CVE-2014-3566

CRITICALNVD 3.49.0
EchelonGraph scoreHIGH confidence

“▲” beside the score: it is higher than NVD's CVSS score.

Score elevated to 9.0 because EPSS predicted >99.9% probability of exploitation within the next 30 days (100th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs) when EchelonGraph scored this CVE. NVD baseline CVSS 3.4 retained for reference. Confidence: see factors.

Triggered by: EPSS exploit prediction (continuous uplift above 30%)
Sources: EPSS, GitHub Security Advisory, NVD CVSS v3
Weaponized

Also known asEUVD-2014-3547 (ENISA EUVD) · GHSA-r82h-wc4x-gcp9 (GitHub Security Advisories)Source: ENISA EUVD

9.0EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixRemediate within your standard update timelines (the SSVC decision on this page).
  • High exploitation likelihood — EPSS >99.9%
  • Public exploit code is available (Metasploit, other public proof-of-concept code)
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: >99.9%CVSS: 3.4Exploit: Metasploit · other public PoCExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is available — apply it.

The SSL protocol 3.0, as used in OpenSSL through 1.0.1i and other products, uses nondeterministic CBC padding, which makes it easier for man-in-the-middle attackers to obtain cleartext data via a padding-oracle attack, aka the "POODLE" issue.

CVSS v3
3.4
EG Score
9.0CRITICALhigh confidence
EG Risk
55
EG Risk 55/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity34% × 45%
Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 3.4 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.
Exploitation>99.9% × 40%
FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.
Automatability0% × 15%
CISA's SSVC Automatable value: no (Vulnrichment).
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at every mission impact level.
Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.
EPSS PROB
>99.9%
EPSS %ILE
100th
KEV
Not listed

What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)

The EG score (9.0): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 9.0 is EPSS's lift toward 9.0 from its impact severity (EG Severity, CVSS 3.4 LOW): a likelihood of exploitation, not impact.

EG Severity
3.4 LOWCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
EG Likelihood
>99.9% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-11-12). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
Confirmed exploitation
None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
EG Priority
SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at every mission impact level.CISA BOD 26-04: 60 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at every mission impact level.

A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.

Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)60 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.

The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

October 15, 2014

Last Modified

May 28, 2026

References (244)

15 of 244 shown · show the other 229

Patch Availability(22)

Vendor / EcosystemFix (by version range) / PatchReleasedSource
ubuntuopenjdk-7-source (7u75-2.5.4-1~utopic1) @ utopic2026-11-12ubuntu
ubuntuopenjdk-6-jre-zero (6b34-1.13.6-1ubuntu0.10.04.1) @ lucid2026-11-12ubuntu
redhatopenshift-origin-node-proxy-0:1.16.4.2-1.el6op2015-08-04redhat
redhatopenshift-origin-node-proxy-0:1.22.3.4-1.el6op2015-08-04redhat
redhatnss-util-0:3.16.2.3-2.el72015-03-05redhat
redhatjava-1.6.0-ibm-1:1.6.0.16.3-1jpp.1.el52015-02-24redhat
redhatjava-1.6.0-openjdk-1:1.6.0.34-1.13.6.1.el7_02015-01-26redhat
redhatjava-1.6.0-sun-1:1.6.0.91-1jpp.1.el72015-01-26redhat
redhatjava-1.7.0-oracle-1:1.7.0.75-1jpp.2.el72015-01-22redhat
redhatjava-1.8.0-oracle-1:1.8.0.31-1jpp.1.el62015-01-22redhat
redhatjava-1.8.0-openjdk-1:1.8.0.31-1.b13.el6_62015-01-21redhat
redhatjava-1.7.0-openjdk-1:1.7.0.75-2.5.4.2.el7_02015-01-21redhat
redhatjava-1.7.0-openjdk-1:1.7.0.75-2.5.4.0.el5_112015-01-20redhat
redhatopenssl2015-01-05redhat
redhatpatch2015-01-05redhat
redhatpatch2015-01-05redhat
redhatjava-1.7.0-ibm-1:1.7.0.8.0-1jpp.1.el6_62014-11-20redhat
redhatjava-1.7.1-ibm-1:1.7.1.2.0-1jpp.3.el7_02014-11-20redhat
redhatjava-1.5.0-ibm-1:1.5.0.16.8-1jpp.1.el6_62014-11-20redhat
redhatjava-1.7.0-ibm-1:1.7.0.8.0-1jpp.1.el52014-11-19redhat
redhatjava-1.6.0-ibm-1:1.6.0.16.2-1jpp.1.el6_62014-11-19redhat
redhatrubygem-hammer_cli_import-0:0.10.4-1.3.el6sat2014-11-13redhat

