CVE-2026-16242

CRITICALPre-NVD 9.49.4
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

“—” beside the score: it is equal to the CVSS score beside it.

Score 9.4 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: CRITICAL) published 2026-07-20. A secondary CVSS source baseline 9.4; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: EPSS, GitHub Security Advisory, a secondary CVSS source

Also known asEUVD-2026-45897 (ENISA EUVD) · GHSA-43hh-68v6-mf36 (GitHub Security Advisories)Source: ENISA EUVD

9.4EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixRemediate within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high (the SSVC decision on this page).
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0.9%CVSS: 9.4Exploit: None knownExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is available — apply it.

A flaw was found in the Konnectivity proxy-server configuration for hosted control planes. The agent-facing listener was started without --cluster-ca-cert (and without token-based agent authentication), so client certificates were not validated. A remote attacker who can reach the Konnectivity cluster endpoint could connect as an unauthenticated agent, join the routing pool, and potentially proxy, inspect, modify, or drop control-plane-to-node traffic.

CVSS v3
9.4
EG Score
9.4CRITICALmedium confidence
EG Risk
58
EG Risk 58/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity94% × 45%
Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 9.4 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.
Exploitation0.9% × 40%
FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.
Automatability100% × 15%
CISA's SSVC Automatable value: yes (Vulnrichment).
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).
Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.
EPSS PROB
0.9%
EPSS %ILE
60th
KEV
Not listed

What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)

The EG score (9.4): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 9.4 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.

EG Severity
9.4 CRITICALCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
EG Likelihood
0.9% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-11-12). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
Confirmed exploitation
None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
EG Priority
SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).CISA BOD 26-04: 3 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; 60 days if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).

A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.

Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)3 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; 60 days if it is not.

The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

July 20, 2026

Last Modified

September 14, 2026

Advisory Details (13)

Auto-updated Oct 2, 2026
Patch available. Sources: redhat.
Red HatMentions a patch (unverified)
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:48670
Red HatMentions a patch (unverified)
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:48657
Red HatMentions a patch (unverified)
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:48284
Red HatMentions a patch (unverified)
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:47974
Red HatMentions a patch (unverified)
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:47953
Red HatMentions a patch (unverified)
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:47949
Red HatMentions a patch (unverified)
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:47735
Red HatMentions a patch (unverified)
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:47728
Red HatMentions a patch (unverified)
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:47388
Red HatMentions a patch (unverified)
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:46885
GitHub pull request

OCPBUGS-99014: Authenticate Konnectivity agents with cluster CA

Fix merged in openshift/hypershift PR #9031 on 2026-07-23 — awaiting tagged release

https://github.com/openshift/hypershift/pull/9031
Red Hat

2502690 – (CVE-2026-16242) CVE-2026-16242 hypershift: Konnectivity proxy-server accepts agent connections without validating client certificates

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2502690
Red HatMentions a patch (unverified)

cve-details

https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-16242

Patch Availability(15)

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 21× in last 7d / 84× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed its CVE.org record (CNA or CISA ADP). An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). "EchelonGraph re-scored" is our own recompute of this CVE's score, not an update from a source, and is not counted in the refreshes above. Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 937 rows on record for this CVE.

A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. None are among the latest 100 rows. The 837 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.

