CVE-2025-64459

CRITICALPre-NVD 9.19.1
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

“—” beside the score: it is equal to the CVSS score beside it.

Score 9.1 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: CRITICAL) published 2025-11-05. CISA-ADP (Vulnrichment) CVSS v3.1 baseline 9.1; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: CISA-ADP (Vulnrichment) CVSS v3.1, EPSS, GitHub Security Advisory
Elevated

Also known asEUVD-2025-37763 (ENISA EUVD) · GHSA-frmv-pr5f-9mcr (GitHub Security Advisories) · PYSEC-2025-108 (OSV.dev)Source: ENISA EUVD

9.1EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixRemediate within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high (the SSVC decision on this page).
  • Public exploit or proof-of-concept code is available
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 19%CVSS: 9.1Exploit: Public PoCExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is available — apply it.

An issue was discovered in 5.1 before 5.1.14, 4.2 before 4.2.26, and 5.2 before 5.2.8. The methods QuerySet.filter(), QuerySet.exclude(), and QuerySet.get(), and the class Q(), are subject to SQL injection when using a suitably crafted dictionary, with dictionary expansion, as the _connector argument. Earlier, unsupported Django series (such as 5.0.x, 4.1.x, and 3.2.x) were not evaluated and may also be affected. Django would like to thank cyberstan for reporting this issue.

CVSS v3
9.1
EG Score
9.1CRITICALmedium confidence
EG Risk
72
EG Risk 72/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity91% × 45%
Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 9.1 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.
Exploitation40% × 40%
EchelonGraph's fixed weight for EG-KEV Tier 3 (Elevated): a constant, not a probability.
Automatability100% × 15%
CISA's SSVC Automatable value: yes (Vulnrichment).
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).
Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.
EPSS PROB
19%
EPSS %ILE
97th
KEV
Not listed

What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)

The EG score (9.1): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 9.1 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.

EG Severity
9.1 CRITICALCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
EG Likelihood
19% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-11-12). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
Confirmed exploitation
None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
EG Priority
SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).CISA BOD 26-04: 3 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; 60 days if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).

A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.

Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)3 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; 60 days if it is not.

The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

November 5, 2025

Last Modified

June 17, 2026

Advisory Details (3)

Auto-updated Sep 16, 2026
Patch available.
Web page

Django security releases issued: 5.2.8, 5.1.14, and 4.2.26 | Weblog | Django

https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2025/nov/05/security-releases/
Web page

Archive of security issues | Django documentation | Django

https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/dev/releases/security/

Patch Availability(11)

Vendor / EcosystemFix (by version range) / PatchReleasedSource
ubuntupython3-django (3:4.2.11-1ubuntu1.12) @ noble2026-11-12ubuntu
redhatansible-automation-platform-26/hub-rhel9:17688735052026-01-29redhat
redhatansible-automation-platform-tech-preview/ansible-devspaces-rhel9:2.6-17656002962025-12-15redhat
redhatansible-automation-platform-25/lightspeed-rhel8:2.52025-12-11redhat
redhatansible-automation-platform-26/lightspeed-rhel9:2.62025-12-11redhat
redhatansible-automation-platform-24/lightspeed-rhel8:2.42025-12-11redhat
redhatpython3.11-django-0:4.2.26-2.el9ap2025-12-10redhat
redhatreceptor-0:1.6.2-1.el9ap2025-12-10redhat
pipdjango @ 5.1.14 (fixes >= 5.0a1, < 5.1.14)—ghsa
pipdjango @ 4.2.26 (fixes < 4.2.26)—ghsa
pipdjango @ 5.2.8 (fixes >= 5.2a1, < 5.2.8)—ghsa

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Affected Packages

(8 across 8 ecosystems)
Alpine:v3.22(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
py3-django—
  • every version up to 4.2.26-r0: fixed in 4.2.26-r0
—
Alpine:v3.23(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
py3-django—
  • every version up to 4.2.26-r0: fixed in 4.2.26-r0
—
Alpine:v3.24(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
py3-django—
  • every version up to 4.2.26-r0: fixed in 4.2.26-r0
—
Debian:11(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
python-django2:2.2.24-1 ... 2:2.2.28-1~deb11u9 (12 versions)
  • every version up to 2:2.2.28-1~deb11u10: fixed in 2:2.2.28-1~deb11u10
—
Debian:12(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
python-django3:3.2.19-1 ... 3:3.2.21-1 (7 versions)
  • every version up to 3:3.2.25-0+deb12u1: fixed in 3:3.2.25-0+deb12u1
—
Debian:13(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
python-django3:4.2.23-1, 3:4.2.24-1, 3:4.2.25-1, 3:4.2.25-2, 3:4.2.26-1
  • every version up to 3:4.2.27-0+deb13u1: fixed in 3:4.2.27-0+deb13u1
—
Debian:14(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
python-django3:4.2.23-1, 3:4.2.24-1, 3:4.2.25-1, 3:4.2.25-2
  • every version up to 3:4.2.26-1: fixed in 3:4.2.26-1
—
PyPI(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
django4.2 ... 5.2.7 (48 versions)
  • 5.2a1 up to 5.2.8: fixed in 5.2.8
  • 5.0a1 up to 5.1.14: fixed in 5.1.14
  • every version up to 4.2.26: fixed in 4.2.26
  • 4.2 up to 4.2.26: fixed in 4.2.26
  • 5.1 up to 5.1.14: fixed in 5.1.14
  • 5.2 up to 5.2.8: fixed in 5.2.8
—

