CVE-2026-40898

HIGHNVD 7.57.5
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

“—” beside the score: it is equal to NVD's CVSS score.

This high-severity CVE scores 7.5 under NVD CVSS v3. EPSS exploit probability: 0.4% (34th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs). GitHub Security Advisory CVSS 5.3 is lower than this score; a lower GitHub score revises it only when its advisory is newer than the CVE record's last change, and this advisory (published 2026-06-03) is not newer than that change (2026-07-22), so it does not.

Triggered by: Headline CVSS from NVD CVSS v3
Sources: EPSS, GitHub Security Advisory, NVD CVSS v3

Also known asEUVD-2026-34312 (ENISA EUVD) · GHSA-vvgj-x9jq-8cj9 (GitHub Security Advisories) · GO-2026-5676 (OSV.dev)Source: ENISA EUVD

7.5EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixRemediate within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high (the SSVC decision on this page).
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0.4%CVSS: 7.5Exploit: None knownExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is available — apply it.

quic-go is an implementation of the QUIC protocol in Go. Prior to version 0.59.1, an attacker can cause excessive memory allocation in quic-go's HTTP/3 client and server implementations by sending a QPACK-encoded HEADERS frame that decodes into a large trailer field section with many unique field names and/or large values. The implementation builds an http.Header for the corresponding http.Request or http.Response, while only enforcing limits on the size of the QPACK-compressed HEADERS frame, not on the decoded field section. This can lead to memory exhaustion. This is very similar to CVE-2025-64702. The difference is that this issue uses HTTP trailers, rather than HTTP headers, as the attack vector. A misbehaving or malicious peer can cause a denial-of-service (DoS) attack against quic-go's HTTP/3 servers or clients by triggering excessive memory allocation, potentially leading to crashes or resource exhaustion. This affects both servers and clients due to symmetric header construction. Version 0.59.1 enforces RFC 9114 decoded field section size limits for trailers as well. It incrementally decodes QPACK entries and checks the field section size after each entry, aborting the stream if an entry causes the limit to be exceeded.

CVSS v3
7.5
EG Score
7.5HIGHmedium confidence
EG Risk
49
EG Risk 49/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity75% × 45%
Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 7.5 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.
Exploitation0.4% × 40%
FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.
Automatability100% × 15%
CISA's SSVC Automatable value: yes (Vulnrichment).
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).
Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.
EPSS PROB
0.4%
EPSS %ILE
34th
KEV
Not listed

What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)

The EG score (7.5): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 7.5 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.

EG Severity
7.5 HIGHCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.NVD CVSS v3 · CVSS v3.0 or v3.1
EG Likelihood
0.4% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-11-11). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
Confirmed exploitation
None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
EG Priority
SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).CISA BOD 26-04: 14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; 60 days if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).

A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.

Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; 60 days if it is not.

The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

June 3, 2026

Last Modified

July 22, 2026

Advisory Details (2)

Auto-updated Jun 11, 2026
Patch available. Sources: github_release, github.
GitHub advisoryMentions a patch (unverified)

HTTP/3 QPACK Trailer Expansion Memory Exhaustion · Advisory · quic-go/quic-go · GitHub

https://github.com/quic-go/quic-go/security/advisories/GHSA-vvgj-x9jq-8cj9
GitHub release Patch Available

v0.59.1

Patch available: quic-go/quic-go v0.59.1

https://github.com/quic-go/quic-go/releases/tag/v0.59.1

Patch Availability(10)

Vendor / EcosystemFix (by version range) / PatchReleasedSource
redhatdevspaces/traefik-rhel9:17877567992026-09-01redhat
redhatcontainer-native-virtualization/kubevirt-apiserver-proxy-rhel9:17861257622026-08-11redhat
redhatansible-automation-platform-27/receptor-rhel9:17853894822026-08-04redhat
redhatreceptor-0:1.6.7-1.el9ap2026-08-04redhat
redhatansible-automation-platform-26/receptor-rhel9:17856321172026-08-04redhat
redhatcaddy-main-2.11.4-0.2.hum12026-07-15redhat
redhatrust-main-1.97.0-1.1.hum12026-07-11redhat
redhatcaddy-main-2.11.4-0.1.hum12026-06-11redhat
redhattrivy-main-0.69.3-1.2.hum12026-05-09redhat
gogithub.com/quic-go/quic-go @ 0.59.1 (fixes <= 0.59.0)—ghsa

