CVE-2024-32459

CRITICALNVD 9.89.8
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

“—” beside the score: it is equal to NVD's CVSS score.

This critical-severity CVE scores 9.8 under NVD CVSS v3. EPSS exploit probability: 3.7% (89th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs). No GitHub Security Advisory CVSS is on record for this CVE.

Triggered by: Headline CVSS from NVD CVSS v3
Sources: EPSS, NVD CVSS v3
Elevated

Also known asEUVD-2024-30277 (ENISA EUVD)Source: ENISA EUVD

9.8EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixRemediate within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high (the SSVC decision on this page).
  • Public exploit or proof-of-concept code is available
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 3.7%CVSS: 9.8Exploit: Public PoCExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is available — apply it.

FreeRDP is a free implementation of the Remote Desktop Protocol. FreeRDP based clients and servers that use a version of FreeRDP prior to 3.5.0 or 2.11.6 are vulnerable to out-of-bounds read. Versions 3.5.0 and 2.11.6 patch the issue. No known workarounds are available.

CVSS v3
9.8
EG Score
9.8CRITICALmedium confidence
EG Risk
75
EG Risk 75/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity98% × 45%
Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 9.8 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.
Exploitation40% × 40%
EchelonGraph's fixed weight for EG-KEV Tier 3 (Elevated): a constant, not a probability.
Automatability100% × 15%
CISA's SSVC Automatable value: yes (Vulnrichment).
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).
Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.
EPSS PROB
3.7%
EPSS %ILE
89th
KEV
Not listed

What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)

The EG score (9.8): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 9.8 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.

EG Severity
9.8 CRITICALCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.NVD CVSS v3 · CVSS v3.0 or v3.1
EG Likelihood
3.7% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-11-12). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
Confirmed exploitation
None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
EG Priority
SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).CISA BOD 26-04: 3 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; 60 days if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).

A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.

Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)3 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; 60 days if it is not.

The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

April 22, 2024

Last Modified

November 3, 2025

Advisory Details (8)

Auto-updated Oct 9, 2026
Patch available. Sources: github_pr, github_release, github.
GitHub release Patch Available

2.11.6

Patch available: FreeRDP/FreeRDP 2.11.6

https://github.com/FreeRDP/FreeRDP/releases/tag/2.11.6
GitHub pull request

Fixes

Fix merged in FreeRDP/FreeRDP PR #10077 on 2024-04-16 — awaiting tagged release

https://github.com/FreeRDP/FreeRDP/pull/10077
Web page

[SECURITY] Fedora 39 Update: freerdp-2.11.7-1.fc39 - package-announce - Fedora mailing-lists

https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]/message/ZKI4UISUXYNBPN4K6TIQKDRTIJ6CDCKJ/
Web page

[SECURITY] Fedora 38 Update: freerdp-2.11.7-1.fc38 - package-announce - Fedora mailing-lists

https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]/message/PX3U6YPZQ7PEJBVKSBUOLWVH7DHROHY5/
Web page

[SECURITY] Fedora 40 Update: freerdp-3.5.1-1.fc40 - package-announce - Fedora mailing-lists

https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]/message/7SIS6NUNLUBOV4CPCSWKDE6T6C2W3WTR/
Web page

[SECURITY] Fedora 40 Update: freerdp2-2.11.7-1.fc40 - package-announce - Fedora mailing-lists

https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]/message/5JL476WVJSIE7SBUKVJRVA6A52V2HOLZ/
GitHub advisoryMentions a patch (unverified)

OutOfBound Read in ncrush_decompress · Advisory · FreeRDP/FreeRDP · GitHub

https://github.com/FreeRDP/FreeRDP/security/advisories/GHSA-cp4q-p737-rmw9
GitHub release Patch Available

Release 3.5.0 (FreeRDP/FreeRDP)

Patch available: FreeRDP/FreeRDP 3.5.0

https://github.com/FreeRDP/FreeRDP/releases/tag/3.5.0

Patch Availability(3)

