CVE-2026-114349

MEDIUMPre-NVD 6.56.5
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

“—” beside the score: it is equal to the CVSS score beside it.

This medium-severity CVE scores 6.5 under CISA-ADP (Vulnrichment) CVSS v3.1 (NVD's own analysis pending). EPSS exploit probability: 0.5% (46th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs). No GitHub Security Advisory CVSS is on record for this CVE.

Triggered by: Headline CVSS from CISA-ADP (Vulnrichment) CVSS v3.1
Sources: CISA-ADP (Vulnrichment) CVSS v3.1, EPSS

Also known asEUVD-2026-112176 (ENISA EUVD) · GHSA-6rr8-5qq5-gq73 (GitHub Security Advisories)Source: ENISA EUVD

6.5EG
EchelonGraph verdictMonitorRemediate within your standard update timelines (the SSVC decision on this page).
  • Lower severity and no public exploit yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0.5%CVSS: 6.5Exploit: None knownExposed services: Not assessed

The CVE record names the fixed release — apply it.

When a broker decodes a compressed record batch, the per-record decoder reads a declared body size from the decompressed stream and allocates a buffer of that size before validating it against the bytes available or any configured limit. The size is attacker-controlled, and the batch CRC does not constrain it, so a small (around 90-byte), CRC-valid compressed produce request can declare a body size of up to about 2 GiB and force the broker to attempt that allocation, raising OutOfMemoryError. The record size limit (max.message.bytes), the request size limit, and client/broker quotas bound only the compressed wire size, not the declared decompressed size.

Impact:

An authenticated principal with Write on a topic can crash broker request-handler threads (reached when a batch's codec differs from the topic's compression.type and records are re-encoded) and any consumer that fetches the record, denying service. On brokers started with -XX:+ExitOnOutOfMemoryError, a common hardening, a single crafted request terminates the broker JVM. More seriously, a crafted record  is accepted at ingest and written to disk; when the log-cleaner later reads it on a compacted topic, the OutOfMemoryError (an Error, not an Exception) terminates the cleaner thread, which is not restarted. With the default of a single cleaner thread, log compaction then stops for the entire broker, including the internal __consumer_offsets and __transaction_state topics, and the condition persists across restarts until the offending record is removed. The impact is availability only; no data is disclosed or altered.

Mitigation:

Upgrade to Apache Kafka 4.2.2, 4.3.2, or 4.4.0, and set max.decompressed.message.bytes (at the broker and/or topic level) to a bounded value appropriate for your workload. Upgrading alone is not sufficient: for backward compatibility this configuration defaults to an effectively unlimited value (about 2 GiB), so a broker remains exposed until the limit is set. Choose a value at or slightly above the largest legitimate decompressed record your applications produce, and comfortably below the broker heap divided by the number of request-handler and cleaner threads. Until you can upgrade and configure the limit, restrict Write access to trusted producers; quotas and max.message.bytes do not mitigate this issue.

Resolution:

From Apache Kafka 4.2.2, 4.3.2, and 4.4.0: the broker validates a record's declared decompressed body size against max.decompressed.message.bytes before allocating, on the produce-validation, log-compaction, and timestamp-lookup paths, and rejects oversized or negative sizes with InvalidRecordException. Operators must set this configuration to a bounded value to be protected, as its default is effectively unlimited.

CVSS v3
6.5
EG Score
6.5MEDIUMmedium confidence
EG Risk
29
EG Risk 29/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity65% × 45%
Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 6.5 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.
Exploitation0.2% × 40%
FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.
Automatability0% × 15%
CISA's SSVC Automatable value: no (Vulnrichment).
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at every mission impact level.
Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: The CVE record names the fixed release. Apply it within your standard update timelines.
EPSS PROB
0.5%
EPSS %ILE
46th
KEV
Not listed

What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)

The EG score (6.5): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 6.5 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.

