CVE-2026-23150

MEDIUMNVD 5.55.5
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

Score 5.5 from GitHub Security Advisory published 2026-02-14. NVD baseline CVSS 5.5; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: epss, ghsa, nvd
5.5EG
EchelonGraph verdictMonitorLow exploitation likelihood right now — keep watching.
  • Lower severity and no public exploit yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0%CVSS: 5.5Exploit: None knownExposed: 0

A fix is available — apply it.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

nfc: llcp: Fix memleak in nfc_llcp_send_ui_frame().

syzbot reported various memory leaks related to NFC, struct nfc_llcp_sock, sk_buff, nfc_dev, etc. [0]

The leading log hinted that nfc_llcp_send_ui_frame() failed to allocate skb due to sock_error(sk) being -ENXIO.

ENXIO is set by nfc_llcp_socket_release() when struct nfc_llcp_local is destroyed by local_cleanup().

The problem is that there is no synchronisation between nfc_llcp_send_ui_frame() and local_cleanup(), and skb could be put into local->tx_queue after it was purged in local_cleanup():

CPU1 CPU2 ---- ---- nfc_llcp_send_ui_frame() local_cleanup() |- do { ' |- pdu = nfc_alloc_send_skb(..., &err) | . | |- nfc_llcp_socket_release(local, false, ENXIO); | |- skb_queue_purge(&local->tx_queue); | | ' | |- skb_queue_tail(&local->tx_queue, pdu); | ... | |- pdu = nfc_alloc_send_skb(..., &err) | ^._________________________________.'

local_cleanup() is called for struct nfc_llcp_local only after nfc_llcp_remove_local() unlinks it from llcp_devices.

If we hold local->tx_queue.lock then, we can synchronise the thread and nfc_llcp_send_ui_frame().

Let's do that and check list_empty(&local->list) before queuing skb to local->tx_queue in nfc_llcp_send_ui_frame().

[0]: [ 56.074943][ T6096] llcp: nfc_llcp_send_ui_frame: Could not allocate PDU (error=-6) [ 64.318868][ T5813] kmemleak: 6 new suspected memory leaks (see /sys/kernel/debug/kmemleak) BUG: memory leak unreferenced object 0xffff8881272f6800 (size 1024): comm "syz.0.17", pid 6096, jiffies 4294942766 hex dump (first 32 bytes): 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................ 27 00 03 40 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 '..@............ backtrace (crc da58d84d): kmemleak_alloc_recursive include/linux/kmemleak.h:44 [inline] slab_post_alloc_hook mm/slub.c:4979 [inline] slab_alloc_node mm/slub.c:5284 [inline] __do_kmalloc_node mm/slub.c:5645 [inline] __kmalloc_noprof+0x3e3/0x6b0 mm/slub.c:5658 kmalloc_noprof include/linux/slab.h:961 [inline] sk_prot_alloc+0x11a/0x1b0 net/core/sock.c:2239 sk_alloc+0x36/0x360 net/core/sock.c:2295 nfc_llcp_sock_alloc+0x37/0x130 net/nfc/llcp_sock.c:979 llcp_sock_create+0x71/0xd0 net/nfc/llcp_sock.c:1044 nfc_sock_create+0xc9/0xf0 net/nfc/af_nfc.c:31 __sock_create+0x1a9/0x340 net/socket.c:1605 sock_create net/socket.c:1663 [inline] __sys_socket_create net/socket.c:1700 [inline] __sys_socket+0xb9/0x1a0 net/socket.c:1747 __do_sys_socket net/socket.c:1761 [inline] __se_sys_socket net/socket.c:1759 [inline] __x64_sys_socket+0x1b/0x30 net/socket.c:1759 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:63 [inline] do_syscall_64+0xa4/0xfa0 arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:94 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f

