CVE-2024-32002

CRITICALNVD 9.09.0
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

“—” beside the score: it is equal to NVD's CVSS score.

This critical-severity CVE scores 9.0 under NVD CVSS v3. EPSS exploit probability: 29% (98th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs). No GitHub Security Advisory CVSS is on record for this CVE.

Triggered by: Headline CVSS from NVD CVSS v3
Sources: EPSS, NVD CVSS v3
Elevated

Also known asEUVD-2024-29843 (ENISA EUVD)Source: ENISA EUVD

9.0EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixRemediate within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high (the SSVC decision on this page).
  • Public exploit or proof-of-concept code is available
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 29%CVSS: 9.0Exploit: Public PoCExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is available — apply it.

Git is a revision control system. Prior to versions 2.45.1, 2.44.1, 2.43.4, 2.42.2, 2.41.1, 2.40.2, and 2.39.4, repositories with submodules can be crafted in a way that exploits a bug in Git whereby it can be fooled into writing files not into the submodule's worktree but into a .git/ directory. This allows writing a hook that will be executed while the clone operation is still running, giving the user no opportunity to inspect the code that is being executed. The problem has been patched in versions 2.45.1, 2.44.1, 2.43.4, 2.42.2, 2.41.1, 2.40.2, and 2.39.4. If symbolic link support is disabled in Git (e.g. via git config --global core.symlinks false), the described attack won't work. As always, it is best to avoid cloning repositories from untrusted sources.

CVSS v3
9.0
EG Score
9.0CRITICALmedium confidence
EG Risk
57
EG Risk 57/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity90% × 45%
Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 9.0 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.
Exploitation40% × 40%
EchelonGraph's fixed weight for EG-KEV Tier 3 (Elevated): a constant, not a probability.
Automatability0% × 15%
CISA's SSVC Automatable value: no (Vulnrichment).
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low, Track* at medium and Attend at high mission impact.
Exploitation public PoC (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.
EPSS PROB
29%
EPSS %ILE
98th
KEV
Not listed

What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)

The EG score (9.0): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 9.0 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.

EG Severity
9.0 CRITICALCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.NVD CVSS v3 · CVSS v3.0 or v3.1
EG Likelihood
29% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-11-12). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
Confirmed exploitation
None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
EG Priority
SSVC Track* at medium mission impactTrack at low, Track* at medium and Attend at high mission impact.CISA BOD 26-04: 14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low, Track* at medium and Attend at high mission impact.

A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.

Exploitation public PoC (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.

The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

May 14, 2024

Last Modified

November 4, 2025

Advisory Details (7)

Auto-updated Jul 24, 2026
Patch available. Sources: github_commit, github.
Web page

oss-security - git: 5 vulnerabilities fixed

http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2024/05/14/2
Web page

[SECURITY] Fedora 40 Update: git-2.45.1-1.fc40 - package-announce - Fedora mailing-lists

https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]/message/S4CK4IYTXEOBZTEM5K3T6LWOIZ3S44AR/
Web pageMentions a patch (unverified)

[SECURITY] [DLA 3844-1] git security update

https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2024/06/msg00018.html
GitHub advisoryMentions a patch (unverified)

Recursive clones on case-insensitive filesystems that support symlinks are susceptible to Remote Code Execution · Advisory · git/git · GitHub

https://github.com/git/git/security/advisories/GHSA-8h77-4q3w-gfgv
GitHub commit

commit 97065761333f (git/git)

Fix landed in git/git commit 97065761333f — awaiting tagged release

https://github.com/git/git/commit/97065761333fd62db1912d81b489db938d8c991d

Patch Availability(10)

Vendor / EcosystemFix (by version range) / PatchReleasedSource
ubuntugitweb (1:2.25.1-1ubuntu3.13) @ focal2026-11-11ubuntu
ubuntugitweb (1:2.7.4-0ubuntu1.10+esm8) @ xenial2026-11-11ubuntu
ubuntugitweb (1:2.25.1-1ubuntu3.12) @ focal2026-11-11ubuntu
redhatgit-0:2.31.1-6.el9_02024-09-11redhat
redhatgit-0:2.31.8-3.el8_62024-08-29redhat
redhatgit-0:2.27.0-5.el8_42024-08-29redhat
redhatgit-0:2.39.5-1.el8_82024-07-16redhat
redhatgit-0:2.39.5-1.el9_22024-07-08redhat
redhatgit-0:2.43.5-1.el9_42024-06-25redhat
redhatgit-0:2.43.5-1.el8_102024-06-25redhat

