CVE-2026-46116

HIGHPre-NVD 7.87.8
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

Score 7.8 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: HIGH) published 2026-05-28. a secondary CVSS source baseline 7.8; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: epss, ghsa, secondary
Trending — Patch released this week
7.8EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixSerious severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet.
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0%CVSS: 7.8Exploit: None knownExposed: 0

A fix is available — apply it.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

xfrm: defensively unhash xfrm_state lists in __xfrm_state_delete

KASAN reproduces a slab-use-after-free in __xfrm_state_delete()'s hlist_del_rcu calls under syzkaller load on linux-6.12.y stable (reproduced on 6.12.47, also reachable via the same code path on torvalds/master and on the ipsec tree). Nine unique signatures cluster in the xfrm_state lifecycle, the load-bearing one being:

BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in __hlist_del include/linux/list.h:990 [inline] BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in hlist_del_rcu include/linux/rculist.h:516 [inline] BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in __xfrm_state_delete net/xfrm/xfrm_state.c Write of size 8 at addr ffff8881198bcb70 by task kworker/u8:9/435

Workqueue: netns cleanup_net Call Trace: __hlist_del / hlist_del_rcu __xfrm_state_delete xfrm_state_delete xfrm_state_flush xfrm_state_fini ops_exit_list cleanup_net

The other observed signatures hit the same slab object from __xfrm_state_lookup, xfrm_alloc_spi, __xfrm_state_insert and an OOB write variant of __xfrm_state_delete, all on the byseq/byspi hash chains.

__xfrm_state_delete() guards its byseq and byspi unhashes with value-based predicates:

if (x->km.seq) hlist_del_rcu(&x->byseq); if (x->id.spi) hlist_del_rcu(&x->byspi);

while everywhere else in the file (e.g. state_cache, state_cache_input) the safer hlist_unhashed() check is used. xfrm_alloc_spi() sets x->id.spi = newspi inside xfrm_state_lock and then immediately inserts into byspi, but a path that observes x->id.spi != 0 outside of xfrm_state_lock can still skip-or-hit the byspi unhash inconsistently with whether x is actually on the list. The same holds for x->km.seq versus byseq, and the bydst/bysrc unhashes have no predicate at all, so a second __xfrm_state_delete() on the same object writes through LIST_POISON pprev.

The defensive change here:

  • Use hlist_del_init_rcu() instead of hlist_del_rcu() on bydst,
bysrc, byseq and byspi so a second deletion is a no-op rather than a write through LIST_POISON pprev. The byseq/byspi nodes are already initialised in xfrm_state_alloc().
  • Test hlist_unhashed() rather than the value predicate for
byseq/byspi, so the unhash decision tracks list state rather than mutable scalar fields.

Empirical verification: applied this patch on top of v6.12.47, rebuilt, and re-ran the same syzkaller harness for 1h16m on a previously-crashy configuration that produced ~100 hits each of slab-use-after-free Read in xfrm_alloc_spi / Read in __xfrm_state_lookup / Write in __xfrm_state_delete. After the patch, 7.1M execs across 32 VMs at ~1550 exec/sec produced zero xfrm_state UAF/OOB hits. /proc/slabinfo confirms the xfrm_state slab is actively allocated and freed during the run (~143 KiB resident), so the fuzzer is still exercising those code paths -- they just no longer crash.

Reproduction:

  • Linux 6.12.47 x86_64 + KASAN_GENERIC + KASAN_INLINE + KCOV
  • syzkaller @ 746545b8b1e4c3a128db8652b340d3df90ce61db
  • 32 QEMU/KVM VMs x 2 vCPU on AWS c5.metal bare metal
  • 9 unique signatures collected in ~9h, all within xfrm_state
lifecycle

CVSS v3
7.8
EG Score
7.8(medium)
EG Risk
40(Track)
EG Risk 40/100SSVC: Track

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed
Severity78% × 45%
Exploitation0% × 40%
Automatability30% × 15%
Action: Routine — remediate on your standard cadence.
EPSS PROB
0%
EPSS %ILE
3%
KEV
Not listed

Published

May 28, 2026

Last Modified

July 24, 2026

Advisory Details (5)

