CVE-2026-97931

HIGHPre-NVD 7.07.0
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

“—” beside the score: it is equal to the CVSS score beside it.

Score 7.0 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: HIGH) published 2026-09-25. A secondary CVSS source baseline 7.0; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: EPSS, GitHub Security Advisory, a secondary CVSS source

Also known asEUVD-2026-86785 (ENISA EUVD) · GHSA-vp4m-4hj6-cc9p (GitHub Security Advisories)Source: ENISA EUVD

7.0EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixRemediate within your standard update timelines (the SSVC decision on this page).
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0.1%CVSS: 7.0Exploit: None knownExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is available — apply it.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

ALSA: us122l: Prevent write upgrades for read mappings

The hwdep mmap callback rejects read-buffer mappings that are initially writable, but leaves VM_MAYWRITE set on mappings created with PROT_READ. A process that can open the hwdep node O_RDWR can later use mprotect() to make the mapping writable.

The read allocation begins with struct usb_stream. Its read_size member is used by the fault handler to decide which pages belong to the read buffer. The read VMA intentionally remains expandable because pcm_usb_stream uses mremap() after reading that size. Changing read_size first can therefore map and access pages beyond the allocation. The same member is also consumed by usb_stream_free(), where changing it can make free_pages_exact() release pages outside the allocation.

Clear VM_MAYWRITE for read-buffer mappings after rejecting an initially writable VMA. This keeps the separate output-buffer mapping writable while preventing later permission upgrades.

CVSS v3
7.0
EG Score
7.0HIGHmedium confidence
EG Risk
32
EG Risk 32/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity70% × 45%
Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 7.0 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.
Exploitation0.1% × 40%
FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.
Automatability0% × 15%
CISA's BOD 26-04 default: no one has published Automatable for this CVE, and CISA treats it as “no” for a CVE not in KEV.
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).
Exploitation none (no CISA value, KEV listing or exploit code on record) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). EchelonGraph holds no SSVC assessment of this CVE from CISA: none of these inputs is from Vulnrichment. EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.
EPSS PROB
0.1%
EPSS %ILE
3rd
KEV
Not listed

What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)

The EG score (7.0): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 7.0 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.

EG Severity
7.0 HIGHCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
EG Likelihood
0.1% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-11-13). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
Confirmed exploitation
None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
EG Priority
SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).CISA BOD 26-04: 14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).

A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.

Exploitation none (no CISA value, KEV listing or exploit code on record) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). EchelonGraph holds no SSVC assessment of this CVE from CISA: none of these inputs is from Vulnrichment. EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.

The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). Where an input reads “CISA's BOD 26-04 default”, no one has published it for this CVE, and CISA's implementation guidance says: “If “Automatable” and “Technical Impact” information items about a CVE ID are not available and the CVE ID is not in the KEV Catalog, CISA will treat its values as “no” and “total,” respectively, until CISA or a third party provides metadata about the CVE ID. CISA will always provide the Vulnrichment data for a CVE ID listed in the KEV Catalog.” Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

September 25, 2026

Last Modified

October 19, 2026

Advisory Details (4)

Auto-updated Sep 25, 2026
Patch available.
Web page

ALSA: us122l: Prevent write upgrades for read mappings - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/71c610aeb1770302ac9c9e0b9a4ecd37f1311928
Web page

ALSA: us122l: Prevent write upgrades for read mappings - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/0eb9dd4774af0ac4d1fd105ef2b0a1f6cec06f2f
Web page

ALSA: us122l: Prevent write upgrades for read mappings - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/d9c537b14f4982f17b103e3a2cfeee4bee6bc026
Web page

ALSA: us122l: Prevent write upgrades for read mappings - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/64a87950239867682cde128020e1a47088295e5c

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-97931(2)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Patch Availability(17)

