Froxlor before 2.3.7 fails to validate the mysql_server parameter against a customer's allowed_mysqlserver allowlist in the Mysqls.add API command. Attackers can supply a disallowed server index to create MySQL databases and users on forbidden servers, bypassing per-customer access controls.
CVE-2026-90935
Score 4.3 from GitHub Security Advisory published 2026-09-14. a secondary CVSS source baseline 4.3; sources differ by 0.0.
- Lower severity and no public exploit yet
No vendor fix yet — apply a workaround or compensating control (WAF / firewall / segmentation) and watch for a patch.
- CVSS v3
- 4.3
- EG Score
- 4.3(high)
- EG Risk
- 24(Track)EG Risk 24/100SSVC: Track
EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).
How it’s computedSeverity43% × 45%Exploitation0% × 40%Automatability30% × 15%Action: Routine — remediate on your standard cadence. - EPSS PROB
- 0%
- EPSS %ILE
- 12%
- KEV
- Not listed
Published
September 14, 2026
Last Modified
September 14, 2026
Advisory Details (2)
Auto-updated Sep 14, 2026Froxlor before 2.3.7 Authorization Bypass via Mysqls.add API | Advisories | VulnCheck
https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/froxlor-before-2.3.7-authorization-bypass-via-mysqls-add-apiFroxlor customer can create MySQL databases on disallowed servers via Mysqls.add API · Advisory · froxlor/froxlor · GitHub
https://github.com/froxlor/froxlor/security/advisories/GHSA-q4rm-m6xh-5pv7Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-90935(1)
These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.
Affected Packages
(1 across 1 ecosystem)
Packagist(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fixed in | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| froxlor/froxlor | 0.10.0 ... 2.3.6 (108 versions) | 2.3.7 | — |
Weakness Classification(1)
MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 18× in last 7d / 18× in last 30d)
Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.
- 2026-09-20 20:16 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-19 23:11 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-19 23:11 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-18 21:37 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-18 21:37 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-18 19:28 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-17 20:04 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-17 20:04 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-17 19:32 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-16 18:29 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-16 18:29 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-16 14:09 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-16 05:15 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-15 16:55 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-15 16:55 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-14 13:28 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-14 13:00 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-14 12:59 UTCMITRE cvelistV5first tracked
Related CVEs(same CWE)
Same CWE
10 shownCWE-285
Frequently asked(5)
What is CVE-2026-90935?
When was CVE-2026-90935 disclosed?
Is CVE-2026-90935 actively exploited?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-90935?
How do I remediate CVE-2026-90935?
Dependency Blast Radius
See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-90935
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-90935?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.