Auto-updated Jun 4, 2026
No patch confirmed yet.
generic

xfrm: defensively unhash xfrm_state lists in __xfrm_state_delete - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/b4a53add2fa8f1b5aa17d4c5686c320785fab182
generic

xfrm: defensively unhash xfrm_state lists in __xfrm_state_delete - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/a2e2d08fb070fab4947447171f1c4e3ca5a188e5
generic

xfrm: defensively unhash xfrm_state lists in __xfrm_state_delete - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/4980162de555cb838f1a189ce7d2cbf5d2e7b050
generic

xfrm: defensively unhash xfrm_state lists in __xfrm_state_delete - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/26edb0a3c99f9d958c212be68b21f1221614dcf0
generic

xfrm: defensively unhash xfrm_state lists in __xfrm_state_delete - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/14acf9652e5690de3c7486c6db5fb8dafd0a32a3

Patch Availability(9)

Vendor / EcosystemFixed in / PatchReleasedSource
redhatkernel-0:5.14.0-570.129.1.el9_62026-07-23redhat
redhatkernel-0:5.14.0-427.139.1.el9_42026-07-22redhat
redhatkernel-0:6.12.0-211.37.1.el10_22026-07-21redhat
redhatkernel-rt-0:3.10.0-1160.156.1.rt56.1308.el72026-07-17redhat
redhatkernel-0:3.10.0-1160.156.1.el72026-07-17redhat
redhatkernel-0:6.12.0-55.88.1.el10_02026-07-14redhat
redhatkernel-rt-0:4.18.0-553.144.1.rt7.485.el8_102026-07-14redhat
redhatkernel-0:4.18.0-553.144.1.el8_102026-07-14redhat
redhatkernel-0:5.14.0-687.22.1.el9_82026-07-06redhat

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Weakness Classification(2)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 15× in last 7d / 58× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 163 total refreshes for this CVE.

