CVE-2025-27363

CRITICALNVD 8.19.0
EchelonGraph scoreHIGH confidence

“▲” beside the score: it is higher than NVD's CVSS score.

Score elevated to 9.0 because this CVE is listed on the CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog (added 2025-05-06), indicating real-world exploitation has been confirmed by US federal agencies. NVD baseline CVSS 8.1 retained for reference. The 9.0 is the floor for confirmed exploitation, not an impact rating: this CVE's impact severity (EG Severity) is CVSS 8.1 HIGH under GitHub Security Advisory CVSS. Confidence: HIGH.

Triggered by: CISA KEV (actively exploited)
Sources: CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog, EPSS, GitHub Security Advisory, NVD CVSS v3
Exploited in the wild

Also known asEUVD-2025-6367 (ENISA EUVD) · GHSA-g8qj-jv5h-78cp (GitHub Security Advisories)Source: ENISA EUVD

9.0EG
EchelonGraph verdictPatch nowTreat as an emergency — this is being exploited.
  • Actively exploited in the wild (CISA-KEV) — the reason this is sooner than the SSVC decision on this page at low or medium mission impact
CISA-KEV: ExploitedEPSS PROB: 28%CVSS: 8.1Exploit: Public PoCExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is available — apply it.

An out of bounds write exists in FreeType versions 2.13.0 and below (newer versions of FreeType are not vulnerable) when attempting to parse font subglyph structures related to TrueType GX and variable font files. The vulnerable code assigns a signed short value to an unsigned long and then adds a static value causing it to wrap around and allocate too small of a heap buffer. The code then writes up to 6 signed long integers out of bounds relative to this buffer. This may result in arbitrary code execution. This vulnerability may have been exploited in the wild.

CVSS v3
8.1
EG Score
9.0CRITICALhigh confidence
EG Risk
76
EG Risk 76/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity81% × 45%
Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 8.1 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.
Exploitation100% × 40%
Fixed at 100% for a CISA KEV listing: EchelonGraph's rule.
Automatability0% × 15%
CISA's SSVC Automatable value: no (Vulnrichment).
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low, Attend at medium and Act at high mission impact.
Exploitation active (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low, sooner than that at medium and as soon as possible at high mission impact.
EPSS PROB
28%
EPSS %ILE
98th
KEV
⚠ Exploited

What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)

The EG score (9.0): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 9.0 is the CISA KEV floor for confirmed exploitation, not an impact rating: its impact severity (EG Severity) is CVSS 8.1 HIGH.

EG Severity
8.1 HIGHCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
EG Likelihood
28% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-11-12). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
Confirmed exploitation
CISA KEV and EG-KEV Tier 1 (exploited in the wild)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
EG Priority
SSVC Attend at medium mission impactTrack at low, Attend at medium and Act at high mission impact.CISA BOD 26-04: 3 days & forensic triage if the affected system is publicly exposed; 14 days if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low, Attend at medium and Act at high mission impact.

A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low, sooner than that at medium and as soon as possible at high mission impact.

Exploitation active (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)3 days & forensic triage if the affected system is publicly exposed; 14 days if it is not.

The score's inputs: In CISA KEV yes (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

CISA required action“Apply mitigations per vendor instructions, follow applicable BOD 22-01 guidance for cloud services, or discontinue use of the product if mitigations are unavailable.”

Quoted verbatim from CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. CISA directs it at US federal civilian executive branch agencies under Binding Operational Directive (BOD) 26-04, which replaced BOD 22-01 on 10 June 2026; it is not EchelonGraph's advice. CISA's notes: https://source.android.com/docs/security/bulletin/2025-05-01 · https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-27363

Published

March 11, 2025

Last Modified

April 20, 2026

Advisory Details (10)

