CVE-2026-46350

CRITICALPre-NVD 9.19.1
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

“—” beside the score: it is equal to the CVSS score beside it.

This critical-severity CVE scores 9.1 under a secondary CVSS source (NVD's own analysis pending). EPSS exploit probability: 0.6% (49th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs). No GitHub Security Advisory CVSS is on record for this CVE.

Triggered by: Headline CVSS from a secondary CVSS source
Sources: EPSS, a secondary CVSS source

Also known asEUVD-2026-117784 (ENISA EUVD) · GHSA-px68-xx5g-48q5 (GitHub Security Advisories)Source: ENISA EUVD

9.1EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixRemediate within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high (the SSVC decision on this page).
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0.6%CVSS: 9.1Exploit: None knownExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is available — apply it.

dcmjs is a JavaScript implementation of DICOM manipulation. Prior to 0.52.0, the DecimalString and IntegerString implementations in src/ValueRepresentation.js sanitize text with a permissive regular expression and pass the result to JavaScript's Number constructor without validating finiteness or the DICOM value-representation rules. Scientific notation overflow in a DS or IS field can produce positive or negative Infinity, while stripping alphabetic characters from signed infinity text can leave a sign-only string that converts to NaN. IntegerString also accepts exponent notation and values outside the DICOM signed 32-bit IS range. Applications that trust these parsed values can propagate invalid numbers into spatial geometry, display windowing, dose scaling, frame counts, rescaling, or volume reconstruction, causing incorrect calculations or disrupted processing. This issue is fixed in version 0.52.0.

CVSS v3
9.1
EG Score
9.1CRITICALmedium confidence
EG Risk
56
EG Risk 56/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity91% × 45%
Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 9.1 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.
Exploitation0.6% × 40%
FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.
Automatability100% × 15%
CISA's SSVC Automatable value: yes (Vulnrichment).
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).
Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.
EPSS PROB
0.6%
EPSS %ILE
49th
KEV
Not listed

What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)

The EG score (9.1): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 9.1 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.

EG Severity
9.1 CRITICALCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.a secondary CVSS source · CVSS v3.0 or v3.1
EG Likelihood
0.6% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-11-12). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
Confirmed exploitation
None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
EG Priority
SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).CISA BOD 26-04: 14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; 60 days if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).

A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.

Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; 60 days if it is not.

The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

October 27, 2026

Last Modified

November 12, 2026

Advisory Details (4)

Auto-updated Nov 5, 2026
Patch available. Sources: github, github_commit, github_pr, github_release.
GitHub release Patch Available

v0.52.0

Patch available: dcmjs-org/dcmjs v0.52.0

https://github.com/dcmjs-org/dcmjs/releases/tag/v0.52.0
GitHub commit Patch Available

commit 81e7e11cdefb (dcmjs-org/dcmjs)

Patch available: dcmjs-org/dcmjs v0.52.0 (contains commit 81e7e11cdefb)

https://github.com/dcmjs-org/dcmjs/commit/81e7e11cdefb56aa1a65bfe259648b865583ff88
GitHub pull request Patch Available

feat: Switch to pnpm for build

Patch available: dcmjs-org/dcmjs v0.52.0 (PR #497 merged 2026-05-19)

https://github.com/dcmjs-org/dcmjs/pull/497
GitHub advisoryMentions a patch (unverified)

DS/IS VALUE REPRESENTATION INPUT VALIDATION BYPASS · Advisory · dcmjs-org/dcmjs · GitHub

Affected: 0.52.0, released 2026-05-19)

https://github.com/dcmjs-org/dcmjs/security/advisories/GHSA-px68-xx5g-48q5

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-46350(1)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Patch Availability(1)

Vendor / EcosystemFix (by version range) / PatchReleasedSource
npmdcmjs @ 0.52.0 (fixes < 0.52.0)—ghsa

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Affected Packages

(1 across 1 ecosystem)
npm(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
dcmjs—
  • every version up to 0.52.0: fixed in 0.52.0
—

Weakness Classification(2)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 17× in last 7d / 22× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed its CVE.org record (CNA or CISA ADP). An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). "EchelonGraph re-scored" is our own recompute of this CVE's score, not an update from a source, and is not counted in the refreshes above. Most recent first.

  1. 2026-11-13 16:52 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 49th percentile
  2. 2026-11-12 22:28 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  3. 2026-11-12 22:28 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-px68-xx5g-48q5 · GitHub severity LOW
  4. 2026-11-12 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
  5. 2026-11-12 14:28 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  6. 2026-11-12 14:28 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-px68-xx5g-48q5 · GitHub severity LOW
  7. 2026-11-11 16:39 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
  8. 2026-11-11 15:47 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-px68-xx5g-48q5 · GitHub severity LOW
  9. 2026-11-10 17:07 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  10. 2026-11-10 17:07 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-px68-xx5g-48q5 · GitHub severity LOW
  11. 2026-11-10 16:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
  12. 2026-11-09 18:27 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  13. 2026-11-09 18:27 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-px68-xx5g-48q5 · GitHub severity LOW
  14. 2026-11-09 17:45 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  15. 2026-11-09 17:45 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-px68-xx5g-48q5 · GitHub severity LOW
  16. 2026-11-09 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
  17. 2026-11-09 16:11 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-px68-xx5g-48q5 · GitHub severity LOW
  18. 2026-11-08 17:28 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  19. 2026-11-08 17:28 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-px68-xx5g-48q5 · GitHub severity LOW
  20. 2026-11-08 16:39 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
  21. 2026-11-07 18:48 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  22. 2026-11-07 18:48 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-px68-xx5g-48q5 · GitHub severity LOW
  23. 2026-11-07 16:39 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
  24. 2026-11-06 20:08 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  25. 2026-11-06 20:08 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-px68-xx5g-48q5 · GitHub severity LOW
Show 8 more
  1. 2026-11-06 16:38 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
  2. 2026-11-05 21:27 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  3. 2026-11-05 21:27 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-px68-xx5g-48q5 · GitHub severity LOW
  4. 2026-11-05 20:23 UTCEchelonGraph re-scoredFirst assessed: 9.1 CRITICAL
  5. 2026-11-05 20:23 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-px68-xx5g-48q5 · GitHub severity LOW
  6. 2026-11-05 20:22 UTCMITRE cvelistV5CVSS v3 → 9.1 · severity → CRITICAL
  7. 2026-11-01 07:48 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-px68-xx5g-48q5 · GitHub severity LOW
  8. 2026-10-27 13:42 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-46350?
CVE-2026-46350 is a critical-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on October 27, 2026. dcmjs is a JavaScript implementation of DICOM manipulation. Prior to 0.52.0, the DecimalString and IntegerString implementations in src/ValueRepresentation.js sanitize text with a permissive regular expression and pass the result to JavaScript's Number constructor without validating finiteness or…
When was the CVE record for CVE-2026-46350 published?
The CVE record for CVE-2026-46350 was published on October 27, 2026. That is the record's publication date; the vulnerability itself may have been made public earlier. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of November 12, 2026; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2026-46350 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-46350 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0.6% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (49th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-46350?
CVE-2026-46350 has a CVSS base score of 9.1 (a secondary CVSS source that NVD displays; NVD's own analysis pending).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-46350?
A fix for CVE-2026-46350 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2026-46350 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-46350

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-46350?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.