Tornado before 6.5.7 contains a credential leak vulnerability in CurlAsyncHTTPClient where pycurl handles are reused across requests without proper state clearing. Attackers can obtain sensitive credentials by issuing requests through the same client instance, allowing TLS certificates or proxy authentication to persist across unintended requests.
CVE-2026-91992
Score 5.9 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: HIGH) published 2026-09-15. a secondary CVSS source baseline 5.9; sources differ by 0.0.
- Lower severity and no public exploit yet
No vendor fix yet — apply a workaround or compensating control (WAF / firewall / segmentation) and watch for a patch.
- CVSS v3
- 5.9
- EG Score
- 5.9(high)
- EG Risk
- 43(Track)EG Risk 43/100SSVC: Track
EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).
How it’s computedSeverity59% × 45%Exploitation40% × 40%Automatability0% × 15%Action: Routine — remediate on your standard cadence. - EPSS PROB
- 0%
- EPSS %ILE
- 11%
- KEV
- Not listed
Published
September 15, 2026
Last Modified
September 17, 2026
Advisory Details (2)
Auto-updated Sep 15, 2026Tornado before 6.5.7 Credential Leak via Handle Reuse | Advisories | VulnCheck
https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/tornado-before-6.5.7-credential-leak-via-handle-reuseCurlAsyncHTTPClient leaks per-request credentials on handle reuse · Advisory · tornadoweb/tornado · GitHub
https://github.com/tornadoweb/tornado/security/advisories/GHSA-pw6j-qg29-8w7fVendor Advisories for CVE-2026-91992(1)
These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.
Affected Packages
(1 across 1 ecosystem)
PyPI(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fixed in | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| tornado | 0.2 ... 6.5b1 (82 versions) | 6.5.7 | — |
Weakness Classification(1)
MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 16× in last 7d / 16× in last 30d)
Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.
- 2026-09-18 19:28 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-18 17:49 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-18 17:49 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-17 19:32 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-17 18:08 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-17 18:08 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-17 15:29 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-17 15:29 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-17 13:29 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-17 13:29 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-16 14:09 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-16 13:45 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-16 13:44 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-15 16:32 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-15 15:23 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-15 15:22 UTCMITRE cvelistV5first tracked
Related CVEs(same CWE)
Frequently asked(5)
What is CVE-2026-91992?
When was CVE-2026-91992 disclosed?
Is CVE-2026-91992 actively exploited?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-91992?
How do I remediate CVE-2026-91992?
Dependency Blast Radius
See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-91992
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-91992?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.