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Additional Vendor Advisories

(2)

Vendors that published advisories for this CVE beyond the curated set above. Broader coverage but minimal per-row detail — click through for the original advisory.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 21× in last 7d / 70× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed its CVE.org record (CNA or CISA ADP). An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). "EchelonGraph re-scored" is our own recompute of this CVE's score, not an update from a source, and is not counted in the refreshes above. Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 271 rows on record for this CVE.

A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. None are among the latest 100 rows. The 171 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.

  1. 2026-11-13 06:21 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  2. 2026-11-13 06:21 UTCVendor advisory
  3. 2026-11-13 06:21 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-frmv-pr5f-9mcr · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.1
  4. 2026-11-12 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 19% · 97th percentile
  5. 2026-11-12 06:12 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  6. 2026-11-12 06:12 UTCVendor advisory
  7. 2026-11-12 06:12 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-frmv-pr5f-9mcr · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.1
  8. 2026-11-11 16:36 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 19% · 97th percentile
  9. 2026-11-11 06:03 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  10. 2026-11-11 06:03 UTCVendor advisory
  11. 2026-11-11 06:03 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-frmv-pr5f-9mcr · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.1
  12. 2026-11-10 16:41 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 19% · 97th percentile
  13. 2026-11-10 05:53 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  14. 2026-11-10 05:53 UTCVendor advisory
  15. 2026-11-10 05:53 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-frmv-pr5f-9mcr · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.1
  16. 2026-11-09 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 19% · 97th percentile
  17. 2026-11-09 05:44 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  18. 2026-11-09 05:44 UTCVendor advisory
  19. 2026-11-09 05:44 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-frmv-pr5f-9mcr · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.1
  20. 2026-11-08 16:37 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 19% · 97th percentile
  21. 2026-11-08 05:35 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  22. 2026-11-08 05:35 UTCVendor advisory
  23. 2026-11-08 05:35 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-frmv-pr5f-9mcr · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.1
  24. 2026-11-07 16:37 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 19% · 97th percentile
  25. 2026-11-07 05:25 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-11-07 05:25 UTCVendor advisory
  2. 2026-11-07 05:25 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-frmv-pr5f-9mcr · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.1
  3. 2026-11-06 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 19% · 97th percentile
  4. 2026-11-06 05:16 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  5. 2026-11-06 05:16 UTCVendor advisory
  6. 2026-11-06 05:16 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-frmv-pr5f-9mcr · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.1
  7. 2026-11-05 17:55 UTCOSV refresh
  8. 2026-11-05 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 19% · 97th percentile
  9. 2026-11-05 05:07 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  10. 2026-11-05 05:07 UTCVendor advisory
  11. 2026-11-05 05:07 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-frmv-pr5f-9mcr · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.1
  12. 2026-11-04 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 19% · 97th percentile
  13. 2026-11-04 04:58 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  14. 2026-11-04 04:58 UTCVendor advisory
  15. 2026-11-04 04:58 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-frmv-pr5f-9mcr · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.1
  16. 2026-11-03 16:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 19% · 97th percentile
  17. 2026-11-03 04:49 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  18. 2026-11-03 04:49 UTCVendor advisory
  19. 2026-11-03 04:49 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-frmv-pr5f-9mcr · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.1
  20. 2026-11-02 16:43 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 19% · 97th percentile
  21. 2026-11-02 04:39 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  22. 2026-11-02 04:39 UTCVendor advisory
  23. 2026-11-02 04:39 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-frmv-pr5f-9mcr · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.1
  24. 2026-11-01 08:02 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-frmv-pr5f-9mcr · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.1
  25. 2026-11-01 08:02 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  26. 2026-11-01 04:30 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  27. 2026-11-01 04:30 UTCVendor advisory
  28. 2026-10-31 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 19% · 97th percentile
  29. 2026-10-31 04:21 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  30. 2026-10-31 04:21 UTCVendor advisory
  31. 2026-10-30 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 19% · 97th percentile
  32. 2026-10-30 04:11 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  33. 2026-10-30 04:11 UTCVendor advisory
  34. 2026-10-29 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 19% · 97th percentile
  35. 2026-10-29 03:59 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  36. 2026-10-28 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 19% · 97th percentile
  37. 2026-10-28 03:51 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  38. 2026-10-28 03:51 UTCVendor advisory
  39. 2026-10-27 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 19% · 97th percentile
  40. 2026-10-27 03:28 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  41. 2026-10-27 03:28 UTCVendor advisory
  42. 2026-10-25 23:12 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  43. 2026-10-25 23:12 UTCVendor advisory
  44. 2026-10-25 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 19% · 97th percentile
  45. 2026-10-25 16:11 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  46. 2026-10-24 23:04 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  47. 2026-10-24 23:04 UTCVendor advisory
  48. 2026-10-24 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 19% · 97th percentile
  49. 2026-10-23 22:54 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  50. 2026-10-23 22:54 UTCVendor advisory
  51. 2026-10-23 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 19% · 97th percentile
  52. 2026-10-22 22:43 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  53. 2026-10-22 22:43 UTCVendor advisory
  54. 2026-10-22 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 19% · 97th percentile
  55. 2026-10-21 22:28 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  56. 2026-10-21 22:28 UTCVendor advisory
  57. 2026-10-21 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 19% · 97th percentile
  58. 2026-10-20 22:16 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  59. 2026-10-20 22:16 UTCVendor advisory
  60. 2026-10-20 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 19% · 97th percentile
  61. 2026-10-19 22:05 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  62. 2026-10-19 22:05 UTCVendor advisory
  63. 2026-10-19 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 19% · 97th percentile
  64. 2026-10-18 20:53 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  65. 2026-10-18 20:53 UTCVendor advisory
  66. 2026-10-18 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 19% · 97th percentile
  67. 2026-10-18 05:20 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  68. 2026-10-17 20:27 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  69. 2026-10-17 20:27 UTCVendor advisory
  70. 2026-10-17 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 19% · 97th percentile
  71. 2026-10-16 20:16 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  72. 2026-10-16 20:16 UTCVendor advisory
  73. 2026-10-16 16:39 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 19% · 97th percentile
  74. 2026-10-15 17:42 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  75. 2026-10-15 17:42 UTCVendor advisory

