CVE-2026-31607

CRITICALPre-NVD 9.89.8
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

Score 9.8 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: CRITICAL) published 2026-04-24. a secondary CVSS source baseline 9.8; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: epss, ghsa, secondary
Trending — 3 sources updated this week
9.8EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixSerious severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet.
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0%CVSS: 9.8Exploit: None knownExposed: 0

A fix is available — apply it.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

usbip: validate number_of_packets in usbip_pack_ret_submit()

When a USB/IP client receives a RET_SUBMIT response, usbip_pack_ret_submit() unconditionally overwrites urb->number_of_packets from the network PDU. This value is subsequently used as the loop bound in usbip_recv_iso() and usbip_pad_iso() to iterate over urb->iso_frame_desc[], a flexible array whose size was fixed at URB allocation time based on the *original* number_of_packets from the CMD_SUBMIT.

A malicious USB/IP server can set number_of_packets in the response to a value larger than what was originally submitted, causing a heap out-of-bounds write when usbip_recv_iso() writes to urb->iso_frame_desc[i] beyond the allocated region.

KASAN confirmed this with kernel 7.0.0-rc5:

BUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in usbip_recv_iso+0x46a/0x640 Write of size 4 at addr ffff888106351d40 by task vhci_rx/69

The buggy address is located 0 bytes to the right of allocated 320-byte region [ffff888106351c00, ffff888106351d40)

The server side (stub_rx.c) and gadget side (vudc_rx.c) already validate number_of_packets in the CMD_SUBMIT path since commits c6688ef9f297 ("usbip: fix stub_rx: harden CMD_SUBMIT path to handle malicious input") and b78d830f0049 ("usbip: fix vudc_rx: harden CMD_SUBMIT path to handle malicious input"). The server side validates against USBIP_MAX_ISO_PACKETS because no URB exists yet at that point. On the client side we have the original URB, so we can use the tighter bound: the response must not exceed the original number_of_packets.

This mirrors the existing validation of actual_length against transfer_buffer_length in usbip_recv_xbuff(), which checks the response value against the original allocation size.

Kelvin Mbogo's series ("usb: usbip: fix integer overflow in usbip_recv_iso()", v2) hardens the receive-side functions themselves; this patch complements that work by catching the bad value at its source -- in usbip_pack_ret_submit() before the overwrite -- and using the tighter per-URB allocation bound rather than the global USBIP_MAX_ISO_PACKETS limit.

Fix this by checking rpdu->number_of_packets against urb->number_of_packets in usbip_pack_ret_submit() before the overwrite. On violation, clamp to zero so that usbip_recv_iso() and usbip_pad_iso() safely return early.

CVSS v3
9.8
EG Score
9.8(medium)
EG Risk
49(Track)
EG Risk 49/100SSVC: Track

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed
Severity98% × 45%
Exploitation0% × 40%
Automatability30% × 15%
Action: Routine — remediate on your standard cadence.
EPSS PROB
0%
EPSS %ILE
23%
KEV
Not listed

Published

April 24, 2026

Last Modified

July 20, 2026

Advisory Details (10)

Auto-updated Jul 20, 2026
Patch available. Sources: redhat.
redhat Patch Available

Affected: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:19568
generic

usbip: validate number_of_packets in usbip_pack_ret_submit() - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/ef8ebb1c637b4cfb61a9dd2e013376774ee2033b
generic

usbip: validate number_of_packets in usbip_pack_ret_submit() - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/ce744264b06b97069b3722511ab355738311fee0
generic

usbip: validate number_of_packets in usbip_pack_ret_submit() - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/973f2c250289f5bf6cc146b98aa6fdde11fe50d6
generic

usbip: validate number_of_packets in usbip_pack_ret_submit() - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/906f16a836de13fe61f49cdce2f66f2dbd14caf4
generic

usbip: validate number_of_packets in usbip_pack_ret_submit() - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/8d155e2d1c4102f74f82a2bf9c016164bb0f7384
generic

