CVE-2018-0264

CRITICALNVD 9.69.6
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

“—” beside the score: it is equal to NVD's CVSS score.

Score 9.6 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: CRITICAL) published 2022-05-13. NVD baseline CVSS 9.6; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: EPSS, GitHub Security Advisory, NVD CVSS v3

Also known asEUVD-2018-1087 (ENISA EUVD) · GHSA-qx7c-998c-pf6j (GitHub Security Advisories)Source: ENISA EUVD

9.6EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan mitigationNo fix on record since 2018: check the vendor's advisory for a fixed release; until one is applied, restrict network exposure of the affected system or apply the vendor's mitigation on your normal schedule (the SSVC decision on this page).
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 3.0%CVSS: 9.6Exploit: None knownExposed services: Not assessed

No fix has been recorded since the CVE record was published in 2018 — use a compensating control (WAF / firewall / segmentation) and check the vendor's advisory.

The CVE record's description, written by its CNA (Cisco Systems, Inc.), states the affected versions: "…prior to 3.0 Patch 1." No release containing a fix is confirmed on record.

A vulnerability in the Cisco WebEx Network Recording Player for Advanced Recording Format (ARF) files could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to execute arbitrary code on the system of a targeted user. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending the user a link or email attachment with a malicious ARF file and persuading the user to follow the link or open the file. Successful exploitation could allow the attacker to execute arbitrary code on the user's system. This vulnerability affects Cisco WebEx Business Suite meeting sites, Cisco WebEx Meetings sites, Cisco WebEx Meetings Server, and Cisco WebEx ARF players. The following client builds of Cisco WebEx Business Suite (WBS31 and WBS32), Cisco WebEx Meetings, and Cisco WebEx Meetings Server are affected: Cisco WebEx Business Suite (WBS31) client builds prior to T31.23.4, Cisco WebEx Business Suite (WBS32) client builds prior to T32.12, Cisco WebEx Meetings with client builds prior to T32.12, Cisco WebEx Meeting Server builds prior to 3.0 Patch 1. Cisco Bug IDs: CSCvh85410, CSCvh85430, CSCvh85440, CSCvh85442, CSCvh85453, CSCvh85457.

CVSS v3
9.6
EG Score
9.6CRITICALmedium confidence
EG Risk
44
EG Risk 44/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity96% × 45%
Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 9.6 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.
Exploitation3.0% × 40%
FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.
Automatability0% × 15%
CISA's SSVC Automatable value: no (Vulnrichment).
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).
Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: No fix has been recorded since the CVE record was published in 2018. Check the vendor's advisory for a fixed release; until one is applied, restrict network exposure of the affected system or apply the vendor's mitigation on your normal schedule.
EPSS PROB
3.0%
EPSS %ILE
87th
KEV
Not listed

What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)

The EG score (9.6): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 9.6 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.

EG Severity
9.6 CRITICALCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
EG Likelihood
3.0% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-11-12). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
Confirmed exploitation
None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
EG Priority
SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).CISA BOD 26-04: 14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.No released fix is confirmed on this page, but CISA's timeline does not wait for a fix's release: it starts when an agency identifies the flaw on an asset and updates the CDM Agency and Federal Dashboard, and the directive counts patching, decommissioning the system or another action as remediation. Until a fixed release is applied, mitigate as this page's verdict says. In the directive's words, “Fix on system upgrade” means that, “unless conditions change”, the vulnerability “should be remediated the next time the vulnerable asset receives a scheduled major upgrade or rebuild”: its timelines are “dynamic as facts change”, and a KEV listing shortens them.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).

No fix has been recorded since the CVE record was published in 2018. Check the vendor's advisory for a fixed release; until one is applied, restrict network exposure of the affected system or apply the vendor's mitigation on your normal schedule.

Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.

No released fix is confirmed on this page, but CISA's timeline does not wait for a fix's release: it starts when an agency identifies the flaw on an asset and updates the CDM Agency and Federal Dashboard, and the directive counts patching, decommissioning the system or another action as remediation. Until a fixed release is applied, mitigate as this page's verdict says. In the directive's words, “Fix on system upgrade” means that, “unless conditions change”, the vulnerability “should be remediated the next time the vulnerable asset receives a scheduled major upgrade or rebuild”: its timelines are “dynamic as facts change”, and a KEV listing shortens them.