  1. 2026-07-27 09:49 UTCEG score recompute
  2. 2026-07-27 09:49 UTCVendor advisory
  3. 2026-07-27 09:49 UTCGHSA enrichment
  4. 2026-07-26 14:54 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-07-26 14:54 UTCEPSS rescore
  6. 2026-07-26 07:39 UTCEG score recompute
  7. 2026-07-26 07:39 UTCVendor advisory
  8. 2026-07-26 07:38 UTCGHSA enrichment
  9. 2026-07-25 14:18 UTCEPSS rescore
  10. 2026-07-24 14:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  11. 2026-07-23 14:18 UTCEPSS rescore
  12. 2026-07-23 03:16 UTCEG score recompute
  13. 2026-07-22 14:08 UTCEPSS rescore
  14. 2026-07-21 15:24 UTCEPSS rescore
  15. 2026-07-20 17:08 UTCEPSS rescore
  16. 2026-07-19 14:31 UTCEPSS rescore
  17. 2026-07-18 10:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  18. 2026-07-16 17:03 UTCEPSS rescore
  19. 2026-07-16 10:27 UTCVendor advisory
  20. 2026-07-16 10:27 UTCGHSA enrichment
  21. 2026-07-15 16:57 UTCEPSS rescore
  22. 2026-07-13 22:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  23. 2026-07-13 06:13 UTCEPSS rescore
  24. 2026-07-12 05:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  25. 2026-07-11 21:21 UTCVendor advisory
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-07-11 21:21 UTCGHSA enrichment
  2. 2026-07-11 08:27 UTCEPSS rescore
  3. 2026-07-09 19:10 UTCEPSS rescore
  4. 2026-07-08 18:35 UTCVendor advisory
  5. 2026-07-08 18:35 UTCGHSA enrichment
  6. 2026-07-08 15:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  7. 2026-07-07 13:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  8. 2026-07-06 16:27 UTCEPSS rescore
  9. 2026-07-06 02:23 UTCEPSS rescore
  10. 2026-07-05 02:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  11. 2026-07-02 14:24 UTCVendor advisory
  12. 2026-07-02 14:23 UTCGHSA enrichment
  13. 2026-07-01 15:12 UTCVendor advisory
  14. 2026-07-01 15:12 UTCGHSA enrichment
  15. 2026-07-01 15:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  16. 2026-07-01 03:16 UTCVendor advisory
  17. 2026-07-01 03:16 UTCGHSA enrichment
  18. 2026-06-30 23:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  19. 2026-06-30 02:09 UTCVendor advisory
  20. 2026-06-30 02:09 UTCGHSA enrichment
  21. 2026-06-29 14:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  22. 2026-06-29 14:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  23. 2026-06-29 13:46 UTCVendor advisory
  24. 2026-06-29 13:46 UTCGHSA enrichment
  25. 2026-06-28 18:40 UTCVendor advisory
  26. 2026-06-28 18:40 UTCGHSA enrichment
  27. 2026-06-28 14:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  28. 2026-06-28 06:38 UTCVendor advisory
  29. 2026-06-28 06:38 UTCGHSA enrichment
  30. 2026-06-28 04:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  31. 2026-06-28 04:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  32. 2026-06-27 18:20 UTCVendor advisory
  33. 2026-06-27 18:20 UTCGHSA enrichment
  34. 2026-06-27 05:30 UTCVendor advisory
  35. 2026-06-27 05:30 UTCGHSA enrichment
  36. 2026-06-27 03:08 UTCEPSS rescore
  37. 2026-06-26 16:54 UTCVendor advisory
  38. 2026-06-26 16:54 UTCGHSA enrichment
  39. 2026-06-25 22:48 UTCVendor advisory
  40. 2026-06-25 22:48 UTCGHSA enrichment
  41. 2026-06-25 13:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  42. 2026-06-25 11:03 UTCVendor advisory
  43. 2026-06-25 11:03 UTCGHSA enrichment
  44. 2026-06-24 22:53 UTCVendor advisory
  45. 2026-06-24 22:53 UTCGHSA enrichment
  46. 2026-06-24 14:05 UTCEPSS rescore
  47. 2026-06-23 21:33 UTCEPSS rescore
  48. 2026-06-23 21:33 UTCEPSS rescore
  49. 2026-06-22 14:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  50. 2026-06-22 14:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  51. 2026-06-21 14:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  52. 2026-06-21 14:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  53. 2026-06-21 01:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  54. 2026-06-21 01:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  55. 2026-06-19 19:26 UTCEPSS rescore
  56. 2026-06-19 19:26 UTCEPSS rescore
  57. 2026-06-17 21:18 UTCVendor advisory
  58. 2026-06-17 21:18 UTCGHSA enrichment
  59. 2026-06-17 17:53 UTCEPSS rescore
  60. 2026-06-17 09:33 UTCGHSA enrichment
  61. 2026-06-16 21:18 UTCVendor advisory
  62. 2026-06-16 21:18 UTCGHSA enrichment
  63. 2026-06-16 17:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  64. 2026-06-16 09:33 UTCVendor advisory
  65. 2026-06-16 09:33 UTCGHSA enrichment
  66. 2026-06-15 21:41 UTCVendor advisory
  67. 2026-06-15 21:40 UTCGHSA enrichment
  68. 2026-06-15 17:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  69. 2026-06-15 06:50 UTCVendor advisory
  70. 2026-06-15 06:50 UTCGHSA enrichment
  71. 2026-06-14 19:05 UTCVendor advisory
  72. 2026-06-14 19:05 UTCGHSA enrichment
  73. 2026-06-14 07:20 UTCVendor advisory
  74. 2026-06-14 07:20 UTCGHSA enrichment
  75. 2026-06-13 23:00 UTCEPSS rescore

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-46116?
CVE-2026-46116 is a high vulnerability published on May 28, 2026. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: xfrm: defensively unhash xfrmstate lists in xfrmstate_delete KASAN reproduces a slab-use-after-free in xfrmstatedelete()'s hlistdelrcu calls under syzkaller load on linux-6.12.y stable (reproduced on 6.12.47, also reachable via the…
When was CVE-2026-46116 disclosed?
CVE-2026-46116 was first published in the National Vulnerability Database on May 28, 2026, with the most recent update on July 24, 2026. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
Is CVE-2026-46116 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-46116 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, which ranks it in the top 97.0% of all scored CVEs.
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-46116?
CVE-2026-46116 has a CVSS v3 base score of 7.8 (NVD).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-46116?
Patch to the fixed version published by the affected vendor. Where vendor advisories exist for CVE-2026-46116, EchelonGraph cross-links them in the Vendor Advisories panel below — those typically contain the canonical remediation steps, fixed version numbers, and any vendor-specific mitigations.

Dependency Blast Radius

Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2026-46116

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-46116?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.