LibreChat is a ChatGPT clone with additional features. Versions 0.8.2-rc2 through 0.8.2 are vulnerable to a server-side request forgery (SSRF) attack when using agent actions or MCP. Although a previous SSRF vulnerability (https://github.com/danny-avila/LibreChat/security/advisories/GHSA-rgjq-4q58-m3q8) was reported and patched, the fix only introduced hostname validation. It does not verify whether DNS resolution results in a private IP address. As a result, an attacker can still bypass the protection and gain access to internal resources, such as an internal RAG API or cloud instance metadata endpoints. Version 0.8.3-rc1 contains a patch.
CVE-2026-31945
This high-severity CVE scores 7.7 under a secondary CVSS source (NVD's own analysis pending). EPSS exploit-prediction score not yet available (the EPSS model rescores nightly; freshly-published CVEs typically appear within 48 hours). GitHub Security Advisory data not yet ingested — confidence will rise once GHSA publishes (typical lag: hours to days for open-source ecosystem CVEs; never for infrastructure-only CVEs).
- High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
No vendor fix yet — apply a workaround or compensating control (WAF / firewall / segmentation) and watch for a patch.
- CVSS v3
- 7.7
- EG Score
- 7.7(low)
- EG Risk
- 39(Track)EG Risk 39/100SSVC: Track
EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).
How it’s computedSeverity77% × 45%Exploitation0% × 40%Automatability30% × 15%Action: Routine — remediate on your standard cadence. - EPSS PROB
- 0%
- EPSS %ILE
- 16%
- KEV
- Not listed
Published
March 27, 2026
Last Modified
June 17, 2026
References (2)
- security-advisories@githubhttps://github.com/danny-avila/LibreChat/security/advisories/GHSA-f92m-jpv7-55p2
- 134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0https://github.com/danny-avila/LibreChat/security/advisories/GHSA-f92m-jpv7-55p2
Weakness Classification(1)
MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 2× in last 7d / 2× in last 30d)
Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.
- 2026-07-28 15:36 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-27 14:19 UTCEG score recompute
Related CVEs(same CWE)
Same CWE
10 shownCWE-918
- CVE-2016-10927EG 10.0CRITICAL
- CVE-2016-10926EG 10.0CRITICAL
- CVE-2018-10511EG 10.0CRITICAL
- CVE-2018-1000124EG 10.0CRITICAL
- CVE-2017-11291EG 10.0EPSS p92CRITICAL
- CVE-2017-12905EG 10.0CRITICAL
- CVE-2017-8794EG 10.0CRITICAL
- CVE-2017-13667EG 9.9CRITICAL
- CVE-2017-17674EG 9.8CRITICAL
- CVE-2013-4864EG 9.8EPSS p93CRITICAL
Frequently asked(5)
What is CVE-2026-31945?
When was CVE-2026-31945 disclosed?
Is CVE-2026-31945 actively exploited?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-31945?
How do I remediate CVE-2026-31945?
Dependency Blast Radius
Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2026-31945
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-31945?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.