CVE-2025-7395

CRITICALPre-NVD 9.29.2
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

“—” beside the score: it is equal to the CVSS score beside it.

This critical-severity CVE scores 9.2 under a secondary CVSS source (NVD's own analysis pending). EPSS exploit probability: 0.3% (19th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs). No GitHub Security Advisory CVSS is on record for this CVE.

Triggered by: Headline CVSS from a secondary CVSS source
Sources: EPSS, a secondary CVSS source

Also known asEUVD-2025-21936 (ENISA EUVD) · GHSA-g6x8-5jj7-qqfv (GitHub Security Advisories)Source: ENISA EUVD

9.2EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixRemediate within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high (the SSVC decision on this page).
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0.3%CVSS: 9.2Exploit: None knownExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is available — apply it.

A certificate verification error in wolfSSL when building with the WOLFSSL_SYS_CA_CERTS and WOLFSSL_APPLE_NATIVE_CERT_VALIDATION options results in the wolfSSL client failing to properly verify the server certificate's domain name, allowing any certificate issued by a trusted CA to be accepted regardless of the hostname.

CVSS
9.2
EG Score
9.2CRITICALmedium confidence
EG Risk
57
EG Risk 57/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity92% × 45%
Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 9.2 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.
Exploitation0.3% × 40%
FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.
Automatability100% × 15%
CISA's SSVC Automatable value: yes (Vulnrichment).
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).
Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.
EPSS PROB
0.3%
EPSS %ILE
19th
KEV
Not listed

What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)

The EG score (9.2): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 9.2 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.

EG Severity
9.2 CRITICALCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.a secondary CVSS source
EG Likelihood
0.3% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-11-12). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
Confirmed exploitation
None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
EG Priority
SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).CISA BOD 26-04: 14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; 60 days if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).

A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.

Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; 60 days if it is not.

The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

July 18, 2025

Last Modified

June 17, 2026

Advisory Details (1)

Auto-updated Sep 15, 2026
Patch available.
Web page

GitHub - wolfSSL/wolfssl: The wolfSSL library is a small, fast, portable implementation of TLS/SSL for embedded devices to the cloud. wolfSSL supports up to TLS 1.3 and DTLS 1.3! Update to wolfSSL 5.9.1 for the latest CVE fixes. · GitHub

http://github.com/wolfssl/wolfssl.git

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2025-7395(1)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 16× in last 7d / 78× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed its CVE.org record (CNA or CISA ADP). An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). "EchelonGraph re-scored" is our own recompute of this CVE's score, not an update from a source, and is not counted in the refreshes above. Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 316 rows on record for this CVE.

A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. None are among the latest 100 rows. The 216 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.

