Nodemailer versions before 8.0.5 contain an SMTP command injection vulnerability in the transport name option used in EHLO/HELO commands. The name parameter is concatenated directly into SMTP commands without sanitizing carriage return and line feed characters, allowing attackers to inject arbitrary SMTP commands for email spoofing and phishing attacks.
CVE-2026-82853
Score 4.9 from GitHub Security Advisory published 2026-08-31. a secondary CVSS source baseline 4.9; sources differ by 0.0.
- Lower severity and no public exploit yet
No vendor fix yet — apply a workaround or compensating control (WAF / firewall / segmentation) and watch for a patch.
- CVSS v3
- 4.9
- EG Score
- 4.9(high)
- EG Risk
- 38(Track)EG Risk 38/100SSVC: Track
EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).
How it’s computedSeverity49% × 45%Exploitation40% × 40%Automatability0% × 15%Action: Routine — remediate on your standard cadence. - EPSS PROB
- 1%
- EPSS %ILE
- 53%
- KEV
- Not listed
Published
August 31, 2026
Last Modified
September 10, 2026
Advisory Details (2)
Auto-updated Aug 31, 2026Nodemailer before 8.0.5 SMTP Command Injection via CRLF | Advisories | VulnCheck
https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/nodemailer-before-8.0.5-smtp-command-injection-via-crlfSMTP Command Injection via CRLF in Transport name Option (EHLO/HELO) · Advisory · nodemailer/nodemailer · GitHub
https://github.com/nodemailer/nodemailer/security/advisories/GHSA-vvjj-xcjg-gr5gVendor Advisories for CVE-2026-82853(1)
These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.
Affected Packages
(4 across 4 ecosystems)
Debian:12(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fixed in | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| node-nodemailer | 6.10.0+~6.4.17-1 ... 9.0.6+~8.0.1-1 (24 versions) | — | — |
Debian:13(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fixed in | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| node-nodemailer | 6.10.0+~6.4.17-1 ... 9.0.6+~8.0.1-1 (17 versions) | — | — |
Debian:14(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fixed in | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| node-nodemailer | 6.10.0+~6.4.17-1 ... 8.0.4+~7.0.11-2 (11 versions) | 8.0.11+~8.0.1-1 | — |
npm(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fixed in | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| nodemailer | — | 8.0.5 | — |
Weakness Classification(1)
MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 18× in last 7d / 56× in last 30d)
Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.
- 2026-09-19 06:34 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-19 06:34 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-18 19:28 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-18 04:50 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-18 04:50 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-17 03:06 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-17 03:06 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-16 14:08 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-16 05:15 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-16 01:21 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-16 01:20 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-15 03:12 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-15 03:12 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-14 23:35 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-13 21:13 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-13 21:13 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-12 19:30 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-12 19:30 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-11 17:46 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-11 17:46 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-11 14:53 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-11 14:53 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-10 16:02 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-10 16:02 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-10 03:22 UTCGHSA enrichment
Show 31 moreShow fewer
- 2026-09-09 01:39 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-09 01:39 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-08 22:01 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-07 23:55 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-07 23:55 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-06 22:10 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-06 22:10 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-06 13:48 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-05 20:26 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-05 20:26 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-05 15:31 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-04 18:43 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-04 18:43 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-04 05:07 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-03 16:46 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-02 15:01 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-02 15:01 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-02 14:12 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-01 13:54 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-01 13:11 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-01 13:11 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-01 04:40 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-01 04:40 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-31 11:26 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-31 11:26 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-08-31 11:06 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-31 11:06 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-08-31 09:37 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-31 09:37 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-08-31 08:55 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-31 08:52 UTCMITRE cvelistV5first tracked
Frequently asked(5)
What is CVE-2026-82853?
When was CVE-2026-82853 disclosed?
Is CVE-2026-82853 actively exploited?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-82853?
How do I remediate CVE-2026-82853?
Dependency Blast Radius
See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-82853
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-82853?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.