CVE-2022-34265

CRITICALNVD 9.89.8
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

“—” beside the score: it is equal to NVD's CVSS score.

Score 9.8 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: CRITICAL) published 2022-07-05. NVD baseline CVSS 9.8; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: EPSS, GitHub Security Advisory, NVD CVSS v3
Elevated

Also known asEUVD-2022-0091 (ENISA EUVD) · GHSA-p64x-8rxx-wf6q (GitHub Security Advisories) · PYSEC-2022-213 (OSV.dev)Source: ENISA EUVD

9.8EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixRemediate within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high (the SSVC decision on this page).
  • High exploitation likelihood — EPSS 74%
  • Public exploit or proof-of-concept code is available
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 74%CVSS: 9.8Exploit: Public PoCExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is available — apply it.

An issue was discovered in Django 3.2 before 3.2.14 and 4.0 before 4.0.6. The Trunc() and Extract() database functions are subject to SQL injection if untrusted data is used as a kind/lookup_name value. Applications that constrain the lookup name and kind choice to a known safe list are unaffected.

CVSS v3
9.8
EG Score
9.8CRITICALmedium confidence
EG Risk
74
EG Risk 74/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity98% × 45%
Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 9.8 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.
Exploitation74% × 40%
FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.
Automatability0% × 15%
CISA's BOD 26-04 default: no one has published Automatable for this CVE, and CISA treats it as “no” for a CVE not in KEV.
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low, Track* at medium and Attend at high mission impact.
Exploitation public PoC (exploit code on record) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). EchelonGraph holds no SSVC assessment of this CVE from CISA: none of these inputs is from Vulnrichment. EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.
EPSS PROB
74%
EPSS %ILE
99th
KEV
Not listed

What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)

The EG score (9.8): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 9.8 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.

EG Severity
9.8 CRITICALCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
EG Likelihood
74% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-11-11). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
Confirmed exploitation
None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
EG Priority
SSVC Track* at medium mission impactTrack at low, Track* at medium and Attend at high mission impact.CISA BOD 26-04: 14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low, Track* at medium and Attend at high mission impact.

A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.

Exploitation public PoC (exploit code on record) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). EchelonGraph holds no SSVC assessment of this CVE from CISA: none of these inputs is from Vulnrichment. EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.

The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). Where an input reads “CISA's BOD 26-04 default”, no one has published it for this CVE, and CISA's implementation guidance says: “If “Automatable” and “Technical Impact” information items about a CVE ID are not available and the CVE ID is not in the KEV Catalog, CISA will treat its values as “no” and “total,” respectively, until CISA or a third party provides metadata about the CVE ID. CISA will always provide the Vulnrichment data for a CVE ID listed in the KEV Catalog.” Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

July 4, 2022

Last Modified

November 21, 2024

Advisory Details (7)

Auto-updated Oct 10, 2026
Patch available.
Web page

[SECURITY] Fedora 37 Update: python-django-4.0.10-1.fc37 - package-announce - Fedora mailing-lists

https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/HWY6DQWRVBALV73BPUVBXC3QIYUM24IK/
Web page

Archive of security issues | Django documentation | Django

https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/4.0/releases/security/
Web page

Django security releases issued: 4.0.6 and 3.2.14 | Weblog | Django

https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2022/jul/04/security-releases/
Web page

[SECURITY] [DSA 5254-1] python-django security update

https://www.debian.org/security/2022/dsa-5254
Web page

[SECURITY] Fedora 38 Update: python-django-4.0.10-1.fc38 - package-announce - Fedora mailing-lists

https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/LTZVAKU5ALQWOKFTPISE257VCVIYGFQI/

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2022-34265(1)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Patch Availability(5)

Vendor / EcosystemFix (by version range) / PatchReleasedSource
ubuntupython-django-doc (2:3.2.12-2ubuntu1.1) @ jammy2026-11-12ubuntu
redhatpython-django-0:3.2.14-2.el8pc2022-11-16redhat
redhatpython-django-0:3.2.14-3.el8ui2022-07-27redhat
pipDjango @ 3.2.14 (fixes >= 3.2a1, < 3.2.14)—ghsa
pipDjango @ 4.0.6 (fixes >= 4.0a1, < 4.0.6)—ghsa

