CVE-2026-123792

HIGHPre-NVD 8.78.7
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

“—” beside the score: it is equal to the CVSS score beside it.

This high-severity CVE scores 8.7 under a secondary CVSS source (NVD's own analysis pending). EPSS exploit probability: 0.5% (43rd percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs). No GitHub Security Advisory CVSS is on record for this CVE.

Triggered by: Headline CVSS from a secondary CVSS source
Sources: EPSS, a secondary CVSS source

Also known asEUVD-2026-118309 (ENISA EUVD)Source: ENISA EUVD

8.7EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixRemediate within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high (the SSVC decision on this page).
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0.5%CVSS: 8.7Exploit: None knownExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is available — apply it.

The Symfony Yaml components Inline and Parser, parse some YAML documents inefficiently, so that a small crafted document can take disproportionately long to process, keeping a PHP process busy for seconds or minutes, potentially causing a denial of service in Symfony versions prior to 5.4.56, 6.x prior to 6.4.50, 7.x prior to 7.4.23, and 8.x prior to 8.1.11.

The parser repeats work it has already done in several places. An embedded mapping in a flow sequence is parsed again for every scalar appended to it, and so are the collections nested in it, so the parse time grows exponentially with the nesting depth. The patterns matching mapping keys and tags scan a run of spaces once per character of the run, and each scalar of a flow collection is matched against a copy of the rest of the collection, so the parse time grows quadratically with the size of the input. Nested blocks are also copied at each nesting level, which consumes memory as well as time. A few other constructs, such as an empty sequence item followed by a blank line or an anchor named 0, trigger similar repeated work.

Any code parsing untrusted YAML is affected, with the default flags. In Symfony 7.4 and later, that includes #[MapRequestPayload] when the Yaml component is installed and the endpoint does not restrict acceptFormat. A single unauthenticated request with a YAML content type keeps a PHP worker busy until max_execution_time. JSON documents are valid YAML, so a JSON payload sent with a YAML content type is enough for the flow collection case. In Symfony 6.4, #[MapRequestPayload] accepts YAML only when the application registers a yaml request format.

CVSS
8.7
EG Score
8.7HIGHmedium confidence
EG Risk
54
EG Risk 54/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity87% × 45%
Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 8.7 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.
Exploitation0.5% × 40%
FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.
Automatability100% × 15%
CISA's SSVC Automatable value: yes (Vulnrichment).
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).
Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.
EPSS PROB
0.5%
EPSS %ILE
43rd
KEV
Not listed

What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)

The EG score (8.7): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 8.7 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.

EG Severity
8.7 HIGHCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.a secondary CVSS source
EG Likelihood
0.5% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-11-10). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
Confirmed exploitation
None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
EG Priority
SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).CISA BOD 26-04: 14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; 60 days if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).

A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.

Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; 60 days if it is not.

The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

November 6, 2026

Last Modified

November 10, 2026

Advisory Details (4)

Auto-updated Nov 6, 2026
Patch available. Sources: github, github_commit.
GitHub commit

commit 49e03035eda3 (symfony/symfony)

Fix landed in symfony/symfony commit 49e03035eda3 — awaiting tagged release

https://github.com/symfony/symfony/commit/49e03035eda3000e978a4612db74900013255ccd
GitHub commit

commit 08db22d52e5d (symfony/symfony)

Fix landed in symfony/symfony commit 08db22d52e5d — awaiting tagged release

https://github.com/symfony/symfony/commit/08db22d52e5d3e6ec2f5c50db30a4d818100ffb9
GitHub commit

commit 487f63bf2cac (symfony/symfony)

Fix landed in symfony/symfony commit 487f63bf2cac — awaiting tagged release

https://github.com/symfony/symfony/commit/487f63bf2cacebc8ed8273c5c10d92955acd2402
GitHub advisoryMentions a patch (unverified)

Exponential and Quadratic Parse Times in the YAML Parser Let a Single Document Hold a Process · Advisory · symfony/symfony · GitHub

https://github.com/symfony/symfony/security/advisories/GHSA-hwfg-qwvh-2wfx

Affected Packages

(3 across 3 ecosystems)
Debian:12(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
symfony5.4.23+dfsg-1 ... 8.2.0~beta1+dfsg-1 (168 versions)
  • every version on: no fix on record
—
Debian:13(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
symfony6.4.21+dfsg-2 ... 6.4.49+dfsg-0+deb13u1 (7 versions)
  • every version up to 6.4.50+dfsg-0+deb13u1: fixed in 6.4.50+dfsg-0+deb13u1
—
Debian:14(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
symfony6.4.21+dfsg-2 ... 7.4.9+dfsg-1 (66 versions)
  • every version up to 7.4.23+dfsg-1: fixed in 7.4.23+dfsg-1
—

Weakness Classification(2)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 8× in last 7d / 8× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed its CVE.org record (CNA or CISA ADP). An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). "EchelonGraph re-scored" is our own recompute of this CVE's score, not an update from a source, and is not counted in the refreshes above. Most recent first.

  1. 2026-11-12 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 43rd percentile
  2. 2026-11-11 16:38 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 43rd percentile
  3. 2026-11-11 03:49 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  4. 2026-11-10 16:42 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 43rd percentile
  5. 2026-11-10 15:27 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  6. 2026-11-10 14:50 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  7. 2026-11-09 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 43rd percentile
  8. 2026-11-08 16:38 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 43rd percentile
  9. 2026-11-07 16:38 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 43rd percentile
  10. 2026-11-06 16:28 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  11. 2026-11-06 16:04 UTCENISA EUVD ID recordedEUVD-2026-118309 · Source: ENISA EUVD
  12. 2026-11-06 15:28 UTCEchelonGraph re-scoredFirst assessed: 8.7 HIGH
  13. 2026-11-06 15:27 UTCMITRE cvelistV5first tracked

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-123792?
CVE-2026-123792 is a high-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on November 6, 2026. The Symfony Yaml components Inline and Parser, parse some YAML documents inefficiently, so that a small crafted document can take disproportionately long to process, keeping a PHP process busy for seconds or minutes, potentially causing a denial of service in Symfony versions prior to 5.4.56, 6.x…
When was CVE-2026-123792 made public?
CVE-2026-123792 was made public on November 6, 2026: that is the date its CVE record's CNA, Checkmarx, gives for when the vulnerability was made public. The CVE record itself was published on November 6, 2026. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of November 10, 2026; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2026-123792 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-123792 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0.5% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (43rd percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-123792?
CVE-2026-123792 has a CVSS base score of 8.7 (a secondary CVSS source that NVD displays; NVD's own analysis pending).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-123792?
A fix for CVE-2026-123792 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-123792

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-123792?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.