Auto-updated Nov 9, 2026
⚠️ Actively exploited (CISA KEV, CISA Vulnrichment). Patch available.
Web page

oss-security - Re: CVE-2025-27363: out of bounds write in FreeType <= 2.13.0

http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2025/03/14/3
Web page

oss-security - Re: CVE-2025-27363: out of bounds write in FreeType <= 2.13.0

http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2025/03/14/2
Web page

oss-security - Re: CVE-2025-27363: out of bounds write in FreeType <= 2.13.0

http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2025/03/14/1
Web page

oss-security - Re: CVE-2025-27363: out of bounds write in FreeType <= 2.13.0

http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2025/03/13/8
Web page

oss-security - Re: CVE-2025-27363: out of bounds write in FreeType <= 2.13.0

http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2025/03/13/3
Web page

oss-security - CVE-2025-27363: out of bounds write in FreeType <= 2.13.0

http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2025/03/13/2
Web page

oss-security - Re: CVE-2025-27363: out of bounds write in FreeType <= 2.13.0

http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2025/03/13/12
Web page

oss-security - Re: CVE-2025-27363: out of bounds write in FreeType <= 2.13.0

http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2025/03/13/11
Web page

oss-security - CVE-2025-27363: out of bounds write in FreeType <= 2.13.0

http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2025/03/13/1

Patch Availability(19)

Vendor / EcosystemFix (by version range) / PatchReleasedSource
ubuntulibfreetype6-dev (2.6.1-0.1ubuntu2.5+esm2) @ xenial2026-11-12ubuntu
ubuntulibfreetype6-dev (2.11.1+dfsg-1ubuntu0.3) @ jammy2026-11-12ubuntu
redhatspice-client-win-0:8.2-12025-06-23redhat
redhatspice-client-win-0:8.10-12025-05-29redhat
redhatspice-client-win-0:8.4-22025-05-28redhat
redhatspice-client-win-0:8.8-52025-05-27redhat
redhatspice-client-win-0:8.6-12025-05-27redhat
redhatopenshift/ose-rhel-coreos-8:412.86.202504240545-02025-05-08redhat
redhatopenshift/ose-rhel-coreos-8:412.86.202503310142-02025-04-10redhat
redhatfreetype-0:2.9.1-10.el8_82025-03-31redhat
redhatfreetype-0:2.8-15.el7_9.12025-03-31redhat
redhatfreetype-0:2.9.1-6.el8_6.32025-03-31redhat
redhatfreetype-0:2.10.4-10.el9_42025-03-31redhat
redhatfreetype-0:2.10.4-10.el9_52025-03-31redhat
redhatfreetype-0:2.10.4-7.el9_02025-03-31redhat
redhatfreetype-0:2.10.4-10.el9_22025-03-31redhat
redhatfreetype-0:2.9.1-5.el8_2.12025-03-31redhat
redhatfreetype-0:2.9.1-10.el8_102025-03-31redhat
redhatfreetype-0:2.9.1-7.el8_42025-03-31redhat

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Affected Packages

(7 across 7 ecosystems)
Alpine:v3.22(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
freetype—
  • every version up to 2.13.1-r0: fixed in 2.13.1-r0
—
Alpine:v3.23(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
freetype—
  • every version up to 2.13.1-r0: fixed in 2.13.1-r0
—
Alpine:v3.24(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
freetype—
  • every version up to 2.13.1-r0: fixed in 2.13.1-r0
—
Debian:11(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
freetype2.10.4+dfsg-1, 2.10.4+dfsg-1+deb11u1
  • every version up to 2.10.4+dfsg-1+deb11u2: fixed in 2.10.4+dfsg-1+deb11u2
—
Debian:12(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
freetype2.12.1+dfsg-5, 2.12.1+dfsg-5+deb12u1, 2.12.1+dfsg-5+deb12u2, 2.12.1+dfsg-5+deb12u3
  • every version up to 2.12.1+dfsg-5+deb12u4: fixed in 2.12.1+dfsg-5+deb12u4
—
Debian:13(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
freetype—
  • every version up to 2.13.1+dfsg-1: fixed in 2.13.1+dfsg-1
—
Debian:14(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
freetype—
  • every version up to 2.13.1+dfsg-1: fixed in 2.13.1+dfsg-1
—

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Additional Vendor Advisories

(2)

Vendors that published advisories for this CVE beyond the curated set above. Broader coverage but minimal per-row detail — click through for the original advisory.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 18× in last 7d / 80× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed its CVE.org record (CNA or CISA ADP). An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). "EchelonGraph re-scored" is our own recompute of this CVE's score, not an update from a source, and is not counted in the refreshes above. Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 1,915 rows on record for this CVE.