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Affected Packages

(13 across 13 ecosystems)
Alpine:v3.17(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
git—
  • 2.40.0 up to 2.39.5-r0: fixed in 2.39.5-r0
—
Alpine:v3.18(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
git—
  • 2.40.0 up to 2.40.3-r0: fixed in 2.40.3-r0
—
Alpine:v3.19(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
git—
  • 2.40.0 up to 2.43.4-r0: fixed in 2.43.4-r0
—
Alpine:v3.20(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
git—
  • 2.40.0 up to 2.45.1-r0: fixed in 2.45.1-r0
—
Alpine:v3.21(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
git—
  • 2.40.0 up to 2.45.1-r0: fixed in 2.45.1-r0
—
Alpine:v3.22(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
git—
  • 2.40.0 up to 2.45.1-r0: fixed in 2.45.1-r0
—
Alpine:v3.23(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
git—
  • 2.40.0 up to 2.45.1-r0: fixed in 2.45.1-r0
—
Alpine:v3.24(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
git—
  • 2.40.0 up to 2.45.1-r0: fixed in 2.45.1-r0
—
Debian:10(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
git1:2.20.1-2 ... 1:2.20.1-2+deb10u8 (9 versions)
  • every version up to 1:2.20.1-2+deb10u9: fixed in 1:2.20.1-2+deb10u9
—
Debian:11(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
git1:2.30.2-1, 1:2.30.2-1+deb11u1, 1:2.30.2-1+deb11u2
  • every version up to 1:2.30.2-1+deb11u3: fixed in 1:2.30.2-1+deb11u3
—
Debian:12(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
git1:2.39.2+next.20230215-1, 1:2.39.2-1.1
  • every version up to 1:2.39.5-0+deb12u1: fixed in 1:2.39.5-0+deb12u1
—
Debian:13(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
git—
  • every version up to 1:2.45.1-1: fixed in 1:2.45.1-1
—
Debian:14(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
git—
  • every version up to 1:2.45.1-1: fixed in 1:2.45.1-1
—

Weakness Classification(3)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Additional Vendor Advisories

(8)

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 13× in last 7d / 56× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed its CVE.org record (CNA or CISA ADP). An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). "EchelonGraph re-scored" is our own recompute of this CVE's score, not an update from a source, and is not counted in the refreshes above. Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 251 rows on record for this CVE.

A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. None are among the latest 100 rows. The 151 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.

  1. 2026-11-12 23:30 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  2. 2026-11-12 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 29% · 98th percentile
  3. 2026-11-11 22:42 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  4. 2026-11-11 22:42 UTCVendor advisory
  5. 2026-11-11 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 29% · 98th percentile
  6. 2026-11-10 21:54 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  7. 2026-11-10 21:54 UTCVendor advisory
  8. 2026-11-10 16:38 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 29% · 98th percentile
  9. 2026-11-09 20:55 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  10. 2026-11-09 20:55 UTCVendor advisory
  11. 2026-11-09 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 29% · 98th percentile
  12. 2026-11-08 20:07 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  13. 2026-11-08 20:07 UTCVendor advisory
  14. 2026-11-08 16:36 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 29% · 98th percentile
  15. 2026-11-07 19:19 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  16. 2026-11-07 19:19 UTCVendor advisory
  17. 2026-11-07 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 29% · 98th percentile
  18. 2026-11-06 18:26 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  19. 2026-11-06 18:26 UTCVendor advisory
  20. 2026-11-06 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 29% · 98th percentile
  21. 2026-11-05 17:38 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  22. 2026-11-05 17:38 UTCVendor advisory
  23. 2026-11-05 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 29% · 98th percentile
  24. 2026-11-04 23:55 UTCOSV refresh
  25. 2026-11-04 16:50 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-11-04 16:50 UTCVendor advisory
  2. 2026-11-04 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 29% · 98th percentile
  3. 2026-11-03 16:42 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 29% · 98th percentile
  4. 2026-11-03 16:01 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  5. 2026-11-03 16:01 UTCVendor advisory
  6. 2026-11-02 15:13 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  7. 2026-11-02 15:13 UTCVendor advisory
  8. 2026-11-01 14:24 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  9. 2026-11-01 14:24 UTCVendor advisory
  10. 2026-10-31 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 29% · 98th percentile
  11. 2026-10-31 13:36 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  12. 2026-10-31 13:36 UTCVendor advisory
  13. 2026-10-30 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 29% · 98th percentile
  14. 2026-10-30 12:48 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  15. 2026-10-30 12:48 UTCVendor advisory
  16. 2026-10-29 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 29% · 98th percentile
  17. 2026-10-29 11:54 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  18. 2026-10-29 11:54 UTCVendor advisory
  19. 2026-10-28 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 29% · 98th percentile
  20. 2026-10-28 11:01 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  21. 2026-10-28 11:01 UTCVendor advisory
  22. 2026-10-27 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 29% · 98th percentile
  23. 2026-10-27 09:22 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  24. 2026-10-27 09:22 UTCVendor advisory
  25. 2026-10-26 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 29% · 98th percentile
  26. 2026-10-26 08:15 UTCVendor advisory
  27. 2026-10-25 17:12 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  28. 2026-10-25 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 29% · 98th percentile
  29. 2026-10-25 07:26 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  30. 2026-10-25 07:26 UTCVendor advisory
  31. 2026-10-24 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 29% · 98th percentile
  32. 2026-10-24 06:38 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  33. 2026-10-24 06:38 UTCVendor advisory
  34. 2026-10-23 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 29% · 98th percentile
  35. 2026-10-23 05:48 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  36. 2026-10-23 05:48 UTCVendor advisory
  37. 2026-10-22 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 29% · 98th percentile
  38. 2026-10-22 05:00 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  39. 2026-10-22 05:00 UTCVendor advisory
  40. 2026-10-21 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 29% · 98th percentile
  41. 2026-10-21 04:12 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  42. 2026-10-21 04:12 UTCVendor advisory
  43. 2026-10-20 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 29% · 98th percentile
  44. 2026-10-20 03:19 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  45. 2026-10-20 03:19 UTCVendor advisory
  46. 2026-10-19 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 29% · 98th percentile
  47. 2026-10-19 02:31 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  48. 2026-10-19 02:31 UTCVendor advisory
  49. 2026-10-18 07:17 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  50. 2026-10-18 01:42 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  51. 2026-10-18 01:42 UTCVendor advisory
  52. 2026-10-17 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 29% · 98th percentile
  53. 2026-10-17 00:53 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  54. 2026-10-17 00:53 UTCVendor advisory
  55. 2026-10-16 16:36 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 29% · 98th percentile
  56. 2026-10-16 00:04 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  57. 2026-10-16 00:04 UTCVendor advisory
  58. 2026-10-15 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 29% · 98th percentile
  59. 2026-10-14 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 29% · 98th percentile
  60. 2026-10-14 16:06 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  61. 2026-10-14 16:06 UTCVendor advisory
  62. 2026-10-13 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 29% · 98th percentile
  63. 2026-10-13 15:13 UTCVendor advisory
  64. 2026-10-12 17:55 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  65. 2026-10-12 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 29% · 98th percentile
  66. 2026-10-12 14:23 UTCVendor advisory
  67. 2026-10-11 21:20 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  68. 2026-10-11 16:13 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  69. 2026-10-11 13:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 29% · 98th percentile
  70. 2026-10-11 03:01 UTCOSV refresh
  71. 2026-10-10 19:58 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 29% · 98th percentile
  72. 2026-10-09 20:05 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 29% · 98th percentile
  73. 2026-10-08 17:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 29% · 98th percentile
  74. 2026-10-07 23:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 29% · 98th percentile
  75. 2026-10-06 15:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 29% · 98th percentile