usbip: validate number_of_packets in usbip_pack_ret_submit() - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/5e1c4ece08ccdc197177631f111845a2c68eede3
generic

usbip: validate number_of_packets in usbip_pack_ret_submit() - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/324262c38438255bf6bdbf6342ca47c0badaab76
generic

usbip: validate number_of_packets in usbip_pack_ret_submit() - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/2ab833a16a825373aad2ba7d54b572b277e95b71
generic

usbip: validate number_of_packets in usbip_pack_ret_submit() - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/885c8591784da6314f9aa82fa460ac69f9f79e5f

Patch Availability(6)

Vendor / EcosystemFixed in / PatchReleasedSource
redhatkernel-0:3.10.0-1160.151.1.el72026-06-10redhat
redhatkernel-0:6.12.0-55.77.1.el10_02026-06-08redhat
redhatkernel-0:5.14.0-570.119.1.el9_62026-06-04redhat
redhatkernel-0:6.12.0-211.16.1.el10_22026-05-20redhat
redhatkernel-0:5.14.0-687.10.1.el9_82026-05-20redhat
linuxKernel @ 5.10.258osv

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Weakness Classification(2)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 15× in last 7d / 46× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 252 total refreshes for this CVE.

  1. 2026-07-26 14:54 UTCEPSS rescore
  2. 2026-07-26 14:54 UTCEPSS rescore
  3. 2026-07-25 14:18 UTCEPSS rescore
  4. 2026-07-25 14:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-07-24 14:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  6. 2026-07-23 14:18 UTCEPSS rescore
  7. 2026-07-23 14:18 UTCEPSS rescore
  8. 2026-07-23 03:08 UTCEG score recompute
  9. 2026-07-22 14:08 UTCEPSS rescore
  10. 2026-07-22 14:08 UTCEPSS rescore
  11. 2026-07-21 15:24 UTCEPSS rescore
  12. 2026-07-21 15:24 UTCEPSS rescore
  13. 2026-07-20 23:02 UTCOSV refresh
  14. 2026-07-20 17:08 UTCEPSS rescore
  15. 2026-07-20 17:08 UTCEPSS rescore
  16. 2026-07-19 02:29 UTCEPSS rescore
  17. 2026-07-18 10:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  18. 2026-07-18 10:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  19. 2026-07-16 17:03 UTCEPSS rescore
  20. 2026-07-16 17:03 UTCEPSS rescore
  21. 2026-07-15 16:57 UTCEPSS rescore
  22. 2026-07-15 16:57 UTCEPSS rescore
  23. 2026-07-15 02:00 UTCEPSS rescore
  24. 2026-07-15 02:00 UTCEPSS rescore
  25. 2026-07-13 22:30 UTCEPSS rescore
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-07-13 06:13 UTCEPSS rescore
  2. 2026-07-13 06:13 UTCEPSS rescore
  3. 2026-07-12 05:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  4. 2026-07-11 08:27 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-07-09 19:10 UTCEPSS rescore
  6. 2026-07-08 15:15 UTCEPSS rescore
  7. 2026-07-07 13:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  8. 2026-07-06 16:27 UTCEPSS rescore
  9. 2026-07-06 16:27 UTCEPSS rescore
  10. 2026-07-06 02:23 UTCEPSS rescore
  11. 2026-07-06 02:23 UTCEPSS rescore
  12. 2026-07-05 02:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  13. 2026-07-04 06:31 UTCEPSS rescore
  14. 2026-07-01 15:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  15. 2026-06-30 23:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  16. 2026-06-29 14:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  17. 2026-06-29 14:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  18. 2026-06-28 14:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  19. 2026-06-28 14:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  20. 2026-06-28 04:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  21. 2026-06-28 04:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  22. 2026-06-27 03:08 UTCEPSS rescore
  23. 2026-06-25 13:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  24. 2026-06-25 13:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  25. 2026-06-24 14:05 UTCEPSS rescore
  26. 2026-06-23 21:33 UTCEPSS rescore
