CVE-2026-90961

CRITICALPre-NVD 9.39.3
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

This critical-severity CVE scores 9.3 under a secondary CVSS source (NVD's own analysis pending). EPSS exploit probability: 0.5%, top 61% of all CVEs by exploit prediction. GitHub Security Advisory data not yet ingested — confidence will rise once GHSA publishes (typical lag: hours to days for open-source ecosystem CVEs; never for infrastructure-only CVEs).

Triggered by: NVD CVSS baseline
Sources: epss, secondary
Trending — 4 sources updated this week
9.3EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixSerious severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet.
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0%CVSS: 9.3Exploit: None knownExposed: 0

No vendor fix yet — apply a workaround or compensating control (WAF / firewall / segmentation) and watch for a patch.

The LdapAuth and LinOTPAuth authentication plugins in MISP contain an authentication bypass vulnerability. Both LdapAuthenticate and LinOTPAuthenticate replace CakePHP's FormAuthenticate class but fail to replicate its _checkFields() input validation guard. As a result, the email and password fields extracted from the login request are passed to downstream authentication logic without verifying that they are non-empty strings.

In the LDAP authenticator, an empty or null password is forwarded to ldap_bind(). Per RFC 4513 section 5.1.2, a bind request with a valid DN and an empty password constitutes an unauthenticated bind, which many LDAP directory servers accept as successful. An attacker who knows any valid user email address in the directory can therefore authenticate as that user without possessing a password. Additionally, non-string values (null, false, arrays) are either coerced to empty strings by ldap_bind(), raise TypeErrors, or are misinterpreted as find conditions in _findUser(), all of which can lead to unintended authentication outcomes.

In the LinOTP authenticator, the same missing guard allows non-string credentials to be concatenated into the LinOTP verification request, and in the mixed-authentication branch an empty password is accepted against a stored hash of the empty string.

A secondary issue in the LDAP authenticator is that newly created user accounts (auto-provisioned on first LDAP login) were assigned an empty password. Because the save path skips validation, the empty string is hashed and stored. If the user later ceases to be found in LDAP and the mixed-authentication fallback is used, the stored hash of the empty string verifies against an empty password, again permitting unauthenticated access.

The vulnerability requires that the affected plugin (LdapAuth or LinOTPAuth) is enabled on the MISP instance and that the attacker knows at least one valid email address registered in the directory or MISP user store. No prior authentication is required. Successful exploitation grants the attacker the full privileges of the impersonated user, which may include administrative access to threat intelligence data.

Version affected: ≤2.5.45

CVSS v3
9.3
EG Score
9.3(medium)
EG Risk
42(Track)
EG Risk 42/100SSVC: Track

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed
Severity93% × 45%
Exploitation0% × 40%
Automatability0% × 15%
Action: Routine — remediate on your standard cadence.
EPSS PROB
0%
EPSS %ILE
39%
KEV
Not listed

Published

September 14, 2026

Last Modified

September 16, 2026

Advisory Details (1)

Auto-updated Sep 14, 2026
Patch available. Sources: github_commit.
github_commit Patch Available

commit 0ee058548 (MISP/MISP)

Patch available: MISP/MISP v2.5.46 (contains commit 0ee058548)

https://github.com/MISP/MISP/commit/0ee058548

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-90961(1)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Weakness Classification(2)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 48× in last 7d / 48× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

  1. 2026-09-20 12:45 UTCGHSA enrichment
  2. 2026-09-20 08:42 UTCGHSA enrichment
  3. 2026-09-20 04:38 UTCGHSA enrichment
  4. 2026-09-20 00:35 UTCGHSA enrichment
  5. 2026-09-19 20:32 UTCGHSA enrichment
  6. 2026-09-19 16:29 UTCEG score recompute
  7. 2026-09-19 16:29 UTCGHSA enrichment
  8. 2026-09-19 12:25 UTCGHSA enrichment
  9. 2026-09-19 08:22 UTCGHSA enrichment
  10. 2026-09-19 04:19 UTCGHSA enrichment
  11. 2026-09-19 00:16 UTCGHSA enrichment
  12. 2026-09-18 20:13 UTCEG score recompute
  13. 2026-09-18 20:13 UTCGHSA enrichment
  14. 2026-09-18 19:28 UTCEPSS rescore
  15. 2026-09-18 16:09 UTCGHSA enrichment
  16. 2026-09-18 12:03 UTCGHSA enrichment
  17. 2026-09-18 07:59 UTCGHSA enrichment
  18. 2026-09-18 03:55 UTCGHSA enrichment
  19. 2026-09-17 23:51 UTCGHSA enrichment
  20. 2026-09-17 19:33 UTCEG score recompute
  21. 2026-09-17 19:33 UTCGHSA enrichment
  22. 2026-09-17 19:32 UTCEPSS rescore
  23. 2026-09-17 14:49 UTCGHSA enrichment
  24. 2026-09-17 10:46 UTCGHSA enrichment
  25. 2026-09-17 06:42 UTCGHSA enrichment
Show 23 more
  1. 2026-09-17 02:26 UTCGHSA enrichment
  2. 2026-09-16 22:20 UTCGHSA enrichment
  3. 2026-09-16 17:56 UTCEG score recompute
  4. 2026-09-16 17:56 UTCGHSA enrichment
  5. 2026-09-16 14:09 UTCEPSS rescore
  6. 2026-09-16 13:44 UTCGHSA enrichment
  7. 2026-09-16 11:29 UTCGHSA enrichment
  8. 2026-09-16 07:26 UTCEG score recompute
  9. 2026-09-16 07:26 UTCGHSA enrichment
  10. 2026-09-16 05:15 UTCEPSS rescore
  11. 2026-09-16 03:22 UTCGHSA enrichment
  12. 2026-09-15 23:16 UTCGHSA enrichment
  13. 2026-09-15 19:07 UTCGHSA enrichment
  14. 2026-09-15 15:03 UTCGHSA enrichment
  15. 2026-09-15 10:53 UTCGHSA enrichment
  16. 2026-09-15 06:47 UTCGHSA enrichment
  17. 2026-09-15 02:44 UTCGHSA enrichment
  18. 2026-09-14 22:41 UTCGHSA enrichment
  19. 2026-09-14 18:38 UTCGHSA enrichment
  20. 2026-09-14 14:30 UTCEG score recompute
  21. 2026-09-14 14:00 UTCEG score recompute
  22. 2026-09-14 13:30 UTCEG score recompute
  23. 2026-09-14 13:29 UTCMITRE cvelistV5first tracked

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-90961?
CVE-2026-90961 is a critical vulnerability published on September 14, 2026. The LdapAuth and LinOTPAuth authentication plugins in MISP contain an authentication bypass vulnerability. Both LdapAuthenticate and LinOTPAuthenticate replace CakePHP's FormAuthenticate class but fail to replicate its _checkFields() input validation guard. As a result, the email and password…
When was CVE-2026-90961 disclosed?
CVE-2026-90961 was first published in the National Vulnerability Database on September 14, 2026, with the most recent update on September 16, 2026. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
Is CVE-2026-90961 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-90961 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, which ranks it in the top 60.7% of all scored CVEs.
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-90961?
CVE-2026-90961 has a CVSS v3 base score of 9.3 (NVD).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-90961?
Patch to the fixed version published by the affected vendor. Where vendor advisories exist for CVE-2026-90961, EchelonGraph cross-links them in the Vendor Advisories panel below — those typically contain the canonical remediation steps, fixed version numbers, and any vendor-specific mitigations.

Dependency Blast Radius

Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2026-90961

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-90961?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.