BUG: memory leak unreferenced object 0xffff88810fbd9800 (size 240): comm "syz.0.17", pid 6096, jiffies 4294942850 hex dump (first 32 bytes): 68 f0 ff 08 81 88 ff ff 68 f0 ff 08 81 88 ff ff h.......h....... 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 68 2f 27 81 88 ff ff .........h/'.... backtrace (crc 6cc652b1): kmemleak_alloc_recursive include/linux/kmemleak.h:44 [inline] slab_post_alloc_hook mm/slub.c:4979 [inline] slab_alloc_node mm/slub.c:5284 [inline] kmem_cache_alloc_node_noprof+0x36f/0x5e0 mm/slub.c:5336 __alloc_skb+0x203/0x240 net/core/skbuff.c:660 alloc_skb include/linux/skbuff.h:1383 [inline] alloc_skb_with_frags+0x69/0x3f0 net/core/sk ---truncated---

CVSS v3
5.5
EG Score
5.5(medium)
EG Risk
29(Track)
EG Risk 29/100SSVC: Track

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed
Severity55% × 45%
Exploitation0% × 40%
Automatability30% × 15%
Action: Routine — remediate on your standard cadence.
EPSS PROB
0%
EPSS %ILE
2%
KEV
Not listed

Published

February 14, 2026

Last Modified

June 17, 2026

Advisory Details (7)

Auto-updated Aug 7, 2026
No patch confirmed yet.
generic

nfc: llcp: Fix memleak in nfc_llcp_send_ui_frame(). - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/f8d002626d434f5fea9085e2557711c16a15cec6
generic

nfc: llcp: Fix memleak in nfc_llcp_send_ui_frame(). - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/ab660cb8e17aa93426d1e821c2cce60e4b9bc56a
generic

nfc: llcp: Fix memleak in nfc_llcp_send_ui_frame(). - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/6734ff1ac6beba1d0c22dc9a3dc1849b773b511f
generic

nfc: llcp: Fix memleak in nfc_llcp_send_ui_frame(). - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/65e976e1f474ae3bf5681d7abafb8f3fdb34b8cc
generic

nfc: llcp: Fix memleak in nfc_llcp_send_ui_frame(). - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/61858cbce6ca4bef9ed116c689a4be9520841339
generic

nfc: llcp: Fix memleak in nfc_llcp_send_ui_frame(). - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/3098e5c8af0f4c8f7eebbb370798df8aa2e12ba5
generic

nfc: llcp: Fix memleak in nfc_llcp_send_ui_frame(). - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/165c34fb6068ff153e3fc99a932a80a9d5755709

Patch Availability(21)

Vendor / EcosystemFixed in / PatchReleasedSource
ubuntulinux-tools-ibm-5.15 (5.15.0.1099.95) @ jammy2026-06-12ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-azure-fips-5.15 (5.15.0.1110.95) @ jammy2026-06-12ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-azure-edge (5.15.0.1110.119~20.04.1) @ focal2026-06-12ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-raspi-nolpae (5.15.0.1099.97) @ jammy2026-06-12ubuntu
ubuntulinux-xilinx-zynqmp-tools-5.15.0-1070 (5.15.0-1070.74) @ jammy2026-06-12ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-nvidia-lowlatency-64k-6.8 (6.8.0-1054.57.1) @ noble2026-06-12ubuntu
ubuntulinux-virtual-6.8 (6.8.0-117.117) @ noble2026-06-12ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-nvidia-hwe-22.04-edge (6.8.0-1054.57~22.04.1) @ jammy2026-06-12ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-gcp-edge (5.15.0.1106.115~20.04.1) @ focal2026-06-12ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-fips-6.8 (6.8.0-116.116+fips1) @ noble2026-06-12ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-nvidia-tegra-rt-6.8 (6.8.0-1024.24) @ noble2026-06-12ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-azure-lts-24.04 (6.8.0-1056.62) @ noble2026-06-12ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-nvidia-tegra-rt-5.15 (5.15.0.1057.57~20.04.1) @ focal2026-06-12ubuntu
ubuntulinux-virtual-hwe-20.04-edge (5.15.0.176.161) @ jammy2026-06-12ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-gcp-fips-5.15 (5.15.0.1105.95) @ jammy2026-06-12ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-realtime-5.15 (5.15.0.1104.108) @ jammy2026-06-12ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-nvidia-tegra-rt-5.15 (5.15.0.1057.57) @ jammy2026-06-12ubuntu
ubuntulinux-virtual-hwe-20.04-edge (5.15.0.176.186~20.04.1) @ focal2026-06-12ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-kvm-5.15 (5.15.0.1097.93) @ jammy2026-06-12ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-azure-fips-6.8 (6.8.0-1059.65+fips1) @ noble2026-06-12ubuntu
linuxKernel @ 5.10.249osv

