CVE-2026-18582

MEDIUMPre-NVD 5.35.3
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

“—” beside the score: it is equal to the CVSS score beside it.

Score 5.3 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: MODERATE) published 2026-08-03. A secondary CVSS source baseline 5.3; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: EPSS, GitHub Security Advisory, a secondary CVSS source
Elevated

Also known asEUVD-2026-52017 (ENISA EUVD) · GHSA-vj8r-wqrg-59qf (GitHub Security Advisories)Source: ENISA EUVD

5.3EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixRemediate within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high (the SSVC decision on this page).
  • CISA's Vulnrichment rates exploitation as PoC; EchelonGraph holds no exploit-code reference for it
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0.9%CVSS: 5.3Exploit: No code on recordExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is available — apply it.

A security flaw has been discovered in mz-automation libiec61850 up to 1.6.1. This vulnerability affects the function Reporting_RCBWriteAccessHandler of the file src/iec61850/server/mms_mapping/reporting.c of the component Report Sending Path Handler. The manipulation results in free of memory not on the heap. It is possible to launch the attack remotely. The exploit has been released to the public and may be used for attacks. Upgrading to version 1.6.2 is able to resolve this issue. The patch is identified as 5b2a69f44256b8548927d8afdd7ac5f5381abe1e. It is suggested to upgrade the affected component. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure.

CVSS v3
5.3
EG Score
5.3MEDIUMmedium confidence
EG Risk
55
EG Risk 55/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity53% × 45%
Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 5.3 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.
Exploitation40% × 40%
EchelonGraph's fixed weight for EG-KEV Tier 3 (Elevated): a constant, not a probability.
Automatability100% × 15%
CISA's SSVC Automatable value: yes (Vulnrichment).
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).
Exploitation public PoC (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.
EPSS PROB
0.9%
EPSS %ILE
59th
KEV
Not listed

What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)

The EG score (5.3): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 5.3 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.

EG Severity
5.3 MEDIUMCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
EG Likelihood
0.9% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-11-07). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
Confirmed exploitation
None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
EG Priority
SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).CISA BOD 26-04: 14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; 60 days if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).

A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.

Exploitation public PoC (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; 60 days if it is not.

The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

August 3, 2026

Last Modified

October 23, 2026

Advisory Details (5)

Auto-updated Aug 3, 2026
Patch available. Sources: github_release, github, github_commit.
Web page

GitHub - mz-automation/libiec61850: Official repository for libIEC61850, the open-source library for the IEC 61850 protocols · GitHub

https://github.com/mz-automation/libiec61850/
GitHub release Patch Available

1.6.2

Patch available: mz-automation/libiec61850 v1.6.2

https://github.com/mz-automation/libiec61850/releases/tag/v1.6.2
GitHub commit Patch Available

commit 5b2a69f44256 (mz-automation/libiec61850)

Patch available: mz-automation/libiec61850 v1.6.2 (contains commit 5b2a69f44256)

https://github.com/mz-automation/libiec61850/commit/5b2a69f44256b8548927d8afdd7ac5f5381abe1e
Web page

`Oversized RptID` can trigger `invalid free` of a stack-backed visible string in the `report send path` · Issue #2 · gff-cw/information · GitHub

https://github.com/gff-cw/information/issues/2
GitHub advisoryMentions a patch (unverified)

Oversized RptID can trigger invalid free of a stack-backed visible string in the report send path · Advisory · mz-automation/libiec61850 · GitHub

https://github.com/mz-automation/libiec61850/security/advisories/GHSA-7qg8-hm25-rv5v

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-18582(1)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 8× in last 7d / 35× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed its CVE.org record (CNA or CISA ADP). An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). "EchelonGraph re-scored" is our own recompute of this CVE's score, not an update from a source, and is not counted in the refreshes above. Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 222 rows on record for this CVE.

A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. None are among the latest 100 rows. The 122 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.