The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

May 2, 2018

Last Modified

November 21, 2024

Advisory Details (2)

Auto-updated Oct 2, 2026
No fix on record since 2018.
Web page

Cisco WebEx Advanced Recording Format Remote Code Execution Vulnerability

https://tools.cisco.com/security/center/content/CiscoSecurityAdvisory/cisco-sa-20180502-war
Web page

CVE-2018-0264 - PSIRT.COM

http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/104073

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 14× in last 7d / 55× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed its CVE.org record (CNA or CISA ADP). An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). "EchelonGraph re-scored" is our own recompute of this CVE's score, not an update from a source, and is not counted in the refreshes above. Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 248 rows on record for this CVE, as 99 entries (1 repeat merged).

A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. 1 repeat row among the latest 100 is merged into the row it repeats. The 148 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.

  1. 2026-11-13 02:39 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  2. 2026-11-13 02:39 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-qx7c-998c-pf6j · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.6
  3. 2026-11-12 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.0% · 87th percentile
  4. 2026-11-12 00:16 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  5. 2026-11-12 00:16 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-qx7c-998c-pf6j · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.6
  6. 2026-11-11 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.0% · 87th percentile
  7. 2026-11-10 21:53 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  8. 2026-11-10 21:53 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-qx7c-998c-pf6j · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.6
  9. 2026-11-10 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.0% · 87th percentile
  10. 2026-11-09 19:17 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  11. 2026-11-09 19:17 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-qx7c-998c-pf6j · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.6
  12. 2026-11-09 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.0% · 87th percentile
  13. 2026-11-08 16:53 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  14. 2026-11-08 16:53 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-qx7c-998c-pf6j · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.6
  15. 2026-11-08 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.0% · 87th percentile
  16. 2026-11-07 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.0% · 87th percentile
  17. 2026-11-07 14:30 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  18. 2026-11-07 14:30 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-qx7c-998c-pf6j · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.6
  19. 2026-11-06 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.0% · 87th percentile
  20. 2026-11-06 12:08 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  21. 2026-11-06 12:08 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-qx7c-998c-pf6j · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.6
  22. 2026-11-05 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.0% · 87th percentile
  23. 2026-11-05 09:45 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  24. 2026-11-05 09:45 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-qx7c-998c-pf6j · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.6
  25. 2026-11-04 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.0% · 87th percentile
Show 74 more
  1. 2026-11-04 07:22 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  2. 2026-11-04 07:22 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-qx7c-998c-pf6j · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.6
  3. 2026-11-03 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.0% · 87th percentile
  4. 2026-11-03 04:59 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  5. 2026-11-03 04:58 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-qx7c-998c-pf6j · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.6
  6. 2026-11-02 02:35 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  7. 2026-11-02 02:35 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-qx7c-998c-pf6j · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.6
  8. 2026-11-01 00:13 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  9. 2026-11-01 00:13 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-qx7c-998c-pf6j · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.6
  10. 2026-10-31 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.0% · 87th percentile
  11. 2026-10-30 21:50 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  12. 2026-10-30 21:50 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-qx7c-998c-pf6j · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.6
  13. 2026-10-30 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.0% · 87th percentile
  14. 2026-10-29 19:28 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  15. 2026-10-29 19:28 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-qx7c-998c-pf6j · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.6
  16. 2026-10-29 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.0% · 87th percentile
  17. 2026-10-28 17:06 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  18. 2026-10-28 17:06 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-qx7c-998c-pf6j · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.6
  19. 2026-10-28 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.0% · 87th percentile
  20. 2026-10-27 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.0% · 87th percentile
  21. 2026-10-27 14:43 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  22. 2026-10-27 14:43 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-qx7c-998c-pf6j · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.6
  23. 2026-10-26 16:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.0% · 87th percentile
  24. 2026-10-26 12:20 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-qx7c-998c-pf6j · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.6
  25. 2026-10-25 19:28 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  26. 2026-10-25 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.0% · 87th percentile
  27. 2026-10-25 09:52 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  28. 2026-10-25 09:52 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-qx7c-998c-pf6j · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.6
