CVE-2026-89811

HIGHPre-NVD 8.88.8
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

“—” beside the score: it is equal to the CVSS score beside it.

Score 8.8 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: HIGH) published 2026-09-16. A secondary CVSS source baseline 8.8; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: EPSS, GitHub Security Advisory, a secondary CVSS source

Also known asEUVD-2026-80411 (ENISA EUVD) · GHSA-vph6-3qcj-jq9w (GitHub Security Advisories)Source: ENISA EUVD

8.8EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixRemediate within your standard update timelines (the SSVC decision on this page).
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0.2%CVSS: 8.8Exploit: None knownExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is available — apply it.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

drm/amdkfd: Add TLB flush after MES queue eviction/suspension

MES (Micro Engine Scheduler) does not perform heavy-weight TLB invalidation after unmapping queues, unlike HWS which does this automatically. This causes a race condition where in-flight DMA descriptors can access memory that has been unmapped, leading to page faults and GPU queue hangs during SVM page migration.

The issue manifests as KFDSVMRangeTest.MultiThreadMigrationTest failures on gfx1151 (Strix Point) with XNACK mode 1 enabled - the GPU compute queue hangs with packets submitted but never consumed.

Add kfd_flush_tlb() calls after MES queue removal in two locations:

  • evict_process_queues_cpsch(): after all queues removed during eviction
  • suspend_queues(): after debug/criu queue suspension (with mem_fence barrier)

This ensures all in-flight memory accesses from unmapped queues are flushed before memory is freed or migrated.

(cherry picked from commit f5c4f88e0f9c45a8fb9dfac0c1df726c95e41b77)

CVSS v3
8.8
EG Score
8.8HIGHmedium confidence
EG Risk
40
EG Risk 40/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity88% × 45%
Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 8.8 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.
Exploitation0.2% × 40%
FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.
Automatability0% × 15%
CISA's BOD 26-04 default: no one has published Automatable for this CVE, and CISA treats it as “no” for a CVE not in KEV.
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).
Exploitation none (no CISA value, KEV listing or exploit code on record) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). EchelonGraph holds no SSVC assessment of this CVE from CISA: none of these inputs is from Vulnrichment. EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.
EPSS PROB
0.2%
EPSS %ILE
7th
KEV
Not listed

What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)

The EG score (8.8): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 8.8 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.

EG Severity
8.8 HIGHCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
EG Likelihood
0.2% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-11-06). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
Confirmed exploitation
None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
EG Priority
SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).CISA BOD 26-04: 14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).

A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.

Exploitation none (no CISA value, KEV listing or exploit code on record) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). EchelonGraph holds no SSVC assessment of this CVE from CISA: none of these inputs is from Vulnrichment. EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.

The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). Where an input reads “CISA's BOD 26-04 default”, no one has published it for this CVE, and CISA's implementation guidance says: “If “Automatable” and “Technical Impact” information items about a CVE ID are not available and the CVE ID is not in the KEV Catalog, CISA will treat its values as “no” and “total,” respectively, until CISA or a third party provides metadata about the CVE ID. CISA will always provide the Vulnrichment data for a CVE ID listed in the KEV Catalog.” Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

September 16, 2026

Last Modified

October 30, 2026

Advisory Details (3)

Auto-updated Sep 16, 2026
Patch available.
Web page

drm/amdkfd: Add TLB flush after MES queue eviction/suspension - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/94e25cb6ab7f4f025bcdcd8ea79fda30f12843a4
Web page

drm/amdkfd: Add TLB flush after MES queue eviction/suspension - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/6aae545c87087e4dc96e205452243813bfa73ba2
Web page

drm/amdkfd: Add TLB flush after MES queue eviction/suspension - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/e230c546ed93741833ab5babb0b202f9c2052b45

Patch Availability(5)

Vendor / EcosystemFix (by version range) / PatchReleasedSource
redhatopenshift/ose-rhel-coreos-9:4.22.9.8.202610241758-02026-10-27redhat
redhatkernel-0:6.12.0-211.68.1.el10_22026-10-23redhat
redhatkernel-0:4.18.0-553.173.1.el8_102026-10-14redhat
redhatkernel-rt-0:4.18.0-553.173.1.rt7.514.el8_102026-10-14redhat
redhatkernel-0:5.14.0-687.57.1.el9_82026-10-13redhat

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Affected Packages

(3 across 3 ecosystems)
Debian:12(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.1.106-1 ... 7.3~rc7-1~exp1 (375 versions)
  • every version on: no fix on record
—
Debian:13(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.12.100-1 ... 6.12.96-1 (38 versions)
  • every version up to 6.12.115-2: fixed in 6.12.115-2
—
Debian:14(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.12.100-1 ... 7.2~rc7-1~exp1 (182 versions)
  • every version up to 7.2.6-1: fixed in 7.2.6-1
—

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 9× in last 7d / 47× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed its CVE.org record (CNA or CISA ADP). An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). "EchelonGraph re-scored" is our own recompute of this CVE's score, not an update from a source, and is not counted in the refreshes above. Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 221 rows on record for this CVE.

A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. None are among the latest 100 rows. The 121 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.

