CVE-2022-23521

CRITICALNVD 9.89.8
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

“—” beside the score: it is equal to NVD's CVSS score.

This critical-severity CVE scores 9.8 under NVD CVSS v3. EPSS exploit probability: 56% (99th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs). No GitHub Security Advisory CVSS is on record for this CVE.

Triggered by: Headline CVSS from NVD CVSS v3
Sources: EPSS, NVD CVSS v3
Elevated

Also known asEUVD-2022-28555 (ENISA EUVD)Source: ENISA EUVD

9.8EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixRemediate within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high (the SSVC decision on this page).
  • High exploitation likelihood — EPSS 56%
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 56%CVSS: 9.8Exploit: No code on recordExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is available — apply it.

Git is distributed revision control system. gitattributes are a mechanism to allow defining attributes for paths. These attributes can be defined by adding a .gitattributes file to the repository, which contains a set of file patterns and the attributes that should be set for paths matching this pattern. When parsing gitattributes, multiple integer overflows can occur when there is a huge number of path patterns, a huge number of attributes for a single pattern, or when the declared attribute names are huge. These overflows can be triggered via a crafted .gitattributes file that may be part of the commit history. Git silently splits lines longer than 2KB when parsing gitattributes from a file, but not when parsing them from the index. Consequentially, the failure mode depends on whether the file exists in the working tree, the index or both. This integer overflow can result in arbitrary heap reads and writes, which may result in remote code execution. The problem has been patched in the versions published on 2023-01-17, going back to v2.30.7. Users are advised to upgrade. There are no known workarounds for this issue.

CVSS v3
9.8
EG Score
9.8CRITICALmedium confidence
EG Risk
82
EG Risk 82/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity98% × 45%
Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 9.8 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.
Exploitation56% × 40%
FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.
Automatability100% × 15%
CISA's SSVC Automatable value: yes (Vulnrichment).
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).
Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.
EPSS PROB
56%
EPSS %ILE
99th
KEV
Not listed

What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)

The EG score (9.8): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 9.8 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.

EG Severity
9.8 CRITICALCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.NVD CVSS v3 · CVSS v3.0 or v3.1
EG Likelihood
56% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-11-12). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
Confirmed exploitation
None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
EG Priority
SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).CISA BOD 26-04: 3 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; 60 days if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).

A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.

Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)3 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; 60 days if it is not.

The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

January 17, 2023

Last Modified

November 21, 2024

Advisory Details (3)

Auto-updated Oct 11, 2026
Patch available. Sources: github_commit, github.
Web page

Git: Multiple Vulnerabilities (GLSA 202312-15) — Gentoo security

https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/202312-15
GitHub advisoryMentions a patch (unverified)

gitattributes parsing integer overflow · Advisory · git/git · GitHub

https://github.com/git/git/security/advisories/GHSA-c738-c5qq-xg89
GitHub commit

commit 508386c6c585 (git/git)

Fix landed in git/git commit 508386c6c585 — awaiting tagged release

https://github.com/git/git/commit/508386c6c5857b4faa2c3e491f422c98cc69ae76

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2022-23521(1)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Patch Availability(13)

Vendor / EcosystemFix (by version range) / PatchReleasedSource
ubuntugit-email (1:2.37.2-1ubuntu1.2) @ kinetic2026-11-11ubuntu
ubuntugit-email (1:2.7.4-0ubuntu1.10+esm4) @ xenial2026-11-11ubuntu
ubuntugit-email (1:1.9.1-1ubuntu0.10+esm1) @ trusty2026-11-11ubuntu
redhatredhat-virtualization-host-0:4.5.3-202304051438_8.62023-04-10redhat
redhatgit-0:1.8.3.1-24.el7_92023-02-28redhat
redhatgit-0:2.31.1-3.el8_62023-02-07redhat
redhatgit-0:2.31.1-3.el9_02023-02-07redhat
redhatgit-0:2.31.1-3.el8_72023-02-06redhat
redhatgit-0:2.18.4-2.el8_12023-02-06redhat
redhatgit-0:2.27.0-3.el8_42023-02-06redhat
redhatgit-0:2.31.1-3.el9_12023-02-06redhat
redhatrh-git227-git-0:2.27.0-4.el72023-02-06redhat
redhatgit-0:2.18.4-3.el8_22023-02-06redhat

