LMDeploy is a toolkit for compressing, deploying, and serving large language models. Starting in version 0.9.1 and prior to version 0.10.2, the LMdeploy implements an rpc server (AsyncRPCServer in zmq_rpc.py) for supporting the RPC communications. In its core functionality call_and_response(), I found it will directly use the pickles.loads() to deserialize the received messages without any sanitization, hence resulting in a remote code execution vulnerability by this RPC server. Version 0.10.2 contains a patch.
CVE-2025-59953
This critical-severity CVE scores 9.8 under a secondary CVSS source (NVD's own analysis pending). EPSS exploit probability: 0.7%, top 49% of all CVEs by exploit prediction. GitHub Security Advisory data not yet ingested — confidence will rise once GHSA publishes (typical lag: hours to days for open-source ecosystem CVEs; never for infrastructure-only CVEs).
- High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
No vendor fix yet — apply a workaround or compensating control (WAF / firewall / segmentation) and watch for a patch.
- CVSS v3
- 9.8
- EG Score
- 9.8(medium)
- EG Risk
- 75(Attend)EG Risk 75/100SSVC: Attend
EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).
How it’s computedSeverity98% × 45%Exploitation40% × 40%Automatability100% × 15%Action: Remediate soon — notable exploitation risk. - EPSS PROB
- 1%
- EPSS %ILE
- 51%
- KEV
- Not listed
Published
September 16, 2026
Last Modified
September 18, 2026
Advisory Details (2)
Auto-updated Sep 18, 2026Remote code execution via unsafe pickle deserialization in the LMDeploy ZMQ RPC server · Advisory · InternLM/lmdeploy · GitHub
https://github.com/InternLM/lmdeploy/security/advisories/GHSA-5h8j-6crg-7rmwv0.10.2
Patch available: InternLM/lmdeploy v0.10.2
https://github.com/InternLM/lmdeploy/releases/tag/v0.10.2Vendor Advisories for CVE-2025-59953(1)
These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.
Affected Packages
(1 across 1 ecosystem)
PyPI(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fixed in | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| lmdeploy | 0.10.0, 0.10.1, 0.9.1, 0.9.2, 0.9.2.post1 | 0.10.2 | — |
Weakness Classification(1)
MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 9× in last 7d / 9× in last 30d)
Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.
- 2026-09-18 22:10 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-18 19:27 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-18 18:32 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-18 18:15 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-17 21:57 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-17 19:30 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-16 16:31 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-16 15:45 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-16 15:44 UTCMITRE cvelistV5first tracked
Frequently asked(5)
What is CVE-2025-59953?
When was CVE-2025-59953 disclosed?
Is CVE-2025-59953 actively exploited?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2025-59953?
How do I remediate CVE-2025-59953?
Dependency Blast Radius
See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2025-59953
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2025-59953?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.