CVE-2026-95629

MEDIUMPre-NVD 5.45.4
EchelonGraph scoreHIGH confidence

“—” beside the score: it is equal to the CVSS score beside it.

Score 5.4 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: MODERATE) published 2026-10-26. A secondary CVSS source baseline 5.4; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: EPSS, GitHub Security Advisory, a secondary CVSS source

Also known asEUVD-2026-109671 (ENISA EUVD) · GHSA-9mgq-6r88-pghr (GitHub Security Advisories)Source: ENISA EUVD

5.4EG
EchelonGraph verdictMonitorRemediate within your standard update timelines (the SSVC decision on this page).
  • Lower severity and no public exploit yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 1.0%CVSS: 5.4Exploit: None knownExposed services: Not assessed

Users on the 4.22.x stream should upgrade to 4.22.2 and users on the 4.18.x stream should upgrade to 4.18.5 (from the CVE record's solution, Apache Software Foundation) — apply it.

Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory ('Path Traversal') vulnerability in Apache Camel Docling component.

This issue affects Apache Camel: from 4.15.0 before 4.18.5, from 4.19.0 before 4.22.2.

DoclingProducer runs the external docling tool in CLI mode, the default, and tells it where to write the converted document through the --output flag. When the CamelDoclingOutputFilePath header was set, addOutputDirectoryArguments handed its value to that flag verbatim: the value was not normalized, an absolute path or a path containing .. segments was accepted as given, and no endpoint option could confine it to a directory. The custom-argument validation added by the fix for CVE-2026-40047 refuses the --output and -o flags in the CamelDoclingCustomArguments header and tells callers to choose the output directory with this header instead, so the one value that decides where docling writes reached the command line without any of the checks applied to custom arguments. Docling writes the conversion result, as Markdown, HTML, JSON or text, into that directory, naming the file after the input file, and the producer afterwards removes only its own temporary directory, so the file is left in place. A party able to set the header could therefore have conversion output created in any directory the Camel process can write to. The content of such a file is the conversion of the document carried by the message, so it is shaped by whoever supplies that document without being written byte for byte, and when the document content arrives in the message body the producer stores it under a random temporary name, which the output file then carries. The header belongs to the Camel header namespace, which consumers applying Camel's default header filtering, such as the JMS and Kafka consumers, remove from incoming messages, so the issue is reached where a route forwards externally influenced values into the header or where a consumer maps incoming headers without that filtering. The docling-serve mode does not use the header.

Users are recommended to upgrade to version 4.23.0, which fixes the issue. If users are on the 4.22.x releases stream, then they are suggested to upgrade to 4.22.2. If users are on the 4.18.x releases stream, then they are suggested to upgrade to 4.18.5. The fix adds an outputBaseDirectory endpoint option that is unset by default, so after upgrading, set it on every docling endpoint whose CamelDoclingOutputFilePath header can carry a value influenced from outside the deployment; without it the header is normalized but can still name any directory. The 4.15.x to 4.17.x and 4.19.x to 4.21.x release lines reached end of life before this issue was resolved and will not receive a fix, so deployments on them must move to a supported release. For deployments that cannot upgrade immediately, do not build the CamelDoclingOutputFilePath header from values that originate outside the deployment, remove that header from messages that arrive from outside before they reach a docling endpoint, and make sure that consumers which map incoming message headers drop the Camel header namespace, so that only the route itself chooses the output directory.

CVSS v3
5.4
EG Score
5.4MEDIUMhigh confidence
EG Risk
24
EG Risk 24/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity54% × 45%
Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 5.4 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.
Exploitation0.3% × 40%
FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.
Automatability0% × 15%
CISA's SSVC Automatable value: no (Vulnrichment).
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at every mission impact level.
Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: Users on the 4.22.x stream should upgrade to 4.22.2 and users on the 4.18.x stream should upgrade to 4.18.5 (from the CVE record's solution, Apache Software Foundation). Apply it within your standard update timelines.
EPSS PROB
1.0%
EPSS %ILE
63rd
KEV
Not listed

What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)

The EG score (5.4): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 5.4 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.

EG Severity
5.4 MEDIUMCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
EG Likelihood
1.0% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS. FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
Confirmed exploitation
None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
EG Priority
SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at every mission impact level.CISA BOD 26-04: 60 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at every mission impact level.

Users on the 4.22.x stream should upgrade to 4.22.2 and users on the 4.18.x stream should upgrade to 4.18.5 (from the CVE record's solution, Apache Software Foundation). Apply it within your standard update timelines.

Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)60 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.