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Affected Packages

(16 across 16 ecosystems)
Alpine:v3.14(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
git—
  • 2.31.0 up to 2.32.5-r0: fixed in 2.32.5-r0
—
Alpine:v3.15(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
git—
  • 2.31.0 up to 2.34.6-r0: fixed in 2.34.6-r0
—
Alpine:v3.16(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
git—
  • 2.31.0 up to 2.36.4-r0: fixed in 2.36.4-r0
—
Alpine:v3.17(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
git—
  • 2.31.0 up to 2.38.3-r0: fixed in 2.38.3-r0
—
Alpine:v3.18(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
git—
  • 2.31.0 up to 2.39.1-r0: fixed in 2.39.1-r0
—
Alpine:v3.19(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
git—
  • 2.31.0 up to 2.39.1-r0: fixed in 2.39.1-r0
—
Alpine:v3.20(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
git—
  • 2.31.0 up to 2.39.1-r0: fixed in 2.39.1-r0
—
Alpine:v3.21(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
git—
  • 2.31.0 up to 2.39.1-r0: fixed in 2.39.1-r0
—
Alpine:v3.22(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
git—
  • 2.31.0 up to 2.39.1-r0: fixed in 2.39.1-r0
—
Alpine:v3.23(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
git—
  • 2.31.0 up to 2.39.1-r0: fixed in 2.39.1-r0
—
Alpine:v3.24(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
git—
  • 2.31.0 up to 2.39.1-r0: fixed in 2.39.1-r0
—
Debian:10(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
git1:2.20.1-2 ... 1:2.20.1-2+deb10u6 (7 versions)
  • every version up to 1:2.20.1-2+deb10u7: fixed in 1:2.20.1-2+deb10u7
—
Debian:11(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
git1:2.30.2-1
  • every version up to 1:2.30.2-1+deb11u1: fixed in 1:2.30.2-1+deb11u1
—
Debian:12(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
git—
  • every version up to 1:2.39.1-0.1: fixed in 1:2.39.1-0.1
—
Debian:13(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
git—
  • every version up to 1:2.39.1-0.1: fixed in 1:2.39.1-0.1
—
Debian:14(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
git—
  • every version up to 1:2.39.1-0.1: fixed in 1:2.39.1-0.1
—

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Additional Vendor Advisories

(13)

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 12× in last 7d / 57× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed its CVE.org record (CNA or CISA ADP). An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). "EchelonGraph re-scored" is our own recompute of this CVE's score, not an update from a source, and is not counted in the refreshes above. Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 229 rows on record for this CVE.

A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. None are among the latest 100 rows. The 129 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.

