GHSA-cp96-jpmq-xrr2HighCVSS 8.2

On a compromised node, the virt-handler service account can be used to modify all node specs

Published
March 16, 2023
Last Modified
March 27, 2023

🔗 CVE IDs covered (1)

📋 Description

Impact

If a malicious user has taken over a Kubernetes node where virt-handler (the KubeVirt node-daemon) is running, the virt-handler service account can be used to modify all node specs.

This can be misused to lure-in system-level-privileged components (which can for instance read all secrets on the cluster, or can exec into pods on other nodes). This way a compromised node can be used to elevate privileges beyond the node until potentially having full privileged access to the whole cluster.

The simplest way to exploit this, once a user could compromise a specific node, is to set with the virt-handler service account all other nodes to unschedulable and simply wait until system-critical components with high privileges appear on its node.

Since this requires a node to be compromised first, the severity of this finding is considered Medium.

Patches

Not yet available.

Workarounds

Gatekeeper users can add a webhook which will block the virt-handler service account to modify the spec of a node.

An example policy, preventing virt-handler from changing the node spec may look like this:

apiVersion: templates.gatekeeper.sh/v1
kind: ConstraintTemplate
metadata:
  name: virthandlerrestrictions
spec:
[...]
  targets:
    - libs:
        - |         
[...]          
          is_virt_handler(username) {
              username == "system:serviceaccount:kubevirt:virt-handler"
          }
          mutates_node_in_unintended_way {
            # TODO
            # only allow kubevirt.io/ prefixed metadata node changes
          }
      rego: |
[...]
        
        violation[{"msg": msg}] {
          is_virt_handler(username)
          mutates_node_in_unintended_way(input.review.object, input.review.oldObject)
          msg := sprintf("virt-handler tries to modify node <%v> in an unintended way.", [input.review.object.name])
        }

and applying this template to node modifications.

Credits

Special thanks to the discoverers of this issue:

Nanzi Yang ([email protected]) Xin Guo ([email protected]) Jietao Xiao ([email protected]) Wenbo Shen ([email protected]) Jinku Li ([email protected])

References

https://github.com/kubevirt/kubevirt/issues/9109

🎯 Affected products1

  • go/kubevirt.io/kubevirt:<= 0.59.0

🔗 References (4)