CVE-2023-31047

CRITICALNVD 9.89.8
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

“—” beside the score: it is equal to NVD's CVSS score.

Score 9.8 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: CRITICAL) published 2023-05-07. NVD baseline CVSS 9.8; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: EPSS, GitHub Security Advisory, NVD CVSS v3

Also known asEUVD-2023-0071 (ENISA EUVD) · GHSA-r3xc-prgr-mg9p (GitHub Security Advisories) · PYSEC-2023-61 (OSV.dev)Source: ENISA EUVD

9.8EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixRemediate within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high (the SSVC decision on this page).
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 1.4%CVSS: 9.8Exploit: None knownExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is available — apply it.

In Django 3.2 before 3.2.19, 4.x before 4.1.9, and 4.2 before 4.2.1, it was possible to bypass validation when using one form field to upload multiple files. This multiple upload has never been supported by forms.FileField or forms.ImageField (only the last uploaded file was validated). However, Django's "Uploading multiple files" documentation suggested otherwise.

CVSS v3
9.8
EG Score
9.8CRITICALmedium confidence
EG Risk
60
EG Risk 60/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity98% × 45%
Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 9.8 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.
Exploitation1.4% × 40%
FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.
Automatability100% × 15%
CISA's SSVC Automatable value: yes (Vulnrichment).
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).
Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.
EPSS PROB
1.4%
EPSS %ILE
72nd
KEV
Not listed

What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)

The EG score (9.8): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 9.8 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.

EG Severity
9.8 CRITICALCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
EG Likelihood
1.4% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-11-12). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
Confirmed exploitation
None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
EG Priority
SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).CISA BOD 26-04: 3 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; 60 days if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).

A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.

Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)3 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; 60 days if it is not.

The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

May 7, 2023

Last Modified

January 29, 2025

Advisory Details (6)

Auto-updated Oct 10, 2026
Patch available.
Web page

[SECURITY] Fedora 37 Update: python-django3-3.2.19-1.fc37 - package-announce - Fedora mailing-lists

https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/DNEHD6N435OE2XUFGDAAVAXSYWLCUBFD/
Web page

[SECURITY] Fedora 38 Update: python-django3-3.2.19-1.fc38 - package-announce - Fedora mailing-lists

https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/A45VKTUVQ2BN6D5ZLZGCM774R6QGFOHW/
Web page

Archive of security issues | Django documentation | Django

https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/4.2/releases/security/
Web page

Django security releases issued: 4.2.1, 4.1.9, and 3.2.19 | Weblog | Django

https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2023/may/03/security-releases/

Patch Availability(7)

Vendor / EcosystemFix (by version range) / PatchReleasedSource
ubuntupython-django (1.8.7-1ubuntu5.15+esm7) @ xenial2026-11-12ubuntu
ubuntupython-django-doc (3:3.2.18-1ubuntu0.1) @ lunar2026-11-12ubuntu
redhatpython-django-0:3.2.21-1.el8pc2023-11-08redhat
redhatpython-django-0:3.2.19-1.0.1.el8ui2023-08-09redhat
pipDjango @ 3.2.19 (fixes >= 3.2a1, < 3.2.19)—ghsa
pipDjango @ 4.1.9 (fixes >= 4.0a1, < 4.1.9)—ghsa
pipDjango @ 4.2.1 (fixes >= 4.2a1, < 4.2.1)—ghsa