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Affected Packages

(4 across 3 ecosystems)
Debian:12(2)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.1.106-1 ... 6.1.99-1 (57 versions)
  • every version up to 6.1.190-1: fixed in 6.1.190-1
—
linux-6.126.12.100-1~deb12u1, 6.12.101-1~deb12u1, 6.12.107-1~deb12u1
  • every version up to 6.12.111-1~deb12u1: fixed in 6.12.111-1~deb12u1
—
Debian:13(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.12.100-1 ... 6.12.96-1 (35 versions)
  • every version up to 6.12.111-1: fixed in 6.12.111-1
—
Debian:14(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.12.100-1 ... 7.2~rc7-1~exp1 (181 versions)
  • every version up to 7.2.7-1: fixed in 7.2.7-1
—

Additional Vendor Advisories

(17)

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 10× in last 7d / 40× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed its CVE.org record (CNA or CISA ADP). An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). "EchelonGraph re-scored" is our own recompute of this CVE's score, not an update from a source, and is not counted in the refreshes above. Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 153 rows on record for this CVE.

A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. None are among the latest 100 rows. The 53 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.

  1. 2026-11-14 00:30 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  2. 2026-11-14 00:30 UTCVendor advisory
  3. 2026-11-14 00:29 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-vp4m-4hj6-cc9p · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.0
  4. 2026-11-12 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 3rd percentile
  5. 2026-11-11 16:41 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 3rd percentile
  6. 2026-11-10 16:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 3rd percentile
  7. 2026-11-09 16:36 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 3rd percentile
  8. 2026-11-08 16:41 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 3rd percentile
  9. 2026-11-07 16:40 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 3rd percentile
  10. 2026-11-07 09:50 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  11. 2026-11-07 09:50 UTCVendor advisory
  12. 2026-11-07 09:50 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-vp4m-4hj6-cc9p · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.0
  13. 2026-11-06 16:40 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 3rd percentile
  14. 2026-11-05 16:39 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 3rd percentile
  15. 2026-11-04 16:37 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 3rd percentile
  16. 2026-11-03 16:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 3rd percentile
  17. 2026-11-02 16:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 3rd percentile
  18. 2026-11-01 16:36 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 3rd percentile
  19. 2026-10-31 23:11 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  20. 2026-10-31 23:11 UTCVendor advisory
  21. 2026-10-31 23:11 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-vp4m-4hj6-cc9p · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.0
  22. 2026-10-31 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 3rd percentile
  23. 2026-10-30 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 3rd percentile
  24. 2026-10-29 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 3rd percentile
  25. 2026-10-28 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 3rd percentile
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-10-26 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 3rd percentile
  2. 2026-10-25 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 3rd percentile
  3. 2026-10-25 13:47 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  4. 2026-10-25 12:33 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  5. 2026-10-25 12:33 UTCVendor advisory
  6. 2026-10-25 12:32 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-vp4m-4hj6-cc9p · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.0
  7. 2026-10-24 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 3rd percentile
  8. 2026-10-23 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 3rd percentile
  9. 2026-10-22 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 3rd percentile
  10. 2026-10-21 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 3rd percentile
  11. 2026-10-20 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 3rd percentile
  12. 2026-10-19 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 3rd percentile
  13. 2026-10-19 10:27 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  14. 2026-10-19 10:27 UTCVendor advisory
  15. 2026-10-19 10:26 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-vp4m-4hj6-cc9p · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.0
  16. 2026-10-19 09:43 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  17. 2026-10-19 09:43 UTCVendor advisory
  18. 2026-10-19 09:43 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-vp4m-4hj6-cc9p · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.0
  19. 2026-10-18 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 3rd percentile
  20. 2026-10-18 02:56 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  21. 2026-10-17 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 3rd percentile
  22. 2026-10-16 16:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 3rd percentile
  23. 2026-10-15 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 3rd percentile
  24. 2026-10-14 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 3rd percentile
  25. 2026-10-13 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 3rd percentile
  26. 2026-10-13 03:59 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  27. 2026-10-13 03:59 UTCVendor advisory