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Affected Packages

(4 across 4 ecosystems)
Debian:11(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFixed inDependents
linux5.10.103-1 ... 5.10.92-2 (48 versions)5.10.249-1
Debian:12(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFixed inDependents
linux6.1.106-1 ... 6.1.99-1 (46 versions)6.1.162-1
Debian:13(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFixed inDependents
linux6.12.38-1 ... 6.12.69-1~bpo12+1 (10 versions)6.12.69-1
Debian:14(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFixed inDependents
linux6.12.100-1 ... 6.18~rc7-1~exp1 (98 versions)6.18.9-1

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

All Vendor Advisories

(25)

Every vendor that published an advisory referencing this CVE — pulled from our cve_vendor_advisories aggregation. Click any row for the vendor's original advisory page.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 5× in last 7d / 26× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 178 total refreshes for this CVE.

  1. 2026-09-20 20:15 UTCEPSS rescore
  2. 2026-09-18 21:36 UTCOSV refresh
  3. 2026-09-18 19:27 UTCEPSS rescore
  4. 2026-09-16 14:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-09-16 05:15 UTCEPSS rescore
  6. 2026-09-13 16:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  7. 2026-09-12 15:01 UTCEPSS rescore
  8. 2026-09-11 14:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  9. 2026-09-10 09:34 UTCEPSS rescore
  10. 2026-09-08 22:00 UTCEPSS rescore
  11. 2026-09-07 16:01 UTCEPSS rescore
  12. 2026-09-06 13:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  13. 2026-09-06 13:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  14. 2026-09-04 05:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  15. 2026-09-02 14:11 UTCEPSS rescore
  16. 2026-09-01 13:53 UTCEPSS rescore
  17. 2026-09-01 04:39 UTCEPSS rescore
  18. 2026-08-31 00:23 UTCOSV refresh
  19. 2026-08-30 19:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  20. 2026-08-30 01:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  21. 2026-08-28 21:41 UTCEPSS rescore
  22. 2026-08-27 14:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  23. 2026-08-26 14:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  24. 2026-08-25 13:48 UTCEPSS rescore
  25. 2026-08-23 00:19 UTCEPSS rescore
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-08-21 23:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  2. 2026-08-20 22:55 UTCEPSS rescore
  3. 2026-08-19 17:03 UTCEPSS rescore
  4. 2026-08-18 13:48 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-08-17 13:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  6. 2026-08-16 14:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  7. 2026-08-16 02:14 UTCEPSS rescore
  8. 2026-08-15 01:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  9. 2026-08-14 10:03 UTCEG score recompute
  10. 2026-08-14 10:03 UTCVendor advisory
  11. 2026-08-14 10:03 UTCGHSA enrichment
  12. 2026-08-13 22:00 UTCEPSS rescore
  13. 2026-08-13 02:22 UTCEG score recompute
  14. 2026-08-13 02:22 UTCVendor advisory
  15. 2026-08-13 02:22 UTCGHSA enrichment
  16. 2026-08-12 13:50 UTCEPSS rescore
  17. 2026-08-11 13:42 UTCEPSS rescore
  18. 2026-08-11 07:54 UTCEG score recompute
  19. 2026-08-11 07:54 UTCVendor advisory
  20. 2026-08-11 07:54 UTCGHSA enrichment
  21. 2026-08-11 00:00 UTCEPSS rescore
  22. 2026-08-09 14:38 UTCEG score recompute
  23. 2026-08-09 14:38 UTCVendor advisory
  24. 2026-08-09 14:38 UTCGHSA enrichment
  25. 2026-08-08 16:37 UTCEPSS rescore
  26. 2026-08-07 21:56 UTCEG score recompute
  27. 2026-08-07 21:56 UTCVendor advisory
  28. 2026-08-07 21:56 UTCGHSA enrichment
