Traefik is an HTTP reverse proxy and load balancer. In Traefik v1.x, v2.x through v2.11.55, and v3.0.0 through v3.7.11, header names are canonicalized only on dashes, so X-Auth-User, X_Auth_User and X.Auth.User are treated as three distinct headers by Traefik, while backends that derive variable names from header names (CGI, WSGI, PHP, NGINX and others) collapse them into a single variable. A client can therefore smuggle a dot-form alias of a header that Traefik manages past the middleware managing it — for example supplying X.Authenticated.User alongside the canonical X-Authenticated-User written by the ForwardAuth middleware — causing such a backend to read the client-supplied value instead of the identity Traefik asserted. In the tested configuration (PHP 8.2 built-in SAPI over an HTTP/1 backend path), Go's lexical header ordering makes the attacker-supplied value win deterministically, so a client that ForwardAuth admits as a low-privilege identity can be treated by the backend as a different user or role. Any header Traefik sets is affected, not only ForwardAuth's. This is an incomplete fix for GHSA-x677-9fxg-v5c5, which blocked only the underscore form. Fixed in v2.11.56 and v3.7.12, which add the aliasHeadersStrategy entry-point option; because it defaults to 'keep' for backwards compatibility, it must be explicitly set to 'delete' or 'reject' for the fix to take effect. Unmaintained release lines will not receive a patch.
CVE-2026-88879
Score 8.2 from GitHub Security Advisory published 2026-09-10. NVD baseline CVSS 8.2; sources differ by 0.0.
- High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
No vendor fix yet — apply a workaround or compensating control (WAF / firewall / segmentation) and watch for a patch.
- CVSS v3
- 8.2
- EG Score
- 8.2(high)
- EG Risk
- 37(Track)EG Risk 37/100SSVC: Track
EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).
How it’s computedSeverity82% × 45%Exploitation0% × 40%Automatability0% × 15%Action: Routine — remediate on your standard cadence. - EPSS PROB
- 0%
- EPSS %ILE
- 11%
- KEV
- Not listed
Published
September 10, 2026
Last Modified
September 14, 2026
Advisory Details (2)
Auto-updated Sep 10, 2026Traefik before v2.11.56 Identity Spoofing via Header Alias | Advisories | VulnCheck
https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/traefik-before-2.11.56-identity-spoofing-via-header-aliasForwardAuth identity spoofing via dot-form header alias · Advisory · traefik/traefik · GitHub
https://github.com/traefik/traefik/security/advisories/GHSA-rf44-j88r-hh8cVendor Advisories for CVE-2026-88879(1)
These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.
Affected Packages
(2 across 1 ecosystem)
Go(2)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fixed in | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| github.com/traefik/traefik/v2 | — | 2.11.56 | — |
| github.com/traefik/traefik/v3 | — | 3.7.12 | — |
Weakness Classification(1)
MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 29× in last 7d / 41× in last 30d)
Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.
- 2026-09-19 19:15 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-19 19:15 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-19 07:20 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-18 19:32 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-18 19:32 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-18 19:28 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-18 07:43 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-17 19:54 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-17 19:54 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-17 19:32 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-17 07:10 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-16 19:21 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-16 19:21 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-16 14:09 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-16 07:31 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-16 07:31 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-16 05:15 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-15 19:42 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-15 07:49 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-15 07:49 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-15 03:12 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-14 20:00 UTCEG score recompute▲ 2.90
- 2026-09-14 20:00 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-14 19:59 UTCNVD updateCVSS v3 → 8.2 · severity → HIGH
- 2026-09-14 11:28 UTCEG score recompute
Show 16 moreShow fewer
- 2026-09-14 11:28 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-13 16:48 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-13 12:42 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-13 12:42 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-12 15:02 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-12 13:56 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-11 15:09 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-11 15:09 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-11 14:53 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-11 14:53 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-10 16:21 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-10 16:21 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-10 15:21 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-10 14:19 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-10 13:20 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-10 13:20 UTCMITRE cvelistV5first tracked
Frequently asked(5)
What is CVE-2026-88879?
When was CVE-2026-88879 disclosed?
Is CVE-2026-88879 actively exploited?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-88879?
How do I remediate CVE-2026-88879?
Dependency Blast Radius
See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-88879
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-88879?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.