A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. None are among the latest 100 rows. The 1,815 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.

  1. 2026-11-13 16:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 28% · 98th percentile
  2. 2026-11-13 06:18 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  3. 2026-11-13 06:18 UTCVendor advisory
  4. 2026-11-13 06:18 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-g8qj-jv5h-78cp · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.1
  5. 2026-11-12 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 28% · 98th percentile
  6. 2026-11-12 03:52 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  7. 2026-11-12 03:52 UTCVendor advisory
  8. 2026-11-12 03:52 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-g8qj-jv5h-78cp · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.1
  9. 2026-11-11 16:36 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 28% · 98th percentile
  10. 2026-11-11 01:27 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  11. 2026-11-11 01:27 UTCVendor advisory
  12. 2026-11-11 01:27 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-g8qj-jv5h-78cp · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.1
  13. 2026-11-10 16:40 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 28% · 98th percentile
  14. 2026-11-09 23:02 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  15. 2026-11-09 23:02 UTCVendor advisory
  16. 2026-11-09 23:02 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-g8qj-jv5h-78cp · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.1
  17. 2026-11-09 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 28% · 98th percentile
  18. 2026-11-08 20:38 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  19. 2026-11-08 20:38 UTCVendor advisory
  20. 2026-11-08 20:38 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-g8qj-jv5h-78cp · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.1
  21. 2026-11-07 18:14 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  22. 2026-11-07 18:14 UTCVendor advisory
  23. 2026-11-07 18:14 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-g8qj-jv5h-78cp · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.1
  24. 2026-11-07 16:36 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 28% · 98th percentile
  25. 2026-11-06 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 28% · 98th percentile
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-11-06 15:49 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  2. 2026-11-06 15:49 UTCVendor advisory
  3. 2026-11-06 15:49 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-g8qj-jv5h-78cp · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.1
  4. 2026-11-05 13:25 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  5. 2026-11-05 13:25 UTCVendor advisory
  6. 2026-11-05 13:25 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-g8qj-jv5h-78cp · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.1
  7. 2026-11-05 10:55 UTCOSV refresh
  8. 2026-11-04 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 28% · 98th percentile
  9. 2026-11-04 11:01 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  10. 2026-11-04 11:01 UTCVendor advisory
  11. 2026-11-04 11:01 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-g8qj-jv5h-78cp · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.1
  12. 2026-11-03 16:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 28% · 98th percentile
  13. 2026-11-03 08:35 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  14. 2026-11-03 08:35 UTCVendor advisory
  15. 2026-11-03 08:35 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-g8qj-jv5h-78cp · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.1
  16. 2026-11-02 06:10 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  17. 2026-11-02 06:10 UTCVendor advisory
  18. 2026-11-02 06:10 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-g8qj-jv5h-78cp · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.1
  19. 2026-11-01 03:45 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  20. 2026-11-01 03:45 UTCVendor advisory
  21. 2026-11-01 03:45 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-g8qj-jv5h-78cp · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.1
  22. 2026-10-31 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 28% · 98th percentile
  23. 2026-10-31 01:20 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  24. 2026-10-31 01:20 UTCVendor advisory
  25. 2026-10-31 01:20 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-g8qj-jv5h-78cp · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.1
  26. 2026-10-30 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 28% · 98th percentile
  27. 2026-10-29 22:56 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  28. 2026-10-29 22:56 UTCVendor advisory
  29. 2026-10-29 22:56 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-g8qj-jv5h-78cp · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.1
  30. 2026-10-29 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 28% · 98th percentile
  31. 2026-10-28 20:32 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  32. 2026-10-28 20:32 UTCVendor advisory
  33. 2026-10-28 20:32 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-g8qj-jv5h-78cp · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.1
  34. 2026-10-28 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 28% · 98th percentile
  35. 2026-10-27 18:08 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  36. 2026-10-27 18:08 UTCVendor advisory
  37. 2026-10-27 18:08 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-g8qj-jv5h-78cp · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.1
  38. 2026-10-27 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 28% · 98th percentile
  39. 2026-10-26 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 28% · 98th percentile
  40. 2026-10-26 15:44 UTCVendor advisory
  41. 2026-10-26 15:43 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-g8qj-jv5h-78cp · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.1
  42. 2026-10-25 16:38 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  43. 2026-10-25 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 28% · 98th percentile
  44. 2026-10-25 13:19 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  45. 2026-10-25 13:19 UTCVendor advisory
  46. 2026-10-25 13:19 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-g8qj-jv5h-78cp · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.1
  47. 2026-10-24 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 28% · 98th percentile
  48. 2026-10-24 10:53 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  49. 2026-10-24 10:53 UTCVendor advisory
  50. 2026-10-24 10:53 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-g8qj-jv5h-78cp · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.1
  51. 2026-10-23 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 28% · 98th percentile
  52. 2026-10-23 08:28 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  53. 2026-10-23 08:28 UTCVendor advisory
  54. 2026-10-23 08:28 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-g8qj-jv5h-78cp · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.1
  55. 2026-10-22 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 28% · 98th percentile
  56. 2026-10-22 06:04 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  57. 2026-10-22 06:04 UTCVendor advisory
  58. 2026-10-22 06:03 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-g8qj-jv5h-78cp · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.1
  59. 2026-10-21 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 28% · 98th percentile
  60. 2026-10-21 03:37 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  61. 2026-10-21 03:37 UTCVendor advisory
  62. 2026-10-21 03:37 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-g8qj-jv5h-78cp · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.1
  63. 2026-10-20 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 28% · 98th percentile
  64. 2026-10-20 01:10 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  65. 2026-10-20 01:10 UTCVendor advisory
  66. 2026-10-20 01:10 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-g8qj-jv5h-78cp · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.1
  67. 2026-10-19 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 28% · 98th percentile
  68. 2026-10-18 22:43 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  69. 2026-10-18 22:43 UTCVendor advisory
  70. 2026-10-18 22:42 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-g8qj-jv5h-78cp · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.1
  71. 2026-10-18 05:41 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  72. 2026-10-17 20:18 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  73. 2026-10-17 20:18 UTCVendor advisory
  74. 2026-10-17 20:18 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-g8qj-jv5h-78cp · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.1
  75. 2026-10-17 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 28% · 98th percentile

