CVE-2026-118515

HIGHPre-NVD 8.48.4
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

“—” beside the score: it is equal to the CVSS score beside it.

This high-severity CVE scores 8.4 under a secondary CVSS source (NVD's own analysis pending). EPSS exploit probability: 0.6% (48th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs). No GitHub Security Advisory CVSS is on record for this CVE.

Triggered by: Headline CVSS from a secondary CVSS source
Sources: EPSS, a secondary CVSS source

Also known asEUVD-2026-118320 (ENISA EUVD)Source: ENISA EUVD

8.4EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixRemediate within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high (the SSVC decision on this page).
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0.6%CVSS: 8.4Exploit: None knownExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is available — apply it.

The Symfony Serializer component DataUriNormalizer handles only the exact types SplFileInfo, SplFileObject, and File, so for a property typed with a subclass such as UploadedFile, ObjectNormalizer instantiates the object through its constructor from attacker-controlled data, including the file path. This allows an arbitrary file on the server to be treated as an uploaded file in Symfony versions prior to 5.4.56, 6.x prior to 6.4.50, 7.x prior to 7.4.23, and 8.x prior to 8.1.11.

A request body such as {"image": {"path": "/path/to/project/.env.local", "originalName": "a.png", "test": true}} makes the application handle any file on the server as an upload, without the file being sent. With test: true, UploadedFile::isValid() skips is_uploaded_file() and move() falls back to rename(). Assert\File does not prevent this because it validates the file at the attacker-chosen path, which exists on the server. Any code that deserializes untrusted data into a type that holds such a property is affected. That includes #[MapRequestPayload] on a DTO with an UploadedFile property, which is how uploads are mapped in Symfony 8.1; a single unauthenticated request with a JSON or form body is enough. Depending on what the application does with the upload, this can expose any file readable by PHP (for instance, when uploads are stored and served back), move any such file when move() is called, and reveal whether a path exists.

A serializer built without DataUriNormalizer ahead of the object normalizer is not protected by the fix; the serializer configured by FrameworkBundle is.

CVSS
8.4
EG Score
8.4HIGHmedium confidence
EG Risk
53
EG Risk 53/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity84% × 45%
Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 8.4 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.
Exploitation0.6% × 40%
FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.
Automatability100% × 15%
CISA's SSVC Automatable value: yes (Vulnrichment).
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).
Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.
EPSS PROB
0.6%
EPSS %ILE
48th
KEV
Not listed

What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)

The EG score (8.4): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 8.4 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.

EG Severity
8.4 HIGHCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.a secondary CVSS source
EG Likelihood
0.6% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-11-10). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
Confirmed exploitation
None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
EG Priority
SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).CISA BOD 26-04: 3 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; 60 days if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).

A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.

Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)3 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; 60 days if it is not.

The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

November 6, 2026

Last Modified

November 11, 2026

Advisory Details (3)

Auto-updated Nov 6, 2026
Patch available. Sources: github, github_commit.
GitHub commit

commit c459104eb18e (symfony/symfony)

Fix landed in symfony/symfony commit c459104eb18e — awaiting tagged release

https://github.com/symfony/symfony/commit/c459104eb18ebda31e112c5490970da3f30bd668
GitHub commit

commit 72ece5bb3084 (symfony/symfony)

Fix landed in symfony/symfony commit 72ece5bb3084 — awaiting tagged release

https://github.com/symfony/symfony/commit/72ece5bb3084e8233325166357f85c8c0650ee86
GitHub advisoryMentions a patch (unverified)

The Serializer Builds UploadedFile Objects From Request Data, Letting a Client Point an Upload at Any Server File · Advisory · symfony/symfony · GitHub

https://github.com/symfony/symfony/security/advisories/GHSA-h38r-xrmh-cwhr

Affected Packages

(3 across 3 ecosystems)
Debian:12(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
symfony5.4.23+dfsg-1 ... 8.2.0~beta1+dfsg-1 (168 versions)
  • every version on: no fix on record
—
Debian:13(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
symfony6.4.21+dfsg-2 ... 6.4.49+dfsg-0+deb13u1 (7 versions)
  • every version up to 6.4.50+dfsg-0+deb13u1: fixed in 6.4.50+dfsg-0+deb13u1
—
Debian:14(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
symfony6.4.21+dfsg-2 ... 7.4.9+dfsg-1 (66 versions)
  • every version up to 7.4.23+dfsg-1: fixed in 7.4.23+dfsg-1
—

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 7× in last 7d / 9× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed its CVE.org record (CNA or CISA ADP). An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). "EchelonGraph re-scored" is our own recompute of this CVE's score, not an update from a source, and is not counted in the refreshes above. Most recent first.

  1. 2026-11-13 16:50 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
  2. 2026-11-12 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
  3. 2026-11-11 16:38 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
  4. 2026-11-11 05:28 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  5. 2026-11-11 03:20 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  6. 2026-11-10 16:42 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
  7. 2026-11-09 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
  8. 2026-11-08 16:38 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
  9. 2026-11-07 16:38 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
  10. 2026-11-06 17:28 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  11. 2026-11-06 17:04 UTCENISA EUVD ID recordedEUVD-2026-118320 · Source: ENISA EUVD
  12. 2026-11-06 16:22 UTCEchelonGraph re-scoredFirst assessed: 8.4 HIGH
  13. 2026-11-06 16:22 UTCMITRE cvelistV5first tracked

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-118515?
CVE-2026-118515 is a high-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on November 6, 2026. The Symfony Serializer component DataUriNormalizer handles only the exact types SplFileInfo, SplFileObject, and File, so for a property typed with a subclass such as UploadedFile, ObjectNormalizer instantiates the object through its constructor from attacker-controlled data, including the file…
When was the CVE record for CVE-2026-118515 published?
The CVE record for CVE-2026-118515 was published on November 6, 2026. That is the record's publication date; the vulnerability itself may have been made public earlier. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of November 11, 2026; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2026-118515 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-118515 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0.6% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (48th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-118515?
CVE-2026-118515 has a CVSS base score of 8.4 (a secondary CVSS source that NVD displays; NVD's own analysis pending).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-118515?
A fix for CVE-2026-118515 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-118515

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-118515?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.