  1. 2026-11-13 16:51 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 60th percentile
  2. 2026-11-13 13:40 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  3. 2026-11-13 13:40 UTCVendor advisory
  4. 2026-11-13 13:40 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-43hh-68v6-mf36 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.4
  5. 2026-11-12 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 60th percentile
  6. 2026-11-12 11:20 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  7. 2026-11-12 11:20 UTCVendor advisory
  8. 2026-11-12 11:20 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-43hh-68v6-mf36 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.4
  9. 2026-11-11 16:38 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 60th percentile
  10. 2026-11-11 09:01 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  11. 2026-11-11 09:01 UTCVendor advisory
  12. 2026-11-11 09:01 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-43hh-68v6-mf36 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.4
  13. 2026-11-10 16:42 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 60th percentile
  14. 2026-11-10 06:41 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  15. 2026-11-10 06:41 UTCVendor advisory
  16. 2026-11-10 06:41 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-43hh-68v6-mf36 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.4
  17. 2026-11-09 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 60th percentile
  18. 2026-11-09 04:22 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  19. 2026-11-09 04:22 UTCVendor advisory
  20. 2026-11-09 04:22 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-43hh-68v6-mf36 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.4
  21. 2026-11-08 16:38 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 60th percentile
  22. 2026-11-08 01:55 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  23. 2026-11-08 01:55 UTCVendor advisory
  24. 2026-11-08 01:55 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-43hh-68v6-mf36 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.4
  25. 2026-11-07 16:38 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 60th percentile
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-11-06 23:36 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  2. 2026-11-06 23:36 UTCVendor advisory
  3. 2026-11-06 23:36 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-43hh-68v6-mf36 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.4
  4. 2026-11-06 16:36 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 60th percentile
  5. 2026-11-05 21:17 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  6. 2026-11-05 21:17 UTCVendor advisory
  7. 2026-11-05 21:17 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-43hh-68v6-mf36 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.4
  8. 2026-11-05 16:36 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 60th percentile
  9. 2026-11-04 18:58 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  10. 2026-11-04 18:58 UTCVendor advisory
  11. 2026-11-04 18:58 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-43hh-68v6-mf36 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.4
  12. 2026-11-04 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 60th percentile
  13. 2026-11-03 16:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 60th percentile
  14. 2026-11-03 16:39 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  15. 2026-11-03 16:39 UTCVendor advisory
  16. 2026-11-03 16:39 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-43hh-68v6-mf36 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.4
  17. 2026-11-02 16:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 60th percentile
  18. 2026-11-02 14:07 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  19. 2026-11-02 14:07 UTCVendor advisory
  20. 2026-11-02 14:07 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-43hh-68v6-mf36 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.4
  21. 2026-11-01 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 60th percentile
  22. 2026-11-01 11:48 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  23. 2026-11-01 11:48 UTCVendor advisory
  24. 2026-11-01 11:48 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-43hh-68v6-mf36 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.4
  25. 2026-10-31 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 60th percentile
  26. 2026-10-31 09:28 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  27. 2026-10-31 09:28 UTCVendor advisory
  28. 2026-10-31 09:28 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-43hh-68v6-mf36 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.4
  29. 2026-10-30 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 60th percentile
  30. 2026-10-30 07:09 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  31. 2026-10-30 07:09 UTCVendor advisory
  32. 2026-10-30 07:09 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-43hh-68v6-mf36 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.4
  33. 2026-10-29 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 60th percentile
  34. 2026-10-29 04:49 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  35. 2026-10-29 04:49 UTCVendor advisory
  36. 2026-10-29 04:49 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-43hh-68v6-mf36 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.4
  37. 2026-10-28 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 60th percentile
  38. 2026-10-28 02:26 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  39. 2026-10-28 02:26 UTCVendor advisory
  40. 2026-10-28 02:26 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-43hh-68v6-mf36 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.4
  41. 2026-10-27 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 60th percentile
  42. 2026-10-27 00:04 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  43. 2026-10-27 00:04 UTCVendor advisory
  44. 2026-10-27 00:03 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-43hh-68v6-mf36 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.4
  45. 2026-10-26 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 59th percentile
  46. 2026-10-25 18:10 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  47. 2026-10-25 18:10 UTCVendor advisory
  48. 2026-10-25 18:10 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-43hh-68v6-mf36 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.4
  49. 2026-10-25 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 59th percentile
  50. 2026-10-25 14:46 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  51. 2026-10-24 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 59th percentile
  52. 2026-10-24 15:33 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  53. 2026-10-24 15:33 UTCVendor advisory
  54. 2026-10-24 15:33 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-43hh-68v6-mf36 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.4
  55. 2026-10-23 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 59th percentile
  56. 2026-10-23 13:14 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  57. 2026-10-23 13:14 UTCVendor advisory
  58. 2026-10-23 13:14 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-43hh-68v6-mf36 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.4
  59. 2026-10-22 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 59th percentile
  60. 2026-10-22 10:51 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  61. 2026-10-22 10:51 UTCVendor advisory
  62. 2026-10-22 10:51 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-43hh-68v6-mf36 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.4
  63. 2026-10-21 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 59th percentile
  64. 2026-10-21 08:33 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  65. 2026-10-21 08:33 UTCVendor advisory
  66. 2026-10-21 08:33 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-43hh-68v6-mf36 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.4
  67. 2026-10-20 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 59th percentile
  68. 2026-10-20 06:13 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  69. 2026-10-20 06:13 UTCVendor advisory
  70. 2026-10-20 06:13 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-43hh-68v6-mf36 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.4
  71. 2026-10-19 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 59th percentile
  72. 2026-10-19 03:53 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  73. 2026-10-19 03:53 UTCVendor advisory
  74. 2026-10-19 03:53 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-43hh-68v6-mf36 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.4
  75. 2026-10-18 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 59th percentile

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-16242?
CVE-2026-16242 is a critical-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on July 20, 2026. A flaw was found in the Konnectivity proxy-server configuration for hosted control planes. The agent-facing listener was started without --cluster-ca-cert (and without token-based agent authentication), so client certificates were not validated. A remote attacker who can reach the Konnectivity…
When was CVE-2026-16242 made public?
CVE-2026-16242 was made public on July 17, 2026: that is the date its CVE record's CNA, Red Hat, Inc., gives for when the vulnerability was made public. The CVE record itself was published on July 20, 2026. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of September 14, 2026; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2026-16242 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-16242 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0.9% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (60th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-16242?
CVE-2026-16242 has a CVSS base score of 9.4 (a secondary CVSS source that NVD displays; NVD's own analysis pending).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-16242?
A fix for CVE-2026-16242 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2026-16242 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2026-16242

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-16242?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.