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Affected Packages

(50 across 7 ecosystems)
Debian:11(11)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
epiphany-browser3.38.2-1 ... 50.4-2 (75 versions)
  • every version on: no fix on record
—
erlang—
  • every version up to 1:17.3-dfsg-3: fixed in 1:17.3-dfsg-3
—
gnutls28—
  • every version up to 3.3.8-5: fixed in 3.3.8-5
—
haskell-tls—
  • every version up to 1.2.9-2: fixed in 1.2.9-2
—
lighttpd—
  • every version up to 1.4.35-4: fixed in 1.4.35-4
—
midori7.0-2.1
  • every version on: no fix on record
—
netsurf—
  • every version up to 3.6-1: fixed in 3.6-1
—
nss—
  • every version up to 2:3.17.1-1: fixed in 2:3.17.1-1
—
openssl—
  • every version up to 1.0.1j-1: fixed in 1.0.1j-1
—
pound—
  • every version up to 2.6-6: fixed in 2.6-6
—
surf2.0+git20201107-2 ... 2.1+git20250419-1 (13 versions)
  • every version on: no fix on record
—
Debian:12(10)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
epiphany-browser43.1-1 ... 51~rc-1 (47 versions)
  • every version on: no fix on record
—
erlang—
  • every version up to 1:17.3-dfsg-3: fixed in 1:17.3-dfsg-3
—
gnutls28—
  • every version up to 3.3.8-5: fixed in 3.3.8-5
—
haskell-tls—
  • every version up to 1.2.9-2: fixed in 1.2.9-2
—
lighttpd—
  • every version up to 1.4.35-4: fixed in 1.4.35-4
—
netsurf—
  • every version up to 3.6-1: fixed in 3.6-1
—
nss—
  • every version up to 2:3.17.1-1: fixed in 2:3.17.1-1
—
openssl—
  • every version up to 1.0.1j-1: fixed in 1.0.1j-1
—
surf2.1+git20221016-4 ... 2.1+git20250419-2 (6 versions)
  • every version on: no fix on record
—
wolfssl—
  • every version up to 3.4.8+dfsg-1: fixed in 3.4.8+dfsg-1
—
Debian:13(10)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
epiphany-browser48.3-2 ... 51~rc-1 (17 versions)
  • every version on: no fix on record
—
erlang—
  • every version up to 1:17.3-dfsg-3: fixed in 1:17.3-dfsg-3
—
gnutls28—
  • every version up to 3.3.8-5: fixed in 3.3.8-5
—
haskell-tls—
  • every version up to 1.2.9-2: fixed in 1.2.9-2
—
lighttpd—
  • every version up to 1.4.35-4: fixed in 1.4.35-4
—
netsurf—
  • every version up to 3.6-1: fixed in 3.6-1
—
nss—
  • every version up to 2:3.17.1-1: fixed in 2:3.17.1-1
—
openssl—
  • every version up to 1.0.1j-1: fixed in 1.0.1j-1
—
pound—
  • every version up to 2.6-6: fixed in 2.6-6
—
surf2.1+git20250419-1, 2.1+git20250419-2
  • every version on: no fix on record
—
Debian:14(10)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
epiphany-browser48.3-2 ... 51~rc-1 (16 versions)
  • every version on: no fix on record
—
erlang—
  • every version up to 1:17.3-dfsg-3: fixed in 1:17.3-dfsg-3
—
gnutls28—
  • every version up to 3.3.8-5: fixed in 3.3.8-5
—
haskell-tls—
  • every version up to 1.2.9-2: fixed in 1.2.9-2
—
lighttpd—
  • every version up to 1.4.35-4: fixed in 1.4.35-4
—
netsurf—
  • every version up to 3.6-1: fixed in 3.6-1
—
nss—
  • every version up to 2:3.17.1-1: fixed in 2:3.17.1-1
—
openssl—
  • every version up to 1.0.1j-1: fixed in 1.0.1j-1
—
pound—
  • every version up to 2.6-6: fixed in 2.6-6
—
surf2.1+git20250419-1, 2.1+git20250419-2
  • every version on: no fix on record
—
Debian:7(5)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
icedove10.0.12-1 ... 31.2.0-1~deb7u1 (45 versions)
  • every version up to 31.3.0-1~deb7u1: fixed in 31.3.0-1~deb7u1
—
lighttpd1.4.31-4, 1.4.31-4+deb7u1, 1.4.31-4+deb7u2, 1.4.31-4+deb7u3
  • every version up to 1.4.31-4+deb7u4: fixed in 1.4.31-4+deb7u4
—
openjdk-66b27-1.12.5-1 ... 6b34-1.13.6-1~deb6u1 (26 versions)
  • every version up to 6b34-1.13.6-1~deb7u1: fixed in 6b34-1.13.6-1~deb7u1
—
openjdk-77u13-2.3.6-1 ... 7u9-2.3.5~pre1-1 (59 versions)
  • every version up to 7u75-2.5.4-1~deb7u1: fixed in 7u75-2.5.4-1~deb7u1
—
pound2.6-2
  • every version up to 2.6-2+deb7u1: fixed in 2.6-2+deb7u1
—
Debian:6.0(3)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
lighttpd1.4.28-2 ... 1.4.28-2+squeeze1.6 (8 versions)
  • every version up to 1.4.28-2+squeeze1.7: fixed in 1.4.28-2+squeeze1.7
—
openjdk-66b18-1.8.10-0+squeeze1 ... 6b33-1.13.5-2~deb7u1 (96 versions)
  • every version up to 6b34-1.13.6-1~deb6u1: fixed in 6b34-1.13.6-1~deb6u1
—
pound2.5-1, 2.5-1.1, 2.6-1
  • every version up to 2.6-1+deb6u1: fixed in 2.6-1+deb6u1
—
Debian:8(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
pound2.6-6
  • every version up to 2.6-6+deb8u1: fixed in 2.6-6+deb8u1
—