Publicly available exploits

(3 references)

Public exploit code is referenced for this CVE (1 Exploit-DB entry, 2 GitHub PoCs). Defenders should treat patch urgency accordingly.

  • Exploit-DBEDB-52456
    Published Dec 3, 2025

    Django 5.1.13 - SQL Injection

    Open source ↗
  • GitHub PoC0xCyberstan/CVE-2025-64459-Poc
    Published Dec 1, 2025

    Vulnerability: SQL Injection via QuerySet and Q() keyword argument unpacking. CVE ID: CVE-2025-64459 Severity: Critical (CVSS 9.1) Affected Versions: Django 5.1 < 5.1.14, 4.2 < 4.2.26, and 5.2 < 5.2.8. Researcher: Cyberstan (University of Warwick)

    Open source ↗
  • GitHub PoComarkurt/django-connector-CVE-2025-64459-testbed
    Published Nov 21, 2025

    A self-contained testbed for Django CVE-2025-64459. Demonstrates QuerySet.filter() parameter injection via dictionary expansion using Docker.

    Open source ↗

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2025-64459?
CVE-2025-64459 is a critical-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on November 5, 2025. An issue was discovered in 5.1 before 5.1.14, 4.2 before 4.2.26, and 5.2 before 5.2.8. The methods QuerySet.filter(), QuerySet.exclude(), and QuerySet.get(), and the class Q(), are subject to SQL injection when using a suitably crafted dictionary, with dictionary expansion, as the _connector…
When was CVE-2025-64459 made public?
CVE-2025-64459 was made public on November 5, 2025: that is the date its CVE record's CNA, Django Software Foundation, gives for when the vulnerability was made public. The CVE record itself was published on November 5, 2025. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of June 17, 2026; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2025-64459 actively exploited?
CVE-2025-64459 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 19% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (97th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2025-64459?
CVE-2025-64459 has a CVSS v3.1 base score of 9.1 (CISA-ADP / Vulnrichment enrichment; NVD's own analysis pending).
How do I remediate CVE-2025-64459?
A fix for CVE-2025-64459 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2025-64459 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2025-64459

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2025-64459?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.