CVE-2026-90678

HIGHPre-NVD 7.57.5
EchelonGraph scoreHIGH confidence

Score 7.5 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: HIGH) published 2026-09-13. a secondary CVSS source baseline 7.5; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: epss, ghsa, secondary
Trending — 4 sources updated this week
7.5EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixSerious severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet.
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 1%CVSS: 7.5Exploit: None knownExposed: 0

No vendor fix yet — apply a workaround or compensating control (WAF / firewall / segmentation) and watch for a patch.

An issue was discovered in HAProxy 3.3.0 through 3.4.4 and in 3.5-dev1 through 3.5-dev5. Exploitation requires an HTTP/3 frontend: HAProxy must be built with QUIC support and configured with a QUIC bind listener, and the affected traffic must reach a backend over HTTP/1.1 using chunked transfer coding on a reused connection. Under those conditions, when an HTTP/3 request carries no Content-Length header, the HTTP/3 multiplexer credits the length declared in a DATA frame header to the stream endpoint's known-input-payload estimate at the moment the frame header is decoded, before the payload has been received, and that declared length is emitted verbatim as the HTTP/1.1 chunk size. A remote unauthenticated client that declares more payload than it delivers and then ends the stream causes HAProxy to announce a chunk larger than the bytes it writes and to return the connection to the idle pool in a desynchronized state. The result is potential HTTP request smuggling on reused backend connections: an attacker can place a request past a frontend rule such as a path-based http-request deny, so that the smuggled request is never seen by HAProxy's HTTP analysis, and can cause concurrent clients' requests, including their request lines and Authorization headers, to be consumed as the attacker's request body and lost. Exploitation is not deterministic; it depends on a race with backend connection pooling, succeeding in a majority of but not all trials during testing, and can be retried freely. The mechanism was introduced in 3.3-dev10; releases 3.2.x and earlier are unaffected.

CVSS v3
7.5
EG Score
7.5(high)
EG Risk
34(Track)
EG Risk 34/100SSVC: Track

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed
Severity75% × 45%
Exploitation1% × 40%
Automatability0% × 15%
Action: Routine — remediate on your standard cadence.
EPSS PROB
1%
EPSS %ILE
43%
KEV
Not listed

Published

September 13, 2026

Last Modified

September 14, 2026

Advisory Details (3)

Auto-updated Sep 13, 2026
Upstream fix merged — awaiting tagged release. Sources: github_commit.
github_commit

commit 86a4ebc761a2 (haproxy/haproxy)

Fix landed in haproxy/haproxy commit 86a4ebc761a2 — awaiting tagged release

https://github.com/haproxy/haproxy/commit/86a4ebc761a278838e8cb06f3a292282ba704c65

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-90678(1)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 27× in last 7d / 27× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

  1. 2026-09-19 03:01 UTCEG score recompute
  2. 2026-09-19 03:01 UTCGHSA enrichment
  3. 2026-09-18 19:28 UTCEPSS rescore
  4. 2026-09-18 15:10 UTCGHSA enrichment
  5. 2026-09-18 03:20 UTCEG score recompute
  6. 2026-09-18 03:20 UTCGHSA enrichment
  7. 2026-09-17 19:32 UTCEPSS rescore
  8. 2026-09-17 15:30 UTCGHSA enrichment
  9. 2026-09-17 03:37 UTCGHSA enrichment
  10. 2026-09-16 15:46 UTCEG score recompute
  11. 2026-09-16 15:46 UTCGHSA enrichment
  12. 2026-09-16 14:09 UTCEPSS rescore
  13. 2026-09-16 05:15 UTCEPSS rescore
  14. 2026-09-16 03:56 UTCGHSA enrichment
  15. 2026-09-15 16:06 UTCGHSA enrichment
  16. 2026-09-15 04:16 UTCEG score recompute
  17. 2026-09-15 04:16 UTCGHSA enrichment
  18. 2026-09-15 03:12 UTCEPSS rescore
  19. 2026-09-14 16:26 UTCEG score recompute
  20. 2026-09-14 16:26 UTCGHSA enrichment
  21. 2026-09-14 15:53 UTCGHSA enrichment
  22. 2026-09-14 04:03 UTCGHSA enrichment
  23. 2026-09-13 16:13 UTCEG score recompute
  24. 2026-09-13 16:13 UTCGHSA enrichment
  25. 2026-09-13 04:23 UTCEG score recompute
Show 2 more
  1. 2026-09-13 03:51 UTCEG score recompute
  2. 2026-09-13 03:51 UTCMITRE cvelistV5first tracked

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-90678?
CVE-2026-90678 is a high vulnerability published on September 13, 2026. An issue was discovered in HAProxy 3.3.0 through 3.4.4 and in 3.5-dev1 through 3.5-dev5. Exploitation requires an HTTP/3 frontend: HAProxy must be built with QUIC support and configured with a QUIC bind listener, and the affected traffic must reach a backend over HTTP/1.1 using chunked transfer…
When was CVE-2026-90678 disclosed?
CVE-2026-90678 was first published in the National Vulnerability Database on September 13, 2026, with the most recent update on September 14, 2026. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
Is CVE-2026-90678 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-90678 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 1% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, which ranks it in the top 56.9% of all scored CVEs.
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-90678?
CVE-2026-90678 has a CVSS v3 base score of 7.5 (NVD).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-90678?
Patch to the fixed version published by the affected vendor. Where vendor advisories exist for CVE-2026-90678, EchelonGraph cross-links them in the Vendor Advisories panel below — those typically contain the canonical remediation steps, fixed version numbers, and any vendor-specific mitigations.

Dependency Blast Radius

Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2026-90678

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-90678?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.