EG Severity
6.5 MEDIUMCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.CISA-ADP (Vulnrichment) CVSS v3.1 · CVSS v3.1
EG Likelihood
0.5% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS. FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
Confirmed exploitation
None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
EG Priority
SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at every mission impact level.CISA BOD 26-04: 60 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at every mission impact level.

The CVE record names the fixed release. Apply it within your standard update timelines.

Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)60 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.

The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

October 28, 2026

Last Modified

November 5, 2026

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-114349(1)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Weakness Classification(3)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 7× in last 7d / 31× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed its CVE.org record (CNA or CISA ADP). An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). "EchelonGraph re-scored" is our own recompute of this CVE's score, not an update from a source, and is not counted in the refreshes above. Most recent first.

  1. 2026-11-13 16:50 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 46th percentile
  2. 2026-11-12 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 46th percentile
  3. 2026-11-11 16:38 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 46th percentile
  4. 2026-11-10 16:42 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 46th percentile
  5. 2026-11-09 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 46th percentile
  6. 2026-11-08 16:38 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 46th percentile
  7. 2026-11-07 16:38 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 46th percentile
  8. 2026-11-06 16:36 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 46th percentile
  9. 2026-11-05 18:27 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-6rr8-5qq5-gq73
  10. 2026-11-05 17:34 UTCEchelonGraph re-scoredFirst assessed: 6.5 MEDIUM
  11. 2026-11-05 17:34 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-6rr8-5qq5-gq73
  12. 2026-11-05 17:33 UTCMITRE cvelistV5CVSS v3 → 6.5 · severity → MEDIUM
  13. 2026-11-05 16:36 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 16th percentile
  14. 2026-11-04 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 16th percentile
  15. 2026-11-03 16:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 16th percentile
  16. 2026-11-02 16:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 16th percentile
  17. 2026-11-01 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 16th percentile
  18. 2026-10-31 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 16th percentile
  19. 2026-10-30 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 16th percentile
  20. 2026-10-29 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 14th percentile
  21. 2026-10-29 15:46 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-6rr8-5qq5-gq73
  22. 2026-10-29 14:27 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-6rr8-5qq5-gq73
  23. 2026-10-29 13:27 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-6rr8-5qq5-gq73
  24. 2026-10-29 13:26 UTCNVD update
  25. 2026-10-29 13:09 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-6rr8-5qq5-gq73
Show 8 more
  1. 2026-10-29 13:08 UTCMITRE cvelistV5
  2. 2026-10-28 20:26 UTCNVD update
  3. 2026-10-28 20:19 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-6rr8-5qq5-gq73
  4. 2026-10-28 20:10 UTCMITRE cvelistV5
  5. 2026-10-28 17:26 UTCNVD update
  6. 2026-10-28 17:01 UTCENISA EUVD ID recordedEUVD-2026-112176 · Source: ENISA EUVD
  7. 2026-10-28 16:58 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  8. 2026-10-28 16:54 UTCMITRE cvelistV5first tracked

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-114349?
CVE-2026-114349 is a medium-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on October 28, 2026. When a broker decodes a compressed record batch, the per-record decoder reads a declared body size from the decompressed stream and allocates a buffer of that size before validating it against the bytes available or any configured limit. The size is attacker-controlled, and the batch CRC does not…
When was the CVE record for CVE-2026-114349 published?
The CVE record for CVE-2026-114349 was published on October 28, 2026. That is the record's publication date; the vulnerability itself may have been made public earlier. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of November 5, 2026; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2026-114349 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-114349 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0.5% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (46th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-114349?
CVE-2026-114349 has a CVSS v3.1 base score of 6.5 (CISA-ADP / Vulnrichment enrichment; NVD's own analysis pending).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-114349?
The CVE record for CVE-2026-114349 names the fix: "Mitigation: Upgrade to Apache Kafka 4.2.2, 4.3.2, or 4.4.0, and set max.decompressed.message.bytes (at the broker and/or topic level) to a bounded value appropriate for your workload." The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2026-114349 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2026-114349

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-114349?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.