CVE-2025-22113MediumMicrosoft CVSS 7.1CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:H

Microsoft security update for CVE-2025-22113

Published
September 3, 2025
Last Modified
—

🔗 CVE IDs covered (1)

📋 Microsoft's advisory

EchelonGraph does not copy Microsoft's advisory page: its FAQ and remediation text are not shown here. Read the advisory on https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2025-22113. This page also shows what EchelonGraph holds for CVE-2025-22113, with the description from its CVE record, which the CVE Numbering Authority that assigned the CVE wrote: for a CVE Microsoft assigned, often in the words of Microsoft's own advisory.

🎯 Affected products27

  • azl3 kernel 6.6.104.2-4 on Azure Linux 3.0
  • azl3 kernel 6.6.112.1-2 on Azure Linux 3.0
  • azl3 kernel 6.6.117.1-1 on Azure Linux 3.0
  • azl3 kernel 6.6.119.3-1 on Azure Linux 3.0
  • azl3 kernel 6.6.119.3-3 on Azure Linux 3.0
  • azl3 kernel 6.6.121.1-1 on Azure Linux 3.0
  • azl3 kernel 6.6.126.1-1 on Azure Linux 3.0
  • azl3 kernel 6.6.130.1-3 on Azure Linux 3.0
  • azl3 kernel 6.6.134.1-2 on Azure Linux 3.0
  • azl3 kernel 6.6.137.1-2 on Azure Linux 3.0
  • azl3 kernel 6.6.138.1-1 on Azure Linux 3.0
  • azl3 kernel 6.6.139.1-1 on Azure Linux 3.0
  • azl3 kernel 6.6.141.1-1 on Azure Linux 3.0
  • azl3 kernel 6.6.143.1-1 on Azure Linux 3.0
  • azl3 kernel 6.6.144.1-1 on Azure Linux 3.0
  • azl3 kernel 6.6.145.2-1 on Azure Linux 3.0
  • azl3 kernel 6.6.150.1-1 on Azure Linux 3.0
  • azl3 kernel 6.6.152.1-1 on Azure Linux 3.0
  • azl3 kernel 6.6.157.1-1 on Azure Linux 3.0
  • azl3 kernel 6.6.159.1-1 on Azure Linux 3.0
  • azl3 kernel 6.6.161.1-1 on Azure Linux 3.0
  • azl3 kernel 6.6.96.2-1 on Azure Linux 3.0
  • azl3 kernel 6.6.96.2-2 on Azure Linux 3.0
  • cbl2 kernel 5.15.186.1-1 on CBL Mariner 2.0
  • cbl2 kernel 5.15.200.1-1 on CBL Mariner 2.0
  • cbl2 kernel 5.15.202.1-1 on CBL Mariner 2.0
  • cbl2 kernel 5.15.202.1-1 on CBL-Mariner 2.0

✅ Updates Microsoft lists: 2 updates

2 rows: one per KB article or update, update type and fixed build. Their details are on Microsoft's advisory.

KB articleUpdateFixed build
—Security Update—
—Security Update—

🧭 EchelonGraph on CVE-2025-22113

EchelonGraph score
5.5 MEDIUM
CISA KEV
Not listed
Fix status
A fix is available — apply it.

Description from the CVE record (CVE.org), as published by its numbering authority

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: ext4: avoid journaling sb update on error if journal is destroying Presently we always BUG_ON if trying to start a transaction on a journal marked with JBD2_UNMOUNT, since this should never happen. However, while ltp running stress tests, it was observed that in case of some error handling paths, it is possible for update_super_work to start a transaction after the journal is destroyed eg: (umount) ext4_kill_sb kill_block_super generic_shutdown_super sync_filesystem /* commits all txns */ evict_inodes /* might start a new txn */ ext4_put_super flush_work(&sbi->s_sb_upd_work) /* flush the workqueue */ jbd2_journal_destroy journal_kill_thread journal->j_flags |= JBD2_UNMOUNT; jbd2_journal_commit_transaction jbd2_journal_get_descriptor_buffer jbd2_journal_bmap ext4_journal_bmap ext4_map_blocks ... ext4_inode_error ext4_handle_error schedule_work(&sbi->s_sb_upd_work) /* work queue kicks in */ update_super_work jbd2_journal_start start_this_handle BUG_ON(journal->j_flags & JBD2_UNMOUNT) Hence, introduce a new mount flag to indicate journal is destroying and only do a journaled (and deferred) update of sb if this flag is not set. Otherwise, just fallback to an un-journaled commit. Further, in the journal destroy path, we have the following sequence: 1. Set mount flag indicating journal is destroying 2. force a commit and wait for it 3. flush pending sb updates This sequence is important as it ensures that, after this point, there is no sb update that might be journaled so it is safe to update the sb outside the journal. (To avoid race discussed in 2d01ddc86606) Also, we don't need a similar check in ext4_grp_locked_error since it is only called from mballoc and AFAICT it would be always valid to schedule work here.

Published by kernel.org, the CVE Numbering Authority that assigned CVE-2025-22113, in its CVE record at CVE.org; reused under the CVE Program's Terms of Use (its licence and MITRE's copyright notice are in our Terms of Service).

🔗 References (2)