Pillow is a Python imaging library. In versions 2.3.0 through 12.3.0, EPS rendering does not validate the scaled image dimensions before invoking Ghostscript. Applications that process untrusted EPS or PostScript files using an application-selected scale greater than one can incur excessive Ghostscript CPU and temporary disk consumption. In versions with decompression-bomb protection, the scaled output is checked only after Ghostscript has completed rendering, allowing resource consumption beyond the configured pixel limit. The amplification depends on the scale selected by the application, not an attacker-controlled scale value. This issue is fixed in version 13.0.0.
CVE-2026-112899
“—” beside the score: it is equal to NVD's CVSS score.
This medium-severity CVE scores 5.3 under NVD CVSS v3. EPSS exploit probability: 0.5% (46th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs). No GitHub Security Advisory CVSS is on record for this CVE.
Also known asEUVD-2026-117791 (ENISA EUVD) · GHSA-vx6w-vv9f-6gvg (GitHub Security Advisories)Source: ENISA EUVD
- CISA's Vulnrichment rates exploitation as PoC; EchelonGraph holds no exploit-code reference for it
A fix is available — apply it.
- CVSS v3
- 5.3
- EG Score
- 5.3MEDIUMmedium confidence
- EG Risk
- 40EG Risk 40/100
EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.
How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)Severity53% × 45%Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 5.3 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.Exploitation40% × 40%EchelonGraph's fixed weight for EG-KEV Tier 3 (Elevated): a constant, not a probability.Automatability0% × 15%CISA's SSVC Automatable value: no (Vulnrichment).SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).Exploitation public PoC (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines. - EPSS PROB
- 0.5%
- EPSS %ILE
- 46th
- KEV
- Not listed
What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)
The EG score (5.3): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 5.3 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.
- EG Severity
- 5.3 MEDIUMCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.NVD CVSS v3 · CVSS v3.0 or v3.1
- EG Likelihood
- 0.5% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS. FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
- Confirmed exploitation
- None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
- EG Priority
- SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).CISA BOD 26-04: 60 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).
A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.
Exploitation public PoC (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table
BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)60 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.
The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it
Published
October 20, 2026
Last Modified
November 10, 2026
Advisory Details (4)
Auto-updated Nov 9, 202613.0.0
Patch available: python-pillow/Pillow 13.0.0
https://github.com/python-pillow/Pillow/releases/tag/13.0.0commit 3e8cc105588d (python-pillow/Pillow)
Patch available: python-pillow/Pillow 13.0.0 (contains commit 3e8cc105588d)
https://github.com/python-pillow/Pillow/commit/3e8cc105588d1dfe062fcada0b6058c1b5f14b65Do not allow Ghostscript to render beyond decompression bomb limit
Patch available: python-pillow/Pillow 13.0.0 (PR #10112 merged 2026-10-03)
https://github.com/python-pillow/Pillow/pull/10112EPS load(scale) lets Ghostscript render past the decompression bomb limit · Advisory · python-pillow/Pillow · GitHub
https://github.com/python-pillow/Pillow/security/advisories/GHSA-vx6w-vv9f-6gvgVendor Advisories for CVE-2026-112899(7)
These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.
- RHSA-2026:94738Red Hat Product SecurityCritical
Red Hat Security Advisory: Red Hat AI Inference 3.5.3 (CUDA)
- RHSA-2026:94721Red Hat Product SecurityCritical
Red Hat Security Advisory: Red Hat AI Inference Tech Preview 3.5.3 (Gaudi)
- RHSA-2026:94717Red Hat Product SecurityCritical
Red Hat Security Advisory: Red Hat AI Inference 3.5.3 (Spyre)
- RHSA-2026:94715Red Hat Product SecurityCritical
Red Hat Security Advisory: Red Hat AI Inference Model Optimization Tools 3.5.3 (CUDA)
- RHSA-2026:94709Red Hat Product SecurityCritical
Red Hat Security Advisory: Red Hat AI Inference 3.5.3 (ROCm)
- RHSA-2026:94702Red Hat Product SecurityCritical
Red Hat Security Advisory: Red Hat AI Inference 3.5.3 (CPU)
- GHSA-vx6w-vv9f-6gvgGitHub Security AdvisoriesMedium
Pillow: EPS load(scale) lets Ghostscript render past the decompression bomb limit
Patch Availability(7)
| Vendor / Ecosystem | Fix (by version range) / Patch | Released | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| redhat | rhaii/vllm-rocm-rhel9:1793444456 | 2026-11-03 | redhat |
| redhat | rhaii/vllm-gaudi-rhel9:1793444510 | 2026-11-03 | redhat |
| redhat | rhaii/vllm-cuda-rhel9:1793444600 | 2026-11-03 | redhat |
| redhat | rhaii/model-opt-cuda-rhel9:1793444339 | 2026-11-03 | redhat |
| redhat | rhaii/vllm-spyre-rhel9:1793444409 | 2026-11-03 | redhat |
| redhat | rhaii/vllm-cpu-rhel9:1793444554 | 2026-11-03 | redhat |
| pip | Pillow @ 13.0.0 (fixes >= 2.3.0, <= 12.3.0) | — | ghsa |
Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.