The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

October 26, 2026

Last Modified

November 6, 2026

Advisory Details (7)

Auto-updated Oct 26, 2026
Fix named in the CVE record's solution (Apache Software Foundation). Sources: github_pr.
Web page

Apache Camel Security Advisory - CVE-2026-78163 - Apache Camel

https://camel.apache.org/security/CVE-2026-78163.html
Web page

Apache Camel Security Advisory - CVE-2026-40047 - Apache Camel

https://camel.apache.org/security/CVE-2026-40047.html
GitHub pull request

[backport camel-4.18.x] CAMEL-24894: camel-docling - make output path handling consistent with input path and custom-argument handling

Fix merged in apache/camel PR #27362 on 2026-10-05 — awaiting tagged release

https://github.com/apache/camel/pull/27362
GitHub pull request

[backport camel-4.22.x] CAMEL-24894: camel-docling - make output path handling consistent with input path and custom-argument handling

Fix merged in apache/camel PR #27365 on 2026-10-05 — awaiting tagged release

https://github.com/apache/camel/pull/27365
GitHub pull request

CAMEL-24894: camel-docling - make output path handling consistent with input path and custom-argument handling

Fix merged in apache/camel PR #26737 on 2026-09-25 — awaiting tagged release

https://github.com/apache/camel/pull/26737
Web page

Apache Camel Security Advisory - CVE-2026-95629 - Apache Camel

https://camel.apache.org/security/CVE-2026-95629.html

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-95629(1)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 8× in last 7d / 24× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed its CVE.org record (CNA or CISA ADP). An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). "EchelonGraph re-scored" is our own recompute of this CVE's score, not an update from a source, and is not counted in the refreshes above. Most recent first.

  1. 2026-11-12 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.0% · 63rd percentile
  2. 2026-11-11 16:41 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.0% · 63rd percentile
  3. 2026-11-10 16:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.0% · 63rd percentile
  4. 2026-11-09 16:36 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.0% · 63rd percentile
  5. 2026-11-08 16:41 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.0% · 63rd percentile
  6. 2026-11-07 16:40 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.0% · 63rd percentile
  7. 2026-11-06 16:47 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  8. 2026-11-06 16:47 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-9mgq-6r88-pghr · GitHub severity MODERATE · GitHub CVSS 5.4
  9. 2026-11-06 16:40 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 27th percentile
  10. 2026-11-05 16:39 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 27th percentile
  11. 2026-11-04 16:37 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 27th percentile
  12. 2026-11-03 16:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 26th percentile
  13. 2026-11-02 21:26 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  14. 2026-11-02 21:26 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-9mgq-6r88-pghr · GitHub severity MODERATE · GitHub CVSS 5.4
  15. 2026-11-02 21:03 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  16. 2026-11-02 21:03 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-9mgq-6r88-pghr · GitHub severity MODERATE · GitHub CVSS 5.4
  17. 2026-11-02 16:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 26th percentile
  18. 2026-11-01 16:36 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 26th percentile
  19. 2026-10-31 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 26th percentile
  20. 2026-10-30 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 26th percentile
  21. 2026-10-29 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 26th percentile
  22. 2026-10-28 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 26th percentile
  23. 2026-10-27 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 26th percentile
  24. 2026-10-26 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 26th percentile
  25. 2026-10-26 13:51 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
Show 5 more
  1. 2026-10-26 13:51 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-9mgq-6r88-pghr · GitHub CVSS 5.4
  2. 2026-10-26 10:01 UTCENISA EUVD ID recordedEUVD-2026-109671 · Source: ENISA EUVD
  3. 2026-10-26 09:26 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  4. 2026-10-26 09:00 UTCEchelonGraph re-scoredFirst assessed: 5.4 MEDIUM
  5. 2026-10-26 09:00 UTCMITRE cvelistV5first tracked

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-95629?
CVE-2026-95629 is a medium-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on October 26, 2026. Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory ('Path Traversal') vulnerability in Apache Camel Docling component. This issue affects Apache Camel: from 4.15.0 before 4.18.5, from 4.19.0 before 4.22.2. DoclingProducer runs the external docling tool in CLI mode, the default, and tells…
When was the CVE record for CVE-2026-95629 published?
The CVE record for CVE-2026-95629 was published on October 26, 2026. That is the record's publication date; the vulnerability itself may have been made public earlier. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of November 6, 2026; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2026-95629 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-95629 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 1.0% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (63rd percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-95629?
CVE-2026-95629 has a CVSS base score of 5.4 (a secondary CVSS source that NVD displays; NVD's own analysis pending).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-95629?
The CVE record's solution for CVE-2026-95629, written by its CNA Apache Software Foundation, names the fix: "Users on the 4.22.x stream should upgrade to 4.22.2 and users on the 4.18.x stream should upgrade to 4.18.5." The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2026-95629 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2026-95629

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-95629?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.