  29. 2026-08-06 13:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  30. 2026-08-06 03:47 UTCEG score recompute
  31. 2026-08-06 03:47 UTCVendor advisory
  32. 2026-08-06 03:47 UTCGHSA enrichment
  33. 2026-08-05 19:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  34. 2026-08-04 10:38 UTCEPSS rescore
  35. 2026-08-03 10:35 UTCEPSS rescore
  36. 2026-08-02 20:35 UTCEG score recompute
  37. 2026-08-02 20:35 UTCVendor advisory
  38. 2026-08-02 20:35 UTCGHSA enrichment
  39. 2026-08-02 02:26 UTCEPSS rescore
  40. 2026-08-01 04:15 UTCEPSS rescore
  41. 2026-07-30 01:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  42. 2026-07-27 14:13 UTCEPSS rescore
  43. 2026-07-26 14:54 UTCEPSS rescore
  44. 2026-07-26 14:54 UTCEPSS rescore
  45. 2026-07-25 14:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  46. 2026-07-25 14:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  47. 2026-07-24 14:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  48. 2026-07-23 14:18 UTCEPSS rescore
  49. 2026-07-23 14:18 UTCEPSS rescore
  50. 2026-07-23 03:06 UTCEG score recompute
  51. 2026-07-22 14:08 UTCEPSS rescore
  52. 2026-07-21 15:24 UTCEPSS rescore
  53. 2026-07-21 15:24 UTCEPSS rescore
  54. 2026-07-20 17:08 UTCEPSS rescore
  55. 2026-07-19 14:31 UTCEPSS rescore
  56. 2026-07-19 14:31 UTCEPSS rescore
  57. 2026-07-18 10:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  58. 2026-07-18 10:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  59. 2026-07-17 14:29 UTCOSV refresh
  60. 2026-07-16 17:03 UTCEPSS rescore
  61. 2026-07-16 17:03 UTCEPSS rescore
  62. 2026-07-15 16:57 UTCEPSS rescore
  63. 2026-07-15 16:57 UTCEPSS rescore
  64. 2026-07-15 02:00 UTCEPSS rescore
  65. 2026-07-15 02:00 UTCEPSS rescore
  66. 2026-07-13 22:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  67. 2026-07-13 06:13 UTCEPSS rescore
  68. 2026-07-13 06:13 UTCEPSS rescore
  69. 2026-07-12 05:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  70. 2026-07-12 05:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  71. 2026-07-11 08:27 UTCEPSS rescore
  72. 2026-07-09 19:10 UTCEPSS rescore
  73. 2026-07-08 15:15 UTCEPSS rescore
  74. 2026-07-08 15:15 UTCEPSS rescore
  75. 2026-07-07 13:46 UTCEPSS rescore

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-23150?
CVE-2026-23150 is a medium vulnerability published on February 14, 2026. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: nfc: llcp: Fix memleak in nfcllcpsenduiframe(). syzbot reported various memory leaks related to NFC, struct nfcllcpsock, skbuff, nfcdev, etc. [0] The leading log hinted that nfcllcpsenduiframe() failed to allocate skb due to…
When was CVE-2026-23150 disclosed?
CVE-2026-23150 was first published in the National Vulnerability Database on February 14, 2026, with the most recent update on June 17, 2026. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
Is CVE-2026-23150 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-23150 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, which ranks it in the top 98.0% of all scored CVEs.
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-23150?
CVE-2026-23150 has a CVSS v3 base score of 5.5 (NVD).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-23150?
Patch to the fixed version published by the affected vendor. Where vendor advisories exist for CVE-2026-23150, EchelonGraph cross-links them in the Vendor Advisories panel below — those typically contain the canonical remediation steps, fixed version numbers, and any vendor-specific mitigations.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-23150

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-23150?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.