  1. 2026-11-13 16:50 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 19th percentile
  2. 2026-11-12 17:43 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  3. 2026-11-12 17:43 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-g6x8-5jj7-qqfv · GitHub severity CRITICAL
  4. 2026-11-12 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 19th percentile
  5. 2026-11-11 17:33 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  6. 2026-11-11 17:33 UTCVendor advisory
  7. 2026-11-11 17:33 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-g6x8-5jj7-qqfv · GitHub severity CRITICAL
  8. 2026-11-11 16:37 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 19th percentile
  9. 2026-11-10 17:18 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  10. 2026-11-10 17:18 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-g6x8-5jj7-qqfv · GitHub severity CRITICAL
  11. 2026-11-10 16:41 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 18th percentile
  12. 2026-11-09 17:08 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  13. 2026-11-09 17:08 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-g6x8-5jj7-qqfv · GitHub severity CRITICAL
  14. 2026-11-09 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 18th percentile
  15. 2026-11-08 16:58 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  16. 2026-11-08 16:58 UTCVendor advisory
  17. 2026-11-08 16:58 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-g6x8-5jj7-qqfv · GitHub severity CRITICAL
  18. 2026-11-08 16:37 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 18th percentile
  19. 2026-11-07 16:48 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  20. 2026-11-07 16:48 UTCVendor advisory
  21. 2026-11-07 16:48 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-g6x8-5jj7-qqfv · GitHub severity CRITICAL
  22. 2026-11-07 16:37 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 18th percentile
  23. 2026-11-06 16:39 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  24. 2026-11-06 16:39 UTCVendor advisory
  25. 2026-11-06 16:39 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-g6x8-5jj7-qqfv · GitHub severity CRITICAL
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-11-06 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 18th percentile
  2. 2026-11-05 19:25 UTCOSV refresh
  3. 2026-11-05 16:36 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 18th percentile
  4. 2026-11-05 16:25 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  5. 2026-11-05 16:25 UTCVendor advisory
  6. 2026-11-05 16:25 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-g6x8-5jj7-qqfv · GitHub severity CRITICAL
  7. 2026-11-04 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 18th percentile
  8. 2026-11-04 16:09 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  9. 2026-11-04 16:09 UTCVendor advisory
  10. 2026-11-04 16:09 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-g6x8-5jj7-qqfv · GitHub severity CRITICAL
  11. 2026-11-03 16:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 18th percentile
  12. 2026-11-03 15:56 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  13. 2026-11-03 15:56 UTCVendor advisory
  14. 2026-11-03 15:56 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-g6x8-5jj7-qqfv · GitHub severity CRITICAL
  15. 2026-11-02 16:43 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 18th percentile
  16. 2026-11-02 15:46 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  17. 2026-11-02 15:46 UTCVendor advisory
  18. 2026-11-02 15:46 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-g6x8-5jj7-qqfv · GitHub severity CRITICAL
  19. 2026-11-01 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 18th percentile
  20. 2026-11-01 15:36 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  21. 2026-11-01 15:36 UTCVendor advisory
  22. 2026-11-01 15:36 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-g6x8-5jj7-qqfv · GitHub severity CRITICAL
  23. 2026-10-31 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 18th percentile
  24. 2026-10-31 15:25 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  25. 2026-10-31 15:25 UTCVendor advisory
  26. 2026-10-31 15:25 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-g6x8-5jj7-qqfv · GitHub severity CRITICAL
  27. 2026-10-30 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 18th percentile
  28. 2026-10-30 15:15 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  29. 2026-10-30 15:15 UTCVendor advisory
  30. 2026-10-30 15:15 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-g6x8-5jj7-qqfv · GitHub severity CRITICAL
  31. 2026-10-29 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 18th percentile
  32. 2026-10-29 15:06 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  33. 2026-10-29 15:06 UTCVendor advisory
  34. 2026-10-29 15:05 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-g6x8-5jj7-qqfv · GitHub severity CRITICAL
  35. 2026-10-28 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 18th percentile
  36. 2026-10-28 14:56 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  37. 2026-10-28 14:56 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-g6x8-5jj7-qqfv · GitHub severity CRITICAL
  38. 2026-10-27 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 18th percentile
  39. 2026-10-27 14:22 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  40. 2026-10-27 14:22 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-g6x8-5jj7-qqfv · GitHub severity CRITICAL
  41. 2026-10-26 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 18th percentile
  42. 2026-10-26 13:59 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  43. 2026-10-26 13:59 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-g6x8-5jj7-qqfv · GitHub severity CRITICAL
  44. 2026-10-25 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 18th percentile
  45. 2026-10-25 16:01 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  46. 2026-10-25 13:26 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  47. 2026-10-25 13:26 UTCVendor advisory
  48. 2026-10-25 13:26 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-g6x8-5jj7-qqfv · GitHub severity CRITICAL
  49. 2026-10-24 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 17th percentile
  50. 2026-10-24 13:14 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  51. 2026-10-24 13:14 UTCVendor advisory
  52. 2026-10-24 13:13 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-g6x8-5jj7-qqfv · GitHub severity CRITICAL
  53. 2026-10-23 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 17th percentile
  54. 2026-10-23 13:02 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  55. 2026-10-23 13:02 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-g6x8-5jj7-qqfv · GitHub severity CRITICAL
  56. 2026-10-22 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 17th percentile
  57. 2026-10-22 12:51 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  58. 2026-10-22 12:51 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-g6x8-5jj7-qqfv · GitHub severity CRITICAL
  59. 2026-10-21 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 17th percentile
  60. 2026-10-21 12:39 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  61. 2026-10-21 12:39 UTCVendor advisory
  62. 2026-10-21 12:39 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-g6x8-5jj7-qqfv · GitHub severity CRITICAL
  63. 2026-10-20 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 17th percentile
  64. 2026-10-20 12:30 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  65. 2026-10-20 12:29 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-g6x8-5jj7-qqfv · GitHub severity CRITICAL
  66. 2026-10-19 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 17th percentile
  67. 2026-10-19 12:18 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  68. 2026-10-19 12:18 UTCVendor advisory
  69. 2026-10-19 12:17 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-g6x8-5jj7-qqfv · GitHub severity CRITICAL
  70. 2026-10-18 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 16th percentile
  71. 2026-10-18 10:29 UTCVendor advisory
  72. 2026-10-18 10:28 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-g6x8-5jj7-qqfv · GitHub severity CRITICAL
  73. 2026-10-18 05:15 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  74. 2026-10-17 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 16th percentile
  75. 2026-10-17 08:24 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2025-7395?
CVE-2025-7395 is a critical-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on July 18, 2025. A certificate verification error in wolfSSL when building with the WOLFSSL_SYS_CA_CERTS and WOLFSSL_APPLE_NATIVE_CERT_VALIDATION options results in the wolfSSL client failing to properly verify the server certificate's domain name, allowing any certificate issued by a trusted CA to be accepted…
When was the CVE record for CVE-2025-7395 published?
The CVE record for CVE-2025-7395 was published on July 18, 2025. That is the record's publication date; the vulnerability itself may have been made public earlier. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of June 17, 2026; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2025-7395 actively exploited?
CVE-2025-7395 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0.3% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (19th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2025-7395?
CVE-2025-7395 has a CVSS base score of 9.2 (a secondary CVSS source that NVD displays; NVD's own analysis pending).
How do I remediate CVE-2025-7395?
A fix for CVE-2025-7395 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2025-7395 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2025-7395

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2025-7395?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.