Weakness Classification(2)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Additional Vendor Advisories

(9)

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 14× in last 7d / 60× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed its CVE.org record (CNA or CISA ADP). An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). "EchelonGraph re-scored" is our own recompute of this CVE's score, not an update from a source, and is not counted in the refreshes above. Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 128 rows on record for this CVE.

A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. None are among the latest 100 rows. The 28 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.

  1. 2026-11-12 17:03 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  2. 2026-11-12 17:03 UTCVendor advisory
  3. 2026-11-12 17:03 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-r82h-wc4x-gcp9 · GitHub severity MODERATE · GitHub CVSS 3.4
  4. 2026-11-11 16:41 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  5. 2026-11-11 16:41 UTCVendor advisory
  6. 2026-11-11 16:41 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-r82h-wc4x-gcp9 · GitHub severity MODERATE · GitHub CVSS 3.4
  7. 2026-11-10 16:20 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  8. 2026-11-10 16:20 UTCVendor advisory
  9. 2026-11-10 16:20 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-r82h-wc4x-gcp9 · GitHub severity MODERATE · GitHub CVSS 3.4
  10. 2026-11-09 15:55 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  11. 2026-11-09 15:55 UTCVendor advisory
  12. 2026-11-09 15:55 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-r82h-wc4x-gcp9 · GitHub severity MODERATE · GitHub CVSS 3.4
  13. 2026-11-08 15:34 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  14. 2026-11-08 15:34 UTCVendor advisory
  15. 2026-11-08 15:34 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-r82h-wc4x-gcp9 · GitHub severity MODERATE · GitHub CVSS 3.4
  16. 2026-11-07 15:13 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  17. 2026-11-07 15:13 UTCVendor advisory
  18. 2026-11-07 15:13 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-r82h-wc4x-gcp9 · GitHub severity MODERATE · GitHub CVSS 3.4
  19. 2026-11-06 14:52 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  20. 2026-11-06 14:52 UTCVendor advisory
  21. 2026-11-06 14:52 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-r82h-wc4x-gcp9 · GitHub severity MODERATE · GitHub CVSS 3.4
  22. 2026-11-05 14:31 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  23. 2026-11-05 14:31 UTCVendor advisory
  24. 2026-11-05 14:31 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-r82h-wc4x-gcp9 · GitHub severity MODERATE · GitHub CVSS 3.4
  25. 2026-11-04 14:10 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-11-04 14:10 UTCVendor advisory
  2. 2026-11-04 14:10 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-r82h-wc4x-gcp9 · GitHub severity MODERATE · GitHub CVSS 3.4
  3. 2026-11-03 13:47 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  4. 2026-11-03 13:47 UTCVendor advisory
  5. 2026-11-03 13:47 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-r82h-wc4x-gcp9 · GitHub severity MODERATE · GitHub CVSS 3.4
  6. 2026-11-02 13:11 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  7. 2026-11-02 13:11 UTCVendor advisory
  8. 2026-11-02 13:11 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-r82h-wc4x-gcp9 · GitHub severity MODERATE · GitHub CVSS 3.4
  9. 2026-11-02 03:55 UTCOSV refresh
  10. 2026-11-01 12:48 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  11. 2026-11-01 12:48 UTCVendor advisory
  12. 2026-11-01 12:48 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-r82h-wc4x-gcp9 · GitHub severity MODERATE · GitHub CVSS 3.4
  13. 2026-10-31 12:27 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  14. 2026-10-31 12:27 UTCVendor advisory
  15. 2026-10-31 12:26 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-r82h-wc4x-gcp9 · GitHub CVSS 3.4
  16. 2026-10-30 12:06 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  17. 2026-10-30 12:06 UTCVendor advisory
  18. 2026-10-30 12:06 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-r82h-wc4x-gcp9 · GitHub CVSS 3.4
