CVE-2026-98108

HIGHPre-NVD 7.57.5
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

“—” beside the score: it is equal to the CVSS score beside it.

Score 7.5 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: HIGH) published 2026-09-25. A secondary CVSS source baseline 7.5; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: EPSS, GitHub Security Advisory, a secondary CVSS source

Also known asEUVD-2026-86939 (ENISA EUVD) · GHSA-q3c9-52vx-cgp8 (GitHub Security Advisories)Source: ENISA EUVD

7.5EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixRemediate within your standard update timelines (the SSVC decision on this page).
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0.2%CVSS: 7.5Exploit: None knownExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is available — apply it.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

Bluetooth: L2CAP: fix chan mode for LE_CONN_REQ + EXT_FLOWCTL pchan

l2cap_new_connection() sets default value of channel mode to match the parent channel. l2cap_le_connect_req() left this at the default, and created L2CAP_MODE_EXT_FLOWCTL channels if listening pchan has that mode. This causes FLAG_DEFER_SETUP channels to reply to L2CAP_LE_CONN_REQ with L2CAP_ECRED_CONN_RSP, which is incorrect.

It can also result to stack OOB write (of l2cap_alloc_cid determined values) in l2cap_ecred_rsp_defer(), as l2cap_le_connect_req() does not limit maximum number of deferred channels or check for duplicate ident.

Fix by setting chan->mode correctly in l2cap_le_connect_req().

Also check channel mode in l2cap_ecred_rsp_defer(), and do WARN_ON_ONCE instead of OOB write to make it less brittle.

CVSS v3
7.5
EG Score
7.5HIGHmedium confidence
EG Risk
34
EG Risk 34/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity75% × 45%
Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 7.5 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.
Exploitation0.2% × 40%
FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.
Automatability0% × 15%
CISA's BOD 26-04 default: no one has published Automatable for this CVE, and CISA treats it as “no” for a CVE not in KEV.
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).
Exploitation none (no CISA value, KEV listing or exploit code on record) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). EchelonGraph holds no SSVC assessment of this CVE from CISA: none of these inputs is from Vulnrichment. EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.
EPSS PROB
0.2%
EPSS %ILE
15th
KEV
Not listed

What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)

The EG score (7.5): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 7.5 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.

EG Severity
7.5 HIGHCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
EG Likelihood
0.2% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-11-12). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
Confirmed exploitation
None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
EG Priority
SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).CISA BOD 26-04: 14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).

A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.

Exploitation none (no CISA value, KEV listing or exploit code on record) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). EchelonGraph holds no SSVC assessment of this CVE from CISA: none of these inputs is from Vulnrichment. EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.

The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). Where an input reads “CISA's BOD 26-04 default”, no one has published it for this CVE, and CISA's implementation guidance says: “If “Automatable” and “Technical Impact” information items about a CVE ID are not available and the CVE ID is not in the KEV Catalog, CISA will treat its values as “no” and “total,” respectively, until CISA or a third party provides metadata about the CVE ID. CISA will always provide the Vulnrichment data for a CVE ID listed in the KEV Catalog.” Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

September 25, 2026

Last Modified

November 12, 2026

Advisory Details (4)

Auto-updated Sep 25, 2026
Patch available.
Web page

Bluetooth: L2CAP: fix chan mode for LE_CONN_REQ + EXT_FLOWCTL pchan - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/4ef05db5b08b176a551b4a6287372045998806b0
Web page

Bluetooth: L2CAP: fix chan mode for LE_CONN_REQ + EXT_FLOWCTL pchan - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/6cb79e6499228cfdbd4b3301371ce74d01cd2f80
Web page

Bluetooth: L2CAP: fix chan mode for LE_CONN_REQ + EXT_FLOWCTL pchan - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/5d5a625cbc854d4c4f68e4b16fcf6e682d9a9ed1
Web page

