CVE-2026-23172

MEDIUMNVD 5.55.5
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

Score 5.5 from GitHub Security Advisory published 2026-02-14. NVD baseline CVSS 5.5; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: epss, ghsa, nvd
5.5EG
EchelonGraph verdictMonitorLow exploitation likelihood right now — keep watching.
  • Lower severity and no public exploit yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0%CVSS: 5.5Exploit: None knownExposed: 0

A fix is available — apply it.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

net: wwan: t7xx: fix potential skb->frags overflow in RX path

When receiving data in the DPMAIF RX path, the t7xx_dpmaif_set_frag_to_skb() function adds page fragments to an skb without checking if the number of fragments has exceeded MAX_SKB_FRAGS. This could lead to a buffer overflow in skb_shinfo(skb)->frags[] array, corrupting adjacent memory and potentially causing kernel crashes or other undefined behavior.

This issue was identified through static code analysis by comparing with a similar vulnerability fixed in the mt76 driver commit b102f0c522cf ("mt76: fix array overflow on receiving too many fragments for a packet").

The vulnerability could be triggered if the modem firmware sends packets with excessive fragments. While under normal protocol conditions (MTU 3080 bytes, BAT buffer 3584 bytes), a single packet should not require additional fragments, the kernel should not blindly trust firmware behavior. Malicious, buggy, or compromised firmware could potentially craft packets with more fragments than the kernel expects.

Fix this by adding a bounds check before calling skb_add_rx_frag() to ensure nr_frags does not exceed MAX_SKB_FRAGS.

The check must be performed before unmapping to avoid a page leak and double DMA unmap during device teardown.

CVSS v3
5.5
EG Score
5.5(medium)
EG Risk
29(Track)
EG Risk 29/100SSVC: Track

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed
Severity55% × 45%
Exploitation0% × 40%
Automatability30% × 15%
Action: Routine — remediate on your standard cadence.
EPSS PROB
0%
EPSS %ILE
4%
KEV
Not listed

Published

February 14, 2026

Last Modified

August 5, 2026

Advisory Details (5)

Auto-updated Jun 9, 2026
No patch confirmed yet.
generic

net: wwan: t7xx: fix potential skb->frags overflow in RX path - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/f9747a7521a48afded5bff2faf1f2dcfff48c577
generic

net: wwan: t7xx: fix potential skb->frags overflow in RX path - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/f0813bcd2d9d97fdbdf2efb9532ab03ae92e99e6
generic

net: wwan: t7xx: fix potential skb->frags overflow in RX path - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/af4b8577d0b388cc3d0039eb0cdd9ca5bbbc9276
generic

net: wwan: t7xx: fix potential skb->frags overflow in RX path - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/2c0fb0f60bc1545c52da61bc6bd4855c1e7814ba
generic

net: wwan: t7xx: fix potential skb->frags overflow in RX path - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/2a0522f564acd34442652ea083091c329fa7c5d5

Patch Availability(8)

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Affected Packages

(3 across 3 ecosystems)
Debian:12(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFixed inDependents
linux6.1.106-1 ... 6.1.99-1 (46 versions)6.1.162-1
Debian:13(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFixed inDependents
linux6.12.38-1 ... 6.12.69-1~bpo12+1 (10 versions)6.12.69-1
Debian:14(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFixed inDependents
linux6.12.100-1 ... 6.18~rc7-1~exp1 (98 versions)6.18.9-1

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

All Vendor Advisories

(14)

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 5× in last 7d / 26× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 198 total refreshes for this CVE.