  1. 2026-11-13 16:51 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 59th percentile
  2. 2026-11-12 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 58th percentile
  3. 2026-11-11 16:38 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 58th percentile
  4. 2026-11-10 16:42 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 58th percentile
  5. 2026-11-09 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 58th percentile
  6. 2026-11-08 16:38 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 58th percentile
  7. 2026-11-07 19:43 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-vj8r-wqrg-59qf · GitHub severity MODERATE · GitHub CVSS 5.3
  8. 2026-11-07 19:43 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  9. 2026-11-07 16:38 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 58th percentile
  10. 2026-11-06 16:37 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 58th percentile
  11. 2026-11-05 16:37 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 58th percentile
  12. 2026-11-04 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 58th percentile
  13. 2026-11-03 16:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 58th percentile
  14. 2026-11-02 16:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 58th percentile
  15. 2026-11-01 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 58th percentile
  16. 2026-10-31 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 58th percentile
  17. 2026-10-30 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 58th percentile
  18. 2026-10-29 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 58th percentile
  19. 2026-10-29 16:00 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  20. 2026-10-29 16:00 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-vj8r-wqrg-59qf · GitHub CVSS 5.3
  21. 2026-10-28 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 58th percentile
  22. 2026-10-27 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 58th percentile
  23. 2026-10-26 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 58th percentile
  24. 2026-10-25 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 58th percentile
  25. 2026-10-25 14:45 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-10-24 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 58th percentile
  2. 2026-10-23 22:32 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  3. 2026-10-23 22:31 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-vj8r-wqrg-59qf · GitHub CVSS 5.3
  4. 2026-10-23 22:26 UTCNVD updateCVSS v4 → 5.5
  5. 2026-10-23 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 58th percentile
  6. 2026-10-23 05:59 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  7. 2026-10-23 05:59 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-vj8r-wqrg-59qf · GitHub CVSS 5.3
  8. 2026-10-22 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 58th percentile
  9. 2026-10-21 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 58th percentile
  10. 2026-10-20 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 57th percentile
  11. 2026-10-19 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 57th percentile
  12. 2026-10-18 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 57th percentile
  13. 2026-10-18 03:58 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  14. 2026-10-17 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 57th percentile
  15. 2026-10-16 16:40 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 57th percentile
  16. 2026-10-15 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 57th percentile
  17. 2026-10-14 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 57th percentile
  18. 2026-10-13 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 57th percentile
  19. 2026-10-12 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 57th percentile
  20. 2026-10-12 16:27 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  21. 2026-10-11 20:07 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  22. 2026-10-11 17:20 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  23. 2026-10-11 14:52 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  24. 2026-10-11 13:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 57th percentile
  25. 2026-10-10 19:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 57th percentile
  26. 2026-10-09 20:06 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 57th percentile
  27. 2026-10-08 17:11 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 57th percentile
  28. 2026-10-07 23:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 57th percentile
  29. 2026-10-06 23:47 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  30. 2026-10-06 23:47 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-vj8r-wqrg-59qf · GitHub CVSS 5.3
  31. 2026-10-06 15:17 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 57th percentile
  32. 2026-10-05 19:50 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  33. 2026-10-05 19:50 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-vj8r-wqrg-59qf · GitHub CVSS 5.3
  34. 2026-10-05 17:42 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 57th percentile
  35. 2026-10-04 23:21 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 57th percentile
  36. 2026-10-04 06:22 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  37. 2026-10-04 06:22 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-vj8r-wqrg-59qf · GitHub CVSS 5.3
  38. 2026-10-03 14:25 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 57th percentile
  39. 2026-10-02 10:25 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  40. 2026-10-02 10:25 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-vj8r-wqrg-59qf · GitHub CVSS 5.3
  41. 2026-10-01 19:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 56th percentile
  42. 2026-10-01 02:39 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  43. 2026-10-01 02:39 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-vj8r-wqrg-59qf · GitHub CVSS 5.3
  44. 2026-09-30 15:02 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 56th percentile
  45. 2026-09-29 15:20 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 56th percentile
  46. 2026-09-29 06:44 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  47. 2026-09-29 06:44 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-vj8r-wqrg-59qf · GitHub CVSS 5.3
  48. 2026-09-28 13:51 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 56th percentile
  49. 2026-09-27 18:19 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  50. 2026-09-27 18:19 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-vj8r-wqrg-59qf · GitHub CVSS 5.3
  51. 2026-09-27 13:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 56th percentile
  52. 2026-09-26 15:58 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 56th percentile
  53. 2026-09-25 05:39 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  54. 2026-09-25 05:39 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-vj8r-wqrg-59qf · GitHub CVSS 5.3
  55. 2026-09-24 05:57 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  56. 2026-09-24 05:57 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-vj8r-wqrg-59qf · GitHub CVSS 5.3
  57. 2026-09-23 05:28 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  58. 2026-09-23 05:28 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-vj8r-wqrg-59qf · GitHub CVSS 5.3
  59. 2026-09-22 05:46 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  60. 2026-09-22 05:46 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-vj8r-wqrg-59qf · GitHub CVSS 5.3
  61. 2026-09-20 11:08 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  62. 2026-09-20 11:08 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-vj8r-wqrg-59qf · GitHub CVSS 5.3
  63. 2026-09-19 08:01 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  64. 2026-09-19 08:01 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-vj8r-wqrg-59qf · GitHub CVSS 5.3
  65. 2026-09-18 19:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 41st percentile
  66. 2026-09-18 06:44 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  67. 2026-09-18 06:44 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-vj8r-wqrg-59qf · GitHub CVSS 5.3
  68. 2026-09-17 07:02 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  69. 2026-09-17 07:02 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-vj8r-wqrg-59qf · GitHub CVSS 5.3
  70. 2026-09-16 14:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 41st percentile
  71. 2026-09-16 06:47 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  72. 2026-09-16 06:47 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-vj8r-wqrg-59qf · GitHub CVSS 5.3
  73. 2026-09-16 05:14 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 41st percentile
  74. 2026-09-15 07:04 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  75. 2026-09-15 07:04 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-vj8r-wqrg-59qf · GitHub CVSS 5.3

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-18582?
CVE-2026-18582 is a medium-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on August 3, 2026. A security flaw has been discovered in mz-automation libiec61850 up to 1.6.1. This vulnerability affects the function Reporting_RCBWriteAccessHandler of the file src/iec61850/server/mms_mapping/reporting.c of the component Report Sending Path Handler. The manipulation results in free of memory not…
When was the CVE record for CVE-2026-18582 published?
The CVE record for CVE-2026-18582 was published on August 3, 2026. That is the record's publication date; the vulnerability itself may have been made public earlier. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of October 23, 2026; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2026-18582 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-18582 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0.9% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (59th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-18582?
CVE-2026-18582 has a CVSS base score of 5.3 (a secondary CVSS source that NVD displays; NVD's own analysis pending).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-18582?
A fix for CVE-2026-18582 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2026-18582 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2026-18582

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-18582?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.