  28. 2026-10-13 03:59 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-vp4m-4hj6-cc9p · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.0
  29. 2026-10-12 14:39 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  30. 2026-10-11 19:10 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  31. 2026-10-11 16:35 UTCVendor advisory
  32. 2026-10-11 16:35 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-vp4m-4hj6-cc9p · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.0
  33. 2026-10-11 16:25 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  34. 2026-10-11 13:50 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 3rd percentile
  35. 2026-10-11 13:37 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  36. 2026-10-11 03:35 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  37. 2026-10-11 03:35 UTCVendor advisory
  38. 2026-10-11 03:35 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-vp4m-4hj6-cc9p · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.0
  39. 2026-10-10 20:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 3rd percentile
  40. 2026-10-10 14:33 UTCVendor advisory
  41. 2026-10-10 14:33 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-vp4m-4hj6-cc9p · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.0
  42. 2026-10-10 01:33 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  43. 2026-10-10 01:33 UTCVendor advisory
  44. 2026-10-10 01:33 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-vp4m-4hj6-cc9p · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.0
  45. 2026-10-09 20:08 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 3rd percentile
  46. 2026-10-09 12:28 UTCVendor advisory
  47. 2026-10-09 12:27 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-vp4m-4hj6-cc9p · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.0
  48. 2026-10-08 21:40 UTCVendor advisory
  49. 2026-10-08 21:40 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-vp4m-4hj6-cc9p · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.0
  50. 2026-10-08 08:32 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  51. 2026-10-08 08:32 UTCVendor advisory
  52. 2026-10-08 08:31 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-vp4m-4hj6-cc9p · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.0
  53. 2026-10-07 23:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 3rd percentile
  54. 2026-10-07 19:31 UTCVendor advisory
  55. 2026-10-07 19:31 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-vp4m-4hj6-cc9p · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.0
  56. 2026-10-07 06:24 UTCVendor advisory
  57. 2026-10-07 06:24 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-vp4m-4hj6-cc9p · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.0
  58. 2026-10-06 17:21 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  59. 2026-10-06 17:21 UTCVendor advisory
  60. 2026-10-06 17:21 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-vp4m-4hj6-cc9p · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.0
  61. 2026-10-06 15:19 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 3rd percentile
  62. 2026-10-06 04:21 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  63. 2026-10-06 04:21 UTCVendor advisory
  64. 2026-10-06 04:21 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-vp4m-4hj6-cc9p · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.0
  65. 2026-10-05 17:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 3rd percentile
  66. 2026-10-05 15:21 UTCVendor advisory
  67. 2026-10-05 15:21 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-vp4m-4hj6-cc9p · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.0
  68. 2026-10-05 02:20 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  69. 2026-10-05 02:20 UTCVendor advisory
  70. 2026-10-05 02:20 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-vp4m-4hj6-cc9p · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.0
  71. 2026-10-04 23:23 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 3rd percentile
  72. 2026-10-04 13:20 UTCVendor advisory
  73. 2026-10-04 13:20 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-vp4m-4hj6-cc9p · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.0
  74. 2026-10-04 00:19 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  75. 2026-10-04 00:19 UTCVendor advisory

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-97931?
CVE-2026-97931 is a high-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on September 25, 2026. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: ALSA: us122l: Prevent write upgrades for read mappings The hwdep mmap callback rejects read-buffer mappings that are initially writable, but leaves VM_MAYWRITE set on mappings created with PROT_READ. A process that can open the…
When was the CVE record for CVE-2026-97931 published?
The CVE record for CVE-2026-97931 was published on September 25, 2026. That is the record's publication date; the vulnerability itself may have been made public earlier. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of October 19, 2026; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2026-97931 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-97931 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0.1% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (3rd percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-97931?
CVE-2026-97931 has a CVSS base score of 7.0 (a secondary CVSS source that NVD displays; NVD's own analysis pending).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-97931?
A fix for CVE-2026-97931 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2026-97931 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-97931

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-97931?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.