CVE-2026-115683

MEDIUMPre-NVD 6.86.8
EchelonGraph scoreHIGH confidence

“—” beside the score: it is equal to the CVSS score beside it.

Score 6.8 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: MODERATE) published 2026-10-30. The CNA's CVSS baseline 6.8; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: the CNA's CVSS, EPSS, GitHub Security Advisory
Elevated

Also known asEUVD-2026-113941 (ENISA EUVD) · GHSA-rgq4-6fxx-v9rg (GitHub Security Advisories)Source: ENISA EUVD

6.8EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixRemediate within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high (the SSVC decision on this page).
  • CISA's Vulnrichment rates exploitation as PoC; EchelonGraph holds no exploit-code reference for it
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0.2%CVSS: 6.8Exploit: No code on recordExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is available — apply it.

A race condition in Epiphany allows a malicious website to bypass the TLS/SSL certificate warning page.

Epiphany registers the main-world script message handler "tlsErrorPage" so its internal TLS error page can implement "Accept Risk and Proceed". The handler was registered immediately before loading the error page, leaving a brief window where the previously loaded untrusted origin could still call window.webkit.messageHandlers.tlsErrorPage.postMessage(...). The only authorization check compares a numeric WebKit page id that increments predictably; an attacker can burst-guess ids and approve a certificate exception with no user click.

If a victim visits malicious site A that redirects to site B with an invalid certificate, site A can, for a few milliseconds, disable TLS certificate error warnings for host B until Epiphany is restarted, enabling man-in-the-middle or site spoofing for that host.

Upstream report: https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/epiphany/-/work_items/2978 Proof of concept: https://beford.net/poc/ssl_poc.html Fix: https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/epiphany/-/merge_requests/2245 (register handlers on LOAD_COMMITTED). No fixed release tagged yet; reporter and maintainer describe all current versions as affected. Maintainer notes the risky registration timing dates to commit 1da1caed (Epiphany 45.x era); before that the handlers were always registered and similarly reachable from web content.

CVSS v3
6.8
EG Score
6.8MEDIUMhigh confidence
EG Risk
47
EG Risk 47/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity68% × 45%
Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 6.8 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.
Exploitation40% × 40%
EchelonGraph's fixed weight for EG-KEV Tier 3 (Elevated): a constant, not a probability.
Automatability0% × 15%
CISA's SSVC Automatable value: no (Vulnrichment).
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low, Track* at medium and Attend at high mission impact.
Exploitation public PoC (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.
EPSS PROB
0.2%
EPSS %ILE
12th
KEV
Not listed

What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)

The EG score (6.8): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 6.8 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.

EG Severity
6.8 MEDIUMCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
EG Likelihood
0.2% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-11-01). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
Confirmed exploitation
None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
EG Priority
SSVC Track* at medium mission impactTrack at low, Track* at medium and Attend at high mission impact.CISA BOD 26-04: 14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low, Track* at medium and Attend at high mission impact.

A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.

Exploitation public PoC (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.

The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

October 30, 2026

Last Modified

November 2, 2026

Advisory Details (5)

Auto-updated Oct 30, 2026
Patch available. Sources: redhat.
Web page

(CVE-2026-115683) TLS/SSL Error Page Bypass window.webkit.messageHandlers.tlsErrorPage (#2978) · Issues · GNOME / Epiphany · GitLab

https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/epiphany/-/work_items/2978
Red HatMentions a patch (unverified)

CVE-2026-115683 - Red Hat Customer Portal

Affected: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 or OpenShift Container Platform 4, is affected by this vulnerability and a fix may be released to a

https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-115683

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-115683(1)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Affected Packages

(3 across 3 ecosystems)
Debian:12(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
epiphany-browser43.1-1 ... 51~rc-1 (48 versions)
  • every version on: no fix on record
—
Debian:13(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
epiphany-browser48.3-2 ... 51~rc-1 (18 versions)
  • every version on: no fix on record
—
Debian:14(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
epiphany-browser48.3-2 ... 51~rc-1 (16 versions)
  • every version up to 51.2-1: fixed in 51.2-1
—

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 7× in last 7d / 20× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed its CVE.org record (CNA or CISA ADP). An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). "EchelonGraph re-scored" is our own recompute of this CVE's score, not an update from a source, and is not counted in the refreshes above. Most recent first.

  1. 2026-11-13 16:50 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  2. 2026-11-12 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  3. 2026-11-11 16:38 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  4. 2026-11-10 16:42 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  5. 2026-11-09 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  6. 2026-11-08 16:38 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  7. 2026-11-07 16:38 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  8. 2026-11-06 16:36 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  9. 2026-11-05 16:36 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  10. 2026-11-04 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  11. 2026-11-03 16:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  12. 2026-11-02 16:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  13. 2026-11-02 11:42 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  14. 2026-11-02 11:42 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-rgq4-6fxx-v9rg · GitHub severity MODERATE · GitHub CVSS 6.8
  15. 2026-11-02 10:26 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  16. 2026-11-02 10:26 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-rgq4-6fxx-v9rg · GitHub severity MODERATE · GitHub CVSS 6.8
  17. 2026-11-02 09:42 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  18. 2026-11-02 09:42 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-rgq4-6fxx-v9rg · GitHub severity MODERATE · GitHub CVSS 6.8
  19. 2026-11-01 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  20. 2026-10-31 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  21. 2026-10-30 19:47 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  22. 2026-10-30 19:47 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-rgq4-6fxx-v9rg · GitHub CVSS 6.8
  23. 2026-10-30 15:02 UTCENISA EUVD ID recordedEUVD-2026-113941 · Source: ENISA EUVD
  24. 2026-10-30 14:26 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  25. 2026-10-30 13:40 UTCEchelonGraph re-scoredFirst assessed: 6.8 MEDIUM
Show 1 more
  1. 2026-10-30 13:39 UTCMITRE cvelistV5first tracked

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-115683?
CVE-2026-115683 is a medium-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on October 30, 2026. A race condition in Epiphany allows a malicious website to bypass the TLS/SSL certificate warning page. Epiphany registers the main-world script message handler "tlsErrorPage" so its internal TLS error page can implement "Accept Risk and Proceed". The handler was registered immediately before…
When was CVE-2026-115683 made public?
CVE-2026-115683 was made public on October 21, 2026: that is the date its CVE record's CNA, Fedora Project, gives for when the vulnerability was made public. The CVE record itself was published on October 30, 2026. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of November 2, 2026; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2026-115683 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-115683 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0.2% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (12th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-115683?
CVE-2026-115683 has a CVSS base score of 6.8 (the CNA's own assessment, by fedora; NVD's own analysis pending).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-115683?
A fix for CVE-2026-115683 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2026-115683 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-115683

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-115683?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.