  29. 2026-10-24 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.0% · 87th percentile
  30. 2026-10-24 07:30 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  31. 2026-10-24 07:30 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-qx7c-998c-pf6j · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.6
  32. 2026-10-23 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.0% · 87th percentile
  33. 2026-10-23 05:07 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  34. 2026-10-23 05:06 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-qx7c-998c-pf6j · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.6
  35. 2026-10-22 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.0% · 87th percentile
  36. 2026-10-22 02:44 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  37. 2026-10-22 02:43 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-qx7c-998c-pf6j · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.6
  38. 2026-10-21 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.0% · 87th percentile
  39. 2026-10-21 00:19 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  40. 2026-10-21 00:18 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-qx7c-998c-pf6j · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.6
  41. 2026-10-20 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.0% · 87th percentile
  42. 2026-10-19 21:56 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  43. 2026-10-19 21:56 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-qx7c-998c-pf6j · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.6
  44. 2026-10-19 16:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.0% · 87th percentile
  45. 2026-10-18 19:06 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  46. 2026-10-18 19:06 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-qx7c-998c-pf6j · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.6
  47. 2026-10-18 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.0% · 87th percentile
  48. 2026-10-18 10:25 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  49. 2026-10-17 16:39 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  50. 2026-10-17 16:39 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-qx7c-998c-pf6j · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.6
  51. 2026-10-17 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.0% · 87th percentile
  52. 2026-10-16 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.0% · 87th percentile
  53. 2026-10-16 14:16 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  54. 2026-10-16 14:16 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-qx7c-998c-pf6j · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.6
  55. 2026-10-15 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.0% · 87th percentile
  56. 2026-10-15 11:53 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  57. 2026-10-15 11:52 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-qx7c-998c-pf6j · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.6
  58. 2026-10-14 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.0% · 87th percentile
  59. 2026-10-14 07:22 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  60. 2026-10-14 07:22 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-qx7c-998c-pf6j · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.6
  61. 2026-10-13 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.0% · 87th percentile
  62. 2026-10-13 02:37 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-qx7c-998c-pf6j · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.6
  63. 2026-10-12 20:23 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  64. 2026-10-12 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.0% · 87th percentile
  65. 2026-10-12 00:46 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  66. 2026-10-11 13:41 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.0% · 87th percentile
  67. 2026-10-10 19:55 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.1% · 87th percentile
  68. 2026-10-09 20:02 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.1% · 87th percentile
  69. 2026-10-08 16:36 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.1% · 87th percentile
  70. 2026-10-07 23:41 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.1% · 87th percentile
  71. 2026-10-06 15:12 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.1% · 87th percentile
  72. 2026-10-05 17:39 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.1% · 87th percentile
  73. 2026-10-04 23:18 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.1% · 87th percentile
  74. 2026-10-03 14:21 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.1% · 87th percentile

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2018-0264?
CVE-2018-0264 is a critical-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on May 2, 2018. A vulnerability in the Cisco WebEx Network Recording Player for Advanced Recording Format (ARF) files could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to execute arbitrary code on the system of a targeted user. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending the user a link or email…
When was CVE-2018-0264 made public?
CVE-2018-0264 was made public on May 2, 2018: that is the date its CVE record's CNA, Cisco Systems, Inc., gives for when the vulnerability was made public. The CVE record itself was published on May 2, 2018. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of November 21, 2024; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2018-0264 actively exploited?
CVE-2018-0264 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 3.0% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (87th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2018-0264?
CVE-2018-0264 has a CVSS v3 base score of 9.6 (NVD).
How do I remediate CVE-2018-0264?
No fix for CVE-2018-0264 has been recorded since its CVE record was published in 2018. Restrict network exposure of the affected system or apply the vendor's mitigation — for example, keep it off the internet or limit it to trusted networks — and check the vendor's advisory for a fix. The CVE record's description, written by its CNA (Cisco Systems, Inc.), states the affected versions: "…prior to 3.0 Patch 1." No release containing a fix is confirmed on record.

Dependency Blast Radius

Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2018-0264

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2018-0264?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.