CVE-2025-0107

CRITICALNVD 9.89.8
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

“—” beside the score: it is equal to NVD's CVSS score.

Score 9.8 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: MODERATE) published 2025-01-11. NVD baseline CVSS 9.8; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: EPSS, GitHub Security Advisory, NVD CVSS v3
Weaponized

Also known asEUVD-2025-1504 (ENISA EUVD) · GHSA-mhj4-9938-5fpw (GitHub Security Advisories)Source: ENISA EUVD

9.8EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixRemediate within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high (the SSVC decision on this page).
  • High exploitation likelihood — EPSS 78%
  • CISA's Vulnrichment rates exploitation as PoC; EchelonGraph holds no exploit-code reference for it
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 78%CVSS: 9.8Exploit: No code on recordExposed services: Not assessed

This issue is fixed in Expedition 1.2.100 and all later versions* of Expedition (from the CVE record's solution, Palo Alto Networks, Inc.) — apply it.

An OS command injection vulnerability in Palo Alto Networks Expedition enables an unauthenticated attacker to run arbitrary OS commands as the www-data user in Expedition, which results in the disclosure of usernames, cleartext passwords, device configurations, and device API keys for firewalls running PAN-OS software.

CVSS v3
9.8
EG Score
9.8CRITICALmedium confidence
EG Risk
90
EG Risk 90/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity98% × 45%
Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 9.8 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.
Exploitation78% × 40%
FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.
Automatability100% × 15%
CISA's SSVC Automatable value: yes (Vulnrichment).
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low, Track* at medium and Attend at high mission impact.
Exploitation public PoC (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: This issue is fixed in Expedition 1.2.100 and all later versions* of Expedition (from the CVE record's solution, Palo Alto Networks, Inc.). Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.
EPSS PROB
78%
EPSS %ILE
99th
KEV
Not listed

What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)

The EG score (9.8): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 9.8 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.

EG Severity
9.8 CRITICALCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
EG Likelihood
78% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-11-12). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
Confirmed exploitation
None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
EG Priority
SSVC Track* at medium mission impactTrack at low, Track* at medium and Attend at high mission impact.CISA BOD 26-04: 3 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; 60 days if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low, Track* at medium and Attend at high mission impact.

This issue is fixed in Expedition 1.2.100 and all later versions* of Expedition (from the CVE record's solution, Palo Alto Networks, Inc.). Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.

Exploitation public PoC (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)3 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; 60 days if it is not.

The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

January 11, 2025

Last Modified

November 4, 2026

Advisory Details (1)

Auto-updated Nov 7, 2026
Fix named in the CVE record's solution (Palo Alto Networks, Inc.).
Web page

PAN-SA-2025-0001 Expedition: Multiple Vulnerabilities in Expedition Migration Tool Lead to Exposure of Firewall Credentials

https://security.paloaltonetworks.com/PAN-SA-2025-0001

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2025-0107(1)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 11× in last 7d / 50× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed its CVE.org record (CNA or CISA ADP). An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). "EchelonGraph re-scored" is our own recompute of this CVE's score, not an update from a source, and is not counted in the refreshes above. Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 184 rows on record for this CVE, as 99 entries (1 repeat merged).

A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. 1 repeat row among the latest 100 is merged into the row it repeats. The 84 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.