  1. 2026-09-20 20:15 UTCEPSS rescore
  2. 2026-09-18 21:36 UTCOSV refresh
  3. 2026-09-18 19:27 UTCEPSS rescore
  4. 2026-09-16 14:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-09-16 05:15 UTCEPSS rescore
  6. 2026-09-13 16:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  7. 2026-09-12 15:01 UTCEPSS rescore
  8. 2026-09-11 14:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  9. 2026-09-10 09:34 UTCEPSS rescore
  10. 2026-09-08 22:00 UTCEPSS rescore
  11. 2026-09-07 16:01 UTCEPSS rescore
  12. 2026-09-06 13:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  13. 2026-09-06 13:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  14. 2026-09-04 05:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  15. 2026-09-02 14:11 UTCEPSS rescore
  16. 2026-09-01 13:53 UTCEPSS rescore
  17. 2026-09-01 04:39 UTCEPSS rescore
  18. 2026-08-31 00:23 UTCOSV refresh
  19. 2026-08-30 19:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  20. 2026-08-30 01:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  21. 2026-08-28 21:41 UTCEPSS rescore
  22. 2026-08-27 14:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  23. 2026-08-26 14:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  24. 2026-08-25 13:48 UTCEPSS rescore
  25. 2026-08-23 00:19 UTCEPSS rescore
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-08-21 23:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  2. 2026-08-20 22:55 UTCEPSS rescore
  3. 2026-08-19 17:03 UTCEPSS rescore
  4. 2026-08-18 13:48 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-08-17 13:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  6. 2026-08-16 14:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  7. 2026-08-16 02:14 UTCEPSS rescore
  8. 2026-08-15 01:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  9. 2026-08-14 10:02 UTCEG score recompute
  10. 2026-08-14 10:02 UTCVendor advisory
  11. 2026-08-14 10:02 UTCGHSA enrichment
  12. 2026-08-13 22:00 UTCEPSS rescore
  13. 2026-08-13 02:22 UTCEG score recompute
  14. 2026-08-13 02:22 UTCVendor advisory
  15. 2026-08-13 02:22 UTCGHSA enrichment
  16. 2026-08-12 13:50 UTCEPSS rescore
  17. 2026-08-11 13:42 UTCEPSS rescore
  18. 2026-08-11 07:53 UTCEG score recompute
  19. 2026-08-11 07:53 UTCVendor advisory
  20. 2026-08-11 07:53 UTCGHSA enrichment
  21. 2026-08-11 00:00 UTCEPSS rescore
  22. 2026-08-09 14:37 UTCEG score recompute
  23. 2026-08-09 14:37 UTCVendor advisory
  24. 2026-08-09 14:37 UTCGHSA enrichment
  25. 2026-08-09 13:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  26. 2026-08-08 16:37 UTCEPSS rescore
  27. 2026-08-07 21:55 UTCEG score recompute
  28. 2026-08-07 21:55 UTCVendor advisory
  29. 2026-08-07 21:55 UTCGHSA enrichment
  30. 2026-08-06 13:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  31. 2026-08-05 19:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  32. 2026-08-05 12:45 UTCEG score recompute
  33. 2026-08-05 12:45 UTCVendor advisory
  34. 2026-08-05 12:45 UTCGHSA enrichment
  35. 2026-08-04 15:10 UTCEPSS rescore
  36. 2026-08-04 10:38 UTCEPSS rescore
  37. 2026-08-03 10:35 UTCEPSS rescore
  38. 2026-08-02 20:34 UTCEG score recompute 2.90
  39. 2026-08-02 20:34 UTCVendor advisory
  40. 2026-08-02 20:34 UTCGHSA enrichment
  41. 2026-08-02 02:26 UTCEPSS rescore
  42. 2026-08-01 04:15 UTCEPSS rescore
  43. 2026-07-30 01:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  44. 2026-07-27 14:13 UTCEPSS rescore
  45. 2026-07-26 14:54 UTCEPSS rescore
  46. 2026-07-26 14:54 UTCEPSS rescore
  47. 2026-07-24 14:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  48. 2026-07-23 14:18 UTCEPSS rescore
  49. 2026-07-23 14:18 UTCEPSS rescore
  50. 2026-07-23 03:06 UTCEG score recompute 2.90
  51. 2026-07-22 14:08 UTCEPSS rescore
  52. 2026-07-21 15:24 UTCEPSS rescore
  53. 2026-07-21 15:24 UTCEPSS rescore
  54. 2026-07-20 17:08 UTCEPSS rescore
  55. 2026-07-19 14:31 UTCEPSS rescore
  56. 2026-07-19 14:31 UTCEPSS rescore
  57. 2026-07-18 10:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  58. 2026-07-18 10:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  59. 2026-07-17 14:29 UTCOSV refresh
  60. 2026-07-16 17:03 UTCEPSS rescore
  61. 2026-07-16 17:03 UTCEPSS rescore
  62. 2026-07-15 16:57 UTCEPSS rescore
  63. 2026-07-15 16:57 UTCEPSS rescore
  64. 2026-07-15 02:00 UTCEPSS rescore
  65. 2026-07-15 02:00 UTCEPSS rescore
  66. 2026-07-13 22:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  67. 2026-07-13 06:13 UTCEPSS rescore
  68. 2026-07-13 06:13 UTCEPSS rescore
  69. 2026-07-12 05:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  70. 2026-07-12 05:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  71. 2026-07-11 08:27 UTCEPSS rescore
  72. 2026-07-09 19:10 UTCEPSS rescore
  73. 2026-07-08 15:15 UTCEPSS rescore
  74. 2026-07-08 15:15 UTCEPSS rescore
  75. 2026-07-07 13:46 UTCEPSS rescore

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-23172?
CVE-2026-23172 is a medium vulnerability published on February 14, 2026. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: net: wwan: t7xx: fix potential skb->frags overflow in RX path When receiving data in the DPMAIF RX path, the t7xxdpmaifsetfragto_skb() function adds page fragments to an skb without checking if the number of fragments has exceeded…
When was CVE-2026-23172 disclosed?
CVE-2026-23172 was first published in the National Vulnerability Database on February 14, 2026, with the most recent update on August 5, 2026. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
Is CVE-2026-23172 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-23172 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, which ranks it in the top 96.2% of all scored CVEs.
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-23172?
CVE-2026-23172 has a CVSS v3 base score of 5.5 (NVD).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-23172?
Patch to the fixed version published by the affected vendor. Where vendor advisories exist for CVE-2026-23172, EchelonGraph cross-links them in the Vendor Advisories panel below — those typically contain the canonical remediation steps, fixed version numbers, and any vendor-specific mitigations.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-23172

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-23172?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.