  27. 2026-06-23 21:33 UTCEPSS rescore
  28. 2026-06-22 14:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  29. 2026-06-22 14:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  30. 2026-06-21 14:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  31. 2026-06-21 14:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  32. 2026-06-21 01:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  33. 2026-06-19 19:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  34. 2026-06-19 19:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  35. 2026-06-18 17:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  36. 2026-06-18 17:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  37. 2026-06-17 17:53 UTCEPSS rescore
  38. 2026-06-16 17:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  39. 2026-06-15 17:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  40. 2026-06-15 06:37 UTCVendor advisory
  41. 2026-06-15 06:37 UTCGHSA enrichment
  42. 2026-06-15 02:07 UTCVendor advisory
  43. 2026-06-15 02:07 UTCGHSA enrichment
  44. 2026-06-14 23:18 UTCEPSS rescore
  45. 2026-06-14 20:59 UTCVendor advisory
  46. 2026-06-14 20:58 UTCGHSA enrichment
  47. 2026-06-14 16:39 UTCVendor advisory
  48. 2026-06-14 16:39 UTCGHSA enrichment
  49. 2026-06-14 11:54 UTCVendor advisory
  50. 2026-06-14 11:54 UTCGHSA enrichment
  51. 2026-06-13 23:00 UTCEPSS rescore
  52. 2026-06-12 23:12 UTCEPSS rescore
  53. 2026-06-12 23:12 UTCEPSS rescore
  54. 2026-06-12 12:21 UTCVendor advisory
  55. 2026-06-12 12:21 UTCGHSA enrichment
  56. 2026-06-12 07:39 UTCVendor advisory
  57. 2026-06-12 07:39 UTCGHSA enrichment
  58. 2026-06-12 03:06 UTCVendor advisory
  59. 2026-06-12 03:06 UTCGHSA enrichment
  60. 2026-06-11 22:48 UTCVendor advisory
  61. 2026-06-11 22:48 UTCGHSA enrichment
  62. 2026-06-11 18:30 UTCVendor advisory
  63. 2026-06-11 18:29 UTCGHSA enrichment
  64. 2026-06-11 14:03 UTCVendor advisory
  65. 2026-06-11 14:03 UTCGHSA enrichment
  66. 2026-06-11 14:00 UTCEPSS rescore
  67. 2026-06-10 22:18 UTCEPSS rescore
  68. 2026-06-10 21:24 UTCVendor advisory
  69. 2026-06-10 21:24 UTCGHSA enrichment
  70. 2026-06-10 17:06 UTCVendor advisory
  71. 2026-06-10 17:06 UTCGHSA enrichment
  72. 2026-06-10 13:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  73. 2026-06-10 12:46 UTCVendor advisory
  74. 2026-06-10 12:46 UTCGHSA enrichment
  75. 2026-06-10 08:28 UTCVendor advisory

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-31607?
CVE-2026-31607 is a critical vulnerability published on April 24, 2026. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: usbip: validate numberofpackets in usbippackret_submit() When a USB/IP client receives a RET_SUBMIT response, usbippackret_submit() unconditionally overwrites urb->numberofpackets from the network PDU. This value is subsequently…
When was CVE-2026-31607 disclosed?
CVE-2026-31607 was first published in the National Vulnerability Database on April 24, 2026, with the most recent update on July 20, 2026. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
Is CVE-2026-31607 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-31607 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, which ranks it in the top 76.5% of all scored CVEs.
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-31607?
CVE-2026-31607 has a CVSS v3 base score of 9.8 (NVD).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-31607?
Patch to the fixed version published by the affected vendor. Where vendor advisories exist for CVE-2026-31607, EchelonGraph cross-links them in the Vendor Advisories panel below — those typically contain the canonical remediation steps, fixed version numbers, and any vendor-specific mitigations.

Dependency Blast Radius

Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2026-31607

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-31607?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.