  19. 2026-10-29 11:44 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  20. 2026-10-29 11:44 UTCVendor advisory
  21. 2026-10-29 11:44 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-r82h-wc4x-gcp9 · GitHub CVSS 3.4
  22. 2026-10-28 11:23 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  23. 2026-10-28 11:23 UTCVendor advisory
  24. 2026-10-28 11:22 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-r82h-wc4x-gcp9 · GitHub CVSS 3.4
  25. 2026-10-27 10:34 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  26. 2026-10-27 10:34 UTCVendor advisory
  27. 2026-10-27 10:34 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-r82h-wc4x-gcp9 · GitHub CVSS 3.4
  28. 2026-10-26 10:11 UTCVendor advisory
  29. 2026-10-26 10:11 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-r82h-wc4x-gcp9 · GitHub CVSS 3.4
  30. 2026-10-25 20:02 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  31. 2026-10-25 16:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS >99.9% · 100th percentile
  32. 2026-10-25 09:50 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  33. 2026-10-25 09:50 UTCVendor advisory
  34. 2026-10-25 09:50 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-r82h-wc4x-gcp9 · GitHub CVSS 3.4
  35. 2026-10-24 09:29 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  36. 2026-10-24 09:29 UTCVendor advisory
  37. 2026-10-24 09:29 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-r82h-wc4x-gcp9 · GitHub CVSS 3.4
  38. 2026-10-23 09:08 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  39. 2026-10-23 09:08 UTCVendor advisory
  40. 2026-10-23 09:07 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-r82h-wc4x-gcp9 · GitHub CVSS 3.4
  41. 2026-10-22 08:44 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  42. 2026-10-22 08:44 UTCVendor advisory
  43. 2026-10-22 08:44 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-r82h-wc4x-gcp9 · GitHub CVSS 3.4
  44. 2026-10-21 08:23 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  45. 2026-10-21 08:23 UTCVendor advisory
  46. 2026-10-21 08:22 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-r82h-wc4x-gcp9 · GitHub CVSS 3.4
  47. 2026-10-20 08:00 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  48. 2026-10-20 08:00 UTCVendor advisory
  49. 2026-10-20 07:59 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-r82h-wc4x-gcp9 · GitHub CVSS 3.4
  50. 2026-10-19 07:39 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  51. 2026-10-19 07:39 UTCVendor advisory
  52. 2026-10-19 07:38 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-r82h-wc4x-gcp9 · GitHub CVSS 3.4
  53. 2026-10-18 07:16 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  54. 2026-10-18 07:16 UTCVendor advisory
  55. 2026-10-18 07:16 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-r82h-wc4x-gcp9 · GitHub CVSS 3.4
  56. 2026-10-17 06:54 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  57. 2026-10-17 06:54 UTCVendor advisory
  58. 2026-10-17 06:54 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-r82h-wc4x-gcp9 · GitHub CVSS 3.4
  59. 2026-10-16 06:33 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  60. 2026-10-16 06:33 UTCVendor advisory
  61. 2026-10-16 06:32 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-r82h-wc4x-gcp9 · GitHub CVSS 3.4
  62. 2026-10-15 05:13 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  63. 2026-10-15 05:13 UTCVendor advisory
  64. 2026-10-15 05:13 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-r82h-wc4x-gcp9 · GitHub CVSS 3.4
  65. 2026-10-14 00:56 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  66. 2026-10-14 00:56 UTCVendor advisory
  67. 2026-10-14 00:56 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-r82h-wc4x-gcp9 · GitHub CVSS 3.4
  68. 2026-10-12 21:01 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  69. 2026-10-12 21:01 UTCVendor advisory
  70. 2026-10-12 21:01 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-r82h-wc4x-gcp9 · GitHub CVSS 3.4
  71. 2026-10-12 01:25 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  72. 2026-09-30 00:22 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  73. 2026-09-29 17:03 UTCOSV refresh
  74. 2026-09-10 08:53 UTCOSV refresh
  75. 2026-08-23 06:24 UTCOSV refresh

