An issue was discovered in HAProxy 3.3.0 through 3.4.4 and in 3.5-dev1 through 3.5-dev5. Exploitation requires an HTTP/3 frontend: HAProxy must be built with QUIC support and configured with a QUIC bind listener, and the affected traffic must reach a backend over HTTP/1.1 using chunked transfer coding on a reused connection. Under those conditions, when an HTTP/3 request carries no Content-Length header, the HTTP/3 multiplexer credits the length declared in a DATA frame header to the stream endpoint's known-input-payload estimate at the moment the frame header is decoded, before the payload has been received, and that declared length is emitted verbatim as the HTTP/1.1 chunk size. A remote unauthenticated client that declares more payload than it delivers and then ends the stream causes HAProxy to announce a chunk larger than the bytes it writes and to return the connection to the idle pool in a desynchronized state. The result is potential HTTP request smuggling on reused backend connections: an attacker can place a request past a frontend rule such as a path-based http-request deny, so that the smuggled request is never seen by HAProxy's HTTP analysis, and can cause concurrent clients' requests, including their request lines and Authorization headers, to be consumed as the attacker's request body and lost. Exploitation is not deterministic; it depends on a race with backend connection pooling, succeeding in a majority of but not all trials during testing, and can be retried freely. The mechanism was introduced in 3.3-dev10; releases 3.2.x and earlier are unaffected.
CVE-2026-90678
Score 7.5 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: HIGH) published 2026-09-13. a secondary CVSS source baseline 7.5; sources differ by 0.0.
- High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
No vendor fix yet — apply a workaround or compensating control (WAF / firewall / segmentation) and watch for a patch.
- CVSS v3
- 7.5
- EG Score
- 7.5(high)
- EG Risk
- 34(Track)EG Risk 34/100SSVC: Track
EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).
How it’s computedSeverity75% × 45%Exploitation1% × 40%Automatability0% × 15%Action: Routine — remediate on your standard cadence. - EPSS PROB
- 1%
- EPSS %ILE
- 43%
- KEV
- Not listed
Published
September 13, 2026
Last Modified
September 14, 2026
Advisory Details (3)
Auto-updated Sep 13, 2026Repositories - haproxy.git/commit
http://git.haproxy.org/?p=haproxy.git;a=commit;h=86a4ebc761a278838e8cb06f3a292282ba704c65commit 86a4ebc761a2 (haproxy/haproxy)
Fix landed in haproxy/haproxy commit 86a4ebc761a2 — awaiting tagged release
https://github.com/haproxy/haproxy/commit/86a4ebc761a278838e8cb06f3a292282ba704c65Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-90678(1)
These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.
Weakness Classification(1)
MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 27× in last 7d / 27× in last 30d)
Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.
- 2026-09-19 03:01 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-19 03:01 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-18 19:28 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-18 15:10 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-18 03:20 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-18 03:20 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-17 19:32 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-17 15:30 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-17 03:37 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-16 15:46 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-16 15:46 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-16 14:09 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-16 05:15 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-16 03:56 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-15 16:06 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-15 04:16 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-15 04:16 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-15 03:12 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-14 16:26 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-14 16:26 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-14 15:53 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-14 04:03 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-13 16:13 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-13 16:13 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-13 04:23 UTCEG score recompute
Show 2 moreShow fewer
- 2026-09-13 03:51 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-13 03:51 UTCMITRE cvelistV5first tracked
Frequently asked(5)
What is CVE-2026-90678?
When was CVE-2026-90678 disclosed?
Is CVE-2026-90678 actively exploited?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-90678?
How do I remediate CVE-2026-90678?
Dependency Blast Radius
Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2026-90678
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-90678?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.