Bluetooth: L2CAP: fix chan mode for LE_CONN_REQ + EXT_FLOWCTL pchan - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/1074bcc57f741223f9fa82ce6afe5c3d783e4d10

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-98108(2)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Affected Packages

(4 across 3 ecosystems)
Debian:12(2)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.1.106-1 ... 6.1.99-1 (57 versions)
  • every version up to 6.1.190-1: fixed in 6.1.190-1
—
linux-6.126.12.100-1~deb12u1, 6.12.101-1~deb12u1, 6.12.107-1~deb12u1
  • every version up to 6.12.111-1~deb12u1: fixed in 6.12.111-1~deb12u1
—
Debian:13(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.12.100-1 ... 6.12.96-1 (35 versions)
  • every version up to 6.12.111-1: fixed in 6.12.111-1
—
Debian:14(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.12.100-1 ... 7.2~rc7-1~exp1 (181 versions)
  • every version up to 7.2.7-1: fixed in 7.2.7-1
—

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 10× in last 7d / 41× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed its CVE.org record (CNA or CISA ADP). An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). "EchelonGraph re-scored" is our own recompute of this CVE's score, not an update from a source, and is not counted in the refreshes above. Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 170 rows on record for this CVE.

A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. None are among the latest 100 rows. The 70 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.