  1. 2026-11-13 16:41 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 56% · 99th percentile
  2. 2026-11-13 06:08 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  3. 2026-11-13 06:08 UTCVendor advisory
  4. 2026-11-12 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 56% · 99th percentile
  5. 2026-11-12 07:00 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  6. 2026-11-12 07:00 UTCVendor advisory
  7. 2026-11-11 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 56% · 99th percentile
  8. 2026-11-11 07:55 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  9. 2026-11-11 07:55 UTCVendor advisory
  10. 2026-11-10 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 56% · 99th percentile
  11. 2026-11-10 08:49 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  12. 2026-11-10 08:49 UTCVendor advisory
  13. 2026-11-09 09:43 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  14. 2026-11-09 09:43 UTCVendor advisory
  15. 2026-11-08 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 56% · 99th percentile
  16. 2026-11-08 10:38 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  17. 2026-11-08 10:38 UTCVendor advisory
  18. 2026-11-07 11:32 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  19. 2026-11-07 11:32 UTCVendor advisory
  20. 2026-11-06 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 56% · 99th percentile
  21. 2026-11-06 12:27 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  22. 2026-11-06 12:27 UTCVendor advisory
  23. 2026-11-05 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 56% · 99th percentile
  24. 2026-11-05 13:22 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  25. 2026-11-05 13:22 UTCVendor advisory
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-11-04 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 56% · 99th percentile
  2. 2026-11-04 14:17 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  3. 2026-11-04 14:17 UTCVendor advisory
  4. 2026-11-03 23:55 UTCOSV refresh
  5. 2026-11-03 16:39 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 56% · 99th percentile
  6. 2026-11-03 15:11 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  7. 2026-11-03 15:11 UTCVendor advisory
  8. 2026-11-02 16:05 UTCVendor advisory
  9. 2026-11-01 16:57 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  10. 2026-11-01 16:57 UTCVendor advisory
  11. 2026-10-31 17:52 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  12. 2026-10-31 17:52 UTCVendor advisory
  13. 2026-10-31 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 56% · 99th percentile
  14. 2026-10-30 18:46 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  15. 2026-10-30 18:46 UTCVendor advisory
  16. 2026-10-30 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 56% · 99th percentile
  17. 2026-10-29 19:40 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  18. 2026-10-29 19:40 UTCVendor advisory
  19. 2026-10-29 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 56% · 99th percentile
  20. 2026-10-28 20:34 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  21. 2026-10-28 20:34 UTCVendor advisory
  22. 2026-10-28 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 56% · 99th percentile
  23. 2026-10-27 21:29 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  24. 2026-10-27 21:29 UTCVendor advisory
  25. 2026-10-27 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 56% · 99th percentile
  26. 2026-10-26 22:24 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  27. 2026-10-26 22:24 UTCVendor advisory
  28. 2026-10-26 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 56% · 99th percentile
  29. 2026-10-25 20:23 UTCVendor advisory
  30. 2026-10-25 18:13 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  31. 2026-10-25 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 56% · 99th percentile
  32. 2026-10-24 21:17 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  33. 2026-10-24 21:17 UTCVendor advisory
  34. 2026-10-24 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 56% · 99th percentile
  35. 2026-10-23 22:12 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  36. 2026-10-23 22:12 UTCVendor advisory
  37. 2026-10-23 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 56% · 99th percentile
  38. 2026-10-22 22:56 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  39. 2026-10-22 22:56 UTCVendor advisory
  40. 2026-10-22 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 56% · 99th percentile
  41. 2026-10-21 23:50 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  42. 2026-10-21 23:50 UTCVendor advisory
  43. 2026-10-21 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 56% · 99th percentile
  44. 2026-10-21 00:45 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  45. 2026-10-21 00:45 UTCVendor advisory
  46. 2026-10-20 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 56% · 99th percentile
  47. 2026-10-20 01:40 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  48. 2026-10-20 01:40 UTCVendor advisory
  49. 2026-10-19 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 56% · 99th percentile
  50. 2026-10-19 00:38 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  51. 2026-10-19 00:38 UTCVendor advisory
  52. 2026-10-18 08:42 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  53. 2026-10-18 01:32 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  54. 2026-10-18 01:32 UTCVendor advisory
  55. 2026-10-17 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 56% · 99th percentile
  56. 2026-10-17 02:21 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  57. 2026-10-17 02:21 UTCVendor advisory
  58. 2026-10-16 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 56% · 99th percentile
  59. 2026-10-16 02:55 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  60. 2026-10-16 02:55 UTCVendor advisory
  61. 2026-10-15 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 56% · 99th percentile
  62. 2026-10-14 22:59 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  63. 2026-10-14 22:59 UTCVendor advisory
  64. 2026-10-14 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 56% · 99th percentile
  65. 2026-10-13 18:37 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  66. 2026-10-13 18:37 UTCVendor advisory
  67. 2026-10-13 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 56% · 99th percentile
  68. 2026-10-12 19:00 UTCVendor advisory
  69. 2026-10-12 18:59 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  70. 2026-10-11 23:25 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  71. 2026-10-11 13:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 56% · 99th percentile
  72. 2026-10-10 19:56 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 56% · 99th percentile
  73. 2026-10-09 20:04 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 56% · 99th percentile
  74. 2026-10-08 16:40 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 56% · 99th percentile
  75. 2026-10-07 23:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 56% · 99th percentile

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2022-23521?
CVE-2022-23521 is a critical-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on January 17, 2023. Git is distributed revision control system. gitattributes are a mechanism to allow defining attributes for paths. These attributes can be defined by adding a .gitattributes file to the repository, which contains a set of file patterns and the attributes that should be set for paths matching this…
When was the CVE record for CVE-2022-23521 published?
The CVE record for CVE-2022-23521 was published on January 17, 2023. That is the record's publication date; the vulnerability itself may have been made public earlier. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of November 21, 2024; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2022-23521 actively exploited?
CVE-2022-23521 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 56% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (99th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2022-23521?
CVE-2022-23521 has a CVSS v3 base score of 9.8 (NVD).
How do I remediate CVE-2022-23521?
A fix for CVE-2022-23521 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2022-23521 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2022-23521

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2022-23521?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.