  1. 2026-11-13 02:23 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  2. 2026-11-13 02:23 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mhj4-9938-5fpw · GitHub severity MODERATE · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  3. 2026-11-12 04:38 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  4. 2026-11-12 04:37 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mhj4-9938-5fpw · GitHub severity MODERATE · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  5. 2026-11-11 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 78% · 99th percentile
  6. 2026-11-11 06:52 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  7. 2026-11-11 06:52 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mhj4-9938-5fpw · GitHub severity MODERATE · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  8. 2026-11-10 16:39 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 78% · 99th percentile
  9. 2026-11-10 09:06 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  10. 2026-11-10 09:06 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mhj4-9938-5fpw · GitHub severity MODERATE · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  11. 2026-11-09 11:20 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  12. 2026-11-09 11:20 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mhj4-9938-5fpw · GitHub severity MODERATE · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  13. 2026-11-08 16:36 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 78% · 99th percentile
  14. 2026-11-08 13:35 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  15. 2026-11-08 13:35 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mhj4-9938-5fpw · GitHub severity MODERATE · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  16. 2026-11-07 15:49 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mhj4-9938-5fpw · GitHub severity MODERATE · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  17. 2026-11-06 18:03 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  18. 2026-11-06 18:03 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mhj4-9938-5fpw · GitHub severity MODERATE · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  19. 2026-11-06 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 78% · 99th percentile
  20. 2026-11-05 20:17 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  21. 2026-11-05 20:17 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mhj4-9938-5fpw · GitHub severity MODERATE · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  22. 2026-11-05 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 78% · 99th percentile
  23. 2026-11-04 22:31 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  24. 2026-11-04 22:31 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mhj4-9938-5fpw · GitHub severity MODERATE · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  25. 2026-11-04 00:36 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mhj4-9938-5fpw · GitHub severity MODERATE · GitHub CVSS 9.8
Show 74 more
  1. 2026-11-03 22:27 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mhj4-9938-5fpw · GitHub severity MODERATE · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  2. 2026-11-03 21:56 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  3. 2026-11-03 21:56 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mhj4-9938-5fpw · GitHub severity MODERATE · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  4. 2026-11-03 05:56 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  5. 2026-11-03 05:56 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mhj4-9938-5fpw · GitHub severity MODERATE · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  6. 2026-11-02 08:10 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  7. 2026-11-02 08:10 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mhj4-9938-5fpw · GitHub severity MODERATE · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  8. 2026-11-01 10:22 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  9. 2026-11-01 10:22 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mhj4-9938-5fpw · GitHub severity MODERATE · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  10. 2026-10-31 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 78% · 99th percentile
  11. 2026-10-31 12:36 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  12. 2026-10-31 12:36 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mhj4-9938-5fpw · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  13. 2026-10-30 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 78% · 99th percentile
  14. 2026-10-30 14:50 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mhj4-9938-5fpw · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  15. 2026-10-29 17:05 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  16. 2026-10-29 17:04 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mhj4-9938-5fpw · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  17. 2026-10-28 19:18 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  18. 2026-10-28 19:18 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mhj4-9938-5fpw · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  19. 2026-10-28 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 78% · 99th percentile
  20. 2026-10-27 21:32 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  21. 2026-10-27 21:32 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mhj4-9938-5fpw · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  22. 2026-10-26 23:47 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  23. 2026-10-26 23:46 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mhj4-9938-5fpw · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  24. 2026-10-26 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 78% · 99th percentile
  25. 2026-10-25 22:23 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mhj4-9938-5fpw · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  26. 2026-10-25 16:50 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  27. 2026-10-25 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 78% · 99th percentile
  28. 2026-10-25 00:37 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  29. 2026-10-25 00:37 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mhj4-9938-5fpw · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  30. 2026-10-24 02:51 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  31. 2026-10-24 02:51 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mhj4-9938-5fpw · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  32. 2026-10-23 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 78% · 99th percentile
  33. 2026-10-23 05:05 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  34. 2026-10-23 05:04 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mhj4-9938-5fpw · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  35. 2026-10-22 07:16 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  36. 2026-10-22 07:16 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mhj4-9938-5fpw · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  37. 2026-10-21 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 78% · 99th percentile
  38. 2026-10-21 09:29 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  39. 2026-10-21 09:29 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mhj4-9938-5fpw · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  40. 2026-10-20 11:44 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  41. 2026-10-20 11:44 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mhj4-9938-5fpw · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  42. 2026-10-19 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 78% · 99th percentile
  43. 2026-10-19 13:49 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  44. 2026-10-19 13:49 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mhj4-9938-5fpw · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  45. 2026-10-18 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 78% · 99th percentile
  46. 2026-10-18 15:58 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mhj4-9938-5fpw · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  47. 2026-10-18 05:54 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  48. 2026-10-17 18:09 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  49. 2026-10-17 18:08 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mhj4-9938-5fpw · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  50. 2026-10-17 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 79% · 99th percentile
  51. 2026-10-16 20:23 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  52. 2026-10-16 20:23 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mhj4-9938-5fpw · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  53. 2026-10-15 17:50 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  54. 2026-10-15 17:50 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mhj4-9938-5fpw · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  55. 2026-10-15 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 79% · 99th percentile
  56. 2026-10-14 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 79% · 99th percentile
  57. 2026-10-14 11:44 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  58. 2026-10-14 11:43 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mhj4-9938-5fpw · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  59. 2026-10-13 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 79% · 99th percentile
  60. 2026-10-13 10:46 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mhj4-9938-5fpw · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  61. 2026-10-12 17:28 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  62. 2026-10-12 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 79% · 99th percentile
  63. 2026-10-12 12:43 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mhj4-9938-5fpw · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  64. 2026-10-11 20:58 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  65. 2026-10-11 19:08 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  66. 2026-10-11 15:50 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  67. 2026-10-10 19:58 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 79% · 99th percentile
  68. 2026-10-07 23:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 79% · 99th percentile
  69. 2026-10-06 15:16 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 79% · 99th percentile
  70. 2026-10-03 14:24 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 79% · 99th percentile
  71. 2026-09-30 15:02 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 79% · 99th percentile
  72. 2026-09-24 14:02 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 79% · 99th percentile
  73. 2026-09-22 14:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 79% · 99th percentile
  74. 2026-09-20 20:14 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 79% · 99th percentile

Public detection templates

(1 reference)

A public Nuclei detection template is referenced for this CVE. A detection template checks whether a system is affected; it is not necessarily exploit code.

  • Nucleihttp/cves/2025/CVE-2025-0107.yaml
    Published May 31, 2025

    Palo Alto Networks Expedition - OS Command Injection

    Open source ↗

Related CVEs(same CWE)

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2025-0107?
CVE-2025-0107 is a critical-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on January 11, 2025. An OS command injection vulnerability in Palo Alto Networks Expedition enables an unauthenticated attacker to run arbitrary OS commands as the www-data user in Expedition, which results in the disclosure of usernames, cleartext passwords, device configurations, and device API keys for firewalls…
When was CVE-2025-0107 made public?
CVE-2025-0107 was made public on January 8, 2025: that is the date its CVE record's CNA, Palo Alto Networks, Inc., gives for when the vulnerability was made public. The CVE record itself was published on January 11, 2025. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of November 4, 2026; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2025-0107 actively exploited?
CVE-2025-0107 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. EchelonGraph's EG-KEV model places it in Tier 2 (Weaponized), which is not evidence of exploitation: CISA's SSVC data says a public PoC exists and its EPSS is 50% or more. EchelonGraph does not test whether exploit code works. FIRST EPSS estimates a 78% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (99th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2025-0107?
CVE-2025-0107 has a CVSS v3 base score of 9.8 (NVD).
How do I remediate CVE-2025-0107?
The CVE record's solution for CVE-2025-0107, written by its CNA Palo Alto Networks, Inc., names the fix: "This issue is fixed in Expedition 1.2.100 and all later versions* of Expedition." The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2025-0107 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2025-0107

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2025-0107?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.

Book a Demo →Browse All CVEs