Publicly available exploits

(3 references)

Public exploit code is referenced for this CVE (3 GitHub PoCs). Defenders should treat patch urgency accordingly.

  • GitHub PoCtin-z/CVE-2025-27363
    Published Jul 23, 2025

    Integer overflow in FreeType software, which also affects Chrome

    Open source ↗
  • GitHub PoCov3rf1ow/CVE-2025-27363
    Published May 26, 2025
    Open source ↗
  • GitHub PoCzhuowei/CVE-2025-27363-proof-of-concept
    Published Mar 23, 2025
    Open source ↗

Frequently asked(6)

What is CVE-2025-27363?
CVE-2025-27363 is a critical-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on March 11, 2025. An out of bounds write exists in FreeType versions 2.13.0 and below (newer versions of FreeType are not vulnerable) when attempting to parse font subglyph structures related to TrueType GX and variable font files. The vulnerable code assigns a signed short value to an unsigned long and then adds a…
When was the CVE record for CVE-2025-27363 published?
The CVE record for CVE-2025-27363 was published on March 11, 2025. That is the record's publication date; the vulnerability itself may have been made public earlier. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of April 20, 2026; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2025-27363 actively exploited?
Yes. CISA added CVE-2025-27363 to the Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog on May 6, 2025, affecting FreeType FreeType. KEV listing indicates confirmed exploitation in the wild; this CVE warrants immediate attention. A fix is available. Apply it.
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2025-27363?
CVE-2025-27363 has a CVSS v3 base score of 8.1 (NVD). EchelonGraph synthesises NVD + CISA KEV + FIRST EPSS + GHSA into a combined EG score of 9.0 (CRITICAL).
Which products are affected by CVE-2025-27363?
CVE-2025-27363 affects FreeType FreeType. The affected packages EchelonGraph has on record, with version ranges, are listed in the Affected Packages section of this page.
How do I remediate CVE-2025-27363?
A fix for CVE-2025-27363 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2025-27363 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2025-27363

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2025-27363?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.