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Affected Packages

(6 across 6 ecosystems)
Debian:10(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
python-django1:1.11.21-1 ... 1:1.11.29-1~deb10u1 (13 versions)
  • every version up to 1:1.11.29-1+deb10u8: fixed in 1:1.11.29-1+deb10u8
—
Debian:11(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
python-django2:2.2.24-1, 2:2.2.25-1~deb11u1, 2:2.2.26-1~deb11u1, 2:2.2.28-1~deb11u1
  • every version up to 2:2.2.28-1~deb11u2: fixed in 2:2.2.28-1~deb11u2
—
Debian:12(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
python-django—
  • every version up to 3:3.2.19-1: fixed in 3:3.2.19-1
—
Debian:13(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
python-django—
  • every version up to 3:3.2.19-1: fixed in 3:3.2.19-1
—
Debian:14(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
python-django—
  • every version up to 3:3.2.19-1: fixed in 3:3.2.19-1
—
PyPI(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
django3.2 ... 4.2rc1 (49 versions)
  • 3.2a1 up to 3.2.19: fixed in 3.2.19
  • 4.0a1 up to 4.1.9: fixed in 4.1.9
  • 4.2a1 up to 4.2.1: fixed in 4.2.1
  • 3.2 up to 3.2.19: fixed in 3.2.19
  • 4.0 up to 4.1.9: fixed in 4.1.9
  • 4.2 up to 4.2.1: fixed in 4.2.1
—

Weakness Classification(2)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Additional Vendor Advisories

(2)

Vendors that published advisories for this CVE beyond the curated set above. Broader coverage but minimal per-row detail — click through for the original advisory.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 21× in last 7d / 73× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed its CVE.org record (CNA or CISA ADP). An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). "EchelonGraph re-scored" is our own recompute of this CVE's score, not an update from a source, and is not counted in the refreshes above. Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 299 rows on record for this CVE.

A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. None are among the latest 100 rows. The 199 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.