Affected Packages
(4 across 4 ecosystems)
Debian:12(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| pillow | 10.0.0-1 ... 9.5.0-1 (24 versions) |
| — |
Debian:13(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| pillow | 11.1.0-5 ... 13.0.0-1 (14 versions) |
| — |
Debian:14(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| pillow | 11.1.0-5 ... 13.0.0-1 (10 versions) |
| — |
PyPI(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| pillow | 10.0.0 ... 9.5.0 (86 versions) |
| — |
Weakness Classification(1)
MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 17× in last 7d / 25× in last 30d)
Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed its CVE.org record (CNA or CISA ADP). An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). "EchelonGraph re-scored" is our own recompute of this CVE's score, not an update from a source, and is not counted in the refreshes above. Most recent first.
- 2026-11-13 16:50 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 46th percentile
- 2026-11-12 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 46th percentile
- 2026-11-11 16:38 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 46th percentile
- 2026-11-11 06:44 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-11-11 06:44 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-vx6w-vv9f-6gvg · GitHub severity MODERATE
- 2026-11-10 18:48 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored▼ 1.00
- 2026-11-10 18:48 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-vx6w-vv9f-6gvg · GitHub severity MODERATE
- 2026-11-10 18:47 UTCNVD updateCVSS v3 → 5.3
- 2026-11-10 16:42 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 45th percentile
- 2026-11-09 19:27 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
- 2026-11-09 19:27 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-11-09 19:27 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-vx6w-vv9f-6gvg · GitHub severity MODERATE
- 2026-11-09 18:41 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
- 2026-11-09 18:41 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-11-09 18:41 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-vx6w-vv9f-6gvg · GitHub severity MODERATE
- 2026-11-09 18:40 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
- 2026-11-09 18:40 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-11-09 18:40 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-vx6w-vv9f-6gvg · GitHub severity MODERATE
- 2026-11-09 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 45th percentile
- 2026-11-08 16:38 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 45th percentile
- 2026-11-07 16:38 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 45th percentile
- 2026-11-06 16:36 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 45th percentile
- 2026-11-05 22:04 UTCENISA EUVD ID recordedEUVD-2026-117791 · Source: ENISA EUVD
- 2026-11-05 21:29 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
- 2026-11-05 21:29 UTCVendor advisory
Show 8 moreShow fewer
- 2026-11-05 21:29 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-vx6w-vv9f-6gvg · GitHub severity MODERATE
- 2026-11-05 20:43 UTCEchelonGraph re-scoredFirst assessed: 6.3 MEDIUM
- 2026-11-05 20:43 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-11-05 20:43 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-vx6w-vv9f-6gvg · GitHub severity MODERATE
- 2026-11-05 20:42 UTCMITRE cvelistV5CVSS → 6.3 · CVSS v4 → 6.3
- 2026-11-01 07:59 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-vx6w-vv9f-6gvg · GitHub severity MODERATE
- 2026-10-25 14:51 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
- 2026-10-20 21:22 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
Related CVEs(same product + same vendor + same CWE)
Same product
10 shownDebian:12:pillow
Same vendor
10 shownredhat:RHSA-2026:94702
Frequently asked(5)
What is CVE-2026-112899?
When was the CVE record for CVE-2026-112899 published?
Is CVE-2026-112899 actively exploited?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-112899?
How do I remediate CVE-2026-112899?
Dependency Blast Radius
See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-112899
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-112899?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.