  1. 2026-11-13 16:58 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  2. 2026-11-12 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  3. 2026-11-11 16:41 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  4. 2026-11-10 16:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  5. 2026-11-09 16:36 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  6. 2026-11-08 16:41 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  7. 2026-11-07 16:40 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  8. 2026-11-06 20:50 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  9. 2026-11-06 20:50 UTCVendor advisory
  10. 2026-11-06 20:50 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-vph6-3qcj-jq9w · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  11. 2026-11-06 16:39 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  12. 2026-11-05 16:39 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  13. 2026-11-04 16:37 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  14. 2026-11-03 16:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  15. 2026-11-02 16:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  16. 2026-10-31 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  17. 2026-10-30 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  18. 2026-10-30 13:29 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  19. 2026-10-30 13:29 UTCVendor advisory
  20. 2026-10-30 13:29 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-vph6-3qcj-jq9w · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  21. 2026-10-30 12:44 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  22. 2026-10-30 12:44 UTCVendor advisory
  23. 2026-10-30 12:44 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-vph6-3qcj-jq9w · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  24. 2026-10-29 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  25. 2026-10-29 03:01 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-10-29 03:01 UTCVendor advisory
  2. 2026-10-29 03:01 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-vph6-3qcj-jq9w · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  3. 2026-10-28 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  4. 2026-10-27 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  5. 2026-10-26 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  6. 2026-10-25 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  7. 2026-10-25 13:52 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  8. 2026-10-24 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 5th percentile
  9. 2026-10-23 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 5th percentile
  10. 2026-10-22 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 5th percentile
  11. 2026-10-21 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 5th percentile
  12. 2026-10-21 13:51 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  13. 2026-10-21 13:51 UTCVendor advisory
  14. 2026-10-21 13:51 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-vph6-3qcj-jq9w · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  15. 2026-10-21 13:08 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  16. 2026-10-21 13:08 UTCVendor advisory
  17. 2026-10-21 13:08 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-vph6-3qcj-jq9w · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  18. 2026-10-20 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 5th percentile
  19. 2026-10-19 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 5th percentile
  20. 2026-10-19 09:29 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  21. 2026-10-19 09:29 UTCVendor advisory
  22. 2026-10-19 09:28 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-vph6-3qcj-jq9w · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  23. 2026-10-19 09:01 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  24. 2026-10-19 09:01 UTCVendor advisory
  25. 2026-10-19 09:01 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-vph6-3qcj-jq9w · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  26. 2026-10-18 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 5th percentile
  27. 2026-10-18 03:01 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  28. 2026-10-17 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 5th percentile
  29. 2026-10-16 16:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 5th percentile
  30. 2026-10-16 12:38 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  31. 2026-10-16 12:38 UTCVendor advisory
  32. 2026-10-16 12:38 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-vph6-3qcj-jq9w · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  33. 2026-10-15 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 5th percentile
  34. 2026-10-14 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  35. 2026-10-13 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  36. 2026-10-13 04:53 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  37. 2026-10-13 04:53 UTCVendor advisory
  38. 2026-10-13 04:52 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-vph6-3qcj-jq9w · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  39. 2026-10-12 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  40. 2026-10-12 14:48 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  41. 2026-10-12 02:04 UTCVendor advisory
  42. 2026-10-12 02:04 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-vph6-3qcj-jq9w · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  43. 2026-10-11 19:15 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  44. 2026-10-11 16:31 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  45. 2026-10-11 13:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  46. 2026-10-11 13:47 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  47. 2026-10-11 11:34 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  48. 2026-10-11 11:34 UTCVendor advisory
  49. 2026-10-11 11:34 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-vph6-3qcj-jq9w · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  50. 2026-10-10 22:46 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  51. 2026-10-10 22:46 UTCVendor advisory
  52. 2026-10-10 22:46 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-vph6-3qcj-jq9w · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  53. 2026-10-10 20:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  54. 2026-10-10 09:55 UTCVendor advisory
  55. 2026-10-10 09:54 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-vph6-3qcj-jq9w · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  56. 2026-10-09 21:32 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  57. 2026-10-09 21:32 UTCVendor advisory
  58. 2026-10-09 21:32 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-vph6-3qcj-jq9w · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  59. 2026-10-09 20:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  60. 2026-10-09 09:08 UTCVendor advisory
  61. 2026-10-09 09:07 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-vph6-3qcj-jq9w · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  62. 2026-10-08 20:44 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  63. 2026-10-08 20:44 UTCVendor advisory
  64. 2026-10-08 20:44 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-vph6-3qcj-jq9w · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  65. 2026-10-08 17:13 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  66. 2026-10-08 07:58 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  67. 2026-10-08 07:58 UTCVendor advisory
  68. 2026-10-08 07:58 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-vph6-3qcj-jq9w · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  69. 2026-10-07 23:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  70. 2026-10-07 19:35 UTCVendor advisory
  71. 2026-10-07 19:35 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-vph6-3qcj-jq9w · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  72. 2026-10-07 07:08 UTCVendor advisory
  73. 2026-10-07 07:08 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-vph6-3qcj-jq9w · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  74. 2026-10-06 18:45 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  75. 2026-10-06 18:45 UTCVendor advisory

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-89811?
CVE-2026-89811 is a high-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on September 16, 2026. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: drm/amdkfd: Add TLB flush after MES queue eviction/suspension MES (Micro Engine Scheduler) does not perform heavy-weight TLB invalidation after unmapping queues, unlike HWS which does this automatically. This causes a race…
When was the CVE record for CVE-2026-89811 published?
The CVE record for CVE-2026-89811 was published on September 16, 2026. That is the record's publication date; the vulnerability itself may have been made public earlier. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of October 30, 2026; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2026-89811 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-89811 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0.2% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (7th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-89811?
CVE-2026-89811 has a CVSS base score of 8.8 (a secondary CVSS source that NVD displays; NVD's own analysis pending).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-89811?
A fix for CVE-2026-89811 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2026-89811 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-89811

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-89811?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.