Publicly available exploits

(11 references, 10 shown)

Public exploit code is referenced for this CVE (11 GitHub PoCs). Defenders should treat patch urgency accordingly.

  • GitHub PoCNishanthAnand21/CVE-2024-32002-PoC
    Published Jul 30, 2024

    PoC of CVE-2024-32002 - Remote Code Execution while cloning special-crafted local repositories

    Open source ↗
  • GitHub PoC10cks/CVE-2024-32002-EXP
    Published May 23, 2024
    Open source ↗
  • GitHub PoCbfengj/CVE-2024-32002-Exploit
    Published May 22, 2024
    Open source ↗
  • GitHub PoCYukaFake/CVE-2024-32002-Reverse-Shell
    Published May 21, 2024

    Este script demuestra cómo explotar la vulnerabilidad CVE-2024-32002 para obtener una reverse shell, proporcionando acceso remoto al sistema afectado. Úselo con precaución en entornos controlados y solo con fines educativos o de pruebas de seguridad.

    Open source ↗
  • GitHub PoCjweny/CVE-2024-32002_EXP
    Published May 20, 2024
    Open source ↗
  • GitHub PoCjweny/CVE-2024-32002_HOOK
    Published May 20, 2024
    Open source ↗
  • GitHub PoCM507/CVE-2024-32002
    Published May 18, 2024

    local poc for CVE-2024-32002

    Open source ↗
  • GitHub PoCsafebuffer/CVE-2024-32002
    Published May 18, 2024

    CVE-2024-32002 RCE PoC

    Open source ↗
  • GitHub PoCamalmurali47/git_rce
    Published May 17, 2024

    Exploit PoC for CVE-2024-32002

    Open source ↗
  • GitHub PoCamalmurali47/hook
    Published May 17, 2024

    Hook for the PoC for exploiting CVE-2024-32002

    Open source ↗

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2024-32002?
CVE-2024-32002 is a critical-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on May 14, 2024. Git is a revision control system. Prior to versions 2.45.1, 2.44.1, 2.43.4, 2.42.2, 2.41.1, 2.40.2, and 2.39.4, repositories with submodules can be crafted in a way that exploits a bug in Git whereby it can be fooled into writing files not into the submodule's worktree but into a .git/ directory.…
When was the CVE record for CVE-2024-32002 published?
The CVE record for CVE-2024-32002 was published on May 14, 2024. That is the record's publication date; the vulnerability itself may have been made public earlier. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of November 4, 2025; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2024-32002 actively exploited?
CVE-2024-32002 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 29% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (98th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2024-32002?
CVE-2024-32002 has a CVSS v3 base score of 9.0 (NVD).
How do I remediate CVE-2024-32002?
A fix for CVE-2024-32002 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2024-32002 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2024-32002

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2024-32002?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.