Publicly available exploits

(3 references)

Public exploit code is referenced for this CVE (1 Metasploit module, 2 GitHub PoCs). Defenders should treat patch urgency accordingly.

  • Metasploitauxiliary/scanner/ssl/ssl_version✓ verified
    Published Oct 17, 2014

    SSL/TLS Version Detection

    Open source ↗
  • GitHub PoCmpgn/poodle-PoC
    Published Feb 3, 2015

    :poodle: Poodle (Padding Oracle On Downgraded Legacy Encryption) attack CVE-2014-3566 :poodle:

    Open source ↗
  • GitHub PoCmikesplain/CVE-2014-3566-poodle-cookbook
    Published Oct 16, 2014
    Open source ↗

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2014-3566?
CVE-2014-3566 is a critical-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on October 15, 2014. The SSL protocol 3.0, as used in OpenSSL through 1.0.1i and other products, uses nondeterministic CBC padding, which makes it easier for man-in-the-middle attackers to obtain cleartext data via a padding-oracle attack, aka the "POODLE" issue.
When was CVE-2014-3566 made public?
CVE-2014-3566 was made public on October 14, 2014: that is the date its CVE record's CNA, Red Hat, Inc., gives for when the vulnerability was made public. The CVE record itself was published on October 15, 2014. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of May 28, 2026; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2014-3566 actively exploited?
CVE-2014-3566 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. EchelonGraph's EG-KEV model places it in Tier 2 (Weaponized), which is not evidence of exploitation: a Metasploit module exists for it. EchelonGraph does not test whether exploit code works. FIRST EPSS estimates a >99.9% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (100th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2014-3566?
CVE-2014-3566 has a CVSS v3 base score of 3.4 (NVD). EchelonGraph synthesises NVD + FIRST EPSS + GHSA into a combined EG score of 9.0 (CRITICAL).
How do I remediate CVE-2014-3566?
A fix for CVE-2014-3566 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2014-3566 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2014-3566

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2014-3566?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.