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Affected Packages

(5 across 5 ecosystems)
Debian:11(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
golang-github-lucas-clemente-quic-go0.19.3-1 ... 0.59.0-2~bpo13+1 (30 versions)
  • every version on: no fix on record
—
Debian:12(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
golang-github-lucas-clemente-quic-go0.29.0-1 ... 0.59.0-2~bpo13+1 (23 versions)
  • every version on: no fix on record
—
Debian:13(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
golang-github-lucas-clemente-quic-go0.50.1-2 ... 0.59.0-2~bpo13+1 (9 versions)
  • every version on: no fix on record
—
Debian:14(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
golang-github-lucas-clemente-quic-go0.50.1-2 ... 0.59.0-2~bpo13+1 (9 versions)
  • every version on: no fix on record
—
Go(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
github.com/quic-go/quic-go—
  • every version up to 0.59.1: fixed in 0.59.1
—

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Additional Vendor Advisories

(2)

Vendors that published advisories for this CVE beyond the curated set above. Broader coverage but minimal per-row detail — click through for the original advisory.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 9× in last 7d / 38× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed its CVE.org record (CNA or CISA ADP). An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). "EchelonGraph re-scored" is our own recompute of this CVE's score, not an update from a source, and is not counted in the refreshes above. Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 259 rows on record for this CVE.

A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. None are among the latest 100 rows. The 159 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.

