CVE-2026-97373

MEDIUMPre-NVD 5.85.8
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

“—” beside the score: it is equal to the CVSS score beside it.

This medium-severity CVE scores 5.8 under a secondary CVSS source (NVD's own analysis pending). EPSS exploit probability: 0.2% (15th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs). No GitHub Security Advisory CVSS is on record for this CVE.

Triggered by: Headline CVSS from a secondary CVSS source
Sources: EPSS, a secondary CVSS source

Also known asEUVD-2026-117101 (ENISA EUVD)Source: ENISA EUVD

5.8EG
EchelonGraph verdictMonitorRemediate within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high (the SSVC decision on this page).
  • Lower severity and no public exploit yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0.2%CVSS: 5.8Exploit: None knownExposed services: Not assessed

The CVE record names the fixed release — apply it.

draw.io is a configurable diagramming and whiteboarding application. Prior to 30.3.8, the optional /proxy endpoint contains an incomplete server-side request forgery blocklist. When the endpoint is enabled, the URL validator does not reject the RFC 6598 shared address range 100.64.0.0/10. An unauthenticated remote attacker can cause the draw.io server to request internal services that are reachable in this range, potentially disclosing data from Carrier-Grade NAT, Kubernetes, cloud, or overlay-network addresses. This vulnerability is fixed in 30.3.8.

CVSS v3
5.8
EG Score
5.8MEDIUMmedium confidence
EG Risk
41
EG Risk 41/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity58% × 45%
Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 5.8 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.
Exploitation0.2% × 40%
FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.
Automatability100% × 15%
CISA's SSVC Automatable value: yes (Vulnrichment).
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).
Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: The CVE record names the fixed release. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.
EPSS PROB
0.2%
EPSS %ILE
15th
KEV
Not listed

What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)

The EG score (5.8): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 5.8 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.

EG Severity
5.8 MEDIUMCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.a secondary CVSS source · CVSS v3.0 or v3.1
EG Likelihood
0.2% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-11-12). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
Confirmed exploitation
None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
EG Priority
SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).CISA BOD 26-04: 14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; 60 days if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).

The CVE record names the fixed release. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.

Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; 60 days if it is not.

The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

November 4, 2026

Last Modified

November 12, 2026

Advisory Details (1)

Auto-updated Nov 9, 2026
🔬 Proof of concept available. Fix named in the CVE record. Sources: github.
GitHub advisoryMentions a patch (unverified)🟡 PoC Available

Incomplete SSRF blocklist in `ProxyServlet` / `Utils.sanitizeUrl`: RFC 6598 CGNAT range `100.64.0.0/10` is not blocked -> server-side request to internal CGNAT hosts · Advisory · jgraph/drawio · GitHub

https://github.com/jgraph/drawio/security/advisories/GHSA-xc39-mcq4-fr4q

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 7× in last 7d / 11× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed its CVE.org record (CNA or CISA ADP). An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). "EchelonGraph re-scored" is our own recompute of this CVE's score, not an update from a source, and is not counted in the refreshes above. Most recent first.

  1. 2026-11-13 16:58 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 15th percentile
  2. 2026-11-12 20:29 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  3. 2026-11-12 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 15th percentile
  4. 2026-11-11 16:41 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 15th percentile
  5. 2026-11-10 16:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 15th percentile
  6. 2026-11-09 17:28 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  7. 2026-11-09 17:05 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  8. 2026-11-09 16:36 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 15th percentile
  9. 2026-11-08 16:41 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 15th percentile
  10. 2026-11-07 16:40 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 15th percentile
  11. 2026-11-06 16:40 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 15th percentile
  12. 2026-11-05 16:39 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 15th percentile
  13. 2026-11-04 22:03 UTCENISA EUVD ID recordedEUVD-2026-117101 · Source: ENISA EUVD
  14. 2026-11-04 21:27 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  15. 2026-11-04 21:01 UTCEchelonGraph re-scoredFirst assessed: 5.8 MEDIUM
  16. 2026-11-04 21:00 UTCMITRE cvelistV5first tracked

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-97373?
CVE-2026-97373 is a medium-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on November 4, 2026. draw.io is a configurable diagramming and whiteboarding application. Prior to 30.3.8, the optional /proxy endpoint contains an incomplete server-side request forgery blocklist. When the endpoint is enabled, the URL validator does not reject the RFC 6598 shared address range 100.64.0.0/10. An…
When was the CVE record for CVE-2026-97373 published?
The CVE record for CVE-2026-97373 was published on November 4, 2026. That is the record's publication date; the vulnerability itself may have been made public earlier. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of November 12, 2026; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2026-97373 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-97373 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0.2% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (15th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-97373?
CVE-2026-97373 has a CVSS base score of 5.8 (a secondary CVSS source that NVD displays; NVD's own analysis pending).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-97373?
The CVE record for CVE-2026-97373 names the fix: "This vulnerability is fixed in 30.3.8."

Dependency Blast Radius

Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2026-97373

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-97373?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.