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Affected Packages

(15 across 15 ecosystems)
Alpine:v3.16(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
py3-django—
  • every version up to 3.2.14-r0: fixed in 3.2.14-r0
—
Alpine:v3.17(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
py3-django—
  • every version up to 3.2.14-r0: fixed in 3.2.14-r0
—
Alpine:v3.18(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
py3-django—
  • every version up to 3.2.14-r0: fixed in 3.2.14-r0
—
Alpine:v3.19(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
py3-django—
  • every version up to 3.2.14-r0: fixed in 3.2.14-r0
—
Alpine:v3.20(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
py3-django—
  • every version up to 3.2.14-r0: fixed in 3.2.14-r0
—
Alpine:v3.21(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
py3-django—
  • every version up to 3.2.14-r0: fixed in 3.2.14-r0
—
Alpine:v3.22(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
py3-django—
  • every version up to 3.2.14-r0: fixed in 3.2.14-r0
—
Alpine:v3.23(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
py3-django—
  • every version up to 3.2.14-r0: fixed in 3.2.14-r0
—
Alpine:v3.24(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
py3-django—
  • every version up to 3.2.14-r0: fixed in 3.2.14-r0
—
Debian:10(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
python-django1:1.11.21-1 ... 1:1.11.29-1~deb10u1 (7 versions)
  • every version up to 1:1.11.29-1+deb10u2: fixed in 1:1.11.29-1+deb10u2
—
Debian:11(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
python-django2:2.2.24-1, 2:2.2.25-1~deb11u1, 2:2.2.26-1~deb11u1
  • every version up to 2:2.2.28-1~deb11u1: fixed in 2:2.2.28-1~deb11u1
—
Debian:12(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
python-django—
  • every version up to 2:4.0.6-1: fixed in 2:4.0.6-1
—
Debian:13(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
python-django—
  • every version up to 2:4.0.6-1: fixed in 2:4.0.6-1
—
Debian:14(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
python-django—
  • every version up to 2:4.0.6-1: fixed in 2:4.0.6-1
—
PyPI(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
django3.2 ... 4.0.5 (20 versions)
  • 3.2a1 up to 3.2.14: fixed in 3.2.14
  • 4.0a1 up to 4.0.6: fixed in 4.0.6
  • 3.2 up to 3.2.14: fixed in 3.2.14
  • 4.0 up to 4.0.6: fixed in 4.0.6
—

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

All Vendor Advisories

(3)

Every vendor that published an advisory referencing this CVE — pulled from our cve_vendor_advisories aggregation. Click any row for the vendor's original advisory page.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 15× in last 7d / 59× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed its CVE.org record (CNA or CISA ADP). An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). "EchelonGraph re-scored" is our own recompute of this CVE's score, not an update from a source, and is not counted in the refreshes above. Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 206 rows on record for this CVE.

A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. None are among the latest 100 rows. The 106 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.