  1. 2026-11-13 16:52 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 34th percentile
  2. 2026-11-12 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 34th percentile
  3. 2026-11-12 05:17 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  4. 2026-11-12 05:17 UTCVendor advisory
  5. 2026-11-12 05:17 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-vvgj-x9jq-8cj9 · GitHub severity MODERATE · GitHub CVSS 5.3
  6. 2026-11-11 16:39 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 34th percentile
  7. 2026-11-10 16:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 34th percentile
  8. 2026-11-09 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 34th percentile
  9. 2026-11-08 16:39 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 34th percentile
  10. 2026-11-07 16:39 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 34th percentile
  11. 2026-11-06 16:37 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 33rd percentile
  12. 2026-11-05 19:41 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  13. 2026-11-05 19:41 UTCVendor advisory
  14. 2026-11-05 19:41 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-vvgj-x9jq-8cj9 · GitHub severity MODERATE · GitHub CVSS 5.3
  15. 2026-11-05 16:37 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 33rd percentile
  16. 2026-11-04 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 33rd percentile
  17. 2026-11-03 16:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 33rd percentile
  18. 2026-11-02 16:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 33rd percentile
  19. 2026-11-01 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 33rd percentile
  20. 2026-11-01 07:51 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-vvgj-x9jq-8cj9 · GitHub severity MODERATE · GitHub CVSS 5.3
  21. 2026-11-01 07:51 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  22. 2026-10-31 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 33rd percentile
  23. 2026-10-30 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 33rd percentile
  24. 2026-10-30 10:06 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  25. 2026-10-30 10:06 UTCVendor advisory
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-10-29 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 33rd percentile
  2. 2026-10-28 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 33rd percentile
  3. 2026-10-27 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 33rd percentile
  4. 2026-10-26 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 33rd percentile
  5. 2026-10-25 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 33rd percentile
  6. 2026-10-25 14:30 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  7. 2026-10-24 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 41st percentile
  8. 2026-10-24 00:29 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  9. 2026-10-24 00:29 UTCVendor advisory
  10. 2026-10-23 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 41st percentile
  11. 2026-10-22 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 41st percentile
  12. 2026-10-21 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 40th percentile
  13. 2026-10-20 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 40th percentile
  14. 2026-10-19 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 40th percentile
  15. 2026-10-18 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 40th percentile
  16. 2026-10-18 03:42 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  17. 2026-10-17 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 40th percentile
  18. 2026-10-17 14:45 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  19. 2026-10-17 14:45 UTCVendor advisory
  20. 2026-10-16 16:42 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 40th percentile
  21. 2026-10-15 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 40th percentile
  22. 2026-10-14 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 40th percentile
  23. 2026-10-13 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 40th percentile
  24. 2026-10-12 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 40th percentile
  25. 2026-10-12 16:09 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  26. 2026-10-11 19:51 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  27. 2026-10-11 17:04 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  28. 2026-10-11 14:31 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  29. 2026-10-11 13:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 40th percentile
  30. 2026-10-10 20:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 40th percentile
  31. 2026-10-09 20:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 40th percentile
  32. 2026-10-08 17:12 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 40th percentile
  33. 2026-10-07 23:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 40th percentile
  34. 2026-10-06 15:17 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 39th percentile
  35. 2026-10-05 17:43 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 39th percentile
  36. 2026-10-04 23:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 39th percentile
  37. 2026-10-03 14:25 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 39th percentile
  38. 2026-10-03 12:09 UTCOSV refresh
  39. 2026-10-01 19:50 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 39th percentile
  40. 2026-09-30 15:03 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 39th percentile
  41. 2026-09-27 13:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 39th percentile
  42. 2026-09-26 15:58 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 39th percentile
  43. 2026-09-23 17:53 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 33rd percentile
  44. 2026-09-20 20:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 33rd percentile
  45. 2026-09-18 19:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 33rd percentile
  46. 2026-09-17 19:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 33rd percentile
  47. 2026-09-16 14:08 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 33rd percentile
  48. 2026-09-16 05:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 33rd percentile
  49. 2026-09-15 03:11 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 33rd percentile
  50. 2026-09-14 05:29 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  51. 2026-09-14 05:29 UTCVendor advisory
  52. 2026-09-13 16:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 33rd percentile
  53. 2026-09-12 23:36 UTCOSV refresh
  54. 2026-09-12 15:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 33rd percentile
  55. 2026-09-11 14:53 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 33rd percentile
  56. 2026-09-11 09:37 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 33rd percentile
  57. 2026-09-10 09:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 33rd percentile
  58. 2026-09-08 22:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
  59. 2026-09-07 16:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
  60. 2026-09-06 13:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
  61. 2026-09-04 05:06 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
  62. 2026-09-02 14:12 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
  63. 2026-09-01 13:53 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
  64. 2026-09-01 04:39 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
  65. 2026-08-30 19:17 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
  66. 2026-08-30 01:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
  67. 2026-08-28 21:41 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
  68. 2026-08-27 14:25 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
  69. 2026-08-26 14:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
  70. 2026-08-25 13:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
  71. 2026-08-25 03:36 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  72. 2026-08-25 03:36 UTCVendor advisory
  73. 2026-08-24 01:13 UTCVendor advisory
  74. 2026-08-23 12:46 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  75. 2026-08-23 12:46 UTCVendor advisory

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-40898?
CVE-2026-40898 is a high-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on June 3, 2026. quic-go is an implementation of the QUIC protocol in Go. Prior to version 0.59.1, an attacker can cause excessive memory allocation in quic-go's HTTP/3 client and server implementations by sending a QPACK-encoded HEADERS frame that decodes into a large trailer field section with many unique field…
When was the CVE record for CVE-2026-40898 published?
The CVE record for CVE-2026-40898 was published on June 3, 2026. That is the record's publication date; the vulnerability itself may have been made public earlier. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of July 22, 2026; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2026-40898 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-40898 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0.4% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (34th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-40898?
CVE-2026-40898 has a CVSS v3 base score of 7.5 (NVD).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-40898?
A fix for CVE-2026-40898 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2026-40898 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-40898

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-40898?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.