Vendor / EcosystemFix (by version range) / PatchReleasedSource
ubuntuwinpr-utils (2.11.5+dfsg1-1ubuntu0.1~esm2) @ noble2026-11-12ubuntu
ubuntuwinpr-utils (2.10.0+dfsg1-1.1ubuntu1.2) @ mantic2026-11-12ubuntu
redhatfreerdp-2:2.11.7-1.el92024-11-12redhat

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Affected Packages

(2 across 2 ecosystems)
Debian:11(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
freerdp22.3.0+dfsg1-2, 2.3.0+dfsg1-2+deb11u1
  • every version up to 2.3.0+dfsg1-2+deb11u2: fixed in 2.3.0+dfsg1-2+deb11u2
—
Debian:12(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
freerdp22.10.0+dfsg1-1 ... 2.11.7+dfsg1-5 (11 versions)
  • every version up to 2.11.7+dfsg1-6~deb12u1: fixed in 2.11.7+dfsg1-6~deb12u1
—

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

All Vendor Advisories

(3)

Every vendor that published an advisory referencing this CVE — pulled from our cve_vendor_advisories aggregation. Click any row for the vendor's original advisory page.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 14× in last 7d / 61× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed its CVE.org record (CNA or CISA ADP). An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). "EchelonGraph re-scored" is our own recompute of this CVE's score, not an update from a source, and is not counted in the refreshes above. Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 295 rows on record for this CVE.

A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. None are among the latest 100 rows. The 195 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.

  1. 2026-11-13 16:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.7% · 89th percentile
  2. 2026-11-13 11:37 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  3. 2026-11-12 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.7% · 89th percentile
  4. 2026-11-12 13:48 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  5. 2026-11-12 13:48 UTCVendor advisory
  6. 2026-11-11 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.7% · 89th percentile
  7. 2026-11-11 15:58 UTCVendor advisory
  8. 2026-11-10 18:09 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  9. 2026-11-10 18:09 UTCVendor advisory
  10. 2026-11-10 16:38 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.7% · 89th percentile
  11. 2026-11-09 20:18 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  12. 2026-11-09 20:18 UTCVendor advisory
  13. 2026-11-09 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.7% · 89th percentile
  14. 2026-11-08 22:29 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  15. 2026-11-08 22:29 UTCVendor advisory
  16. 2026-11-08 16:36 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.7% · 89th percentile
  17. 2026-11-08 00:39 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  18. 2026-11-08 00:39 UTCVendor advisory
  19. 2026-11-07 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.7% · 89th percentile
  20. 2026-11-07 02:50 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  21. 2026-11-07 02:50 UTCVendor advisory
  22. 2026-11-06 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.7% · 89th percentile
  23. 2026-11-06 05:00 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  24. 2026-11-06 05:00 UTCVendor advisory
  25. 2026-11-05 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.7% · 89th percentile
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-11-05 07:11 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  2. 2026-11-05 07:11 UTCVendor advisory
  3. 2026-11-04 23:55 UTCOSV refresh
  4. 2026-11-04 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.7% · 89th percentile
  5. 2026-11-04 09:21 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  6. 2026-11-04 09:21 UTCVendor advisory
  7. 2026-11-03 16:42 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.7% · 89th percentile
  8. 2026-11-03 11:31 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  9. 2026-11-03 11:31 UTCVendor advisory
  10. 2026-11-02 16:40 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.7% · 89th percentile
  11. 2026-11-02 13:40 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  12. 2026-11-02 13:40 UTCVendor advisory
  13. 2026-11-01 15:51 UTCVendor advisory
  14. 2026-10-31 18:03 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  15. 2026-10-31 18:03 UTCVendor advisory
  16. 2026-10-31 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.7% · 89th percentile
  17. 2026-10-30 20:13 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  18. 2026-10-30 20:13 UTCVendor advisory
  19. 2026-10-30 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.7% · 89th percentile
  20. 2026-10-29 22:24 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  21. 2026-10-29 22:24 UTCVendor advisory
  22. 2026-10-29 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.7% · 89th percentile
  23. 2026-10-29 00:35 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  24. 2026-10-29 00:35 UTCVendor advisory
  25. 2026-10-28 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.7% · 89th percentile
  26. 2026-10-28 02:43 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  27. 2026-10-28 02:43 UTCVendor advisory
  28. 2026-10-27 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.7% · 89th percentile
  29. 2026-10-27 04:48 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  30. 2026-10-27 04:48 UTCVendor advisory
  31. 2026-10-26 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.7% · 89th percentile
  32. 2026-10-26 02:38 UTCVendor advisory
  33. 2026-10-25 17:11 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  34. 2026-10-25 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.7% · 89th percentile
  35. 2026-10-25 04:48 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  36. 2026-10-25 04:48 UTCVendor advisory
  37. 2026-10-24 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.7% · 89th percentile
  38. 2026-10-24 06:59 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  39. 2026-10-24 06:59 UTCVendor advisory
  40. 2026-10-23 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.7% · 89th percentile
  41. 2026-10-23 09:09 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  42. 2026-10-23 09:09 UTCVendor advisory
  43. 2026-10-22 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.7% · 89th percentile
  44. 2026-10-22 11:18 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  45. 2026-10-22 11:18 UTCVendor advisory
  46. 2026-10-21 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.7% · 89th percentile
  47. 2026-10-21 13:29 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  48. 2026-10-21 13:29 UTCVendor advisory
  49. 2026-10-20 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.7% · 89th percentile
  50. 2026-10-20 15:16 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  51. 2026-10-20 15:16 UTCVendor advisory
  52. 2026-10-19 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.7% · 89th percentile
  53. 2026-10-19 15:45 UTCVendor advisory
  54. 2026-10-18 17:52 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  55. 2026-10-18 17:52 UTCVendor advisory
  56. 2026-10-18 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.7% · 89th percentile
  57. 2026-10-18 07:17 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  58. 2026-10-17 20:02 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  59. 2026-10-17 20:02 UTCVendor advisory
  60. 2026-10-17 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.7% · 89th percentile
  61. 2026-10-16 22:11 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  62. 2026-10-16 22:11 UTCVendor advisory
  63. 2026-10-16 16:36 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.7% · 89th percentile
  64. 2026-10-15 18:46 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  65. 2026-10-15 18:46 UTCVendor advisory
  66. 2026-10-15 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.7% · 89th percentile
  67. 2026-10-14 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.7% · 89th percentile
  68. 2026-10-14 12:25 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  69. 2026-10-14 12:25 UTCVendor advisory
  70. 2026-10-13 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.7% · 89th percentile
  71. 2026-10-13 12:16 UTCVendor advisory
  72. 2026-10-12 17:55 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  73. 2026-10-12 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.7% · 89th percentile
  74. 2026-10-12 14:22 UTCVendor advisory
  75. 2026-10-11 21:19 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored

