Microsoft advisory for CVE-2024-44956
🔗 CVE IDs covered (1)
📋 Microsoft's advisory
EchelonGraph does not copy Microsoft's advisory page: its FAQ and remediation text are not shown here. Read the advisory on https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2024-44956. This page also shows what EchelonGraph holds for CVE-2024-44956, with the description from its CVE record, which the CVE Numbering Authority that assigned the CVE wrote: for a CVE Microsoft assigned, often in the words of Microsoft's own advisory.
🎯 Affected products23
- azl3 kernel 6.6.104.2-4 on Azure Linux 3.0
- azl3 kernel 6.6.112.1-2 on Azure Linux 3.0
- azl3 kernel 6.6.117.1-1 on Azure Linux 3.0
- azl3 kernel 6.6.119.3-1 on Azure Linux 3.0
- azl3 kernel 6.6.119.3-3 on Azure Linux 3.0
- azl3 kernel 6.6.121.1-1 on Azure Linux 3.0
- azl3 kernel 6.6.126.1-1 on Azure Linux 3.0
- azl3 kernel 6.6.130.1-3 on Azure Linux 3.0
- azl3 kernel 6.6.134.1-2 on Azure Linux 3.0
- azl3 kernel 6.6.137.1-2 on Azure Linux 3.0
- azl3 kernel 6.6.138.1-1 on Azure Linux 3.0
- azl3 kernel 6.6.139.1-1 on Azure Linux 3.0
- azl3 kernel 6.6.141.1-1 on Azure Linux 3.0
- azl3 kernel 6.6.143.1-1 on Azure Linux 3.0
- azl3 kernel 6.6.144.1-1 on Azure Linux 3.0
- azl3 kernel 6.6.145.2-1 on Azure Linux 3.0
- azl3 kernel 6.6.150.1-1 on Azure Linux 3.0
- azl3 kernel 6.6.96.2-1 on Azure Linux 3.0
- azl3 kernel 6.6.96.2-2 on Azure Linux 3.0
- cbl2 kernel 5.15.186.1-1 on CBL Mariner 2.0
- cbl2 kernel 5.15.200.1-1 on CBL Mariner 2.0
- cbl2 kernel 5.15.202.1-1 on CBL Mariner 2.0
- cbl2 kernel 5.15.202.1-1 on CBL-Mariner 2.0
🧭 EchelonGraph on CVE-2024-44956
- EchelonGraph score
- 5.5 MEDIUM
- CISA KEV
- Not listed
- Fix status
- A fix is available — apply it.
Description from the CVE record (CVE.org), as published by its numbering authority
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: drm/xe/preempt_fence: enlarge the fence critical section It is really easy to introduce subtle deadlocks in preempt_fence_work_func() since we operate on single global ordered-wq for signalling our preempt fences behind the scenes, so even though we signal a particular fence, everything in the callback should be in the fence critical section, since blocking in the callback will prevent other published fences from signalling. If we enlarge the fence critical section to cover the entire callback, then lockdep should be able to understand this better, and complain if we grab a sensitive lock like vm->lock, which is also held when waiting on preempt fences.
Published by kernel.org, the CVE Numbering Authority that assigned CVE-2024-44956, in its CVE record at CVE.org; reused under the CVE Program's Terms of Use (its licence and MITRE's copyright notice are in our Terms of Service).