentile
  20. 2026-10-15 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 39th percentile
  21. 2026-10-14 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 39th percentile
  22. 2026-10-13 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 39th percentile
  23. 2026-10-12 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 39th percentile
  24. 2026-10-12 15:59 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  25. 2026-10-11 19:42 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  26. 2026-10-11 16:57 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  27. 2026-10-11 14:21 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  28. 2026-10-11 13:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 39th percentile
  29. 2026-10-10 20:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 39th percentile
  30. 2026-10-09 20:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 39th percentile
  31. 2026-10-08 17:12 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 38th percentile
  32. 2026-10-07 23:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 38th percentile
  33. 2026-10-07 05:32 UTCVendor advisory
  34. 2026-10-07 05:32 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-5mvj-m7fw-m49w · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.4
  35. 2026-10-06 18:00 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  36. 2026-10-06 18:00 UTCVendor advisory
  37. 2026-10-06 18:00 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-5mvj-m7fw-m49w · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.4
  38. 2026-10-06 15:18 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 38th percentile
  39. 2026-10-05 18:08 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  40. 2026-10-05 18:08 UTCVendor advisory
  41. 2026-10-05 18:08 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-5mvj-m7fw-m49w · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.4
  42. 2026-10-05 17:43 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 38th percentile
  43. 2026-10-04 23:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 38th percentile
  44. 2026-10-04 22:47 UTCVendor advisory
  45. 2026-10-04 22:47 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-5mvj-m7fw-m49w · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.4
  46. 2026-10-04 09:15 UTCVendor advisory
  47. 2026-10-04 09:15 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-5mvj-m7fw-m49w · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.4
  48. 2026-10-03 21:27 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  49. 2026-10-03 21:27 UTCVendor advisory
  50. 2026-10-03 21:27 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-5mvj-m7fw-m49w · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.4
  51. 2026-10-03 14:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 38th percentile
  52. 2026-10-02 22:27 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  53. 2026-10-02 22:27 UTCVendor advisory
  54. 2026-10-02 22:27 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-5mvj-m7fw-m49w · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.4
  55. 2026-10-02 17:56 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 38th percentile
  56. 2026-10-02 08:45 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  57. 2026-10-02 08:45 UTCVendor advisory
  58. 2026-10-02 08:45 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-5mvj-m7fw-m49w · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.4
  59. 2026-10-01 19:50 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 38th percentile
  60. 2026-10-01 10:00 UTCVendor advisory
  61. 2026-10-01 10:00 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-5mvj-m7fw-m49w · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.4
  62. 2026-09-30 22:20 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  63. 2026-09-30 22:20 UTCVendor advisory
  64. 2026-09-30 22:20 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-5mvj-m7fw-m49w · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.4
  65. 2026-09-30 15:03 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 38th percentile
  66. 2026-09-29 05:16 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  67. 2026-09-29 05:16 UTCVendor advisory
  68. 2026-09-29 05:16 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-5mvj-m7fw-m49w · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.4
  69. 2026-09-28 13:58 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  70. 2026-09-28 13:58 UTCVendor advisory
  71. 2026-09-28 13:58 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-5mvj-m7fw-m49w · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.4
  72. 2026-09-28 13:51 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 38th percentile
  73. 2026-09-28 02:20 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  74. 2026-09-28 02:20 UTCVendor advisory
  75. 2026-09-28 02:20 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-5mvj-m7fw-m49w · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.4

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-50237?
CVE-2026-50237 is a high-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on August 11, 2026. A Server-Side Request Forgery and supply chain flaw was found in the OpenShift Console Helm catalog proxy. A namespace tenant can plant a ProjectHelmChartRepository with an arbitrary URL that the console pod fetches server-side, bypassing tenant egress restrictions. Combined with catalog metadata…
When was CVE-2026-50237 made public?
CVE-2026-50237 was made public on August 11, 2026: that is the date its CVE record's CNA, Red Hat, Inc., gives for when the vulnerability was made public. The CVE record itself was published on August 11, 2026. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of October 24, 2026; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2026-50237 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-50237 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0.5% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (41st percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-50237?
CVE-2026-50237 has a CVSS base score of 7.4 (a secondary CVSS source that NVD displays; NVD's own analysis pending).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-50237?
A fix for CVE-2026-50237 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2026-50237 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2026-50237

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-50237?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.