  1. 2026-11-13 16:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.4% · 72nd percentile
  2. 2026-11-13 15:07 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  3. 2026-11-13 15:07 UTCVendor advisory
  4. 2026-11-13 15:07 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-r3xc-prgr-mg9p · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  5. 2026-11-12 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.4% · 72nd percentile
  6. 2026-11-12 13:47 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  7. 2026-11-12 13:47 UTCVendor advisory
  8. 2026-11-12 13:47 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-r3xc-prgr-mg9p · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  9. 2026-11-11 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.4% · 72nd percentile
  10. 2026-11-11 12:28 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  11. 2026-11-11 12:28 UTCVendor advisory
  12. 2026-11-11 12:28 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-r3xc-prgr-mg9p · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  13. 2026-11-10 16:37 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.4% · 72nd percentile
  14. 2026-11-10 11:08 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  15. 2026-11-10 11:08 UTCVendor advisory
  16. 2026-11-10 11:08 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-r3xc-prgr-mg9p · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  17. 2026-11-09 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.4% · 72nd percentile
  18. 2026-11-09 09:49 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  19. 2026-11-09 09:49 UTCVendor advisory
  20. 2026-11-09 09:49 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-r3xc-prgr-mg9p · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  21. 2026-11-08 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.4% · 72nd percentile
  22. 2026-11-08 08:30 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  23. 2026-11-08 08:30 UTCVendor advisory
  24. 2026-11-08 08:30 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-r3xc-prgr-mg9p · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  25. 2026-11-07 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.4% · 72nd percentile
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-11-07 07:11 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  2. 2026-11-07 07:11 UTCVendor advisory
  3. 2026-11-07 07:11 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-r3xc-prgr-mg9p · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  4. 2026-11-06 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.4% · 72nd percentile
  5. 2026-11-06 05:47 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  6. 2026-11-06 05:47 UTCVendor advisory
  7. 2026-11-06 05:47 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-r3xc-prgr-mg9p · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  8. 2026-11-05 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.4% · 72nd percentile
  9. 2026-11-05 04:28 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  10. 2026-11-05 04:28 UTCVendor advisory
  11. 2026-11-05 04:28 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-r3xc-prgr-mg9p · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  12. 2026-11-04 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.4% · 72nd percentile
  13. 2026-11-04 12:55 UTCOSV refresh
  14. 2026-11-04 03:08 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  15. 2026-11-04 03:08 UTCVendor advisory
  16. 2026-11-04 03:08 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-r3xc-prgr-mg9p · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  17. 2026-11-03 16:40 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.4% · 72nd percentile
  18. 2026-11-03 01:48 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  19. 2026-11-03 01:48 UTCVendor advisory
  20. 2026-11-03 01:48 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-r3xc-prgr-mg9p · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  21. 2026-11-02 16:39 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.4% · 72nd percentile
  22. 2026-11-02 00:29 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  23. 2026-11-02 00:29 UTCVendor advisory
  24. 2026-11-02 00:29 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-r3xc-prgr-mg9p · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  25. 2026-11-01 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.4% · 72nd percentile
  26. 2026-11-01 08:21 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-r3xc-prgr-mg9p · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  27. 2026-11-01 08:21 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  28. 2026-10-31 23:09 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  29. 2026-10-31 23:09 UTCVendor advisory
  30. 2026-10-31 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.4% · 72nd percentile
  31. 2026-10-30 21:50 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  32. 2026-10-30 21:50 UTCVendor advisory
  33. 2026-10-30 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.4% · 72nd percentile
  34. 2026-10-29 20:31 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  35. 2026-10-29 20:31 UTCVendor advisory
  36. 2026-10-29 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.4% · 72nd percentile
  37. 2026-10-28 19:12 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  38. 2026-10-28 19:12 UTCVendor advisory
  39. 2026-10-28 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.4% · 72nd percentile
  40. 2026-10-27 17:42 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  41. 2026-10-27 17:42 UTCVendor advisory
  42. 2026-10-27 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.4% · 72nd percentile
  43. 2026-10-26 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.4% · 72nd percentile
  44. 2026-10-26 16:22 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  45. 2026-10-26 16:22 UTCVendor advisory
  46. 2026-10-25 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.4% · 72nd percentile
  47. 2026-10-25 14:55 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  48. 2026-10-25 14:55 UTCVendor advisory
  49. 2026-10-24 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.4% · 72nd percentile
  50. 2026-10-24 13:35 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  51. 2026-10-24 13:35 UTCVendor advisory
  52. 2026-10-23 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.4% · 72nd percentile
  53. 2026-10-23 12:10 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  54. 2026-10-23 12:10 UTCVendor advisory
  55. 2026-10-22 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.4% · 72nd percentile
  56. 2026-10-22 10:51 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  57. 2026-10-22 10:51 UTCVendor advisory
  58. 2026-10-21 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.4% · 72nd percentile
  59. 2026-10-21 09:31 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  60. 2026-10-21 09:31 UTCVendor advisory
  61. 2026-10-20 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.4% · 71st percentile
  62. 2026-10-20 08:11 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  63. 2026-10-20 08:11 UTCVendor advisory
  64. 2026-10-19 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.4% · 71st percentile
  65. 2026-10-19 06:51 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  66. 2026-10-19 06:51 UTCVendor advisory
  67. 2026-10-18 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.4% · 71st percentile
  68. 2026-10-18 05:31 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  69. 2026-10-18 05:31 UTCVendor advisory
  70. 2026-10-17 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.4% · 71st percentile
  71. 2026-10-17 04:11 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  72. 2026-10-17 04:11 UTCVendor advisory
  73. 2026-10-16 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.4% · 71st percentile
  74. 2026-10-16 02:52 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  75. 2026-10-16 02:52 UTCVendor advisory

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2023-31047?
CVE-2023-31047 is a critical-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on May 7, 2023. In Django 3.2 before 3.2.19, 4.x before 4.1.9, and 4.2 before 4.2.1, it was possible to bypass validation when using one form field to upload multiple files. This multiple upload has never been supported by forms.FileField or forms.ImageField (only the last uploaded file was validated). However,…
When was the CVE record for CVE-2023-31047 published?
The CVE record for CVE-2023-31047 was published on May 7, 2023. That is the record's publication date; the vulnerability itself may have been made public earlier. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of January 29, 2025; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2023-31047 actively exploited?
CVE-2023-31047 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 1.4% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (72nd percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2023-31047?
CVE-2023-31047 has a CVSS v3 base score of 9.8 (NVD).
How do I remediate CVE-2023-31047?
A fix for CVE-2023-31047 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2023-31047 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2023-31047

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2023-31047?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.