  1. 2026-11-12 18:48 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  2. 2026-11-12 18:48 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-q3c9-52vx-cgp8 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  3. 2026-11-12 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 15th percentile
  4. 2026-11-11 16:41 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 15th percentile
  5. 2026-11-10 16:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 15th percentile
  6. 2026-11-09 16:37 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 15th percentile
  7. 2026-11-09 09:23 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  8. 2026-11-09 09:23 UTCVendor advisory
  9. 2026-11-09 09:23 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-q3c9-52vx-cgp8 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  10. 2026-11-08 16:41 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 15th percentile
  11. 2026-11-07 16:40 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 15th percentile
  12. 2026-11-06 16:40 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 15th percentile
  13. 2026-11-05 16:39 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 15th percentile
  14. 2026-11-04 16:37 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 15th percentile
  15. 2026-11-03 16:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 15th percentile
  16. 2026-11-02 16:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 15th percentile
  17. 2026-11-01 22:58 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  18. 2026-11-01 22:58 UTCVendor advisory
  19. 2026-11-01 22:58 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-q3c9-52vx-cgp8 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  20. 2026-11-01 16:36 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 15th percentile
  21. 2026-10-31 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 15th percentile
  22. 2026-10-30 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 15th percentile
  23. 2026-10-29 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 15th percentile
  24. 2026-10-28 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 15th percentile
  25. 2026-10-27 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 15th percentile
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-10-26 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 15th percentile
  2. 2026-10-25 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 15th percentile
  3. 2026-10-25 13:47 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  4. 2026-10-25 12:34 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  5. 2026-10-25 12:34 UTCVendor advisory
  6. 2026-10-25 12:33 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-q3c9-52vx-cgp8 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  7. 2026-10-24 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 14th percentile
  8. 2026-10-23 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 14th percentile
  9. 2026-10-22 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 14th percentile
  10. 2026-10-21 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 14th percentile
  11. 2026-10-20 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 14th percentile
  12. 2026-10-19 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 14th percentile
  13. 2026-10-19 10:26 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  14. 2026-10-19 10:26 UTCVendor advisory
  15. 2026-10-19 10:26 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-q3c9-52vx-cgp8 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  16. 2026-10-19 09:43 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  17. 2026-10-19 09:43 UTCVendor advisory
  18. 2026-10-19 09:43 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-q3c9-52vx-cgp8 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  19. 2026-10-18 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 14th percentile
  20. 2026-10-18 02:56 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  21. 2026-10-17 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 14th percentile
  22. 2026-10-16 16:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 14th percentile
  23. 2026-10-15 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 14th percentile
  24. 2026-10-14 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 14th percentile
  25. 2026-10-13 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 14th percentile
  26. 2026-10-13 03:59 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  27. 2026-10-13 03:59 UTCVendor advisory
  28. 2026-10-13 03:58 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-q3c9-52vx-cgp8 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  29. 2026-10-12 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 14th percentile
  30. 2026-10-12 14:39 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  31. 2026-10-12 01:29 UTCVendor advisory
  32. 2026-10-12 01:28 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-q3c9-52vx-cgp8 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  33. 2026-10-11 19:10 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  34. 2026-10-11 16:25 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  35. 2026-10-11 13:50 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 14th percentile
  36. 2026-10-11 13:37 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  37. 2026-10-11 12:35 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  38. 2026-10-11 12:35 UTCVendor advisory
  39. 2026-10-11 12:35 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-q3c9-52vx-cgp8 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  40. 2026-10-11 01:24 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  41. 2026-10-11 01:24 UTCVendor advisory
  42. 2026-10-11 01:24 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-q3c9-52vx-cgp8 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  43. 2026-10-10 20:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 14th percentile
  44. 2026-10-10 13:33 UTCVendor advisory
  45. 2026-10-10 13:33 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-q3c9-52vx-cgp8 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  46. 2026-10-10 02:25 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  47. 2026-10-10 02:25 UTCVendor advisory
  48. 2026-10-10 02:25 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-q3c9-52vx-cgp8 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  49. 2026-10-09 20:08 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 14th percentile
  50. 2026-10-09 15:16 UTCVendor advisory
  51. 2026-10-09 15:15 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-q3c9-52vx-cgp8 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  52. 2026-10-09 04:06 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  53. 2026-10-09 04:06 UTCVendor advisory
  54. 2026-10-09 04:06 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-q3c9-52vx-cgp8 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  55. 2026-10-08 17:14 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 14th percentile
  56. 2026-10-08 16:57 UTCVendor advisory
  57. 2026-10-08 16:57 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-q3c9-52vx-cgp8 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  58. 2026-10-08 04:48 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  59. 2026-10-08 04:48 UTCVendor advisory
  60. 2026-10-08 04:48 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-q3c9-52vx-cgp8 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  61. 2026-10-07 23:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 14th percentile
  62. 2026-10-07 17:40 UTCVendor advisory
  63. 2026-10-07 17:40 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-q3c9-52vx-cgp8 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  64. 2026-10-07 04:35 UTCVendor advisory
  65. 2026-10-07 04:35 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-q3c9-52vx-cgp8 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  66. 2026-10-06 17:26 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  67. 2026-10-06 17:26 UTCVendor advisory
  68. 2026-10-06 17:26 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-q3c9-52vx-cgp8 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  69. 2026-10-06 15:19 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 14th percentile
  70. 2026-10-06 06:18 UTCVendor advisory
  71. 2026-10-06 06:18 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-q3c9-52vx-cgp8 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  72. 2026-10-05 19:09 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  73. 2026-10-05 19:09 UTCVendor advisory
  74. 2026-10-05 19:09 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-q3c9-52vx-cgp8 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  75. 2026-10-05 17:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 14th percentile

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-98108?
CVE-2026-98108 is a high-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on September 25, 2026. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: Bluetooth: L2CAP: fix chan mode for LE_CONN_REQ + EXT_FLOWCTL pchan l2cap_new_connection() sets default value of channel mode to match the parent channel. l2cap_le_connect_req() left this at the default, and created…
When was the CVE record for CVE-2026-98108 published?
The CVE record for CVE-2026-98108 was published on September 25, 2026. That is the record's publication date; the vulnerability itself may have been made public earlier. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of November 12, 2026; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2026-98108 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-98108 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0.2% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (15th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-98108?
CVE-2026-98108 has a CVSS base score of 7.5 (a secondary CVSS source that NVD displays; NVD's own analysis pending).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-98108?
A fix for CVE-2026-98108 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2026-98108 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-98108

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-98108?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.