Publicly available exploits

(1 reference)

Public exploit code is referenced for this CVE (1 GitHub PoC). Defenders should treat patch urgency accordingly.

  • GitHub PoCabsholi7ly/FreeRDP-Out-of-Bounds-Read-CVE-2024-32459-
    Published May 22, 2024

    The FreeRDP - Out-of-Bounds Read (CVE-2024-32459) vulnerability concerns FreeRDP, a free implementation of Remote Desktop Protocol. FreeRDP-based clients and servers using a version of FreeRDP prior to version 3.5.0 or 2.11.6 are vulnerable to out-of-bounds reading12. Versions 3.5.0 and 2.11.6 correct the problem

    Open source ↗

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2024-32459?
CVE-2024-32459 is a critical-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on April 22, 2024. FreeRDP is a free implementation of the Remote Desktop Protocol. FreeRDP based clients and servers that use a version of FreeRDP prior to 3.5.0 or 2.11.6 are vulnerable to out-of-bounds read. Versions 3.5.0 and 2.11.6 patch the issue. No known workarounds are available.
When was the CVE record for CVE-2024-32459 published?
The CVE record for CVE-2024-32459 was published on April 22, 2024. That is the record's publication date; the vulnerability itself may have been made public earlier. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of November 3, 2025; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2024-32459 actively exploited?
CVE-2024-32459 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 3.7% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (89th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2024-32459?
CVE-2024-32459 has a CVSS v3 base score of 9.8 (NVD).
How do I remediate CVE-2024-32459?
A fix for CVE-2024-32459 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2024-32459

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2024-32459?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.