  1. 2026-11-12 16:02 UTCVendor advisory
  2. 2026-11-12 16:02 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-p64x-8rxx-wf6q · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  3. 2026-11-11 18:11 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  4. 2026-11-11 18:11 UTCVendor advisory
  5. 2026-11-11 18:11 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-p64x-8rxx-wf6q · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  6. 2026-11-11 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 74% · 99th percentile
  7. 2026-11-10 20:18 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  8. 2026-11-10 20:18 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-p64x-8rxx-wf6q · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  9. 2026-11-10 16:36 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 74% · 99th percentile
  10. 2026-11-09 22:28 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  11. 2026-11-09 22:28 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-p64x-8rxx-wf6q · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  12. 2026-11-09 00:38 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  13. 2026-11-09 00:38 UTCVendor advisory
  14. 2026-11-09 00:38 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-p64x-8rxx-wf6q · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  15. 2026-11-08 02:48 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  16. 2026-11-08 02:48 UTCVendor advisory
  17. 2026-11-08 02:48 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-p64x-8rxx-wf6q · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  18. 2026-11-07 04:57 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  19. 2026-11-07 04:57 UTCVendor advisory
  20. 2026-11-07 04:57 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-p64x-8rxx-wf6q · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  21. 2026-11-06 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 74% · 99th percentile
  22. 2026-11-06 07:07 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  23. 2026-11-06 07:07 UTCVendor advisory
  24. 2026-11-06 07:07 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-p64x-8rxx-wf6q · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  25. 2026-11-05 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 74% · 99th percentile
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-11-05 09:14 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  2. 2026-11-05 09:14 UTCVendor advisory
  3. 2026-11-05 09:14 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-p64x-8rxx-wf6q · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  4. 2026-11-04 11:24 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  5. 2026-11-04 11:24 UTCVendor advisory
  6. 2026-11-04 11:24 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-p64x-8rxx-wf6q · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  7. 2026-11-04 04:25 UTCOSV refresh
  8. 2026-11-03 16:39 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 74% · 99th percentile
  9. 2026-11-03 13:33 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  10. 2026-11-03 13:33 UTCVendor advisory
  11. 2026-11-03 13:33 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-p64x-8rxx-wf6q · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  12. 2026-11-02 15:22 UTCVendor advisory
  13. 2026-11-02 15:22 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-p64x-8rxx-wf6q · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  14. 2026-11-01 17:32 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  15. 2026-11-01 17:32 UTCVendor advisory
  16. 2026-11-01 17:32 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-p64x-8rxx-wf6q · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  17. 2026-11-01 08:26 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-p64x-8rxx-wf6q · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  18. 2026-11-01 08:26 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  19. 2026-10-31 19:41 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  20. 2026-10-31 19:41 UTCVendor advisory
  21. 2026-10-31 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 74% · 99th percentile
  22. 2026-10-30 21:50 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  23. 2026-10-30 21:50 UTCVendor advisory
  24. 2026-10-30 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 74% · 99th percentile
  25. 2026-10-30 00:00 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  26. 2026-10-30 00:00 UTCVendor advisory
  27. 2026-10-29 02:11 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  28. 2026-10-29 02:11 UTCVendor advisory
  29. 2026-10-28 04:19 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  30. 2026-10-28 04:19 UTCVendor advisory
  31. 2026-10-27 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 74% · 99th percentile
  32. 2026-10-27 06:20 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  33. 2026-10-27 06:20 UTCVendor advisory
  34. 2026-10-26 04:30 UTCVendor advisory
  35. 2026-10-25 18:06 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  36. 2026-10-25 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 74% · 99th percentile
  37. 2026-10-25 06:37 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  38. 2026-10-25 06:37 UTCVendor advisory
  39. 2026-10-24 08:46 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  40. 2026-10-24 08:46 UTCVendor advisory
  41. 2026-10-23 10:56 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  42. 2026-10-23 10:56 UTCVendor advisory
  43. 2026-10-22 12:59 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  44. 2026-10-22 12:59 UTCVendor advisory
  45. 2026-10-21 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 74% · 99th percentile
  46. 2026-10-21 15:07 UTCVendor advisory
  47. 2026-10-20 17:07 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  48. 2026-10-20 17:07 UTCVendor advisory
  49. 2026-10-19 19:15 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  50. 2026-10-19 19:15 UTCVendor advisory
  51. 2026-10-19 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 74% · 99th percentile
  52. 2026-10-18 21:22 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  53. 2026-10-18 21:22 UTCVendor advisory
  54. 2026-10-18 08:33 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  55. 2026-10-17 22:57 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  56. 2026-10-17 22:57 UTCVendor advisory
  57. 2026-10-17 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 74% · 99th percentile
  58. 2026-10-17 01:04 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  59. 2026-10-17 01:04 UTCVendor advisory
  60. 2026-10-16 01:08 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  61. 2026-10-16 01:08 UTCVendor advisory
  62. 2026-10-15 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 74% · 99th percentile
  63. 2026-10-14 20:11 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  64. 2026-10-14 20:11 UTCVendor advisory
  65. 2026-10-14 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 74% · 99th percentile
  66. 2026-10-13 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 74% · 99th percentile
  67. 2026-10-13 16:18 UTCVendor advisory
  68. 2026-10-12 18:25 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  69. 2026-10-12 18:25 UTCVendor advisory
  70. 2026-10-11 23:16 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  71. 2026-10-10 19:56 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 74% · 99th percentile
  72. 2026-10-08 16:40 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 74% · 99th percentile
  73. 2026-10-07 23:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 74% · 99th percentile
  74. 2026-10-05 17:40 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 74% · 99th percentile
  75. 2026-10-04 23:19 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 74% · 99th percentile

Publicly available exploits

(3 references)

Public exploit code is referenced for this CVE (3 GitHub PoCs). Defenders should treat patch urgency accordingly.

  • GitHub PoCZhaoQi99/CVE-2022-34265
    Published Aug 24, 2022

    PoC for CVE-2022-34265

    Open source ↗
  • GitHub PoCtraumatising/CVE-2022-34265
    Published Jul 13, 2022

    CVE-2022-34265 Vulnerability

    Open source ↗
  • GitHub PoCaeyesec/CVE-2022-34265
    Published Jul 7, 2022

    PoC for CVE-2022-34265 (Django)

    Open source ↗

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2022-34265?
CVE-2022-34265 is a critical-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on July 4, 2022. An issue was discovered in Django 3.2 before 3.2.14 and 4.0 before 4.0.6. The Trunc() and Extract() database functions are subject to SQL injection if untrusted data is used as a kind/lookup_name value. Applications that constrain the lookup name and kind choice to a known safe list are unaffected.
When was the CVE record for CVE-2022-34265 published?
The CVE record for CVE-2022-34265 was published on July 4, 2022. That is the record's publication date; the vulnerability itself may have been made public earlier. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of November 21, 2024; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2022-34265 actively exploited?
CVE-2022-34265 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 74% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (99th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2022-34265?
CVE-2022-34265 has a CVSS v3 base score of 9.8 (NVD).
How do I remediate CVE-2022-34265?
A fix for CVE-2022-34265 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2022-34265 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2022-34265

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2022-34265?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.